SEMANTICS
Page a. (Xis inconsistent with (not : (X) These scissors are sharp is inconsistent with These scissors are not sharp.
b. if (Xis tautology, (not : (Xis a contradiction
Apples are fruits is tautologyApples are not fruits is a contradiction.
c. if (Xis a contradiction, (not : (Xis tautology Apples are animals is a contradiction.
Apples are not animals is a tautology.
We have said there is not a double not in a positive proposition, or the negation of positive proposition cannot be two. If for example, the following negative proposition (contain in two negations)
John did not open the door,
can be accepted (in the sense that it is grammatical, the rule such d. (not : (Xis synonymous with (X, will agree.
But if we deal with Leech’s expression : “ And if we want to make its meaning clear we have to use intonation (Leech 1981 : 172). He was concerning herewith ambiguous sentence. Nevertheless, we can apply this to
the negative proposition above, in away that we put the voice fall on not
SEMANTICS
Page the first) in a low pitch, and to the second we make the voice rise/stressed a little. So it becomes John did not open the door.
So that it is possible to use more than one negation
for the sake of emphasis, like the following John did not, not, not, not,……………………………………
open the door.
Rosenbaum said that we can produce along,
longer sentence as we want,
but we can slip upon the uneffective meaning. Similarly with our notes above.
Share with your friends: