Affirmative action program university of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, Massachusetts


Faculty Availability Estimates and Utilization Analysis



Download 1.35 Mb.
Page4/24
Date31.01.2017
Size1.35 Mb.
#14710
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   24

Faculty Availability Estimates and Utilization Analysis:

For Women and Minorities
Availability data for faculty were drawn primarily from a 10 year composite of the Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED) 1998-2008, which includes the gender and racial/ethnic heritage of degree recipients. Only degrees granted to U.S. Citizens and permanent residents are included in the totals. The doctorates reported include research and applied-research doctorates in all fields; professional degrees are not included in this source. There were three departments for which an alternate data source was used in whole or in part: Art, Nursing, and Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies. For Art, availability data were drawn from a combination of the 1998-2008 SED data and master’s degrees granted data for the corresponding period. The estimate for Nursing was based on The National Sample of Registered Nurses (2008). For Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies, availability data were drawn from a combination of the 1998-2008 SED data and corresponding data from the Digest of Education Statistics.

Using the Survey of Earned Doctorates' list of specialties, the disciplinary composition of the faculty in each academic department was identified by a survey conducted by the EO&D Office. Availability estimates for faculty in each academic department were determined as follows: the total number of degrees earned in the respective discipline(s) were summed for the time period and the total percentage of degrees earned by women and minorities, respectively, were calculated. In cases where the department identified a single discipline, these percentages equaled the availability estimate for women and minorities, respectively. For departments which identified more than one discipline, degrees in the relevant subdisciplines were also included. If a weighted formula for the disciplinary composition of the department was provided to the EO&D Office, this formula was used to produce the departmental availability estimate.

The EEO-6 category Faculty is divided into two primary job groups: Tenure System Faculty (tenured/tenure-track), and Other Faculty (non-tenure track). The Tenure System Faculty job group includes a separate subgroup for each department or program budgetary unit where a tenured/tenure-track faculty member is employed. Similarly, the Other Faculty job group includes departmental subgroups. It should be noted that some of the faculty subgroups are very small in size. For example there are some academic departments with as few as three or four tenure system faculty members. Achievement of diversity within these subgroups, therefore, may be restricted by their small size. Due to the smaller number of non-tenure system faculty, data for the job group Other Faculty have been summarized by school and college.

Statistics on the utilization of women and minorities among the faculty are presented in Table 6, Faculty Utilization Report. This table displays the current composition of the faculty with respect to the total number, the number and percentage female, and the number and percentage of minority group members; the availability estimate for female and minority faculty (percentage basis), the shortfall between current utilization and the availability estimate (percentage basis), and the determination of whether or not underutilization exists.

As of 3/31/13, there were 1,014 tenure system faculty members at the University of Massachusetts Amherst; 390 (38.5%) were women and 225 (22.2%) were minority group members. Using the definition of utilization as described in “Availability Estimates & Utilization Analysis,” out of the 52 academic departments of Regular Faculty of sufficient size for analysis, 22 (42.3%) were underutilized for women and 12 (23.1%) were underutilized for minorities. There was one department without any minority faculty members (Judaic & Near Eastern Studies). All 52 of these academic departments had at least one female tenure system faculty member on staff.

The following 25 departments were found to meet utilization standards for both women and minority faculty: Afro-American Studies; Anthropology; Art, Architecture & Art History; Astronomy; Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Classics; Communication Disorders; Economics; Educational Policy, Research & Administration; English; Environmental Conservation; Finance & Operations Management; History; Judaic & Near Eastern Studies; Kinesiology; Nursing; Nutrition; Philosophy; Political Science; Resource Economics; Sociology; Teacher Education & Curriculum Studies; Theater; Veterinary & Animal Sciences; and Women, Gender, Sexuality Studies.

The utilization analysis for non-tenure system faculty is displayed at the school/college level in Table 6, Faculty Utilization Report; see “Other Faculty”. Please note that only non-tenure system faculty who work half-time or greater are included in these numbers. A weighted availability estimate was calculated for each school and college, by using the departmental availability estimate weighted by the number of non-tenure track faculty in each of their departments.

