APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS AND CANONS

fourth-century collection of decisions made by earlier councils and leaders concerning Christian faith and church order. Its sources are the now lost Didascalia Apostolorum, a Greek manual on church order from early third-century Syria; the Didache, a Greek church order from the early sec­ond century; Hipollytus of Rome's Concerning Spiritual Gifts (now lost) and Apostolic Tradition from the early third century. Its familiarity with the worship patterns of Antioch (Syria) and its internal references and sources seem to place its origins in Syria about 380. The language with

47

Although its original title was "The Ordi­nances of the Holy Apostles Through Clement," there seems never to have been any inclination to accept the work as being authentically apos­tolic in origin. In the West, where the Roman church predominated, only the first 50 Apostolic Canons, which are found in VIII 47, were gener­ally accepted as binding. The rest of the work, including the other 35 canons, varied in author­ity according to time and place. The canons themselves were taken from the Constitutions and the canons of councils at Antioch (341) and Laodicea (363). The last of the canons lists the biblical books accepted as canonical in the church of the 380s. It excludes Revelation but in­cludes the Apostolic Constitutions and the two letters traditionally called the Epistles of Clement to the Corinthians.

The Constitutions is not an orderly book, but there is some coherence to each of its eight books (we would call them chapters). Book I is for the laity and is especially concerned to warn them about the kinds of association with pagans that would destroy their ethical sensitivities. Book II is for the clergy and presents the qualities of character, the prerogatives, and the duties be­longing to each of the orders of clergy: bishops, presybters, and deacons. It also treats the ques­tion of penitential discipline. Book III considers widows and their special office in the church. A consideration of their limitations carries the author-compiler to a concern for the duties of deacons. And he also puts a small treatise on baptism in this book. Book IV talks about the Christian's concern for charitable works, es­pecially for such persons as orphans. Book V moves from a discussion of the Christian's re­sponsibility toward those suffering persecution to discussions of martyrdom and idolatry. Book VI offers a history of earlier schisms and here­sies.

From the perspective of influence in the later church, Books VII and VIII are most important. Book VII, which has 49 chapters, is a manual on church order. Chapters 1—32, which are based on the Didache, talk of baptism and the Lord's Supper and of such practices as fasting; 33—38 is a collection of prayers of Jewish origin; 39—45 present the rites of baptism and a prototype of confirmation as they were practiced in Antioch;

46—49 are also liturgical materials. Book VIII, in 47 chapters, interweaves several concerns, in­cluding several liturgies and a section on the du­ties of various persons (16—46). The so-called Liturgy of St. Clement, for the consecration of a bishop, is especially valuable as it contains a complete Eucharistic service. It is in chaper 47 that one finds the Apostolic Canons as has been mentioned.

The Apostolic Constitutions and Canons were exceptionally important in the early and me­dieval church as guides to understanding the na­ture of the church and its worship.

See apostolic fathers.

For Further Reading: Witteick, A History of Christian Thought, 44-56; Westcott, A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament.

Paul M. Bassett

APOSTOLIC DECREES. Apostolic refers to some­thing traceable to the apostles. Decrees are reso­lutions proposed by the apostles at the Council of Jerusalem about a.d. 50 (Acts 15).

The Jerusalem Council convened to decide a critical issue that had arisen in connection with the spread of the gospel to the Gentiles and which threatened to divide the Early Church. The issue was: Shall Gentiles who convert to the Christian faith be required to accept the ritual for Gentile proselytes to the Jewish faith, especially circumcision? After debating pro and con, the council decided with Paul that salvation was by faith, not by works of the law such as circumci­sion.

Having settled this crucial theological issue, however, there remained a practical issue of table fellowship between Jewish and Gentile believers. It was difficult for a first-century Jew, even a Christian Jew, to eat at the same table with a Gentile, even a Christian Gentile. This difficulty was compounded if the Gentiles ate food which was abhorred by Jews. The council recommend­ed, therefore, that Gentile Christians abstain from food and practices obnoxious to the Jews (Acts 15:20, 29).

There were four apostolic decrees according to the ancient Alexandrian text. The Gentiles were asked to abstain from (1) things associated with idols; (2) fornication; (3) what is strangled; and (4) blood. The later Western text omits "what is strangled" and regards the prohibitions as re­ferring to the three cardinal sins: (1) idolatry; (2) fornication; and (3) murder. The Alexandrian text commands the strongest evidence and is pre­ferred by most translations (cf. Acts 15:20).

