7. Comments:
Revision: Signature: Date:
APPENDIX B
Course Name:
Tom Baker Cancer Centre UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY
Department of Medical Physics Instructor(s)
COURSE EVALUATION
Date:
The opinions you express may be used to assist the Instructor in improving the course for future students, and to assist the University in assessing the teaching skills of the Instructor. We ask you to be both candid and thorough with your comments. This form can be completed electronically. Please forward completed evaluations to the Administrative Assistant for Academic Programs.
Choose only one answer for each question unless otherwise instructed.
-
Student perspective
Please provide the following information about yourself and your participation in this class.
Before enrolling I had an interest in the subject matter of this course.
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral/undecided
Disagree
Strongly disagree
I wanted to take this course.
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral/Undecided
Disagree
Strongly disagree
This course for me was:
Required Elective
I attended approximately this percentage of class meetings:
Less than 60%
60 – 69%
70 – 79%
80 – 89%
90 – 100%
I expect a final grade in this course of:
A
B
C
D
Other
-
General Evaluation of the Course
-
How would you rate this course?
-
How much have you learned in this course?
-
For me, the course was:
-
The workload in the course was:
-
The course pace was:
-
This course was well organized.
-
My responsibilities as a student in this course were
made clear.
-
Evaluation and grading methods were clear and fair.
-
The readings contributed to my understanding of
course content.
-
The assignments contributed to my understanding of
course content.
Name up to three major strengths of the course:
-
-
-
Name up to three ways to improve the course:
-
-
-
-
Instructor(s) Feedback:
Instructor #1:
-
The instructor made clear and understandable presentations.
-
The instructor’s oral and visual presentations helped me understand the subject matter.
-
The instructor stimulated questions and interest in the subject matter.
-
The instructor was available to answer questions and discuss complex material outside of class time.
-
The instructor treated all students in the class equally and with respect.
-
The instructor demonstrated good knowledge of the course content.
-
The instructor provided feedback on my performance in a reasonable amount of time.
What overall rating would you give this instructor?
Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor
What would you recommend to improve the instructor’s performance?
Instructor #2:
-
The instructor made clear and understandable presentations.
-
The instructor’s oral and visual presentations helped me understand the subject matter.
-
The instructor stimulated questions and interest in the subject matter.
-
The instructor was available to answer questions and discuss complex material outside of class time.
-
The instructor treated all students in the class equally and with respect.
-
The instructor demonstrated good knowledge of the course content.
-
The instructor provided feedback on my performance in a reasonable amount of time.
What overall rating would you give this instructor?
Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor
What would you recommend to improve the instructor’s performance?
Instructor #3:
-
The instructor made clear and understandable presentations.
-
The instructor’s oral and visual presentations helped me understand the subject matter.
-
The instructor stimulated questions and interest in the subject matter.
-
The instructor was available to answer questions and discuss complex material outside of class time.
-
The instructor treated all students in the class equally and with respect.
-
The instructor demonstrated good knowledge of the course content.
-
The instructor provided feedback on my performance in a reasonable amount of time.
What overall rating would you give this instructor?
Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor
What would you recommend to improve the instructor’s performance?
Name Signature Date
(optional))
 
APPENDIX C
University of Calgary/Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Department of Medical Physics
Radiation Oncology Physics Residency Program
MDPH 711 & 712 CLINICAL Performance Evaluation
Resident: | Course No: | Course Start Date: | Course Finish Date: | Date of Report: | Contributing Instructors: | Course Leader: |
|
Topic
|
Poor Excellent
|
N/A
|
|
Interactions with others
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Constructive and effective communication
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Oral and written communication
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Anticipation, analysis and reaction to problems
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Judgement
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Seeks advice and guidance when appropriate
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Contribution of innovative ideas
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Initiative
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Motivation
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Interest and enthusiasm
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Effort
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Preparation
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Time management
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Documentation
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Prioritization
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Multitasking
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Compliance with established policies and procedures
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Equipment handling
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Skill development
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Participation in meetings/discussions
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Evaluation and enquiry skills
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Professional development
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Teaching preparation and delivery
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Teaching effectiveness
|
1 2 3 4 5
|
|
|
Share with your friends: | 
