November 2005 Review Period: July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005 Table of Contents



Download 1.98 Mb.
Page21/44
Date14.08.2017
Size1.98 Mb.
#32054
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   ...   44

Graph 7 Graph 8



Graph 9 Graph 10


Graph 11 Graph 12



Graph 13 Graph 14




Table 3



University

Department

N

%

N

%

Gender

Female

1477

71.2

68

88.3

Male

597

28.8

9

11.7



Graph 15


Appendix D5c

Academic Program Review

School Of Social Work

Undergraduate Alumni Survey

University Comparisons Report

March 2005
Department N = 215 (response rate = 31.9 percent)

University (17 departments) N = 704 (response rate = 35.8 percent)
Table 1



University

Department

University

Department

N

%

N

%

Mean*

SD

Mean*

SD

Faculty members in the department were interested in the academic development of undergraduate majors.



Strongly disagree

26

3.7

11

5.2

4.05

1.058

4.16

1.124

2

31

4.5

10

4.7

3

122

17.6

23

10.8

4

218

31.4

58

27.4

Strongly agree

298

42.9

110

51.9

The undergraduate program of study was academically challenging.

Strongly disagree

19

2.7

15

7.0

4.06

.972

3.85

1.187

2

33

4.7

18

8.4

3

100

14.2

25

11.7

4

288

40.9

83

38.8

Strongly agree

264

37.5

73

34.1

Faculty in the department were appropriately prepared for their courses.

Strongly disagree

21

3.0

16

7.5

4.24

.969

4.08

1.160

2

20

2.8

6

2.8

3

79

11.2

21

9.8

4

231

32.9

72

33.6

Strongly agree

352

50.1

99

46.3

I feel the undergraduate program prepared me for my professional career and/or further study.

Strongly disagree

43

6.3

16

7.6

3.71

1.206

3.83

1.226

2

78

11.5

17

8.1

3

130

19.1

32

15.2

4

213

31.3

68

32.2

Strongly agree

217

31.9

78

37.0

There was open communication between faculty and undergraduate students about student concerns.



Strongly disagree

40

5.8

13

6.2

3.82

1.158

3.94

1.179

2

56

8.1

13

6.2

3

125

18.2

34

16.3

4

233

33.9

62

29.7

Strongly agree

234

34.0

87

41.6

Class size was suitable for effective learning.

Strongly disagree

24

3.4

15

7.0

4.17

1.028

4.16

1.155

2

32

4.6

7

3.3

3

81

11.6

16

7.5

4

229

32.7

66

31.0

Strongly agree

335

47.8

109

51.2

*Mean range: 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Don’t know/not applicable excluded from analysis.

Graph 1 Graph 2



Graph 3 Graph 4



Graph 5 Graph 6



Table 2



University

Department

University

Department

N

%

N

%

Mean*

SD

Mean*

SD

Academic advisement available in the department

Poor

58

8.7

4

1.9

3.62

1.259

3.98

1.023

2

75

11.3

16

7.6

3

123

18.6

40

19.0

4

209

31.5

71

33.8

Excellent

198

29.9

79

37.6

Career advisement available in the department



Poor

81

13.4

8

4.0

2.99

1.215

3.41

1.043

2

130

21.6

31

15.3

3

182

30.2

64

31.7

4

135

22.4

69

34.2

Excellent

75

12.4

30

14.9

Availability of faculty to students outside the classroom



Poor

12

1.8

4

1.9

3.89

1.013

4.09

.964

2

58

8.5

10

4.9

3

146

21.3

33

16.0

4

245

35.8

76

36.9

Excellent

223

32.6

83

40.3

Effectiveness of teaching methods used by faculty



Poor

8

1.1

3

1.4

4.02

.889

4.08

.887

2

31

4.4

8

3.7

3

130

18.5

34

15.9

4

305

43.4

93

43.5

Excellent

229

32.6

76

35.5

Procedures used to evaluate student performance

Poor

15

2.2

4

1.9

3.82

.944

3.85

.881

2

48

7.0

9

4.2

3

144

21.1

49

23.0

4

316

46.3

103

48.4

Excellent

159

23.3

48

22.5

Frequency of undergraduate major course offerings



Poor

41

5.9

8

3.8

3.51

1.128

3.71

1.029

2

83

12.0

19

9.0

3

196

28.3

45

21.4

4

225

32.5

92

43.8

Excellent

148

21.4

46

21.9

Variety of undergraduate major course offerings



Poor

28

4.1

8

3.8

3.65

1.100

3.64

1.042

2

80

11.6

23

10.8

3

171

24.7

50

23.6

4

237

34.3

88

41.5

Excellent

175

25.3

43

20.3

Clarity of degree requirements

Poor

26

3.7

4

1.9

3.97

1.057

4.22

.936

2

48

6.9

9

4.2

3

98

14.1

24

11.2

4

271

38.9

76

35.5

Excellent

254

36.4

101

47.2

*Mean range: 1=poor to 5=excellent


Download 1.98 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   ...   44




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page