Table 4-2-12 Forecast result (contribution value) of airplane noise Leq of sensitive points (representative point) of village Unit: dB
No.
|
Name of Sensitive Point
|
Day of 2020 (dBA)
|
Night of 2020 (dBA)
|
1
|
Gongjiacun
|
38.2
| 30.9 |
2
|
Wangjia
|
43.1
|
36.2
|
3
|
Kejia
|
42.2
|
35.5
|
4
|
Laowushandi
|
40.1
|
33.0
|
5
|
Wangjiashan
|
41.2
|
34.5
|
6
|
Xiazhou
|
41.7
|
34.9
|
7
|
Zhongtancun
|
43.8
|
36.2
|
8
|
Shangzhoucun
|
42.2
|
32.3
|
9
|
Huayuan
|
43.8
|
33.9
|
10
|
Liujia
|
43.0
|
33.1
|
11
|
Xiajia of Tashui
|
41.1
|
34.4
|
12
|
Xujia of Tashui
|
52.1
|
45.4
|
13
|
Zhangjia of Tashui
|
43.2
|
36.6
|
14
|
Beilong
|
51.0
|
44.1
|
15
|
Cangdun
|
50.0
| 43.1 |
16
|
Cangting
|
51.1
|
43.3
|
17
|
Xujia
|
42.0
|
35.3
|
18
|
Fujiacun
|
45.5
|
38.7
|
19
|
Zhoujia
|
48.7
|
40.7
|
20
|
Xiejia
|
41.3
|
34.5
|
21
|
Wanli
|
46.4
|
39.7
|
22
|
Maowan
|
43.9
|
37.3
|
23
|
Shanjiao
|
42.9
|
36.3
|
24
|
Wangsidun
|
48.7
|
41.7
|
25
|
Xinwuqiaotou
|
43.1
|
36.5
|
26
|
Caijia
|
42.7
|
36.0
|
27
|
Chengjiabao
|
44.2
|
37.5
|
28
|
Wangjia
|
42.4
|
35.7
|
29
|
Luosiwan
|
38.8
|
32.0
|
30
|
Xiaojia
|
40.4
| 33.8 |
31
|
Shigu
|
43.2
|
36.6
|
32
|
Qianshan
|
46.0
|
39.4
|
33
|
Zhoujiashan
|
39.0
|
32.3
|
34
|
Zhongjia
|
40.4
|
31.9
|
35
|
Yangshi
|
46.9
|
36.8
|
36
|
Fujiashi
|
46.4
|
37.5
|
37
|
Zhangjiafan
|
48.8
|
37.9
|
38
|
Xiacun
|
42.0
|
34.4
|
39
|
Zhucunwan
|
46.6
|
36.9
|
40
|
Yuantangwu
|
40.7
|
33.4
|
41
|
Shangwan
|
42.9
|
35.7
|
42
|
Qianshan
|
36.6
|
28.2
|
43
|
Zhoudun
|
37.5
|
29.1
|
44
|
Shanbei
|
50.5
|
39.3
|
45
|
Zhouwu
|
48.3
| 39.1 |
46
|
Xiawutang
|
52.8
|
43.2
|
47
|
Huangwuluojia
|
46.0
|
38.9
|
48
|
Shanghuangwu
|
51.0
|
44.2
|
49
|
Wayaodi
|
39.2
|
32.4
|
50
|
Fangcun
|
38.8
|
32.0
|
51
|
Maowan
|
41.1
|
30.8
|
52
|
Majia
|
38.8
|
29.6
|
53
|
Linjia
|
39.3
|
30.1
|
54
|
Shantou
|
43.7
|
33.3
|
The evaluation sets 6 monitoring points of background noise in airport surroundings the monitoring results as follows:
Table 4-2-13 Monitoring value of background noise of sensitive points of airport surroundings
Point
|
Monitoring average value in day [dB(A)]
|
Monitoring average value in night [dB(A)]
|
Zhouwu Village
|
44.7
|
39.5
|
Xiawutang
|
45.4
|
40.6
|
Xujia of Tashui
|
46.6
|
40.8
|
Fangcun
|
44.4
|
40.2
|
Beilong
|
44.4
|
40.7
|
Wangsidun
|
43.5
|
40.3
|
Average Value
|
44.8
|
40.4
|
Because it is unable to carry out monitoring of background value of all sensitive points, the evaluation adopts the representative points on both ends and sides of runway for monitoring to calculate the background value of area noise in day and night. In addition that the monitoring point adopts actual monitoring value, other points take 44.8dB for background noise value in day and 40.4dB in night. The forecast values of representative points are calculated as follows:
Table 4-2-14 Forecast result (forecast value) of airplane noiseLeq of sensitive points including hospitals and schools Unit: dB
No.