49

There is no clear evidence of the early devel­opment of the tradition of apostolic succession. It was not until the fifth century that historians be­gan to trace a chain of Roman popes back to Pe­ter. From this time on, the church claimed its bishops as the successors of the apostles. It was on the basis of this tradition that the Councils of Trent, Vatican I, and Vatican II declared the bish­ops to have by divine right special apostolic au­thority. Vatican II further explained that it is the episcopal college that succeeds to the apostolic college; individual bishops, therefore, share in the apostolic succession by their membership in the episcopal body.

Protestants have had no problem in accepting the perpetuity of the apostolic office. In every generation God has raised up ministers and mes­sengers who fulfilled the Great Commission in the apostolic spirit and in the power of the Holy Spirit, but not pretending to the special authority invested in the original Twelve. What Protestant­ism rejects is the doctrine which invalidates the ordination of men whose ordination is not by hands authorized by bishops in an approved Ro­man line of succession, as if the stream of power and authority flowed through this narrow stream and no other.

See church government, apostle, clergy, or­dain (ordination).

Arius, a presbyter at Alexandria, conflicted with his bishop in about a.d. 318 over this kind of teaching, and the first Ecumenical Council was convened in a.d. 325 at Nicea to discuss the matter. Bishops numbering 318, from both the East and the West, came together, and Emperor Constantine presided. They voted overwhelm­ingly against the Arian view—there being only about 20 bishops in all who were either Arian (saying Christ's nature was unlike that of the Fa­ther), or in agreement with Eusebius, who said

Christ's nature was like that of the Father (homoi-ousios).

Since the view voted as orthodox, that Christ's nature was the same as that of the Father, homo-ousios (without the i), Historian Gibbon later made light of the matter by saying that it was a huge squabble merely over a diphthong. Yet most historians of doctrine would agree that it was indeed a gravely significant issue. Not only was it significant because the orthodox teaching came to be that Christ was fully divine instead of less than divine, but because, of all the Chris-tological heresies, Arianism came to be believed the most widely and the most persistently in the West. Sometimes, during the 50 years after Nicea, it was Athanasius who was sent into exile, while Arianism was given status. And still later, many peoples, especially among the barbarians who helped to make up the Roman Empire, were Arian. Besides, it has been revived in modern times in Socinianism and Unitarianism.

See unitarianism, socinianism, athanasian creed, christology, hypostasis.

For Further Reading: Athanasius, "Discourse I Against the Arians," A Library of Fathers of the Catholic Church, vol. 18; Leith, Creeds of the Churches; MacGre-gor, The Nicene Creed; Orr, The Progress of Dogma.

J. Kenneth Grider

ARK OF THE COVENANT. The central object of the Tabernacle was the ark of the covenant, sometimes referred to as the "ark of the testi­mony," "ark of God," and "ark of the Lord." The phrase "ark of the covenant" implies two theo­logical truths relating to law and grace. Law may be seen in the contents of the chest, while grace can be seen in its lid called the "mercy seat," a pure gold cover (Exod. 25:17) surrounded by two antithetically-placed cherubim with outspread wings. These heavenly figures were not detached but were sculptured into the pure gold mercy seat itself.

As is usually the case in biblical presentations, God gave Moses very specific instructions as to how to construct the ark with a somewhat lim­ited explanation as to its purpose. At a later date when the ark was pressed into the religious ser­vice of the nation, its purpose would become clear (Num. 10:33-36). The Bible's minimal use of explanation and maximal use of affirmation (and command) is in deference to man's freedom to choose. True choice implies man's ability to make decisions while not fully understanding why. Were it not for this specific biblical procedure, decision making would require very little faith.

God's precise instruction was to make a rectan­



50

ARMAGEDDON


gular box of acacia wood measuring 2V-2 by IV2 by 1V2 cubits (i.e., 3³A by 2V4 by 2^]A feet), covered both inside and outside with gold, to be carried (when the camp moved) on poles inserted in rings located at the four lower corners. Bezaleel made the ark at Sinai according to God's exact instruction to Moses. Upon completion it became the receptacle for the two tablets of the Deca­logue (Exod. 25:16, 21; 40:20; Deut. 10:1-5): and Heb. 9:4-5 indicates that it contained also the golden pot of manna (Exod. 16:33-34), and Aaron's rod which budded (Num. 17:10). Its es­pecially designated place was in the holy of ho­lies.

