Afghanistan Aff


AC - Positive Peace Add-On



Download 0.73 Mb.
Page9/62
Date02.02.2017
Size0.73 Mb.
#15229
1   ...   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   ...   62

1AC - Positive Peace Add-On



Structural violence kills more than any other type
Pilisuk 1 (Marc, “GLOBALISM AND STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE” Peace, Conflict, and Violence:

Peace Psychology for the 21st Century. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.) CH

Limited material resources are not the only plight of poor people. Poverty inflicts psychological scars as well; it is an experience of scarcity amidst affluence. For many reasons, such as those discussed by Opotow (this volume), poverty produces the scorn of others and the internalized scorn of oneself. Indigence is not just about money, roads, or TVs, but also about the power to determine how local resources will be used to give meaning to lives. The power of global corporations in local communities forces people to depend on benefits from afar. Projected images of the good life help reduce different cultural values to the one global value of money. Meanwhile, money becomes concentrated in fewer hands. The world is dividing into a small group of “haves” and a growing group of paupers. This division of wealth inflicts a level of structural violence that kills many more persons than have died by all direct acts of violence and by war.
Structural violence is more damaging than nuclear war
Evangelista 5 (Matthew, Professor of International and comparative politics, Harvard University, “Peace studies: Critical Concepts in Political Science”, 2005, http://books.google.com/books?id=9IAfLDzySd4C&pg=PA41&lpg=PA41&dq=%22structural+violence%22+%22nuclear+war%22&source=bl&ots=m9wAXnUQqH&sig=4MnhVGRGJJ_Z8aS5SSmTptgRqYM&hl=en&ei=YBJZSoSeKYuqswOQ9fjWBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6, AD: 7/11/9) MT

But equally important is to recall that it is hardly possible to arrive at any general judgment, independent of time and space, as to which type of violence is more important. In space, today, it may certainly be argued that research in the Americas should focus on structural violence, between nations as well as between individuals, and that peace research in Europe should have a similar focus on personal violence. Latent personal violence in Europe may erupt into nuclear war, but the manifest structural violence in the Americas (and not only there) already causes an annual toll of nuclear magnitudes. In saying this, we are of course not neglecting the structural components of the European situation, (such as the big power dominance and the traditional exploitation of Eastern Europe by Western Europe) nor are we forgetful of the high level of personal violence in the Americas even though it does not take the form of international warfare (but sometimes the form of interventionist aggression).


1AC Poverty Advantage



The war on drugs & eradication policies pushes Afghan farmers into poverty



ICOS 6 (International Council on Security and Development, “Afghan Farmers Come to UK to Plead for the ir Livelihoods, http://www.icosgroup.net/modules/press_releases/afghan_farmers, date accessed:6/22/2010) AK

Following the international donors’ conference for Afghanistan’s reconstruction, which took place in London this week, a group of Afghan farmers has arrived in London today to urge the British government not to use violent strategies against their communities and their families in the coming months. Poppy crop eradication is part of the planned drug strategy by the UK – the lead country for counter-narcotics in Afghanistan – to curb the cultivation of opium in the country. During their visit, the farmers will also visit drug-users and communities affected by drug use in Blackburn on Saturday and will attend a meeting at the House of Commons on Monday.  “We have come to London to ask the British government to help us, and not to use violence against us and our families,” said Mr Akramullah Said, a farmer from Nangahar province. “We want the British people to understand that we are very poor people and that if our crops are destroyed we will be ruined. We are frightened about our future and our children’s lives. If our crops are destroyed we cannot feed our children. Surely there must be an alternative to this that can be found?”  Eradication of poppy crops poses a major threat to the future stability of Afghanistan because it destroys rural livelihoods without replacing them. This in turn presents a large security risk to the country and the region as confidence in the central government plummets. The eradication of crops which has been happening since 2001 has had no effect on the amounts of opium being produced in Afghanistan – the country still produces 87% of the world’s opium.  “Eradication is a very dangerous and destructive policy to pursue,said Emmanuel Reinert, Executive Director of ICOS. “Drug policy is the core issue in Afghanistan’s security and the proposed “quick-fix” aggressive tactics should not be used,” he warned. “Drug policy has to be tackled in a comprehensive, ‘pro-poor’, development orientated way. Current approaches are totally out of touch with the reality of the security situation in Afghanistan. What Afghanistan needs is an intelligent response, not militaristic tactics that wage war on the poor farmers of Afghanistan.”  The Council warned that the British troops who are being deployed to Southern Afghanistan in April must under no circumstances be involved in crop eradication.  “The mandate of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force has no authority to destroy crops or to take military action against Afghan Farmers,” said Reinert. “Soldiers will also be put in life-threatening situations if they participate in crop-destruction campaigns because they could become the victims of increasing violence and instability as a result of the current approach to the drug issue.” 


Poverty is already killing Afghani people- eliminating opium would destroy the country
Cordesman & Mausner 2010 (Anthony and Adam, “Is a “population-centric” Strategy Possible?”, http://csis.org/publication/agriculture-food-and-poverty-afghanistan, date accessed: 6/22/2010) AK

Poverty actually kills more Afghans than those who die as a direct result of the armed conflict either accidental, nor inevitable; it is both a cause and a consequence of a massive human rights deficit. The deficit includes widespread impunity and inadequate investment in, and attention to, human rights. Patronage, corruption, impunity and over-emphasis on short-term goals rather than targeted long-term development are exacerbating a situation of dire poverty that is the condition of an overwhelming majority of Afghans.

...According to the report published by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), some 9 million Afghans – 36 per cent of the population – are believed to live in absolute poverty and a further 37 per cent live only slightly above the poverty line, despite an estimated injection of some $35 billion during the period 2002-2009. Afghanistan has the second highest maternal mortality rate in the world and the third highest rate of child mortality. Only 23 per cent of the population have access to safe drinking water, and only 24 per cent of Afghans above the age of 15 can read and write, with much lower literacy rates among women and nomadic populations.




Download 0.73 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   ...   62




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page