|
Name of Sensitive Point
|
Day of 2020 (dBA)
|
Night of 2020 (dBA)
|
1
|
Gongjia Kindergarten
|
45.7
|
40.9
|
2
|
Hualong School
|
46.4
|
41.4
|
3
|
Aimin Hospital
|
46.1
|
41.1
|
4
|
Zhongtan Primary School
|
47.3
|
41.8
|
5
|
Cangbei Primary School
|
51.1
|
45.0
|
6
|
Longfeng Kindergarten
|
46.4
|
41.4
|
7
|
Xiangshan Primary School
|
47.5
|
42.2
|
8
|
Masters Yuying School
|
47.5
|
42.2
|
9
|
Aixin Kindergarten
|
46.8
|
41.7
|
10
|
Yangshi Primary School
|
49.0
|
42.0
|
11
|
Yangshi Home for the Aged
|
49.4
|
41.7
|
12
|
Yuantang Primary School
|
46.2
|
41.2
|
13
|
Zhoudun Primary School
|
45.5
|
40.7
|
14
|
Luojia Teaching Point
|
48.5
|
42.7
|
Table 4-2-15 Forecast result (forecast value) of airplane noise LWECPN of sensitive points (representative point) of Village Unit: dB
No.
|
Name of Sensitive Point
|
Day of 2020 (dBA)
|
Night of 2020 (dBA)
|
1
|
Gongjiacun
|
45.7
|
40.9
|
2
|
Wangjia
|
47.0
|
41.8
|
3
|
Kejia
|
46.7
|
41.6
|
4
|
Laowushandi
|
46.1
|
41.1
|
5
|
Wangjiashan
|
46.4
|
41.4
|
6
|
Xiazhou
|
46.5
|
41.5
|
7
|
Zhongtancun
|
47.3
|
41.8
|
8
|
Shangzhoucun
|
46.7
|
41.0
|
9
|
Huayuan
|
47.3
|
41.3
|
10
|
Liujia
|
47.0
|
41.1
|
11
|
Xiajia
|
46.3
|
41.4
|
12
|
Xujia of Tashui
|
53.2
|
46.7
|
13
|
Zhangjia
|
47.1
|
41.9
|
14
|
Beilong
|
51.9
|
45.7
|
15
|
Cangdun
|
51.1
|
45.0
|
16
|
Cangting
|
52.0
|
45.1
|
17
|
Xujia
|
46.6
|
41.6
|
18
|
Fujiacun
|
48.2
|
42.6
|
19
|
Zhoujia
|
50.2
|
43.6
|
20
|
Xiejia
|
46.4
|
41.4
|
21
|
Wanli
|
48.7
|
43.1
|
22
|
Maowan
|
47.4
|
42.1
|
23
|
Shanjiao
|
47.0
|
41.8
|
24
|
Wangsidun
|
49.8
|
44.1
|
25
|
Xinwuqiaotou
|
47.0
|
41.9
|
26
|
Caijia
|
46.9
|
41.7
|
27
|
Chengjiabao
|
47.5
|
42.2
|
28
|
Wangjia
|
46.8
|
41.7
|
29
|
Luosiwan
|
45.8
|
41.0
|
30
|
Xiaojia
|
46.1
|
41.3
|
31
|
Shigu
|
47.1
|
41.9
|
32
|
Qianshan
|
48.5
|
42.9
|
33
|
Zhoujiashan
|
45.8
|
41.0
|
34
|
Zhongjia
|
46.1
|
41.0
|
35
|
Yangshi
|
49.0
|
42.0
|
36
|
Fujiashi
|
48.7
|
42.2
|
37
|
Zhangjiafan
|
50.3
|
42.3
|
38
|
Xiacun
|
46.6
|
41.4
|
39
|
Zhucunwan
|
48.8
|
42.0
|
40
|
Yuantangwu
|
46.2
|
41.2
|
41
|
Shangwan
|
47.0
|
41.7
|
42
|
Qianshan
|
45.4
|
40.7
|
43
|
Zhoudun
|
45.5
|
40.7
|
44
|
Shanbei
|
51.5
|
42.9
|
45
|
Zhouwu
|
49.9
|
42.3
|
46
|
Xiawutang
|
53.5
|
45.1
|
47
|
Huangwuluojia
|
48.5
|
42.7
|
48
|
Shanghuangwu
|
51.9
|
45.7
|
49
|
Wayaodi
|
45.9
|
41.0
|
50
|
Fangcun
|
45.5
|
40.8
|
51
|
Maowan
|
46.3
|
40.9
|
52
|
Majia
|
45.8
|
40.7
|
53
|
Linjia
|
45.9
|
40.8
|
54
|
Shantou
|
47.3
|
41.2
|
Standard value
|
55.0
|
45.0
|
It can be seen from above that each village representative sensitive points of daytime noise predictive values do not exceed the standard, 4 sensitive points exceed the standard in night. However, because Shangrao Airport site is located in hilly areas, residents of the same village are in scattered distribution; there are different noise effects, according to the calculation of contribution value isoline 54.5dB, located in the daytime within the night contribution, within valueisoline43dB residents, superimposed background noise value, noise impact value will exceed the diurnal 55dB, night 45dB standard. According to calculation, 5 villages in total have some residents appear different circadian over-standard condition, exceed the standard as follows:
