For Further Reading: Arminius

1. His ascension to the Father is the sign of the completion of His redemptive mission on earth. As such it is directly related to His session at God's right hand, in which He takes the role of the enthroned, victorious King (Heb. 1:3; 10:12-14), whose final triumph over all His foes is thereby assured (Eph. 1:20; Phil. 2:9-11; 1 Pet. 3:22).

2. 
   Christ is enthroned not merely as King but as Priest-King (Heb. 10:11), in virtue of which office He exercises a continuous ministry of in­tercession on behalf of men: not as pleading for boons which He may be refused but rather those to which He has already received title by His vic­torious death (Rom. 8:34; Heb. 7:25; 9:24; 1 John 2:1-2).
   
3. 
   The Ascension is likewise connected with Christ's work as Forerunner (John 14:3; Heb. 6:20). His entry into heaven is the guarantee of our own, demonstrating that transformed man­hood in the form of the spiritualized body can inhabit the eternal sphere (Eph. 2:6).
   
4. 
   The Ascension is also the precondition of the giving of the Spirit, whose task is to continue on earth the work formerly effected by the his­torical Jesus (John 14:16-18; 15:26-27; 16:13-14; Acts 2:32-33).
   
5. 
   Finally the Ascension is the occasion for the angelic assurance of Christ's second coming, in the words "this Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven" (Acts 1:11, nasb). That the apostolic community did not interpret this as a prediction of Pentecost, or suppose that the outpouring of the Spirit was the second coming of Christ, is clear from Acts 2:33; 3:19-21; 7:55; et al.
   

See estates of christ, second coming of christ.

53

In the early days of the Christian Church the belief that Christ's return was imminent and that the world was soon to come to an end fostered asceticism. Thus, concern with the temporal world was not expedient. Because persecutions grew intense in the second and third centuries, believers were consoled by the idea that Christ would especially crown the sufferers of this world. Thus, it was a natural step to believe that voluntary suffering would lead to God's special favor.

Probably the greatest factor in the rise of as­ceticism in the Early Church was the confusion of Gnostic dualism with biblical teachings. The Gnostics emphasized that the body is evil while the spirit is good. Thus, the body was to be flag­ellated in order to cultivate the spirit. This em­phasis soon led to the monastic movement with its attempt to withdraw from the world in order to concentrate on holy practices.

Sacrifice, self-denial, and separation from the world should be the legitimate concerns of bibli­cal Christians. To avoid extremes, the Scriptures will have to be studied carefully in order to dis­cover the healthy balance between the body and the spirit, the spiritual and the secular, and sepa­ration from the world and penetration into the world.

See discipline, body, gnosticism, celibacy, tem­perance.

For Further Reading: Turner, The Vision Which Trans­forms, 90, 166-67, 275; Flew, The Idea of Perfection in Christian Theology, 340; Kirk, The Vision of God.

Robert A. Mattke

ASSUMPTION OF MARY. See mother of god

ASSURANCE. See witness of the spirit.

ASTROLOGY. Astrology is the study of the sup­posed influence of stars upon human fortunes— the belief that heavenly bodies foretell or reflect the destinies of individuals and nations. Widely practiced in the ancient world, and eventually suppressed by the impact of Christianity, astrol­ogy experienced revival in the West in the 13 th century, becoming powerful again in the 16th century. With the growth of the scientific temper in the 18th century it again went into the shad­ows. The religious indifference and skepticism of our times has produced a renewal of interest in astrology.

The word horoscope (Greek, libra, time; scopein, to look) refers to the study of the position of the stars at the time of one's birth in order to foretell one's destiny. Horoscopy is the major aim of astrology. The few passages in the OT that men­tion astrologers refer to Babylonian practice. Isa­iah in his lamentation over Babylon scornfully repudiates it: "Thou art wearied in the multitude of thy counsels. Let now the astrologers, the star-gazers, the monthly prognosticators, stand up, and save thee from these things that shall come upon thee" (Isa. 47:13). Jeremiah warns the house of Israel: "Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dis­mayed at them" (Jer. 10:2).

See cults.

