A. Space being used to support ruling party legitimacy



Download 207.65 Kb.
Page15/16
Date28.01.2017
Size207.65 Kb.
#9681
1   ...   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16

Turns Case


Turns case- Space Debris increases

Zhang 06 (Hui, Senior Research Associate, Project on Managing the Atom, "Space Weaponization and Space Security: A Chinese Perspective"

Journal Article, China Security, volume 2, issue 1, pages 24-36)

Weaponizing space would further exacerbate current problems with space debris.17 Even worse, some scientists warn that if a number of satellites are destroyed in the course of a war, the Earth would be encased in a cloud of debris that would prevent future satellite stationing and space access.18 Given concerns over the space debris issue, senior scientists in China have emphasized that preventing environmental pollution should not only apply on Earth, but should also apply in outer space. As Xiangwan recently noted, “prevention of pollution in space should be put on an agenda and as time goes by, this problem will become increasingly obvious.” He further states: “In preventing space pollu- tion, the following two issues are worth noticing: space garbage and weaponiza- tion of space.” “[W]eaponization of space is more dangerous than ordinary space garbage,” since “it will seriously pollute space” and “it will threaten peace and stability on the Earth.”19



Put in an impact

Sophisticated Turns Case




A2: NU Space Exploration


US. Space program is ending in the status quo

Tkacik 10 (c John J., a retired Foreign Service officer, was chiefof China analysis in the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research during the Clinton administration, “Chin space program shoots for moon,” The Washington Times, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/08/china-eyes-high-ground/?page=1)

October’s launch of the experimental Ares 1-X heavy lift rocket, while flawless, may well mark the end rather than the beginning of America’s next-generation Constellation manned-space program. The space shuttle is scheduled for retirement this year and until Constellation gets off the ground, future American astronauts will rely on Russians - or Chinese - to get into orbit - if they want to get there at all. America’s multitrillion-dollar deficits over the next 10 years are likely to dissuade the Obama administration from budgeting for Constellation until well after Mr. Obama leaves office, if then.


China attempting to catch up to the US in space now

Trivedi 6-16-11 (Sahiba, rrently working with SFG's 'Asian Horizons' team on emerging trends in the South Asian and Southeast Asian regions, “Space: the final frontier of Sino-US rivalry?” http://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/sahiba-trivedi/space-final-frontier-of-sino-us-rivalry)

The US and Chinese space programmes cannot be compared directly. The American programme precedes China’s by at least 40 years and China has yet to land its first man on moon. The US satellite and spacecraft technology is still years ahead of China. But China is on the fast track right now. In 2011 alone, China aims to put more than twenty vehicles into space. Compared to this, the US space programme is in a state of inertia. It has had to scrap its ‘Constellation Program’ since the struggling American economy cannot afford the huge price tag attached to the programme at present.


CCP on the brink- space is uniquely key

Yao 6/22 (Liang, CCP’s Tombstone Planted on Parliament Hill, Epoch Times Staff)

He said his residence was located in a flourishing business district of Zhengzhou City. The local government seized it and tore it down, offering Zhang very low compensation, about US$34 per square foot.“Behind the real estate developer were corrupt CCP officials,” Zhang said.
“Due to the local authorities’ forced expropriation of private properties, there have been countless instances of frustrated appeals ending in protests, self-immolation, and even bombings of state buildings in China,” he said.
Putting his right foot on the tombstone expresses his feelings of contempt for the CCP and his hope for its swift demise, Zhang said.
“The social contradictions between haves and have-nots have accumulated to the tipping point. Every event, regardless of how minor, can trigger conflicts between authorities and citizens,” he said. Zhang said he chose to publicly protest to upholding his rights, and in addition to convey the voices of thousands upon thousands of oppressed Chinese people, who aren’t able to make their voices heard.



