Interagency Committee on the Health Effects of Non-ionising Fields: Report to Ministers 2015

Download 274.35 Kb.
Size274.35 Kb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   16

Interagency Committee on the Health Effects of Non-ionising Fields:
Report to Ministers 2015

Citation: Ministry of Health. 2015. Interagency Committee on the Health Effects of Nonionising Fields: Report to Ministers 2015. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

Published in April 2015
by the Ministry of Health
PO Box 5013, Wellington 6145, New Zealand

ISBN: 978-0-478-44811-5 (online)

HP 6181

This document is available at


Executive summary 4

1 Introduction 6

2 Current Ministry of Health policies and recommendations in New Zealand 7

2.1 Extremely low frequency fields 7

2.2 Radiofrequency fields 8

3 Research: ELF fields 11

3.1 Introduction 11

3.2 Review by WHO in 2007 11

3.3 Work since publication of the WHO review 12

3.4 Overseas reviews in the past three years 14

3.5 Future work 14

3.6 Conclusions 14

4 Research: RF fields 15

4.1 Introduction 15

4.2 RF and cancer 15

4.3 Electrohypersensitivity and other symptoms 18

4.4 Children 18

4.5 EEG effects 19

4.6 Recent overseas reviews 20

4.7 Future work 20

4.8 Conclusions 21

5 Exposure limits in other jurisdictions 22

5.1 Australia 22

5.2 European Union 22

5.3 Canada 23

5.4 IEEE/ICES 24

5.5 USA 24

5.6 Comparison of limits for RF field exposures 25

6 Issues in New Zealand 26

6.1 How exposures in New Zealand are covered under current legislation 26

6.2 New technologies 28

6.3 How EMF / health issues are handled in New Zealand 31

6.4 Key EMF research carried out in New Zealand 33

Appendix A: Common concerns about the New Zealand RF field exposure standard 34

Appendix B: The IARC classification scheme 36

Appendix C: Recent ELF reviews 37

Appendix D: Recent RF reviews 40

Appendix E: The Bioinitiative Report 48

Appendix F: Terms of reference of the Interagency Committee on the Health Effects of Non-ionising Fields 50

Appendix G: Background material on ELF and RF fields 52

References 56

Executive summary

The Ministry of Health convenes a technical advisory committee, the Interagency Committee on the Health Effects of Non-ionising Fields (the Committee), to monitor and review research on the health effects of electromagnetic fields. The Committee reports to the Director-General of Health but also periodically prepares a report for Ministers to provide them with background information and a current summary of key research findings.

This report is not intended to be an exhaustive or systematic review of recent research. Rather, it highlights key findings from comprehensive reviews undertaken in recent years by national and international health and scientific bodies, illustrated in places by examples from individual studies of interest or that exemplify work carried out in particular areas.

Extremely low frequency magnetic fields

The questions over whether exposures to extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields have any effect on the development of leukaemia in children, and neurodegenerative diseases in adults (such as Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), remain unresolved. Further studies on childhood leukaemia have not led to any more definitive conclusions on whether the associations between long-term exposure to ELF magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia show a true cause and effect relationship or are simply the results of biases (acknowledged as a possibility), confounding by unidentified factors (less likely), or something else.

This work has confirmed, however, that even if there is some effect of magnetic fields, this would be responsible for only a very low percentage of childhood leukaemias. A comprehensive review by the World Health Organization (WHO) published in 2007 recommended the use of exposure guidelines such as those used in New Zealand, together with very-low-cost measures to reduce exposures where this can be readily achieved. The Committee and the Ministry of Health support these recommendations.

Radiofrequency fields

Research into the possible effects of radiofrequency (RF) fields on health also has some open questions. Although studies into brain tumour risks associated with cellphone use have found a small association in the heaviest users, the researchers acknowledge that this could simply reflect biases in the data. Nevertheless, the suggestion that there may be a risk has meant that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RF fields as a 2B ‘possible’ carcinogen in 2011.*

Animal studies do not suggest an effect of RF fields on cancer. Analysis of brain tumour registrations in relation to numbers of cellphone subscriptions does not show any trends suggesting a link, but this could be due to long latencies, or (perhaps, more improbably) some other factor that is simultaneously acting to reduce brain tumours. Research published since the IARC classification tends to weigh against the possibility of any risk, but may just reflect the fact that exposures from the newer cellphone technologies are much lower than those in use at the time most of the data used in the IARC evaluation was acquired.

RF research is continuing in a number of areas, but data currently available provides no clear or persuasive evidence of any other effects. For this reason, the Committee and the Ministry of Health continue to support the use of exposure limits for RF fields set in the current New Zealand Standard, which is based on guidelines published by an international scientific body recognised by the WHO for its independence and expertise in this area. Those guidelines were first published in 1998 and endorsed, following a review of more recent research, in 2009.

The Committee notes, however, that recent data suggests that at some frequencies the margin of safety may not be quite as high as previously thought. This is not of immediate concern, as public exposures are normally, at most, only small fractions of the allowable limit and a considerable safety margin still remains. However, the Committee recommends that the situation be reviewed following publication of a WHO evaluation of RF fields and health, expected in early 2016.

Overall conclusions

Much new research has been published since 2004, when the Committee last prepared a report for Ministers, but none of this causes the Committee to consider that current policies and recommendations should be reviewed.

In view of the continuing public interest in this area, the ubiquitous nature of exposures and the open research questions that remain, the Committee will continue to monitor new research.

Directory: system -> files -> documents -> publications
publications -> Acknowledgements
documents -> Annual Report 2013
documents -> Monitoring International Trends posted August 2015
documents -> Final report
documents -> Foreign Research Reactor West Coast Shipment Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Institutional Program External Lessons Learned September 18, 1998 frr snf west Coast Shipment Institutional Program Lesson Learned
documents -> Report: Shelter Support Mission to Afghanistan
documents -> Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination in Emergencies: Towards a Predictable Model
documents -> Guidance for Public Health Units about the core capacities required at New Zealand international airports under the International Health Regulations (2005) Purpose
documents -> Rapid Education Needs Assessment Report
documents -> H Report of a Workshop on Coordinating Regional Capacity Building on Gender Responsive Humanitarian Action in Asia-Pacific

Download 274.35 Kb.

Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   16

The database is protected by copyright © 2020
send message

    Main page