There were 468 non-tenure track faculty as of 3/31/13; 245 (52.4%) were women, and 55 (11.8%) were minority group members. The representation of women among the non-tenure system faculty was found to meet utilization standards at the school/college level in all deaneries. The representation of minorities among the non-tenure system faculty was found to meet utilization standards in two deaneries: Humanities & Fine Arts and Social & Behavioral Sciences. Minorities were underrepresented among the non-tenure system faculty in seven areas: Engineering (shortfall=29.5%), Education (shortfall=16.1%), Isenberg School of Management (shortfall=16.4%), Natural Sciences (shortfall=11.9%), Nursing (shortfall=17.8%), Public Health & Health Sciences (shortfall=20.5). and Other (shortfall=11.2%).











Comparison of the Diversity of the Non-Faculty Workforce:

For Women and Minorities
A one-year comparison of the diversity of the non-faculty workforce is presented in Table 7, Diversity of Non-Faculty Employees Workforce Comparison, 2013 vs. 2012. This table provides, by job group, the percentage of women and minorities in the non-faculty workforce and the availability estimate for women and minorities, for 2012 and 2013. A workforce change indicator (increase, decrease, no change) provides a comparison of these statistics. Differences in availability estimates (2012 vs. 2013) are primarily due to yearly changes in the availability of women and minorities in feeder job groups within the University.

In total, the percentage of women in the non-faculty workforce remained the same at 53.8% in 2013. Changes in the percentage representation of women within the non-faculty job groups were as follows: 14 job groups increased in female representation, 16 job groups decreased in female representation, and 7 job groups remained the same. Among the Executive/Administrative/Managerial staff; female representation decreased in two job group (EAM B and EAM C), increased in one (EAM D), and remained the same in EAM A. The EAM C job group became underutilized for women in 2013. Women held a majority of the Professional/Non-Faculty jobs in 2013 (54.0%) and continued to be fully utilized in all of these job groups. Women constitute a majority in the Secretarial/Clerical job groups with the exception of the Sales job group. Women were fully utilized in the Secretarial/Clerical job groups with the exception of the Sales job group, which remained underutilized for women in 2013. In the Technical/Paraprofessional category, the overall representation of women increased to 48.3% in 2013. Women remained underutilized in one job group (Fire & Safety Officers) and became underutilized in Science & Other Technicians. The Computer, Engineering & Related Technicians job group became utilized for women in 2013. The total number of women employed in the Skilled Crafts category remained the same at 11 in 2013. Within Skilled Crafts, three job groups (Skilled Crafts Supervisors; Construction Trades, Non-Supervisory; and Plant & System Operation) remained underutilized for women in 2013. There remained no women in the Plant & System Operation area in 2013. The overall percentage representation of women in the Service/Maintenance category decreased to 36.8% in 2013. The Food Preparation & Services, Supervisory job group saw an increase in the percentage of women from 41.8 in 2012 to 50.0 in 2013. The job group Parking Enforcement became utilized for women in 2013. Two job groups (Cleaning/Building Services, Non-Supervisory and Farming & Forestry) became underutilized for women in 2013.