When the moment arrived for the congrega­tion to leave Sinai, the ark of the covenant "went before them" (Num. 10:33). It played a signifi­cant role at the crossing of the Jordan (Joshua 3—4) and the fall of Jericho (chap. 6); but it was to be carried into battle only with God's specific command. Years later when it was carried into battle against the Philistines without God's or­ders (1 Sam. 4:3-4), tragedy occurred and the ark was captured. The ark was permanently depos­ited at Shiloh by Joshua and still resided there at the close of the period of the judges (1 Sam. 1:9; 3:3).

It was God's obvious intention that the ark should symbolize His very presence in the midst of Israel. The people readily grasped this mean­ing from their early experience at Sinai and never deviated from it. Although many times they fell into idolatry, the ark was never idolized. The Decalogue gave them guidance for the devel­opment of interpersonal, divine-personal, and social relationships as they evolved into a unified nation. It taught them that without law there can be neither personal nor interpersonal stability. Aaron's rod was a constant reminder that God demands accountability to His elected leadership and to himself. The golden pot of manna per­petuated the concept that God is the Provider of human necessities. The mercy seat with its heav­enly representations helped them never to forget that mercy and forgiveness are not earthborn but heaven-sent.

In NT concepts, according to the writer to the Hebrews (6:18-20; 8:1-2; 9:8-12, 23-26), the ark of the covenant, together wtih its contents and mercy seat, prefigured the work of Christ on the Cross where He brought man to God, and God to man (the mercy seat). Power dispensed at Pen­tecost makes possible through the Spirit the achievement of the ethical standards of the Decalogue (Rom. 8:1-4); and in the figurative language of Revelation (2:17) the manna repre­sents special strength made available to Chris­tians during times of great distress.

See type (typology), temple. mosaic law, penta­teuch, mercy seat, propitiation, covenant, deca­logue, holy of holies.

For Further Reading: IDB, 222-26; NBD, 82; Living-

The basic theme of the Revelation is the strug­gle between Christ and Antichrist. Chapter 12 pictures the struggle which is being waged be­hind the scenes of history. A great red dragon appears, so huge that when he wagged his tail, he swept a third of the stars from heaven. His opponent is a heavenly woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet. (She is the symbolic representation in Gal. 4:26 of the heav­enly Jerusalem, our mother.) The nations of men line up on either side—on the one side the Church, symbolically portrayed as Israel, sealed by God that they may be delivered from His wrath which He is about to pour out (Rev. 7:9); and on the other the pagan nations of the earth who follow and worship the Antichrist, and who are sealed with his seal (13:16ff). Armageddon is the last great battle on the day of God the Al­mighty (16:14). The battle itself is not described. Christ's victory is portrayed in chapter 19, where He is pictured riding a white battle horse, with His garments stained in blood. He is accom­panied by the armies of heaven who are also garbed in white, but who do not participate in the battle. The carnage wrought by Christ's vic­tory is described in vivid terms of a battlefield covered by corpses (19:18), which many feel will be literally fulfilled. And Christ then con­summates His victory by destroying first the An­tichrist, then Satan himself.

See tribulation.

For Further Reading: Biederwolf, The Millennium Bi-

51

James Arminius, the ablest exponent of this kind of teaching in his time, opposed the Cal­vinism of his day which emphasized God's abso­lute sovereignty. Arminius' teacher at Calvin's school at Geneva, Calvin's son-in-law, Theodore Beza, was a supralapsarian. That is, Beza be­lieved that even Adam's first and racially crucial sin was not free, but was unconditionally deter­mined by God. In fact, he believed that the first decree of God, before the decree to create man, was the decree to predestinate some individuals to be saved and other individuals to be damned. Francis Gomarus, Arminius' colleague on the faculty of the University of Leiden, was also a supralapsarian. Augustine and Luther had only been sublapsarians—teaching that Adam's first sin was done freely, but that after that time, that is, after the Fall, the eternal destiny of every other person was decreed by God. And it cannot be definitely determined whether or not John Calvin himself was sublapsarian or supralap­sarian.

Arminius, however, opposed both of those unconditional predestination views, giving 20 arguments against them in his Declaration of Sentiments—delivered by him before the govern­mental authorities at The Hague in 1608. He said that all 20 arguments boil down to this: that they make God the author of sin.

