General Assembly Distr.: General



Download 159.54 Kb.
Page1/4
Date31.01.2017
Size159.54 Kb.
#14763
  1   2   3   4




United Nations




A/59/370




General Assembly




Distr.: General

21 September 2004


Original: English










Fifty-ninth session

Agenda item 105 (c)



Human rights questions: human rights situations and
reports of special rapporteurs and representatives



Report of the independent expert of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan


* The present report is submitted after the deadline established by the General Assembly in view of the fact that the independent expert was appointed only in April 2004 and undertook his mission to Afghanistan from 14 to 22 August 2004.


Note by the Secretary-General*

The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly the report of the independent expert on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan, M. Cherif Bassiouni, submitted pursuant to the mandate established by the Commission on Human Rights in its resolution 2003/77 and extended by the Commission at its sixtieth session in 2004, endorsed by the Economic and Social Council in its decision 2004/284.




Summary

The present report contains the findings of the independent expert, M. Cherif Bassiouni, on the current human rights situation in Afghanistan. It is based on research and consultations undertaken since his appointment in April 2004, on the basis of a mission to the country in August 2004 and extensive consultations held during that mission. The report is in partial fulfilment of the mandate established by the Commission on Human Rights in its resolution 2003/77. As this is the first report of the independent expert, it surveys some of the major issues that have a determining impact on the human rights situation in Afghanistan. The situation in that country involves a wide range of issues, including past and present violations committed by State and non-State actors, both as elements of widespread and systematic policies, and as a result of individuals operating beyond the reach of the



law. Key to understanding these violations are the problems of security in a country that is still dominated by the military power of warlords and local commanders, and by the rising economic power of those engaged in poppy cultivation and heroin traffic. A number of priority issues have been identified by the independent expert where action needs to be taken by the Government and other actors. Concrete recommendations are included in the report. They concern the problems of security, warlords and local commanders, the rule of law, detention facilities and due process, the situation of women and children, land disputes and housing, transitional or post-conflict justice, the strengthening of civil society, and the actions of the Coalition Forces and the International Security Assistance Force. Despite progress, deep concerns remain about the human rights situation in Afghanistan and many challenges are still to be overcome.



Contents








Paragraphs

Page

  1. Introduction

1–11

3

  1. Sociopolitical context

12–17

7

  1. Overview of the armed conflict and past human rights and humanitarian law violations

18

8

  1. The Transitional Administration

19–25

10

  1. Security and the rule of law

26–40

11

  1. The human rights actors

41–48

15

  1. Coalition forces

49–53

16

  1. Specific human rights violations

54–78

17

  1. Transactional or post-conflict justice

79–80

23

  1. Recommendations

81–115

24

I. Introduction

1. The present report contains preliminary observations regarding the current human rights situation in Afghanistan and issues relevant to capacity-building. It is in partial fulfilment of the mandate provided by the Commission on Human Rights in its resolution 2003/77, adopted at its fifty-ninth session, in which it requested the Secretary-General to appoint an independent expert “for a period of one year to develop, in strict collaboration with the Transitional Authority, including the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, as well as with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the [United Nations] Assistance Mission [in Afghanistan], a programme of advisory services to ensure the full respect and protection of human rights and the promotion of the rule of law and to seek and receive information about and report on the human rights situation in Afghanistan in an effort to prevent human rights violations”. At its sixtieth session, the Chairperson, on behalf of the Commission, made a statement concerning technical cooperation and the situation of human rights in Afghanistan (see E/2004/23-E/CN.4/2004/127), in which the Commission requested the independent expert to report on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan and on the achievements of the technical assistance in the field of human rights to the General Assembly at its fifty-ninth session, and requested the Secretary-General to extend the mandate of the independent expert for a further year. The Economic and Social Council endorsed this request in its decision 2004/284.