Table 4-2-16 Over-standard condition of residents during day
Monitoring Point
|
Forecast value at location of maximum noise in day (dBA)
|
Over-standard condition during day
|
Xiawutang
|
56.7
|
17 households (over-standard less than 3dB)
|
Xujia of Tashui
|
56.3
|
3 households (over-standard less than 3dB)
|
Beilong
|
52.7
|
Not exceeding the standard
|
Cangting
|
52.0
|
Not exceeding the standard
|
Shanghuangwu
|
52.5
|
Not exceeding the standard
|
Table 4-2-17 Over-standard condition residents during night
Monitoring Point
|
Forecast value at location of maximum noise in night (dBA)
|
Over-standard condition during night
|
Xiawutang
|
44.3
|
Not exceeding the standard
|
Xujia of Tashui
|
49.7
|
35 households for over-standard
(Over-standard of 28 households less than 3dB, over-standard of 7 households 3-6dB)
|
Beilong
|
46.6
|
70 households (over-standard less than 3dB)
|
Cangting
|
45.3
|
100 households (over-standard less than 3dB)
|
Shanghuangwu
|
46.3
|
12 households (over-standard less than 3dB)
|
4.1.2.5 Evaluation of airplane noise of Shangrao Airport
1. Evaluation of airplane noise LWECPN
(1) Evaluation of LWECPN of sensitive points of Shangrao Airport such as school and hospital
According to forecast result in 2015 and 2020, the sensitive points listed in the table do not exceed the standard, in which the noise decibel value is highest in Cangbei Primary School, in 2020 their predictive value for 65.1dB, less than 70dB airport regional standard of the first zone.
(2) Comparison of 2015 (acceptance year) and 2020 (target year)
(i) Comparison of impact range under different sound levels
The prediction results show that 70-75dB noise impact area of Shangrao Airport in 2015 is 0.504km2, 75-80dB area is 0.160km2; 70-75 noise impact area in 2020 is 0.897km2, and 75-80dB area is 0.32km2. It can be seen that as the airline business volume growth, different sound level of the noise influence to increase somewhat, but because of air traffic growth is not significant, so the noise scope of influence did not change much, to a target on 2020 Shangrao Airport surrounding sound better environmental conditions.
(ii) Impact of airport noise on adjacent villages
Houmentang of Shangrao Airport is location between Tashui Village, Zhoushi Village and Zhouwu Village, and the airport boundary is distributed with a plurality of natural village, the residents of relatively dense, on airport noise sensitive. This prediction in distance from the airport boundary nearest villages mainly includes Shanghuangwu, Xiawutang, Xujia of Tashui. Upon Forecast result and analysis, because of inhabitants of dispersive distribution, Xiawutang, Xujia of Tashui combination of scattered residents into the 70dBisoline range around the airport, on the whole the villages affected by the noise is small, no noise exceed the standard sensitive points.