For Further Reading: 7DB, 1:304; ODCC, 100.

James D. Robertson

ATHANASIAN CREED. This, along with the Apostles' and Nicene creeds, is one of the three most important of the ancient formulas of the Christian faith. No one knows who wrote it, or just when it was composed. Its wording shows that it would have had to be written some time after the Council of Chalcedon in a.d. 451. The first mention of it is at a synod held some time between 659 and 670. It could not have been written by Athanasius, who died in 373. Indeed, it was no doubt written in the West, in Latin. It was only named for the great fourth-century de­fender of orthodoxy, Athanasius. In content it defines the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity— guarding against tritheism—and also the ortho­dox doctrine of Christ.

See creed (creeds), trinity (holy), christology apostles' creed, nicene creed.

J. Kenneth Grider

The Bible takes little note of atheism per se. The Hebrews never argued the existence of God; they simply testified to His activities.

Paul's nearest approach to acknowledging



54

ATONEMENT


atheism is his statement that before conversion the Gentiles were "godless in the world" (atheoi en to kosmo: Eph. 2:12), and that confirmed pa­gans "did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer" (Rom. 1:28, nasb). However, in neither case is God's existence actually denied. In the first they were simply ignorant of the true God, whereas in the second they had put out of mind the God they knew to exist (vv. 19-21). The Psalmist declared, "The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God'" (Ps. 53:1, nasb). Jean-Paul Sartre seemed to recognize this folly when he said, "If there is no God, then I am God," obvi­ously a yet greater folly.

An atheist would be a person or universe with­out invisible or metaphysical support. Without a personal, intelligent God there is no way to ac­count for the ultimate origin, existence, or des­tiny of man or the universe.

In the 1960s a modern form of atheism came to full flower in the "God Is Dead" movement, coupled with a thoroughgoing ethical relativism, sponsored by such thinkers as Thomas Altizer and William Hamilton. However, this movement hardly outlasted the decade.

Practical atheism is a mode of life quite un­related to belief in God. It divorces belief from action and lives as though God did not exist. Of practical atheism there is much in the world, sometimes even among Christians. Whatever form atheism may take, and there are many, it destroys faith in the very basis of all human rela­tions and removes any foundation from religious and social ethics, and thus reduces human life and the universe to utter meaninglessness.

See theism, agnosticism, skepticism, unbelief, secularism, apologetics, theistic proofs.

For Further Reading: ISBE, 1:318-19; Baker's DT, 70-71; K. Hamilton, What's New in Religion?

Charles W. Carter

ATONEMENT. This word does not appear in the Greek NT, but it does appear in the Hebrew OT. There, its literal meaning is "to cover." The word refers to our sins being "covered" or "covered over."

Calvinists tend to interpret the word to mean that our sins are still there, but are hidden from view by the blood of Christ—so that the holy God excuses us of them when Christ's righteous­ness is imputed to us.

Arminians, who believe in actual, imparted righteousness, understand that the believer's sins are covered in the way that a wound is covered when new flesh heals it (see Ps. 32:1-2).

Christians in general understand that it is

Christ's death on the Cross (and His resurrection) which provides an atonement for our disobedi­ence. Yet the precise way in which Christ's cruci­fixion is efficacious is conceived differently by various groups of Christians.

Some Calvinists teach the limited Atonement theory. That is, that the saving benefit of Christ's atonement is limited to the ones God the Father had previously elected to salvation (and heaven). Arminians teach the unlimited Atonement theory—that the benefit it provides for extends to the entire human race. Naturally, the Ar­minians understand that the salvation the Atonement provides is conditional—it awaits our repentance and faith before the salvation it provides is realized. Many Calvinists teach that its benefit is unconditional—that is, that the eleet, for whom it was accomplished, cannot fi­nally resist saving grace, but will indeed be saved eternally.

All the groupings of Christians more or less believe in the ransom theory of the Atonement, since the NT (in Mark 10:45; 1 Tim. 2:6) states that Christ died to ransom us. Yet there is much difference among Christians as to Atonement theories per se.