In that treatise, Arminius presents his own un­derstanding of what he calls the divine decrees. He says that (1) the first decree was to send Christ to redeem sinful people; (2) the second de­cree was to receive into favor the ones who would repent and believe; (3) the third decree was to grant prevenient grace to help people to repent and believe; and (4) the fourth decree was to save and damn individuals according to His foreknowledge of the way in which they would freely respond to or reject the offer of grace through Christ.

It is important to note that Arminius, there-1 fore, did believe that some individuals are pre­destinated to be damned, before they are ever

born—but that this is based solely on God's fore- \ knowledge of the way individuals will freely de-/ cide, about Christ, in their lifetime. Some Arminian evangelicals, today, disagree with Ar­minius as to this fourth decree. They say that God does not foreknow free acts—because that would prevent their being free. The "regular" Ar-minians, however, understand that God does foreknow free acts. They quote, in support, e.g., where Paul says, "Whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son" (Rom. 8:29, nasb). They also wonder how biblical prophecy could otherwise be fulfilled—such as that in Zechariah about Jesus' betrayal, and what would be done with the 30 pieces of silver. Surely Jesus' enemies, Judas and the ones who later received the silver, were not setting out to fulfill biblical prophecy.

One matter pointed out in Grace Unlimited, ed­ited by Clark Pinnock, is that the predestination, in Scripture, is never to heaven or to hell. Pin­nock writes, "There is no predestination to salva-" tion or to damnation in the Bible. There is only a predestination for those who are already chil­dren of God with respect to certain privileges out ahead of them" (18). >

Something else pointed out in this symposium, written largely by scholars who have been wide­ly associated with the Calvinistic position, is that classical Calvinism twists the meaning of numer­ous Scripture passages in order to teach that Christ died only to save some—the elect. Donald M. Lake, a professor at Wheaton College, in his chapter on "He Died for All," writes, "It is a fact that these redemptive events in the life of Jesus pro­vided a salvation so extensive, so broad as to poten­tially include the whole of humanity past, present and future!" (31). He shows that while Christ had said, '"I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself" (John 12:32, rsv), John Calvin had commented, "When He says all it must be referred to the children of God, who are His flock" (Calvin's New Testament Commentaries: St, John Part Two, 11-21, and I John, 43). Lake comments, "The critical judgment remains: has Calvin been consistent with the text and its obvi­ous meaning? Personally, I cannot help but give a negative answer to this question" (ibid., 37). Ac­cording to classical Calvinism, the atonement of Christ was only efficacious for the ones God had previously predestinated to be saved. Its adher­ents, e.g., John Owen, have usually understood that the passages which say that Christ died for all (e.g., 2 Cor. 5:15), mean "all of the elect." Ar-minianism has always taught an unlimited atonement: that anyone at all who repents and

believes may be saved through Christ's atone­ment.

After 42 followers of Arminius drew up a doc­ument called the Remonstrance in 1610, which outlined their differences with the Calvinists, it was responded to by the Calvinists, and the con­troversy became a serious matter in the United Netherlands. Prince Maurice, who favored Cal­vinism, arranged for a national synod to meet at Dort; and that synod, with its official Calvinist delegates, drew up the Canons of Dort, a most official Calvinistic creed.

Arminianism was outlawed in the United Netherlands until 1623; but it never did die out in that country. Later it spread to England where it was basically espoused by John Wesley (1703-91) and the Methodists—Methodism be­ing sometimes called "Arminianism on fire." It was through Methodism—and the Holiness movement generally—that Arminianism has been widely disseminated in America.

See canons of dort, calvinism, predestination, foreknowledge, infralapsarianism, wesleyanism.

Directory: sites -> default -> files -> publications
publications -> Table of Content forward introduction
publications -> Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Technologies Georgia Institute of Technology
publications -> Housing Counseling Research in Chicago
publications -> Communicating with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Audiences
publications -> New Brunswick Info Sheet on First Nations Child Welfare
publications -> Paap’s Electronic Newsletter 14 November 2008 Volume 11 Number 22 towards ‘smart’ subsidies in agriculture: lessons from recent experience in malawi
publications -> Information support of pedagogical process for the children experiencing difficulties with acquisition of preschool educational programs
publications -> Asus’ ZenFone ar has Google’s augmentted and virtual reality baked in — but not combined
publications -> School Readiness and Early Grade Success Consultation Memo Atlanta, ga

Download 6.66 Mb.

Share with your friends: