Future Infrastructure budget cuts are inevitable – We must locate other means of investment to rebuild and innovate



Download 1.29 Mb.
Page6/32
Date19.10.2016
Size1.29 Mb.
#4191
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   32

Ext 1—NextGen Inevitable




NextGen is inevitable—cost issues are preventing successful deployment


Christopher Mims July 8th, 2011. “NextGen Will Change Air Travel. Why the Delay?” Txchnologist.com—magazine sponsored by GE that covers science and technology. Christopher Mims is a Txchnologist writer. http://www.txchnologist.com/2011/nextgen-will-change-air-travel-why-the-delay

The way we prevent planes from crashing into one another hasn’t changed much since World War II. But by 2020, and in some places much sooner, air traffic control, navigation, and the nature of flight itself will undergo a transformation as momentous as the invention of radar itself. The results, according to the Federal Aviation Administration, will be safer skies, fewer delays, and significantly lower costs – for the taxpayer, at least.¶ To understand just how different Next Generation technology, or NextGen, is from our current air traffic control system, it helps to know a little about the one we have now. The first thing to know is that pilots generally have little idea where other planes are. All of that knowledge resides with the air traffic controller, and even his or her picture of the sky is limited. Ground radar over major air routes only sweeps the sky once every 12 seconds, while radar at terminals sweeps every four. In four seconds, a jet can travel several miles… But who will pay? The fact that NextGen will reduce costs for the FAA, by eliminating the need for many expensive radar installations and the overtaxed air traffic controllers who run them, has led some in industry to conclude that the agency should foot most of the bill.¶ The FAA has already spent $4.4 billion of the $7 billion it currently has allotted to realize NextGen. To incentivize airlines to cover the cost of retrofitting their own planes with ADS-B and, in some cases, new navigational systems, which Hansman says can run to hundreds of thousands of dollars a plane for a large commercial aircraft, the agency is considering giving carriers who install the equipment before the 2020 deadline privileged access to airports.¶ If that doesn’t work, there’s always the argument that, as fuel costs rise, the routes that can be plotted with precise satellite navigation will save enough fuel to justify the cost of retrofits. Southwest Airlines has already made this kind of commitment, and is saving $16 million a year in fuel as a result. It’s also been proposed that the FAA subsidize airlines’ costs for upgrading, but that seems unlikely in the current fiscal climate in Washington.¶ Many of the benefits of NextGen, such as safety and improved awareness for America’s many small airplanes, are public goods that are not likely to be justified on the grounds of cost alone, anyway. That’s just one of the reasons it has taken this long to realize a system that was first proposed in the 1980s. Another is that a misconception remains that NextGen is a monolithic enterprise that will be realized all at once, and can’t be rolled out in pieces.¶ “NextGen is completely based on an incremental rollout; it’s designed to be scalable” says Laura Brown, deputy assistant administrator for public affairs at the FAA. One of the dimensions of the technology that will continue to scale is a feature of NextGen that will be present only in the U.S.: A high-bandwidth data channel, known as UAT, which will allow ground controllers to send almost any kind of digital communication to planes.

NextGen rollout will fail without cost confidence and assurance.


Hinton 11 (Christopher, Reporter – MarketWatch, “Airlines Uneasy Over Costly Bid to Replace Radar”, MarketWatch, 5-19, http://www.marketwatch.com/Story/story/print?guid=D235C056-7D9A-11E0-915A-00212804637C)