A2: Weaponization Inevitable


http://www.colorado.edu/ArtsSciences/PWR/occasions/articles/Lowery_Why%20the%20Weaponization%20of%20Space%20Should%20Not%20Be%20Pursued.pdf

The final and most solid case for inevitability rests on the fact that space assets are an excellent military target, and attacking them would be an effective precursor to terrestrial warfare. The argument has some merit, as it has been shown that space plays a key role in the abilities of the US military. The argument states that if the US does not develop space weapons, someone else will, placing the US at a disadvantage. This is reasonable but not conclusive. If an enemy did want to disrupt US space power, it would not necessarily need to weaponize space. The earth-based portions of space systems, such as ground control stations and communication dishes, are equally vulnerable and can be destroyed with existing, far cheaper systems: a few men with bombs can disable a satellite network just as well as a ballistic missile. In summary, the arguments for inevitability fall short of being substantive, relying on little more than the “sky is falling mentality” (Belote).


A2: Cooperation Turn



No Cooperation- Recent Bill

Johnson-Freese 6/10/11 (Emma Singer’s birthday! Professor at the USA Naval War College, specialty in space programs and space security, “US-China Space Cooperation: Congress’ Pointless Lockdown,” http://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/us-china-space-cooperation-congress’-pointless-lockdown/)

In early May when the US government was scrambling to pass a budget, a provision was slipped into the NASA appropriations bill that while counter to Obama Administration policy of expanded space cooperation, was not as important as getting a continuing resolution passed and so allowed to slide through. Section 1340 of NASA’s budget prohibited NASA and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) from spending funds to “develop, design, plan, promulgate, implement, or execute a bilateral policy, program, order, or contract of any kind to participate, collaborate, or coordinate bilaterally in any way with China or any Chinese-owned company.” It also prohibited the hosting of “official Chinese visitors” at any NASA facility. Clearly, a comprehensive ban on US-China space cooperation was intended. Just as clearly, ban supporters are under the impression that Chinese space officials are anxiously banging on the proverbial US door, waiting and hoping for the opportunity to work with the United States – which just isn’t the case.


Rivalry now- want to cooperate but it’s not working

Richburg 11 (Keith B., Washington Post New York Bureau Chief, “The Joys and Perils of Puberty: Nationalism and Space,” http://www.alphabetics.info/international/?p=6139)

China’s grand ambitions extend literally to the moon, with the country now embarked on a multi-pronged program to establish its own global navigational system, launch a space laboratory and put a Chinese astronaut on the moon within the next decade. The Obama administration views space as ripe territory for cooperation with China. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has called it one of four potential areas of “strategic dialogue,” along with cybersecurity, missile defense and nuclear weapons. And President Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao vowed after their White House summit last week to “deepen dialogue and exchanges” in the field.

But as China ramps up its space initiatives, the diplomatic talk of cooperation has so far found little traction. The Chinese leadership has shown scant interest in opening up the most sensitive details of its program, much of which is controlled by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).  At the same time, Chinese scientists and space officials say that Washington’s wariness of China’s intentions in space, as well as U.S. bans on some high-technology exports, makes cooperation problematic.

For now, the U.S.-China relationship in space appears to mirror the one on Earth – a still-dominant but fading superpower facing a new and ambitious rival, with suspicion on both sides.  “What you have are two major powers, both of whom use space for military, civilian and commercial purposes,” said Dean Cheng, a researcher with the Washington-based Heritage Foundation and an expert on the Chinese military and space program.
China and US are aggressive towards each other in the status quo

Tkacik 10 (c John J., a retired Foreign Service officer, was chiefof China analysis in the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research during the Clinton administration, “Chin space program shoots for moon,” The Washington Times, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/08/china-eyes-high-ground/?page=1)

This combination of financial wealth, educational excellence, advanced technology and a penchant for plundering intellectual property has enabled China’s space program to develop swiftly. In 2003, China’s gained entry into the exclusive manned-space club previously restricted to the United States and Russia. By 2008, Chinese astronauts were taking space walks and buzzing tiny “BX-1” nano-satellites around their space capsules, a technology that puts them on the cutting edge of “space situational awareness” that America’s military space assets still lack.

Beijing’s political and military leaders alike foresee “competition” in space with the United States. They certainly plan to seize the high ground of low-Earth orbit and then will likely move to the even higher ground of moon landings perhaps before this decade is out. Judging from the past behavior of China’s state-owned aerospace firms especially in their unseemly eagerness to proliferate ballistic missile technology to rogue states, it is unlikely that Mr. Obama can count on much “cooperation” with China in space - except on China’s terms.



Download 207.65 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page