2. The independent expert was appointed by the Secretary-General in April 2004, and submitted a statement to the Commission (E/CN.4/2004/102/Add.1, annex). The independent expert held a round of consultations in Geneva on 28 and 29 April 2004 with representatives of Governments, intergovernmental organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) with the aim of presenting his mandate and gathering support for its fulfilment. Between April and August, he examined United Nations and other available reports, and from 14 to 22 August 2004, he undertook a mission to the country, during which he held extensive consultations and meetings with senior governmental officials, including President Karzai, Vice-President Shohrani, President of the Supreme Court Judge Shinwari, Vice-President of the Supreme Court Judge Ma’anawi, Minister for Foreign Affairs Abdullah, Minister of the Interior Jalali, Prosecutor General Doqiq and others. The independent expert also met on several occasions with members and staff of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC). During these consultations, he was briefed extensively on the work of AIHRC. Other consultations and briefings were held on several occasions with 32 Afghan human rights organizations, as well as with individual human rights activists. Inspection visits were carried out with the cooperation of the Ministries of Justice and the Interior at the prison of Pol-e Charkhi, and to the women’s detention facility in Kabul. In addition, consultations and briefings were held with a number of foreign missions in Afghanistan, including those of the United States of America, States members of the European Union (EU) and the representative of EU. The independent expert also benefited from briefings by the staff of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), including the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Afghanistan, the Deputy Special Representatives and the head of human rights unit, and United Nations agencies operating in the country, including the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the World Bank. Additionally, meetings were held with representatives of international NGOs and individual experts.

3. The independent expert wishes to acknowledge the cooperation of President Karzai and other senior government officials, United States Ambassador Khalilzad, EU Ambassador Vendrell, as well as the support and assistance of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General, Jean Arnault, and UNAMA staff, and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).

4. The human rights situation in Afghanistan involves an extensive range of issues, including past and present violations committed by both State and non-State actors, operating beyond the reach of the law as elements of widespread and systematic policies, and by individuals. The violations identified constitute gross violations of fundamental human rights such as extrajudicial execution, torture, rape, arbitrary arrest and detention, inhuman conditions of detention, illegal and forceful seizure of private property, child abduction and trafficking in children, various forms of abuse against women and a variety of other violations committed against the weaker elements of society, such as minorities, returning refugees, women, children, the poor, and the handicapped.1

5. Key to understanding these violations are the problems of security in a country that is still dominated by the military power of warlords and local commanders and by the rising economic power of those engaged in poppy cultivation and heroin traffic (see paras. 37-38 below).2 The absence of security has a direct and significant impact on all human rights. As the Secretary-General stated in his report to the General Assembly and the Security Council:

“The security situation in Afghanistan is volatile, having seriously deteriorated in certain parts of the country.… The deterioration of the security situation must be addressed resolutely. This requires increased international forces, sufficient in number and area of responsibility, and the full cooperation of neighbouring States” (A/58/868-S/2004/634, paras. 17 and 27).

6. Most human rights violations occur at the hands of warlords, local commanders, drug traffickers and other actors who wield the power of force and who exercise varying degrees of authority in the different provinces and districts. These actors’ control and influence is in some provinces and districts absolute, while in others, it is partial or marginal. The Government is for the most part unable to exercise effective control over these actors, and has in that respect limited support from the Coalition forces and the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). Thus, despite the Government’s best intentions, it cannot with the 10,000-15,000 troops of the fledgling Afghanistan National Army (ANA) effectively oppose the estimated 100,000 armed and battle-tested forces loyal to the warlords and local commanders (see paras. 29-32 below).3

7. The Coalition forces, which at one time could have marginalized these warlords, did not do so, and even worked with them to combat the Taliban regime and to pursue Al-Qaida (see para. 34 below). This situation contributed to the entrenchment of the warlords. Subsequently, however, the Coalition forces and ISAF have supported the Government’s programme of disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) of combatants, with so far only marginal success. As stated by the Secretary-General:

“There has been insufficient progress in the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of factional forces. The commitment made at the Berlin conference was to achieve the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of no less than 40 per cent of the stated troop strength of 100,000 Afghan Militia Forces, as well as the cantonment of all heavy weapons under credible supervision by June, ahead of the 2004 elections” (ibid., para. 29)

It is this power equation that has an impact on the human rights situation and on the Government’s ability to prevent and redress human rights violations that derive from it.

8. The paramount factor affecting human rights is security. To understand this requires an appreciation of the state of conflict and turmoil which the country has experienced over the past three decades, and whose consequences have an impact upon so much of the present situation (see paras. 26 et seq. below). Moreover, it is important to bear in mind that the Taliban forces defeated in 2001 reintegrated into society, and constitute a strong force opposing the Government.