The moral influence theory, pretty much origi­nating with Peter Abelard (1079-1142), suits modernism in theology. It overstresses God's love and denies man's utter sinfulness. Christ's death does not need to satisfy anything in God's nature to make it possible for Him to forgive man. Christ's death helps us to see that God loves us. Thus we call it a subjective theory of the Atonement—nothing objective for man being accomplished by it, but only something within man.

Anselm (1033-1109) taught the satisfaction theory of the Atonement, which view peculiarly suits Roman Catholicism. This is an objective theory, for something is accomplished in God's nature—objective of man—by Christ's death. Specifically the Atonement made it possible for God to forgive man and still maintain His own honor—so important in those feudal times. Ac­cording to Anselm's Why the God-Man, man, a sort of serf, got into debt to God by sinning; and Christ, who, as sinless, did not need to suffer physical death, nonetheless died, and therefore did a most meritorious act. He paid man's debt by dying, since He was man; and since He was divine, He paid an infinite debt. God received the payment, forgives us, and maintains His honor. This theory suits the vast merit system of Roman Catholic theology. It precludes actual for­giveness, however, as Arminians view the mat-



ATTRIBUTES, DIVINE

55

The penal (punishment) satisfaction theory of the Calvinists says that the claims of God against the elect were satisfied by Christ's death being a vicarious punishment. The emphasis here is not on debt (Anselm) but justice. Sin must be pun­ished. In Christ's death the sins of the elect were punished in full, and justice can make no further clairfTagainst the elect. Although the KJV does not use the specific word that Christ was "pun­ished" for us, the view suits the unconditional and the limited Atonement understandings taught by Calvinism. Besides its not being scrip­tural, the view, like the satisfaction theory, pre­cludes forgiveness—for, surely, God cannot accept Christ's punishment as what satisfies His justice, and still really forgive man. If the sin has already been fully punished, it cannot now be forgiven.

The governmental theory is the one which peculiarly suits Arminianism. According to this theory, Christ suffered, as Scripture so often says, in man's behalf, more precisely, as a pro­visional substitute for penalty. And He suffered for all men, not for a limited number. Because of Christ's suffering, God can forgive those who re­pent and believe—and still maintain His govern­mental control.

However, not all Arminians are willing to rest their doctrine of Atonement entirely on the gov­ernmental theory. This would be true of Watson, Pope, Summers, Tigert, and Wiley—to name but a few. According to H. Orton Wiley, the Atone­ment is not only grounded in governmental ne­cessity but in the divine holiness and in the appeal of divine love. Thus the propitiatory idea and the moral influence idea also represent fac­ets of truth which are indispensable to a full-orbed doctrine of the Atonement. In fact, Wiley says that the "idea of propitiation is the domi­nant note in the Wesleyan type of Arminian the­ology" (CT, 2:284).

Furthermore, Wiley stresses what he calls the "vital principle" of the Atonement. The Atone­ment, he says, is "God's method of becoming im­manent in a sinful race" (CT, 2:276). Among other things this includes that restoration of the Spirit as indwelling Sanctifier which the death and resurrection of Christ made possible. The Logos who became Man, and who represented the race on the Cross in atonement, is now avail­able to the believer in a personal, vital, inner re­lationship.

See cross, estates of Christ, ransom, forgive­ness, expiation, propitiation, governmental the-

J. Kenneth Grider

God thus does not possess the quality of love. God is love. When God loves, He is not man­ifesting a particular quality of His nature. When God loves, He expresses His essential Being. Again, when God is said to be holy, this refer­ence is to His essential Being, not to a character­istic of His nature.

It is true that the Bible uses action words to describe God. But the Scriptures also employ im­perative words to describe God's nature and His sovereign relationship to man, such as Lev. 19:2: "Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy." And on occasion the Scriptures do use ab­stract terms in reference to God. For instance, Moses requests that he be allowed to see God's glory (Exod. 33:18). Also, the Psalmist writes that "the Lord is a great God, and a great King above all gods" (Ps. 95:3). Isaiah's lofty vision of God included the joyful exclamation of the seraphim: "Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory" (Isa. 6:3).