Overall, the representation of minorities in the non-faculty workforce decreased slightly to 16.5% in 2013. Between 2012 and 2013, minority representation increased in 21 job groups, decreased in 12 job groups, and remained the same in 4 job groups. Minority representation within the Executive/Administrative/Managerial (EAM) category increased to 10.7% in 2013. Three EAM job groups increased in minority representation (EAM B, EAM C and EAM D), and one remained the same (EAM A). Overall minority representation in the Professional/Non-Faculty category decreased to 15.3% in 2013. Three job groups saw an increase in racial/ethnic diversity (Administrative, Medical Care, and Technical). Five job groups (Education/Training, Institutional Relations, Library Sciences, Research/Post Doctorates and Allied Health) declined in minority representation. Three professional job groups (Institutional Relations, Library Sciences, and Medical Care) remained underutilized for minorities in 2013. Overall, the representation of minorities within the Secretarial/Clerical category increased from 10% in 2012 to 10.7% in 2013. Minority representation increased in five job groups (Administrative Support; Data Entry Operator; Financial Records; Duplicating/Mail; and Library); and decreased in two (Secretaries/Clerks/Typists and Sales). The Administrative Support job group is no longer underutilized for minorities; the Secretaries/Clerks/Typists job group became underutilized for minorities in 2013. In the Technical/Paraprofessional category, the overall representation of minorities increased to 12.0% in 2013. The percentage representation of minorities decreased in one job group (Computer, Engineering & Related Technicians); remained the same in one (Fire & Safety Officers); and increased in four (Business Related; Health Services; Protective Services and Science & Other Technicians). There continued to be no minority employees in the Fire & Safety Officers job group. In the Skilled Crafts area, the number of minority employees decreased from 13 in 2012 to 12 in 2013. The percentage representation of minorities increased in one job group (Skilled Crafts, Supervisory); decreased in Construction Trades, Non-Supervisory; and remained the same in two (Mechanics & Repairs, Non-Supervisory and Plant & System Operation). Three job groups (Construction Trades, Non-Supervisory; Mechanics & Repairers, Non-Supervisory; and Skilled Crafts, Supervisory) remained underutilized for minorities in 2013. The representation of minorities in Service/Maintenance remained stable at 32.8% in 2013. Five job groups increased in minority percentage representation (Food Preparation & Services, Non-Supervisory; Cleaning/Building Services, Non-Supervisory; Motor Vehicle Operators; Food Preparation & Services, Supervisory and Cleaning/Building Services, Supervisory). Three job groups decreased in minority percentage representation (Farming & Forestry; Parking Enforcement; and Departmental Assistant). The Parking Enforcement job group is no longer underutilized for minorities in 2013; the Food Preparation & Services, Supervisory, became underutilized for minorities in 2013. The Cleaning/Building Services, Supervisory job group remained underutilized for minorities in 2013.

Table 7

Diversity of Non-Faculty Employees

Workforce Comparison, 2013 v. 2012

















































2013




2012




Workforce







Workforce

Availability




Workforce

Availability




Change







Fem

Min

Fem

Min Min




Fem Fe%m

Min Min

Fem

Min




2012 v. 2011




 

%

%

%

%

 

%

%

%

%

 

Fem

Min

EEO-6 Category 1: Executive/Administrative/Managerial (EAM)










EAM A




18.2

9.1

54.1

17.5




18.2

9.1

46.9

14.4








EAM B




30.4

8.7

49.5

15.2




33.3

8.3

45.2

13.4






­

EAM C




44.9

10.2

59.2

15.5




46.5

9.3

49.8

12.4






­

EAM D




47.4

10.5

47.7

13.1




43.6

10.3

46.6

12.5




­

­











































EEO-6 Category 3: Professional/Non-Faculty






















Administrative

69.4

10.6

61.2

11.7




69.8

10.4

60.5

11.7






­

Education/Training

66.4

14.7

61.1

16.4




67.0

16.0

62.6

16.4








Institutional Relations

61.1

4.8

59.5

10.9




62.7

5.9

61.1

8.7








Library Sciences

63.3

6.1

70.3

8.9




63.6

6.8

69.9

9.1








Research/Post Doctorates

39.0

39.4

32.6

18.9




39.4

41.6

33.5

20.1








Medical Care

72.2

8.3

75.6

16.0




71.8

7.7

73.4

14.4




­

­

Technical

26.9

10.2

28.8

10.9




27.5

10.0

30.9

10.7






­

Professional Non-Faculty, Other





































Allied Health

69.7

15.2

65.3

16.2




64.5

16.1

64.8

16.3




­













































EEO-6 Category 4: Secretarial/Clerical































Administrative Support




92.2

10.8

87.7

11.5




92.2

8.3

88.5

10.9






­

Secretaries/Clerks/Typists




90.9

9.5

85.5

14.0




89.7

11.3

85.2

13.4




­



Data Entry Operator




83.3

33.3

83.2

16.4




81.8

27.3

82.7

20.0




­

­

Financial Records




100.0

4.5

96.1

7.2




100.0

4.3

94.6

7.0






­

Duplicating/Mail




52.9

11.8

52.9

11.8




50.0

11.1

50.0

11.0




­

­

Library




64.2

9.4

64.4

9.4




67.3

9.1

73.1

10.0






­

Sales




11.5

19.2

37.6

19.2




12.0

20.0

30.4

19.4








Note: Data not reported for units with fewer than three employees. The workforce change indicator is based on changes in percentage representation.


Download 1.35 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   24




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page