(5) Evaluation conclusion
Shangrao Airport operation to forecast target year 2020, resident points have not entered into the range over 75dB. From 2015 to 2020, no buildings such as schools and hospitals have entered into 70dB; therefore, according to the LWECPN evaluation, airplane noise for people living near the airport can be endured.
2. Evaluation of airplane noise Leq
(1) Leq evaluation of sensitive points of Shangrao Airport such as schools and hospitals
According to forecast result of sensitive points such as schools and hospitals in 2020, in 14 sensitive points listed in the table, 13 sensitive points do not exceed the standard, in which the noise decibel value is highest in Cangbei Primary School, whose predicted value is 45.0dB at night in 2020, reaching the night noise standard of 45.0dB, because Cangbei Primary School does not carry out the teaching activity after 22 at night, and the school student accommodation, so the airport noise sensitive points in surrounding schools hospitals had no effect.
(2) Leq evaluation of sensitive points of Shangrao Airport such as villages
According to forecast result of sensitive points of residents in 2020, Xiawutang, Xujia of Tashui diurnal have a total of 20 households Leq predictive value than 55dB daytime noise standard; Xujia of Tashui, Beilong, Cangting, Shanghuangwu have a total of 217 households Leq predictive value than 45dB night noise standard.
(3) Evaluation conclusion
Shangrao Airport operation to predict the target Day of 2020 have a total of 20 households night exceed the standard, 217 households have exceed the standard, thus, according to the Leq evaluation, Shangraoairplane noise for people living near the airport has caused certain effect.
4.1.3 Noise Impact Mitigation Mearsures
4.1.3.1 Measures to Reduce Noise Effect during the Construction Period
The Shangrao Airport Construction project comprises of airfield construction, terminal construction as well as other related support constructions. Noise prevention measures during the construction period should meet the following requirements:
Reasonably arrange the use of construction machines, reduce the use time of noisy equipments, improve repair and maintenance for all kinds of construction machines, try all means to reduce the noise emission of the construction machines, strictly limit the use of piling machine at night; In each phase of the construction period, in accordance with the noise effect characteristics of each construction machine and in combination of the situation of village distribution around the airport, reasonably arrange the use time of the construction machines, reduce the use time of highly noisy construction machines at night, and try to arrange daytime work for all kinds of constructions near Tashui Village and Huangwu Village both of which are close to the airport boundary.
During the structure construction period, build simple envelopes for concrete pumps and concrete tank trucks to reduce noise, improve repair and maintenance for concrete pumps, strengthen training and responsibility education for the construction personnel, and ensure stable operation of the vehicles.
4.1.3.2 Measures to Reduce Noise Effect during the Operation Period
To avoid airport noise effects on surrounding inhabitants, many countries in the world have stipulated land use rules related to airports. After the confirmation of the airport construction, it’s required to stipulate rules for using the surrounding land, legally determine land use limits according to its distance to the runway and the flight path. The rules should be followed by each party to avoid unnecessary disputes.
As the Shangrao Airport will have just a few flights, use comparatively less noisy airplanes of type B and C, and have few and scattered inhabitants around, the noise of airplanes will have no obvious impact on local inhabitants by 2020. To minimize the noise effect on the inhabitants, the follow measures are proposed:
Reasonable arrangement of land development around the airport is an important measure to avoid airplane noise interference; the local authority and government should make good planning for land use around the airport in view of future development of the airport, in accordance with the forecast results for the airport noise by the target year 2020 of this phase, implement planning control within an area 3-4km away from both ends and 0.5km away from both sides of the runway, and avoid constructing buildings which are sensitive to noises, such as buildings for inhabitants, science & research, cultural education and healthcare and office buildings. If such buildings are necessary, it’s required to take corresponding building sound-proofing measures. During the process of new rural construction, the local planning department should make reasonable planning for the settlements near the airport and provide space for the airport development.
This evaluation adopts Leq (equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level) as the noise evaluation to forecast and analyze the noise impact on surroundings of the Shangrao Airport. The forecast and the Leq evaluation show a certain degree of sensitive point overproof around the airport. Therefore, this evaluation mainly proposes sound environment protection measures for the Leq forecast results.
