November 2005 Review Period: July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005 Table of Contents
Download
1.98 Mb.
Page
21/44
Date
14.08.2017
Size
1.98 Mb.
#32054
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
44
Navigate this page:
Graph 11 Graph 12
Graph 15 Appendix D5c Academic Program Review
Department N = 215 (response rate = 31.9 percent) University (17 departments) N = 704 (response rate = 35.8 percent) Table 1
Graph 1 Graph 2
Graph 5 Graph 6
Graph 7 Graph 8
Graph 9 Graph 10
Graph 11 Graph 12
Graph 13 Graph 14
Table 3
University
Department
N
%
N
%
Gender
Female
1477
71.2
68
88.3
Male
597
28.8
9
11.7
Graph 15
Appendix D5c
Academic
Program Review
School Of Social Work
Undergraduate
Alumni Survey
University Comparisons Report
March 2005
Department N = 215 (response rate = 31.9 percent)
University (17 departments) N = 704 (response rate = 35.8 percent)
Table 1
University
Department
University
Department
N
%
N
%
Mean*
SD
Mean*
SD
Faculty members in the department were interested in the academic development of undergraduate majors.
Strongly
disagree
26
3.7
11
5.2
4.05
1.058
4.16
1.124
2
31
4.5
10
4.7
3
122
17.6
23
10.8
4
218
31.4
58
27.4
Strongly agree
298
42.9
110
51.9
The undergraduate program of study was academically challenging.
Strongly disagree
19
2.7
15
7.0
4.06
.972
3.85
1.187
2
33
4.7
18
8.4
3
100
14.2
25
11.7
4
288
40.9
83
38.8
Strongly agree
264
37.5
73
34.1
Faculty in the department were appropriately prepared for their courses.
Strongly disagree
21
3.0
16
7.5
4.24
.969
4.08
1.160
2
20
2.8
6
2.8
3
79
11.2
21
9.8
4
231
32.9
72
33.6
Strongly agree
352
50.1
99
46.3
I feel the undergraduate program prepared me for my professional career and/or further study.
Strongly disagree
43
6.3
16
7.6
3.71
1.206
3.83
1.226
2
78
11.5
17
8.1
3
130
19.1
32
15.2
4
213
31.3
68
32.2
Strongly agree
217
31.9
78
37.0
There was open communication between faculty and undergraduate students about student concerns.
Strongly disagree
40
5.8
13
6.2
3.82
1.158
3.94
1.179
2
56
8.1
13
6.2
3
125
18.2
34
16.3
4
233
33.9
62
29.7
Strongly agree
234
34.0
87
41.6
Class size was suitable for effective learning.
Strongly disagree
24
3.4
15
7.0
4.17
1.028
4.16
1.155
2
32
4.6
7
3.3
3
81
11.6
16
7.5
4
229
32.7
66
31.0
Strongly agree
335
47.8
109
51.2
*Mean range: 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Don’t know/not applicable excluded from analysis.
Graph 1 Graph 2
Graph 3 Graph 4
Graph 5 Graph 6
Table 2
University
Department
University
Department
N
%
N
%
Mean*
SD
Mean*
SD
Academic advisement
available in the department
Poor
58
8.7
4
1.9
3.62
1.259
3.98
1.023
2
75
11.3
16
7.6
3
123
18.6
40
19.0
4
209
31.5
71
33.8
Excellent
198
29.9
79
37.6
Career advisement available in the department
Poor
81
13.4
8
4.0
2.99
1.215
3.41
1.043
2
130
21.6
31
15.3
3
182
30.2
64
31.7
4
135
22.4
69
34.2
Excellent
75
12.4
30
14.9
Availability of faculty to students
outside the classroom
Poor
12
1.8
4
1.9
3.89
1.013
4.09
.964
2
58
8.5
10
4.9
3
146
21.3
33
16.0
4
245
35.8
76
36.9
Excellent
223
32.6
83
40.3
Effectiveness of teaching methods used by faculty
Poor
8
1.1
3
1.4
4.02
.889
4.08
.887
2
31
4.4
8
3.7
3
130
18.5
34
15.9
4
305
43.4
93
43.5
Excellent
229
32.6
76
35.5
Procedures used to
evaluate student performance
Poor
15
2.2
4
1.9
3.82
.944
3.85
.881
2
48
7.0
9
4.2
3
144
21.1
49
23.0
4
316
46.3
103
48.4
Excellent
159
23.3
48
22.5
Frequency of undergraduate
major course offerings
Poor
41
5.9
8
3.8
3.51
1.128
3.71
1.029
2
83
12.0
19
9.0
3
196
28.3
45
21.4
4
225
32.5
92
43.8
Excellent
148
21.4
46
21.9
Variety of undergraduate major course offerings
Poor
28
4.1
8
3.8
3.65
1.100
3.64
1.042
2
80
11.6
23
10.8
3
171
24.7
50
23.6
4
237
34.3
88
41.5
Excellent
175
25.3
43
20.3
Clarity of degree requirements
Poor
26
3.7
4
1.9
3.97
1.057
4.22
.936
2
48
6.9
9
4.2
3
98
14.1
24
11.2
4
271
38.9
76
35.5
Excellent
254
36.4
101
47.2
*Mean range: 1=poor to 5=excellent
Directory:
files
->
2017
2017 -> Richard Overy. Why The Allies Won
2017 -> Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
2017 -> To all attendees
2017 -> Final Research Paper: The Falklands War
2017 -> Temporary Autonomous Zones: Anarchist Gatherings, 1988-2017
2017 -> Master msk anatomy Structure List Back
2017 -> City of Colorado Springs
2017 -> Board of Student Advisers Harvard Law School
2017 -> AmeriCorps Project Conserve Member Application 2017-2018 Application Deadline: May 31, 2017
Download
1.98 Mb.
Share with your friends:
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
44
The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message
Main page
united states
national association
united kingdom
last decade
other half
most notable
faculty members
self-study
other units
review period