Help was supposed to come by scrapping the 1950s-era ground-based air-traffic control system in favor of a 21st-century satellite-based tracking technology. GPS-assisted aircraft could then fly closer together, react faster to changing flight conditions and optimize their landing approaches.¶ It’s an upgrade that could save the airlines hundred of millions of dollars a yearBut the U.S. plan to achieve that, estimated to cost $40 billion, is stuck on the groundPoor planning and the politics of fiscal austerity have left the system only partially installed. Now, airline executives are so disillusioned that they’re balking at buying additional cockpit gear for a program they say isn’t delivering on its promise.¶ Even avionic suppliers with rich contracts at stake in the plan came up with a novel way of making their equipment more affordable, aircraft operators haven’t changed their position.¶ “Many carriers — Delta, Southwest, American, United — we have all made significant investments in equipage for our existing fleets that we are not using,” said Delta Air Lines (NYSE:DAL) Chief Executive Richard Anderson, during a recent conference call with reporters. “We want to leverage the technology we have today before we add more technology and more cost.”¶ For the Federal Aviation Administration, which is overseeing the so-called NextGen plan, the loss of confidence is another black eye for an agency still smarting from the furor over napping air-traffic controllers and a sharp rise in close calls of mid-air collisions.¶ In a watchdog report last week, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s inspector general criticized the FAA for not coming up with an “integrated master schedule” for NextGen, and highlighted design decisions that put the entire program’s cost and schedule targets at further risk.¶ Growth goals¶ In the long run, such uncertainty threatens to undermine the program and its broader economic benefits.Local officials in the New York area have been hopeful that NextGen would not only drive down delay times, but also allow more aircraft to land at its airports and help spur more than $5 billion in growth by 2030.¶ For the FAA’s part, agency officials have shrugged off the concerns and defended NextGen phase-in as being on schedule since work began in 2004.¶ Once it’s online, NextGen is supposed to replace a radar system that first took shape in the aftermath of World War II.¶ Essentially a GPS system, NextGen is designed to be more accurate than radar and allow computers to track aircraft. Instead of flying in easy-to-monitor “skyways,” pilots could go “off road” and fly more efficient trajectories, supporters say.¶ The system would also help pilots plan their flight times and plot optimal landing approaches, and it allows dispatchers to narrow the space between arriving aircraft to less than a mile compared with the roughly three miles now maintained. Such optimizing is estimated to reduce flight delays by 35%, lowering fuel use and cutting pollution.¶ With the price for jet fuel up four-fold in the last decade, it’s a system the airlines can’t start using soon enough. But higher fuel prices have also squeezed profit margins, and some airlines say they can no longer stomach NextGen upgrades done haphazardly or subject to delay.¶ At the same time, the program’s potential $160 billion in build-out costs over 15 years represent a lucrative target for aerospace and avionics companies like ITT Corp. (USC:ITT) , Boeing Co. (NYSE:BA) , Lockheed Martin Corp. (NYSE:LMT) , Honeywell International Inc. (NYSE:HON) , and General Electric Co. (NYSE:GE) .¶ Last month, avionic companies acted to soften airlines’ hardened position by having Congressional allies propose a public-private partnership as part of an FAA funding bill. The arrangement aims to lease avionic equipment to aircraft operators, with options to buy.¶ Loan guarantees¶ Called the NextGen Equipage Fund, it would be financed with $1.5 billion in private capital, with ITT as the lead investor, and largely guaranteed by the federal government.¶ Backers say the fund’s advantage is that it can equip the airlines without a large cash outlay or taking on more debt, and payments would be deferred until the FAA delivers the related services, according to Russell Chew, managing partner of Nexa General Partnership Capital, which would manage the fund.¶ “The deferred payments are an important selling point to airlines that are short on cash, or have been burnt by the U.S. in past attempts to upgrade the traffic-control system,” Chew said.¶ Some of that equipment would include Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast, which gives pilots highly accurate data on an aircraft’s position in relation to others. That would allow pilots to fly more efficient trajectories between airports and closely line up their planes on final runway approaches, shortening the times between individual landings and saving fuel.¶ It could also include revamping communications with a data-exchange system between air traffic controllers and pilots, decreasing the reliance on voice communication and reducing the chance of error. It would also streamline departure clearances, airborne reroutes and taxiway information.¶ “The fund is enough to equip up to 75% of the retrofit-able aircraft,” Chew said. “And the airlines need the majority of other airlines to get equipped; otherwise you have a mix of planes that burdens air traffic control and reduces NextGen use.”¶ The House passed the FAA funding bill in April, and it now awaits reconciliation with a version cleared in the Senate.¶ “If the fund did pass, it would certainly benefit us significantly,” said Clay Jones, CEO of Rockwell Collins Inc. (NYSE:COL) , which builds some the cockpit equipment. “The fund would accelerate airlines’ move to NextGen.”The ground equipment for Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast should be in place by 2013, the FAA says.

Agencies have already made NextGen a top priority


Aaron Karp January 13, 2012. “US Chamber says NextGen ATC should be a ‘top priority’” Air Transport World, Aaron Karp is an associate writer and researcher. http://atwonline.com/operations-maintenance/news/us-chamber-says-nextgen-atc-should-be-top-priority-0112

US Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Thomas Donohue called on Congress to make transitioning to a satellite-based, NextGen air traffic control (ATC) system "a top priority." Delivering his annual "State of American Business" address in Washington Thursday, the influential business lobbyist said upgrading ATC should be part of a "broader effort to modernize the nation's entire physical platform."¶ Financing for the NextGen system is tied up in long-stalled talks in Congress over FAA reauthorization; FAA's latest temporary funding extension expires Jan. 31 (ATW Daily News, Sept. 19, 2011). Donohue said that a "new NextGen air traffic control system ... will ease delays, conserve fuel, create jobs and save lives."
NextGen is inevitable—the FAA is going to move forward with the initiative but will fail without funding security.

Rutrell Yasin March 21, 2012. “NextGen air traffic control plan moves ahead despite uncertain funding forecast.” Federal Computer Week- Strategy and Business Management for Government Leaders. http://fcw.com/articles/2011/03/21/faa-nextgen-2011-ppan.aspx



The Federal Aviation Administration is riding a wave of momentum toward meeting its midterm vision for the NextGen National AirSpace System, but it also faces many technical, programmatic and organizational challenges, according to FAA’s recently released 2011 NextGen Implementation Plan.¶ Chief among the hurdles are uncertainties over funding and the contributions of other agencies in what is a collaborative project.¶ Funding concerns linger for the program, especially amid talk of spending cuts on Capitol Hill and the release of a Transportation Department inspector general's report last April that questioned the FAA’s ability to deliver on the project.




Download 1.29 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   32




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page