Ir231 1st Lec. 24/09/2019



Download 0.86 Mb.
View original pdf
Page29/39
Date07.12.2023
Size0.86 Mb.
#62861
1   ...   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   ...   39
IR231 1
Ayşe-Şevval-Raylaz Assignment 2, book assignment, ENG102 Final, adm1122, Adm1122 midterm
dependency vs.
Lenin brings core and periphery
dependency school working on owning
WSTH also linked to two tier system, he adds third trier rd Hour many argue that modern world system did emerge in Asia, then to Europe, and lead then thereto wealth (
gunter frank) some say that modern society created in Middle EAST, it emerged to MEA and then expand to Europe somewhere in the 16th cent in Europe
58


-
hence, he Wallerstain argues that emergence of Europe existed within the
modern world system
• feminist scholars who argue and who challenge capitalism and neglect of women
• they argue how in dev world women created the workforce through reproduction without being payed, without being outside the economy
• Robert MIes,
• most important aspect of WALLERSTAIN : there is the core and periphery
• what Wallerstein argues there is a semi periphery which has emerged in time helping in different ways the working of
• constant enrichment of core, and hope of periphery too become semiperiphery
• semipheriphery softens constant idea of exploitation and the immediacy of core and periphery
• in this context shapes social life
-
what are characteristic of core
• general argument that core countries more democracy, high wages , based on HR, they import raw imp, export manufactures good
59


-
gramsci— has been jailed in 1926
• he wrote about concept of hegemony , and why rev in industrialised Europe did not occur bc of hegemony
gramsci in his prison notes of why rev in eu did not happen
• although we tased bout capitalism , woking class, basic question why no rev
• came up with this idea pf hegemony
• those in lower do not always rule with coercion
• he underlines that we have overestimated the component of force within power, in addition to that the inkling class use their power through consent, they get consent
• by disseminating consent one those they control they create hegemonic position
• through rule of hegemony manage to avoid constant resisting against themselves
so consent acc to gramsci is created, recreated by ruling classes
• those who’re ruled by bourgeoisie think the burg, deserve to be in that position
• there are ruling blocs, coalitions of blocs in different parts go society that maintain consent of society
• as long as there ruling bloc and coalitions generated in hegemony, the corcei mechanisms and the consent, we see continuation of existing order acc to grmasci
• so why no rev
• bc those in power, burgeosie, managed to cinice workes that there share certain common traits
• workers gave consent to leadership of bourgeoisie , bur. imaged to buy off minimum wages etc, convincing workers that the order was a good one
• the ruling elite , burg, built a hegemony and hard to challenge this bloc
• how do u challenge ruling elite only by building alternative hegemonic blocs
• sob gramscib underlines within capitalist economy in intl system , the leaders of intl system, hegemonic power do not only impose norms, values intetrtst through coercion but in this context they manage to get consent of weaker parties+ theydeserve to be there
• the role of consent generated in hegemonic ruling blocs very imp in this concept
• one of imp pointy by new grams the current ruling class does not belong to any nation, but a transnational capitalist claSS
• Robinson ruling elite now inst transnational CAPITALIST CLASS
60


• there are some new marxist Rosenberg and Teschke
• they do not look on theories based on Marx
• make reference to marx, trying to look origins workings of Marx

Download 0.86 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   ...   39




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page