VOLUME 6: GROUND AND LAUNCH PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT, SYSTEMS, AND MATERIAL OPERATIONS SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
|
I
|
|
|
This manual implements NASA Procedural Requirements related to NASA ELV payloads including NPR 8715.7 Expendable Launch Vehicle Payload Safety Program and AFSPCMAN 91-710 Range Safety User Requirements Manual as it applies to NASA payloads. It also implements NPR 8715.3, NASA General Safety Program Requirements; Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 3100.10, Space Policy; DoDD 3200.11, Major Range and Test Facility Base; Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 91-1, Nuclear Weapons and Systems Surety; AFPD 91-2, Safety Programs; and AFPD 63-12, Assurance of Occupational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness.
|
I
|
|
|
This volume contains NASA and Air Force Range Safety requirements for NASA ELV payload projects and related personnel and equipment, systems, and material operations on NASA or NASA contracted facilities and on the Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) ranges, including the Eastern Range (ER) and Western Range (WR). This volume, as does this publication, applies to all NASA ELV payload projects, payload project related operations, payload project related personnel (NASA, contractors, or persons with other agencies) whether involved directly on the project, a payload instrument, GSE or the facility. Like the rest of this publication, this requires tailoring to accommodate NASA ELV payload projects processing and launching from Air Force ranges. This publication may be tailored for other ranges and launch facilities however local range and safety requirements must be included and coordinated in the tailoring.
The following major topics are addressed: payload project responsibilities; ground operations policies; documentation requirements; ground operations general requirements; material handling equipment, crane and hoist, personnel platform, powered industrial truck, and elevator operations; acoustic hazard operations; non-ionizing radiation operations; radioactive (ionizing radiation) sources operations; hazardous materials operations; ground support and flight hardware pressure systems operations; ordnance operations; electrical systems operations; motor vehicle operations; convoy operations; launch operations; and solid rocket motor and motor segment operations.
|
I
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
I
|
|
|
Applicability
All NASA ELV payload projects are subject to the requirements of this volume to ensure that operations are conducted safely.
|
I
|
|
|
Organization of the Volume |
I
|
|
|
1.2.1. Main Chapters. The main chapters of this volume include common requirements for all payload risk classifications. Appendixes include additional requirements to supplement the main chapters.
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.2. Open Text. The open text contains the actual mandatory performance-based requirements. The only tailoring expected for these requirements would be the deletion of non-applicable requirements. For example, solid rocket motor performance requirements would be deleted for launch systems that do not use solid rocket motors.
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3. Bordered Paragraphs
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.1. Bordered paragraphs are non-mandatory and are used to identify some of the potential detailed technical solutions that meet the performance requirements. In addition, the bordered paragraphs contain lessons learned from previous applications of the performance requirement, where a certain design may have been found successful, or have been tried and failed to meet the requirement. These technical solutions are provided for the following reasons:
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.1.1. To aid the tailoring process between the PSWG, Range Safety and the payload project in evaluating a potential system against all the performance requirements.
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.1.2. To aid the PSWG, Range Safety and the payload project in implementing lessons learned.
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.1.3. To provide benchmarks that demonstrate what the PSWG and Range Safety considers an acceptable technical solution/implementation of the performance requirement and to help convey the level of safety the performance requirement is intended to achieve.
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.2. The technical solutions in the bordered paragraphs may be adopted into the tailored version of the requirements for a specific program when the payload project intends to use that solution to meet the performance requirement. At this point, they become mandatory requirements to obtain the PSWG and Range Safety approval. This process is done to:
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.2.1. Provide an appropriate level of detail necessary for contractual efforts and to promote efficiency in the design process.
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.2.2. Avoid contractual misunderstandings that experience has shown often occur if an appropriate level of detail is not agreed to. The level of detail in the bordered paragraphs is necessary to avoid costly out-of-scope contractual changes and to prevent inadvertently overlooking a critical technical requirement.
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.3. The payload project always has the option to propose alternatives to the bordered paragraph solutions. Payload project proposed alternative solutions shall achieve an equivalent level of Safety and be approved by the PSWG and Range Safety. After meeting these two requirements, the payload project proposed solutions become part of the tailored requirements from this publication for that specific project.
|
I
|
|
|
1.2.3.4. The PSWG and Range Safety determines whether the payload project proposed detailed technical solutions meet the intent of this document.
|
I
|
|
|
Compliance Documents
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (29 CFR), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR), Department of Transportation (DOT) (49 CFR), NASA procedural requirements (NPRs) documents including NPR 8715.7, NASA Standards, Air Force instructions (AFIs), and industry standards are specified as compliance documents throughout this volume. When there is a conflict between federal regulations, industry standards, local requirements, and other requirements, the more stringent requirement shall be used.
|
I
|
|
|
| |
I
|
|
|
Payload Safety Working Group
The PSWG consists of safety engineers and personnel from the NASA payload project (NASA and contractor), NASA Launch Services SMA with participation from the Launch Site Integration Manager (LSIM), Air Force Range Safety, the Launch Services Provider contractor organization, the payload processing facility safety representative, and others as needed in accordance with NPR 8715.7. The PSWG is responsible for ensuring the review and approval of all safety deliverables required by this document. Specific responsibilities of the PSWG are provided in NPR 8715.7 and include the following:
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.1. Review and Approval.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.1.2. Ground Operations Plans (GOPs).
