EXT: 1NC #4
Another GPS failure is inevitable
Coursey 9 (David, technology writer, broadcaster, and marketing consultant, “GPS System Could Begin to Fail Within a Year”, PC World Business Center, http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/165126/gps_system_could_begin_to_fail_within_a_year.html)
The Global Positioning System faces the possibility of failures and blackouts, a federal watchdog agency has warned the U.S. Congress. Mismanagement by and underinvestment by the U.S. Air Force places the GPS at risk of failure in 2010 and beyond. The problem: Delays in launching replacement satellites, among other things. According to the Government Accountability Office report, "In recent years, the Air Force has struggled to successfully build GPS satellites within cost and schedule goals" as part of a $2 billion modernization program. "If the Air Force does not meet its schedule goals for development of GPS IIIA satellites, there will be an increased likelihood that in 2010, as old satellites begin to fail, the overall GPS constellation will fall below the number of satellites required to provide the level of GPS service that the U.S. government commits to." Considered by the GAO to be "essential to national security" the GPS is also widely used by business and consumers and is a driver for next-generation location-based mobile applications used with smartphones and other devices. "Such a gap in capability could have wide-ranging impacts on all GPS users," the GAO report states, "though there are measures the Air Force and others can take to plan for and minimize these impacts." It is hard to imagine the U.S. government could allow this to happen. Actually, that's a lie, it's easy to imagine, but there is also time for corrective action to be taken. The first replacement satellite is expected to be launched this November, some three years after the original launch date. Speeding up future launches can solve the problem, but is likely to come at a high price. The American GPS, though the pioneering consumer satnav system, is not alone. Russia, China, and India each have systems of their own, which are being expanded. The European Union's Galileo system, intended as a rival for GPS, is expected to begin its rollout later this year. The delay and potential failure of GPS gives these other nations the potential to rival the U.S. in space, something the U.S. government is unlikely to accept. The report is a black eye for the Air Force, which developed the GPS system during the 1980s and has maintained it since.
GPS fails
Rawnsley 11
[Adam, is a former think-tanker and contributor to Danger Room who writes about terrorists and pirates “North Korea Jams GPS in War Game Retaliation” http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/03/north-korea-jams-gps-in-war-game-retaliation/]
North Korea isn’t exactly following through on its threats to go to war if the U.S. and South Koreans held military exercises together. Instead, Pyongyang is apparently resorting to a half-assed campaign of jamming and overloading web servers. North Korea is reportedly jamming Global Positioning System (GPS) signals in South Korea, possibly in an attempt to interfere with the U.S.-South Korean annual Key Resolve/Foal Eagle drills, which kicked off on February 28. GPS jammers work by sending a signal that interferes with the communication between a satellite and GPS receiver. It’s a relatively simple operation, with relatively short-range effects. Thus far, cell phones used by civilians and troops and some military equipment have been put on the fritz by the disruption attempts. But the juiciest target for the North’s jamming efforts would be the U.S. and South Korean arsenals of GPS-directed bombs. If it works just right, the GPS jammer can cut off a satellite-guided bomb’s ability to guide itself to target. The bomb simply continues hurtling towards the ground in the direction it was when it lost contact with a satellite. However, these weapons have other means of guiding themselves in the event of jamming. Take theJoint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM), a guidance kit that’s strapped to older, “dumb” bombs to make them more accurate. In addition to GPS, the JDAM kit comes equipped with an Inertial Navigation System (INS), which measures a bomb’s acceleration and uses the information to plot its way to a target. In the event a JDAM’s GPS signal is successfully jammed, it can rely on its INS to guide it, although accuracy is reduced from 5 to 30 meters. That’s not the only backup for U.S. bombs. “Increasingly you see that there are multi-mode smart munitions that have both GPS and laser guided so that if one is not working, the other can,” says John Pike, a defense and aerospace expert and president of Globalsecurity.org. Though he’s not familiar with the specific systems used by the North Korea, Pike says other incidents make him think the U.S. might not have much to worry about in this case. “The jammings that I have been aware of in other instances I would place into the category of ’seriously annoying.’” North Korea is believed to have both a GPS jamming system imported from Russia and a modified version its been shopping around the Middle East, according to South Korea’s Chosun Ilbo. Russia reportedly sold a GPS jamming system to Iraq on the eve of the second Gulf War. And in case you missed that one, jamming wasn’t much of an issue for U.S. bombs. But jamming might not be the only info war trick North Korea’s been up to lately. Last week, at least 29 websites were affected by a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack, which targeted a number of South Korean government, U.S. military and private sector sites. At the moment, the origin of the web traffic flood remains unknown, but North Korea is widely suspected because of its prior history. In June 2009, South Korea intelligence attributed a series of DDoS attacks which targeted a similar portfolio of sites to North Korea.
GPS failure inevitable without space debris
McGrath 9
[THOMAS M. MCGRATH, B.S., Virginia Tech, M.S., Naval Postgraduate School “What Happens if the Stars Go Out? U.S. Army Dependence on the Global Positioning System” 2-2009 http://dodreports.com/pdf/ada520135.pdf] AK
In order to use the Precision Positioning Service (PPS), the receiver must be loaded with cryptography (a system that allows only the receiver to understand the signal) in order to utilize the signal information. Without the cryptography, only the Standard Positioning Service (SPS) is received. Without encryption, the SPS signal remains susceptible to spoofing by an adversary. ―Use of commercial SPS receivers continues to be an issue in the Afghanistan and Iraq theaters. In a study conducted in 2006, AFSPC [Air Force Space Command] determined that many GPS-impacting interference events were unintentional and self-inflicted, and had a significant impact on commercial (SPS) GPS receivers in theater‖ (Department of Defense 2008a, 22). Vulnerabilities to the GPS signal still exist even with encryption of the signal. Jamming and interference can just as easily deter effective use of the signal as spoofing. ―The GPS signal strength measured at the surface of the Earth is about-160dBw (1 x 10-16 watts), which is roughly equivalent to viewing a 25-watt light bulb from a distance of 10,000 miles. This weak signal can easily be blocked by destroying or shielding the GPS receiver’s antenna. The GPS signal can also be effectively jammed by a signal of a similar frequency but greater strength‖ (Johnston 2003, 1). Jamming can also occur through interference with own force systems. ―Commercial television, very high-frequency transmitters, aeronautical satellite communications and Mobile Satellite System terminals can also degrade GPS signals, and natural occurrences can cause interference that would pose distinct problems for users, including the military‖ (Adams 2001, 13). The trend towards increased usage of satellite and high frequency communications will continue to saturate the electromagnetic spectrum, thus making interference with the GPS signal a continuing challenge. Even the Department of Defense (DoD) in its 2008 GPS Report to Congress stated that, ―The potential harmful effects of interference on GPS services continue to justify attention from the DoD and civil agencies‖ (Department of Defense 2008a, 19).
Share with your friends: |