(1) Determination of Noise Reducing Measures
In view of the requirements of WBG that the necessity of environmental protection oriented removal depends on whether there is any economical and feasible noise reducing measures. According to the environmental evaluation and analysis, with the Leq proposed by WBG as the evaluation method, there are about 227 residential houses which will experience noise impact around the airport, but the overproof amount is less than 5dB, which shows a medium or small degree of noise impact, so it’s planned to use sound-proofing doors and windows with sealing measures for sound-proofing of the natural villages, so that both indoor and outdoor noises of such area can meet the corresponding noise standard requirements and also meet the residential requirements.
(2) Effect and Development of Sound-Proofing Measures
To make effective use of the land around the airport, sound-proofing measures can be taken for the transition area with Leqd 45~51dB (A) around the airport to reduce the impact of airplane noise on the inhabitants. This is an internationally accepted way.
The sound-proofing effects of domestic professional sound-proofing windows show below in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1 Weighted Sound-Proofing Amount of Each Level of Sound-Proofing Windows
Level
|
Weighted Sound-Proofing Amount ( RW)
|
Ⅰ
|
RW≥45
|
Ⅱ
|
45> RW≥40
|
Ⅲ
|
40> RW≥35
|
Ⅳ
|
35> RW≥30
|
Ⅴ
|
30> RW≥25
|
For buildings within the area with daytime equivalent A-weighted sound pressure level Leqd 55~58dB(A) and night equivalent A-weighted sound pressure level Leqd 45~48dB(A), level-V sound-proofing windows (weighted sound-proofing amount: 30>RW≥25) can be used to realize 20dB of the sound pressure level difference between indoor and outdoor;
For buildings within the area with daytime equivalent A-weighted sound pressure level Leqd 58~61dB(A) and night equivalent A-weighted sound pressure level Leqd 48~51dB(A), level-IV sound-proofing windows (weighted sound-proofing amount: 35>RW≥30) can be used to realize 25dB of the sound pressure level difference between indoor and outdoor;
At present, 30~35dB sound-proofing windows have been put on the market and have received good effect on traffic noise control. However, there is no successful experience in China in the aspect of airplane noise control for airports. According to the actual situation of the residential houses around Shangrao Airport, the sound-proofing measures proposed by this evaluation mainly consider the sound-proofing measures of doors and windows.
Domestic sound-proofing windows have various types including normal ones, natural draught ones and forced draught ones, the last of which is proposed for schools to meet the requirement on draught amount; general residents are proposed to use normal or natural draught sound-proofing windows.
(3) Expenses of Village Sound-Proofing Treatment Measures
It’s planned to use sound-proofing doors and windows with sealing measures for sound-proofing of the natural villages, so that both indoor and outdoor noises of such area can meet the corresponding noise standard requirements and also meet the residential requirements.
In view of social stability, this sound-proofing treatment plan will proceed with village as the unit. According to the evaluation impact scope, it will influence a total of 563 residential houses (comprising of 227 houses with noise impact), including 110 residential houses in Xiawutang and 71 in Shanghuangwu in Zhunqiao Township of Shangrao County, and 90 residential houses in Beilong and 230 in Cangting in Zaotou Town of Shangrao County, and 62 in Xujia in Tashui, Maojialing, Xinzhou District.
As counted by 2020, the door and window area of each house is 70m2, with the unit price of windows of 500 yuan/m2, so the calculated expenses for the sound-proofing measures will reach 19.95 million Yuan totally, with detailed evaluation results below in Table 6-2.
Table 6-2 Overview of Sound-Proofing Measures and Expenses for Each Natural Village in 2020
Sensitive Points
|
Residential Houses
|
Sound-Proofing Houses
|
Unit Price (10 thousand yuan)
|
Total Price (10 thousand yuan)
|
Xiawutang
|
110
|
110
|
3.5
|
385
|
Shanghuangwu
|
71
|
71
|
3.5
|
248.5
|
Beilong
|
90
|
90
|
3.5
|
315
|
Cangting
|
230
|
230
|
3.5
|
805
|
Tashuixujia
|
62
|
55
|
3.5
|
241.5
|
7
|
7
|
Total
|
563
|
563
|
/
|
1995
|
(4) Expenses of School Sound-Proofing Measures
According to the forecast results, among altogether 14 schools within the noise evaluation scope, only the night noise of Cangbei Primary School reaches 45.0dB. However, as there are no teaching and studying activities in Cangbei Primary School after 22:00 and no students stay in the school at night, there is no need to take noise treatment measures for this school.