9. At the outset of this report, the independent expert expresses special concern at pressing human rights issues about which the Government is in a position to take immediate corrective action. These issues include the following, all of which are described in greater detail below:

(a) The illegal detention for nearly thirty months of some 734 Pakistani and Afghani detainees in the Pol-e Charkhi prison, under conditions which violate the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (see para. 65 below). The independent expert asked the Minister of Justice on 17 May 2004 to release these prisoners. Subsequently, during his mission to Afghanistan, he met President Karzai and other senior officials, reiterating this request. On 12 September 2004, President Karzai ordered the release of 362 Pakistani detainees, and on 13 September 2004, 372 Afghani detainees were released. The independent expert commends President Karzai and his Government for this wise and humane decision, though he continues to urge the Government and the international community to significantly enhance the conditions of Pol-e Charkhi prison, which houses a large number of criminally sentenced detainees;4

(b) The detention facilities operated by United States-led Coalition forces in Bagram, Kandahar, and in field “fire bases” unregulated by a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) (at least none that is publicly known or disclosed by any public official), where an estimated 300-400 detainees are held without legal process under international humanitarian law or domestic law. Their conditions of detention are unverifiable (see paras. 50-53 below).5 It should be noted that the independent expert requested from appropriate United States authorities permission to visit the Bagram prison facilities, but bureaucratic impediments de facto prevented his access;

(c) The exposure of returning refugees to extrajudicial execution, torture, rape and extortion and the seizure of their lands and homes by local commanders, forcing them to become internally displaced persons (IDPs) (see paras. 70-72 below);

(d) The absence of due process in the arrest and detention of persons by the Intelligence Department and Police Forces that are outside judicial supervision, detaining persons accused of crimes for extended pre-trial detention periods and, in general, a failure of the justice system to perform its function. As the Secretary-General stated:

“Progress is hampered by a lack of coordination between the main justice institutions; the inroads made by the drug mafia at many levels within the institutions of State, the slow expansion of effective national security institutions, interference by civil and military authorities in the administration of justice, as well as a lack of adequate financial support and coordination of reform programmes in the security sector” (ibid., para. 39);

(e) The detention conditions in prisons, particularly with respect to women and children, which violate most of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners and other human rights instruments, because of the lack of specialized facilities;

(f) The egregious practices concerning women accused by spouses and male relatives of acts that do not constitute a crime under Afghan laws, but who are nonetheless convicted and, when convicted by tribal judges or councils, are confined to the tribal chief’s custody and are de facto reduced to a slave-like condition. President Karzai was informed by the independent expert of this situation and promised action. As the Secretary-General stated:

“Women continue to be detained for offences against social mores; ‘honour crimes’ and death threats often follow a woman’s escape from a forced or arranged marriage. The absence of legal and social support systems has left many women trapped in abusive situations, from which they sometimes try to escape by drastic measures, including suicide and self-immolation ...” (ibid., para. 50);

(g) The continued legality of the transfer of young girls in marriage as payment of “blood money” often placing them in slave-like conditions. President Karzai spoke out publicly against this practice in March 2004;

(h) The reportedly increasing practice of child abduction and child trafficking, which seems to pass under the radar screen of law enforcement. President Karzai was informed by the independent expert of this situation and promised action. As the Secretary-General stated:

“Child kidnappings also continue to increase. Some families in the provinces of Helmand and Kandahar and elsewhere have become reluctant to send their children to school because of fears they will be abducted. Evidence suggests that the kidnapped children are being trafficked for sexual purposes and forced labour. The Government, in cooperation with the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, is focusing on the problem and has recently formulated a national plan of action to combat trafficking in children” (ibid., para. 51);

(i) The high level of corruption among government officials, including law enforcement and the judiciary, which is related to low salaries, insufficient training and sensitization and, in particular, lack of administrative control and enforcement;

(j) The illegal forcible evictions and seizure of land and homes belonging to refugees and to minorities. As the Secretary-General stated:

“Complaints about forced eviction and the illegal occupation of land continue to be pervasive throughout the country. Efforts by the courts to address these issues have generally failed because many of the perpetrators are connected to powerful figures within the Government. President Hamid Karzai has appointed a commission, chaired by Vice-President Karim Khalili, to investigate the matter. The commission has, however, acknowledged that the level of corruption in the municipalities has prevented it from being effective. United Nations bodies, including UNHCR and the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat), as well as other international agencies, are attempting to assist the Government in its efforts to address the matter” (ibid., para. 52).