For all practical purposes, then, it appears



56

ATTRIBUTES, DIVINE (cont.)

sound to use any terms available in referring to God, as long as the terms convey accurately the revelation of God in Scripture. For example, one may use the phrase "God is everywhere," or he may say that God is omnipresent. Both the phrase "God is everywhere" and the word omni­presence mean that there are no limits to His presence—that God is free from the restraints of space.

Revelation the Source of Knowledge. The mys­tery of God eliminates all knowledge of God except when He makes himself known by revela­tion. As Emil Brunner points out, God is not an object which man can manipulate by his own reasoning (The Christian Doctrine of God, 14). Ex­cept when He chooses to reveal himself, God is a mystery dwelling in the depths of inaccessible light. And even when He reveals himself, "the believer will not even be able fully to understand all that God has revealed concerning His attri­butes" (Fred H. Klooster in Basic Christian Doc­trines, 22). Finite man can never fully understand the infinite God.

But man must state some sweeping and final affirmations about God's essential being, or the whole idea of God becomes merely formal, the­oretical, and sterile. The modern mind, with its bent toward secularism, seems unable or unwill­ing to present or to accept any ultimates about God. This confusion about the nature of God has minimized the influence of the redemptive mes­sage. As Carl Henry writes: "The modern inabil­ity to speak literally of God's essential being, the contentment with merely relational reflection, ... augur but further religious decline for the Western world" (Christian Faith and Modern The­ology, 92).

Taking our directives from Scripture, the dis­cussion below deals with specific attributes of God.

Classification of the Attributes. The divine attri­butes may be arranged under two headings: (1) the absolute or incommunicable attributes; (2) the moral or communicable attributes.

1. The absolute or incommunicable attributes. The term absolute is derived from the Latin abso-lutus, a compound of ab (from) and solvere (to loosen). Absolute means free as to condition, or free from limitation or restraint. The absolute at­tributes are reserved for God alone. Neither God's general creation, the universe, nor God's special creation, man, shares these divine per­fections. The absolute attributes are infinity, self-existence, eternality, immutability, immensity (omnipresence), perfect knowledge (omni­science), perfect power (omnipotence), and spiri­tuality.

The term infinite refers to that perfection of God by which He is free from all limitations. God is in no way limited by the created world, by time-space relationships. God's perfection is His infiniteness. The only limitations of God are self-imposed or inherent in His nature. God cannot lie, sin, change, or deny himself (Num. 23:19; 1 Sam. 15:29; 2 Tim. 2:13; Heb. 6:18; Jas. 1:13,17).

By self-existence (or self-sufficiency, indepen­dence, or aseity of God) is meant that God has no origin, that He is uncreated, that He depends on nothing. This self-existence of God finds expres­sion in the name Jehovah. God is the great I AM (Exod. 3:14). John states that God is self-caused: "For as the Father hath life in himself ..." (John 5:26). The fact that God is independent of all things and that all things exist only through Him is found in Ps. 94:8 ff, in Isa. 40:18 ff, and Acts 17:25. See also Rom. 11:33-34; Eph. 1:5; Rev. 4:11.

The eternality of God is His timelessness. He exists outside the categories of time or space. Mo­ses paid his tribute by singing: "Before the moun­tains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from ever­lasting to everlasting, thou art God" (Ps. 90:2; cf. Gen. 21:33; Isa. 57:15; 1 Tim. 1:17).

Immutability refers to the unchanging nature of God. A perfect being cannot increase or de­crease in any respect. God does not change in regard to His being, in relation to His decrees, or in respect to His works. The prophet Malachi states it precisely: "For I am the Lord, I change not" (Mai. 3:6). See also Exod. 3:14; Ps. 102:26-28; Isa. 41:4; Heb. 1:11-12; 6:17; Jas. 1:17. In God, as absolute perfection, neither improve­ment nor deterioration are possible.