(5) Total Noise Expenses
As the Shangrao Airport project involves no environmental protection oriented removal at this phase and no measures are necessary for the overproof night noise in the school, the expenses of environmental protection measures at this phase only includes the fees for residential house sound-proofing measures, i.e. 19.95 million yuan in total.
(6) Noise Treatment Instructions
For the fact that Shangrao Airport meets the current noise evaluation indices and standard, but is overproof in inhabitant quantity and WBG proposed evaluation Leq as well as its standards, we think that many conditions have not been fully implemented, such as Chinese airport construction review program and conditions closely related to noise influence such as flight quantity, flight timetable and airfield operation situation. In addition, the current noise forecast results of Shangrao Airport are based on analogical data and airline operation parameters, so the airport operation will change as the related parameters are adjusted, which will lead to a great change in Leq forecast results. Therefore, we suggest that for the overproof noise forecast of Shangrao Airport, we solve future possible noise interference through a combination of operation period tracking and monitoring as well as supplemental noise calculation methods, detailed as follows:
① After the airport goes into operation, noise tracking and monitoring will be adopted for villages close to the airport and villages with overproof forecast. Generally speaking, the flights of airports divide into two seasons each year, so it’s required to monitor noises twice each year. Once it’s overproof, immediately use the preserved noise expenses to implement measures. As the flight quantity of Shangrao Airport will keep growing, it is suggested that we should implement noise measures step by step to reduce social influence.
② As noise monitoring can reflect noise effects only on the day of monitoring, the actual noise effects of the airport operation will change with comprehensive factors such as the weather. Therefore, after the airport goes into operation, the airport management department can entrust a related qualified organization to calculate each year’s daily noise effect based on the annual airport operation parameters and take the calculation results as the basis for noise effect analysis and feasible measures.
4.1.4 Estimation result of long-term noise
4.1.4.1 Estimation parameters
(1) Conditions of long-term runway
Shangrao Airport long-term goal in 2040 of that year, to the Northeast extension of runway will be extended by 200m and length of 2600m.
(2) Air traffic
Dated 2040 aircraft sorties for 17143 sorties, daily landing 47 sorties.
(3) Models of combination forecasting
See table 4-3-1 for combination forecasting model.
Table 4-3-1 Table for forecast of airplane model combination
Year
|
Category
|
Representative airplane model and proportion
|
Subtotal
|
B (EMB145, CRJ)
|
C (B737, A319, A320)
|
D (B767, A310)
|
2040
|
Domestic
|
15%
|
70%
|
15%
|
100%
|
(4) Shangrao Airport in different time flying sorties proportion
Long-term target different time flying sorties proportion at present cannot determine by 2020, estimates the forecasting parameters.
(5) Proportion of different course
The long-term goal of different routes of takeoff and landing proportion at present cannot determine by 2020, estimates the forecasting parameters.
(6) Flight program
Late 2040 due to the extension of the runway and routes of factors such as increased, so the flight procedures need to design, estimate the flight procedure was used in this phase of the 2020 project flight program.
4.1.4.2 Estimation results
(1) LWECPN contour lines and the estimation results in 2040
In 2040, Shangrao Airport estimates obtained by aircraft noise cover are shown in table 4-3-2. Estimation results of aircraft noise of sensitive points are shown in table 4-3-3, 4-3-4. Aircraft noise estimation of contour map of figure 4-1-12.
Table 4-3-2 Estimated coverage area of airport noise Unit: km2
Year
|
LWECPN sound level range (dB)
|
>70
|
>75
|
>80
|
>85
|
>90
|
2040
|
6.250
|
2.456
|
1.080
|
0.618
|
0.474
|
Table 4-3-3 Estimation results of airplane noise of sensitive points such as school and hospitals Unit: dB
No.
|
Name of Sensitive Point
|
Noise estimation value in 2040
|
1
|
Gongjia kindergarten
|
59.3
|
2
|
Longhua School
|
62.4
|
3
|
Aimin Hospital
|
61.3
|
4
|
Zhongtan Primary School
|
64.7
|
5
|
Cangbei Primary School
|
71.8
|
6
|
Longfeng kindergarten
|
61.4
|
7
|
Xiangshan Primary School
|
64.2
|
8
|
Masters School
|
64.2
|
9
|
Aixin kindergarten
|
62.1
|
10
|
Yangshi Primary School
|
66.6
|
11
|
Yangshi geracomium
|
67.6
|
12
|
Yuantang Primary School
|
60.9
|
13
|
Zhoudun Primary School
|
56.5
|
14
|
Luojia teaching point
|
67.7
|
15
|
Zhouwu Primary School
|
68.5
|
Table 4-2-9 Estimation result of airplane noise LWECPN of Village sensitive points (representative point) Unit: dB
No.