10. These situations are highlighted because the Government can, for the most part, act to redress them without delay, even within the current context. Some actions may have immediate effect; others may take more time to produce tangible results.6

11. The Government’s accomplishments in the last two years in the face of difficult conditions are impressive. However, much is still needed, and the Government is aware of the complex challenges it faces. It should be noted that as the Government makes progress in different areas, expectations of higher performance and better results increase. However, serious advances in the protection of human rights require substantial and sustained support on the part of the international community as well. There is a feeling in Afghanistan that, as has happened before, the country’s people and needs will soon be forgotten.

II. Sociopolitical context

12. Afghanistan is a landlocked nation that shares over 5,000 kilometres of border with China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. The population is estimated at 28 million, almost half of whom are under 18 years old.7 Afghanistan has a diverse population divided among the Pashtun (42 per cent), Tajik (27 per cent), Hazara (9 per cent), Uzbek (9 per cent), Aimak (4 per cent), Turkmen (3 per cent), Baloch (2 per cent) and others. Approximately half the population speaks Dari, a third speak Pashtu, and 10 per cent speak Turkic languages, primarily Uzbek and Turkmen. Different groups dominate particular regions of the country, and ethnic tensions play a central role in regional politics and are often associated with violence, discrimination and various types of serious human rights violations. About 8 out of every 10 Afghans are Sunni Muslims, with the remaining population Shi’ah Muslims with a few members of other Muslim sects. Historically, a sense of centralized statehood has been lacking: this is essentially an ethnic and tribal society where these characteristics predominate.8

13. For almost three decades, Afghanistan has suffered extraordinary devastation as a result of near constant violent conflict. While exact statistics are unavailable, it is believed that 1.5 million Afghans, the majority of whom were civilians, have died as a result of internal conflicts. These include battlefield casualties as well as civilian victims of massacres, disappearances, indiscriminate bombing and shelling, landmines, unexploded ordnance, as well as indirect victims who have died of exposure, hunger and disease as a result of the violence. The conflicts are believed to have forced over 6 million Afghans to become refugees, mainly in Pakistan and the Islamic Republic of Iran, and over 1.4 million to become IDPs.9

14. The violence has destroyed the nation’s limited infrastructure and prevented the country from advancing in almost every area of social and economic development. Consequently, Afghanistan presents some of the world’s worst social statistics, with a life expectancy of only 42 years and an infant mortality rate of 167 per 1,000 live births. Only half of Afghan men and one fifth of Afghan women are literate. Significant portions of the population lack access to adequate housing, clean water, electricity and medical care.

15. The territory of Afghanistan has long been subjected to invasion and violent conflict. The Afghan people have a history of resisting foreign domination and a culture of military organization along local, regional and ethnic lines. However, the political violence of the last several decades has been especially destructive, allowing political authority to rest in the hands of ethnic armed groups that have grown accustomed to acting with near complete impunity. In addition, the conflict has heightened ethnic and regional tensions.

16. While Afghanistan is one of the world’s poorest countries, the nation now has an opportunity for social and economic development as a result of a willingness on the part of the international community to invest resources in the nation’s reconstruction.10 The country has various development possibilities, but it remains a non-industrialized nation with an agriculture-based economy. Afghanistan is in need of significant, sustained assistance if it is to seriously address its pressing social problems and develop a viable economic base and a unified, functioning national government. It is, however, the world’s largest producer of opium, an industry whose sales account for about 68 per cent of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP).11

17. Economic development requires the existence of a strong and effective central bank capable of monitoring a banking system, and a system of financial credit. This does not exist in Afghanistan. The central bank essentially prints currency. There is no banking system, and in fact, only two foreign banks have recently opened offices in Kabul. Financial transactions are in cash, and the cash economy is dominated by drug profits. In the last two years, the Government and the international community have not focused enough on this problem. Considering that proceeds from drugs are estimated to bring in $1 billion a year (see paras. 37-38 below), one can only imagine the negative impact even a small portion of these proceeds has on the country’s submerged economy. In a short period of time, the economy will simply be controlled by the drug lords.



Download 159.54 Kb.

Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page