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.1.6. Other documents as specified in this publication and NPR 8715.7.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.1.7. During the review and approval process, both the PSWG and the payload project shall assure timely coordination with other authorities as appropriate. Other authorities include, but are not limited to, appropriate Radiation Officer (RPO), Environmental Health, Institutional Safety, Pad Safety, Occupational Health/Medical, Civil Engineering, and the Fire Department.
|
C
|
|
|
2.1.2. General
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.2.1. Ensuring that hazardous and safety critical facilities are periodically inspected as required.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.2.2. Monitoring hazardous and safety critical operations.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.2.3. Defining the threat envelopes of all hazardous operations that may affect public safety or launch base safety and establishing safety clearance zones.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3. Pad Safety. Although the following are not payload project requirements, it is intended that the payload project be familiar with some of the key responsibilities of the Pad Safety function as they relate to the payload project's safety requirements. Pad Safety functions are performed by the local launch pad Ground Safety organization, referred to as Pad Safety.
Note: The payload project should also be familiar with the Payload Processing Facility (PPF) safety requirements, facility features and facility personnel responsibilities and functions as they relate to the payload project’s operations and safety.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1. General Responsibilities. Pad Safety shall participate in meetings and events as directed by Range Safety, including the following.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.1. Observe, evaluate, and enforce compliance of Range Safety requirements by all personnel within the launch complexes, assembly and checkout areas, propellant and ordnance storage areas, and other areas as deemed appropriate by Range Safety.
Note: Pad Safety personnel shall not be denied access to any range area where hazardous operations are conducted.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.2. Review and provide comments on hazardous procedures to Range Safety.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.3. Review and provide comments on system design data and operating procedures.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.4. Implement specified safety precautions and impose safety holds, when necessary, during ground operations, as required by procedures or OSP.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.5. Assist in the resolution of safety problems in areas where Pad Safety has jurisdiction.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.6. Attend meetings and conferences that involve safety working groups and facility working groups, technical interchange meetings, etc., as necessary.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.7. Coordinate with the RPO/RSO to ensure enforcement of the Radiation Control Program in all areas where launch vehicles, payloads, and their related hazards are located.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.8. Coordinate with Bioenvironmental Engineering and Environmental Health (both Health Physics and Industrial Hygiene) on environmental health hazards.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.9. Notify Environmental Health, Range Safety, Range Scheduling (30 SW), and Cape Support (45 SW) immediately anytime an incident involves an environmental health hazard.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.10. When present, Pad Safety shall ensure the evacuation of personnel from launch complexes and facilities and operations are halted when a lightning hazard is imminent in accordance with the various safety plans.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.11. Respond to mishaps and/or incidents in accordance with 30/45 SW OPLANs 32-1
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.1.12. Assist payload projects on safety related issues.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.2. Hazardous and Safety Critical Pad Support. Pad Safety shall provide oversight of the payload project for the following:
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.2.1. Ensure compliance with established directives and procedures during hazardous and safety critical operations.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.2.2. Assess procedure deviations and resolve with Range Safety, as necessary.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.2.3. Ensure the number of personnel is kept to a minimum in designated safety clearance zones in accordance with Range Safety approved procedures.
Note: Pad Safety shall be included in the maximum allowable manning level, unless Range Safety determines that adequate support can be provided from a remote location.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.2.4. Ensure a comprehensive safety briefing is conducted and understood by participants prior to the start of a hazardous operation.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.2.5. Control personnel access into safety clearance zones during hazardous operations.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.2.6. Advise the operation control authority on whether or not to stop operations when a hazardous condition or a safety compromise exists.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.2.7. Allow operations to resume only after the imminent danger no longer exists and safety requirements are met.
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.3. Notifications
|
I
|
|
|
2.1.3.3.1. Immediately notify the appropriate agency (Command Post at the 30 SW and Range Safety at the 45 SW) of any launch vehicle or payload mishap, hazard, handling malfunction, or other incident creating or contributing to an unsafe condition for personnel or critical hardware.
|
I
|
|
|