|
Name of Sensitive Point
|
Estimated value of noise in 2040
|
1
|
Gongjia Village
|
59.3
|
2
|
Wangjia
|
64.1
|
3
|
Kejia
|
62.7
|
4
|
Laowushandi
|
61.3
|
5
|
Wangjiashan
|
62.4
|
6
|
Xiazhou
|
62.7
|
7
|
Zhongtan Village
|
64.7
|
8
|
Shangzhou Village
|
62.8
|
9
|
Park
|
64.6
|
10
|
Liujia
|
63.7
|
11
|
Xiajia
|
62.6
|
12
|
Xujia
|
74.7
|
13
|
Zhangjia
|
65.1
|
14
|
Beilong
|
73.0
|
15
|
Cangdun
|
71.8
|
16
|
Cangting
|
72.4
|
17
|
Xujia
|
62.6
|
18
|
Fujia Village
|
66.2
|
19
|
Zhoujia
|
69.7
|
20
|
Xiejia
|
61.4
|
21
|
Wanli
|
68.1
|
22
|
Maowan
|
65.5
|
23
|
Mountain foot
|
63.3
|
24
|
Wangsidun
|
69.3
|
25
|
Xinwuqiaotou
|
63.2
|
26
|
Caijia
|
62.6
|
27
|
Chengjiabao
|
64.2
|
28
|
Wangjia
|
62.1
|
29
|
Luosiwan
|
60.2
|
30
|
Xiaojia
|
62.0
|
31
|
Shigu
|
65.1
|
32
|
Qianshan
|
68.1
|
33
|
Zhoujia mountain
|
60.5
|
34
|
Zhongjia
|
59.7
|
35
|
Yueshi
|
66.6
|
36
|
Fujiashi
|
66.4
|
37
|
Zhangjiadian
|
69.0
|
38
|
Xia Village
|
61.9
|
39
|
Zhucunwan
|
66.3
|
40
|
Yuantangwu
|
60.9
|
41
|
Shangwan
|
63.9
|
42
|
Qianshan
|
56.0
|
43
|
Zhoudun
|
56.9
|
44
|
Shanbei
|
71.0
|
45
|
Zhouwu
|
68.5
|
46
|
Xiawutang
|
74.0
|
47
|
Huangwu Luojia
|
67.7
|
48
|
Shanghuangwu
|
73.2
|
49
|
Wayaodi
|
60.9
|
50
|
Fangcun
|
60.4
|
51
|
Maowan
|
60.4
|
52
|
Majia
|
58.1
|
53
|
Linjia
|
58.7
|
54
|
Shantou
|
63.3
|
4.1.4.3 Evaluation of long-term airplane noise
(1) Evaluation of LWECPN of sensitive points such as hospitals and schools of Shangrao Airport
According to the estimation results in 2040, listed in the table, the sensitive points in addition to Cangbei Primary School, other schools of the hospital were not exceed the standard, in which the noise decibel value was highest in the Cangbei Primary School 2040 noise estimation value reached 71.8dB, over a class of 70dB standard.
(2) Impact of airport noise on adjacent village group
According to estimation results of villages in 2040, representative point of the noise are exceed the standard, because the inhabitants of dispersive distribution, group Xiawutang and water tower Xujia has scattered residents into the 75dB contour of range, Xiawutang group has 26 households, 130 people enter, water tower Xujia 12 households 60 people enter。Overall, to 2040, airport to periphery effect is not significant.
4.1.4.4 Long-term noise control range
Due to long-term noise in the existing conditions, estimation, so as to noise abatement measures put forward basis, we as long as the basis of long term noise calculation results suggested Shangrao Airport surrounding land use control range. According to 70dB range in 2040, we will track the ends of each 3km, both 500m range is determined for the airport noise construction control area. See the specific scope of the pictures.
Share with your friends: |