Sbsp affirmative- arl lab- ndi 2011



Download 1.74 Mb.
Page98/99
Date02.02.2017
Size1.74 Mb.
#15744
1   ...   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99

Theory- Consult Illegit




Consultation counterplans are illegitimate -




  1. Infinitely regressive – the aff can’t predict the infinite possibilities of actors to consult – kills fairness




  1. Education – consult CPs move the round away from topic specific education to discussion of irrelevant NBs and procedurals




  1. Not real world a country never cedes full veto power to another – there’s no historical precedent or literature on the issue because it’s never happened – voter for policymaking and education




  1. Strat skew – they steal the entire 1AC ground and render it useless – gives us only 1 constructive and kills fairness




  1. Future fiat - This proves the CP is delay and magnifies why consult CP’s are bad - the Neg can non-unique DA’s to the CP because its passed later after consultation




***Other CPs***

AT: Private Sector CPs




Private sector fails –




A. No expertise or unity



NSSO, ‘7 National Security Space Office [10/10/07, “Space-Based Solar Power as an Opportunity for Strategic Security: Report to the Director, National Security Space office Interim Assessment Release 0.1,” http://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/final-sbsp-interim-assessment-release-01.pdf, DS]
A similar problem exists in the private sector. US space companies are used to small launch markets with the government as a primary customer and advocate, and do not have a developed business model or speak in a common language with the energy companies. The energy companies have adequate capital and understand their market, but do not understand the aerospace sector. One requires a demonstrated market, while the other requires a demonstrated technical capability. Without a trusted agent to mediate the collaboration and serve as an advocate for supportive policy, progress is likely to be slow.

B. No motivation



NSSO, ‘7 National Security Space Office [10/10/07, “Space-Based Solar Power as an Opportunity for Strategic Security: Report to the Director, National Security Space office Interim Assessment Release 0.1,” http://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/final-sbsp-interim-assessment-release-01.pdf, DS]
When to Transition to Commercial Sector C - 3 At this stage is important to ask why SBSP is not yet being done by the commercial sector. What needs to happen for them to develop a credible interest? There are at least two private entities which are working on making SBSP a reality at the moment. One is actively looking both for investors and prepurchase agreements for the future sale of the power (primarily to India at this stage). Another is proposing a Congressionally chartered corporation (Sunsat Corporation) to create a public/private corporation such as when Comsat (for the development of communications satellites) was created in 1962. Elon Musk, one of the founders of PayPal, while still an undergraduate asked himself “Well, what are the most significant problems humanity faces?” “The three that [came to mind] were space exploration, the internet and clean energy. Just, you know, in terms of what would affect the world the most.” He became wealthy through the internet companies he created. When he was later looking at space businesses to start, he considered SBSP but eliminated it as an option as the necessary inexpensive launch capability did not exist. Instead he decided to work on the issue of cheap launch first, through the creation of SpaceX. (Also concerned about clean energy and the issues of CO2 emissions and global warming, he became a major investor in Tesla Motors, the new electric car company.) Investors and the commercial sector have concerns that still need to be addressed. They need to believe that SBSP is technically possible and that the necessary technologies to make it economically viable are at a sufficient stage of readiness that they can go out and purchase them, should they choose to become involved with SBSP. Intellectual property rights and frequencies for power beaming must be protected. Demonstrations and proofs of concepts are needed. Until business is confident this is practical and doable (and not just technically feasible assuming that various technologies mature) and that it can buy or make the components necessary, it will likely just watch but not act. Incentives would help. These could include loan guarantees, availability of balloon loans (where interest payments are deferred until the SBSP system is operational), transferable tax credits, subsidies similar to those already in existence for other alternative energy sources, energy pre‐purchase agreements, and/or tax holidays on the sale of the power. The commercial sector needs to see profit potential within a reasonable time frame. Electric utilities understand the need for large amounts of capital for infrastructure development. This can be acceptable as long as the payback is large and for an extended period. The payback period and rate of returns must be attractive after the amortization of the infrastructure costs.

Perm solves better – government key to private sector will



NSSO, ‘7 National Security Space Office [10/10/07, “Space-Based Solar Power as an Opportunity for Strategic Security: Report to the Director, National Security Space office Interim Assessment Release 0.1,” http://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/final-sbsp-interim-assessment-release-01.pdf, DS]
FINDING: The SBSP Study Group found that adequate capital exists in the private sector to finance construction, however private capital is unlikely to develop this concept without government assistance because the timeframe of reward and degree of risk are outside the window of normal private sector investment. Capital in the energy and other sectors is available on the level needed for such a large project, but capital flows under fairly conservative criteria, and SBSP has not yet experienced a suitable demonstration, nor have the risks been adequately characterized to make informed business plan decisions.


Aerospace can’t solve – lacks knowledge and resources



NSSO, ‘7 National Security Space Office [10/10/07, “Space-Based Solar Power as an Opportunity for Strategic Security: Report to the Director, National Security Space office Interim Assessment Release 0.1,” http://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/final-sbsp-interim-assessment-release-01.pdf, DS]
FINDING: The SBSP Study Group found that America’s aerospace industry alone does not have all of the necessary skills, knowledge, resources, systems or procedures necessary to effectively and economically develop SBSP in 2007. o Recommendation: The SBSP Study Group recommends that America’s energy companies should be included early on in the development of this new strategic energy resource.



Download 1.74 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page