November 2005 Review Period: July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2005 Table of Contents

Download 1.98 Mb.

Page	18/44
Date	14.08.2017
Size	1.98 Mb.
	#32054

1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 44

Appendix D5a

Academic Program Review

Department Of Social Work

Faculty Survey University Comparisons Report

February 2005
Department of Social N = 14 (response rate = 82.4 percent)

University (21 departments) N = 461 (response rate = 83.8 percent)
Table 1

		University		Department		University		Department
		N	%	N	%	Mean*	SD	Mean*	SD
Scholarship of the faculty in the department	Poor	4	.9	1	7.1	4.24	.824	4.29	1.069
	2	7	1.6	0	.0
	3	65	14.6	0	.0
	4	171	38.5	6	42.9
	Excellent	197	44.4	7	50.0
Frequency of required course offerings	Poor	0	.0	0	.0	4.18	.785	4.07	.730
	2	12	2.9	1	7.1
	3	62	14.8	0	.0
	4	184	44.0	10	71.4
	Excellent	160	38.3	3	21.4
Variety of advanced course offerings	Poor	6	1.4	0	.0	3.90	.935	3.93	.829
	2	30	7.0	1	7.1
	3	84	19.5	2	14.3
	4	189	44.0	8	57.1
	Excellent	121	28.1	3	21.4
Level of clerical staff support	Poor	30	6.8	2	14.3	3.70	1.189	3.21	1.311
	2	39	8.9	2	14.3
	3	100	22.7	3	21.4
	4	136	30.9	5	35.7
	Excellent	135	30.7	2	14.3
Clarity of departmental goals for the next two years	Poor	32	7.4	0	.0	3.67	1.227	4.43	.938
	2	42	9.7	1	7.1
	3	104	24.0	1	7.1
	4	116	26.8	3	21.4
	Excellent	139	32.1	9	64.3
Availability of computer/data base software relevant to your work	Poor	12	3.0	0	.0	4.07	1.041	4.71	.469
	2	23	5.8	0	.0
	3	59	14.9	0	.0
	4	131	33.2	4	28.6
	Excellent	170	43.0	10	71.4

*Mean range: 1=poor to 5=excellent

Graph 1 Graph 2

Graph 3 Graph 4

Graph 5 Graph 6

Table 2

		University		Department		University		Department
		N	%	N	%	Mean*	SD	Mean*	SD
The department's program of study is academically challenging.	Strongly disagree	8	1.8	0	.0	4.12	.932	4.29	.611
	2	19	4.3	0	.0
	3	64	14.4	1	7.1
	4	174	39.1	8	57.1
	Strongly agree	180	40.4	5	35.7
Faculty in the department work together toward program goals.	Strongly disagree	27	6.0	0	.0	3.84	1.155	4.57	.756
	2	28	6.3	0	.0
	3	94	21.0	2	14.3
	4	140	31.3	2	14.3
	Strongly agree	158	35.3	10	71.4
In our department, faculty feel comfortable expressing different views and opinions.	Strongly disagree	33	7.4	0	.0	3.88	1.228	4.50	.855
	2	33	7.4	1	7.1
	3	69	15.5	0	.0
	4	131	29.4	4	28.6
	Strongly agree	180	40.4	9	64.3
I have adequate opportunities to influence decisions made in the department about our programs.	Strongly disagree	25	5.7	0	.0	3.83	1.220	4.29	1.069
	2	50	11.3	1	7.1
	3	70	15.9	3	21.4
	4	124	28.1	1	7.1
	Strongly agree	172	39.0	9	64.3
Guidelines regarding job performance are clear to faculty in the department.	Strongly disagree	25	5.9	0	.0	3.88	1.168	4.21	1.051
	2	34	8.1	1	7.1
	3	63	14.9	3	21.4
	4	144	34.1	2	14.3
	Strongly agree	156	37.0	8	57.1

Graph 7 Graph 8

Directory: files -> 2017
2017 -> Richard Overy. Why The Allies Won
2017 -> Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
2017 -> To all attendees
2017 -> Final Research Paper: The Falklands War
2017 -> Temporary Autonomous Zones: Anarchist Gatherings, 1988-2017
2017 -> Master msk anatomy Structure List Back
2017 -> City of Colorado Springs
2017 -> Board of Student Advisers Harvard Law School
2017 -> AmeriCorps Project Conserve Member Application 2017-2018 Application Deadline: May 31, 2017

Download 1.98 Mb.

Share with your friends:

1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 44