Department of transportation


Need for and Purpose of the Action



Download 0.99 Mb.
Page8/21
Date17.08.2017
Size0.99 Mb.
#33939
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   21

Need for and Purpose of the Action

(Need and Purpose)


A Need and Purpose Statement will identify and describe the proposed action and the transportation problem(s) or other needs that the action is intended to address (40 CFR 1502.13). This section should clearly demonstrate that a "Need" exists and should define the "Need" in terms understandable to the general public. This statement should identify the critical issues as well as any secondary benefits. Data and discussion must be provided to support each conclusion.


This discussion should clearly describe the problems that the proposed action is to correct. It will form the basis of the Alternatives discussion in the "Alternatives" section of the environmental document, including the "No action" discussion, and assist with the identification of reasonable alternatives and the selection of the preferred alternative. While project impacts are compared to one another, project impacts also are weighed against the stated Need and Purpose (i.e., is the need great enough to warrant the impacts on the environment). Charts, tables, maps, and other illustrations (e.g., typical cross-section, photographs, etc.) are encouraged as useful presentation techniques.
The Need and Purpose Statement does not describe in detail a proposed project!
Elements that must be included in a sound “Need and Purpose Statement” are as follows. It is by no means all-inclusive and is intended only as a guide.


  1. Planning background and Project history:

    1. Project Status - Briefly describe the project history including actions taken to date, other agencies and governmental units involved, action spending, and schedules.

  2. Logical termini discussion should include traffic generators at the termini (if applicable), existing typical sections at the termini, as well as, demonstrate that the project:

    1. Connects logical points and is of sufficient length,

    2. Has independent utility, and

    3. Does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable improvements.

  3. Traffic:

    1. Existing and design year.

    2. Capacity:

      1. Is the capacity of the present facility inadequate for the present traffic?

      2. What capacity is needed?

      3. What are the levels of service for the existing facility, Preferred Alternative, and “No-Build Alternative”?

  4. General land use in the project area, context and setting of the project.

  5. Identification of any known Environmental Justice or other community concerns.

  6. Relationship to statewide and local transportation plan(s) (if in an area where they exist):

    1. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).

    2. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).

    3. Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) references.

    4. List other projects identified in the vicinity of the proposed project.

Elements that must be included, if these issues form the basis of the transportation problem being addressed:



  1. Safety:

    1. Is the proposed project necessary to correct an existing or potential safety hazard?

    2. Is the existing accident rate excessively high?

      1. Accident data to substantiate this concern - raw

      2. Numbers and comparison to statewide averages as well as types of accidents

    3. How will the proposed project improve it?

  2. Roadway Deficiencies

    1. Is the proposed project necessary to correct existing roadway deficiencies?

      1. Substandard geometry

      2. Load limits on structures

      3. Inadequate cross-section

      4. High maintenance costs, or

      5. Provide alternative transportation modes

    2. How will the proposed project improve it?

Other elements that may be appropriate and could be added to bolster the Project’s Need and Purpose.



  1. System Linkage:

    1. Is the proposed project a "connecting link?"

    2. How does it fit in the transportation system?

  2. Legislation - Is there a Federal, State, or local governmental mandate for the action?

  3. Social Demands or Economic Development:

    1. New employment, schools, land use plans, recreation, etc.

    2. What projected economic development/land use changes indicate the need to improve or add to the highway capacity?

  4. Modal Interrelationships - How will the proposed facility interface with and serve to complement airports, rail and port facilities, mass transit services, etc.?

The Need and Purpose may be updated as the project analysis progresses.


APPENDIX C

Concept Reports

To assist the Team Leader in completing the Concept Report, the following information is herein provided:


A. Full Oversight (FOS)/Exempt/State Funded (SF) - The designations for Full Oversight and Exempt are provided in coded form in The Department's Project Management System under the field labeled "Exempt.” The reference to Exempt projects under this definition does not refer to Air Quality exempt projects. These designations relate to federally funded projects only. The SF designation is to be selected for projects for which state funds, such as EDS or MLP, are programmed.
B. Plan Development Process (PDP) Classification and Time Saving Procedures - Projects are Plan Development Process (PDP) classified as either Major or Minor Projects.

  • A Major Project is one for which Time Saving Procedures are not appropriate. A Public Hearing, or Opportunity for a Public Hearing, and Location and Design approval are required. A Major Project requires the acquisition of significant amounts of right-of-way, substantially changes the functions of the facility being improved, has a significant impact on abutting property, has significant changes in travel patterns, or has significant social, economic, or environmental effects.

  • For a Minor Project, Time Saving Procedures are appropriate. When the concept for a Minor Project is approved, the Location and Design for the project is approved. For this reason the "Other Alternates Considered" section of the Concept Report will be carefully considered and the recommended concept justified.



Federal Agencies to Invite to Concept Meetings

The Project Manager will extend an invitation, as appropriate, to the following Federal Agencies to attend the Concept meeting:




Federal Highway Administration

61 Forsyth Street, SW

Suite 17T100

Atlanta, Georgia 30303



1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   21




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page