When God is stated to be superior to space, or transcendent over space, or unlimited by space, this perfection is called immensity. When God is said to be present everywhere in creation, this perfection is named omnipresence. Though God remains distinct from creation and may not be identified with the world, yet He is present in every part of His creation. The omnipresence of God is a basic teaching of the Bible. Heaven and earth cannot contain Him (1 Kings 8:27; Isa. 66:1; Acts 7:48-49); yet He occupies both at the same time and is a God who is always present (Ps. 139:7-10; Jer. 23:23-24; Acts 17:27-28).

God's perfect knowledge is called omniscience. God knows all that is knowable. His knowledge is inclusive and comprehensive. He knows him­self and all that comes from Him. He knows all



AUGSBURG CONFESSION

57


things as they actually come to pass, past, present, and future. He knows all relations and relationships. He knows what is actual and what is possible. The omniscience of God is a distinct revelation in Scripture. God's knowledge is per­fect (Job 37:16); He knows the inner heart of man (1 Sam. 16:7; 1 Chron. 28:9; Ps. 139:14; Jer. 17:10). God sees the ways of men (Deut. 2:7; Job 23:10; 24:23; Ps. 1:6; Ps. 37:18). God also knows about contingent events (1 Sam. 23:10-12; 2 Kings 13:19; Ps. 81:14-15; Isa. 42:9; Ezek. 3:6; Matt. 11:21).

Omnipotence, or God's perfect power, means that by the exercise of His will He can realize whatever is present in His will. The idea of God's omnipotence finds expression in the name El-Shaddai. The Bible is emphatic in speaking of the Lord God Almighty (Job 9:12; Ps. 115:3; Jer. 32:17; Matt. 19:26; Luke 1:37; Rom. 1:20; Eph. 1:19); God reveals His power in creation (Isa. 44:24; Rom. 4:17); in works of providence (Heb. 1:3), and in the redemption of sinners (Rom. 1:16; 1 Cor. 1:24). God's absolute power, how­ever, may never be divorced from His per­fections.

The Bible does not contain a definition of God. The nearest approach to anything like a defini­tion is found in the word of Christ to the Samar­itan woman, "God is a Spirit" (John 4:24). "By teaching the spirituality of God theology stresses the fact that God has a substantial Being all His own and distinct from the world, and that this substantial Being is immaterial, invisible, and without composition or extension" (Erickson, ed., The Living God, 347f). By accepting the spiritu­ality of God it is affirmed that He has none of the properties belonging to matter, and that He can­not be discerned by the bodily senses. Paul speaks of Him as "the King eternal, immortal, in­visible" (1 Tim. 1:17).

2. The moral or communicable attributes. Among the divine perfections which God may impart, to a degree, are holiness, truth, righ­teousness, justice, love, grace, goodness, and faithfulness. We can briefly discuss only some.

In the OT the word "holiness" carried three meanings—brilliance (glory), separation, and pu­rity (Exod. 29:43; Lev. 10:3; Isa. 6:3; 10:17; 1 Kings 8:10-11; Exod. 13:2; 28:41; Isa. 40:25; Ezek. 43:7-9). While holiness is in one sense the unique and exclusive perfection of God, it is ca­pable, under divinely appointed conditions, of being imparted to persons, places, and things. Wiley writes that "the love of God is in fact the desire to impart holiness and this desire is satis­fied only when the beings whom it seeks are ren­dered holy" (Wiley and Culbertson, Introduction to Christian Theology, 107). In essence, God's love is His unceasing and benevolent desire to share all of His perfections, to the extent possible, with man.

Truth as an attribute of God means that God can never be capricious, whimsical, indulgent, or misleading. Any act or any word of revelation by God must be an expression of holy love. Truth as a perfection of God indicates that God's analysis of man is based on His perfect knowledge of what man is and what man can be.

God is true and faithful, in that He always acts in harmony with His nature. His purposes never waver, and His promises are never annulled. Paul wrote to the wavering Corinthians that "God is faithful" (1 Cor. 10:13).

Righteousness is the conformity of God to the moral and spiritual law which He has revealed. To put it another way, righteousness is the con­sistent and unvarying expression of God's nature in complete harmony with His holiness. To Brun­ner the righteousness of God means "the con­stancy of God's will in view of His Purpose and Plan for Israel" (The Christian Doctrine of God, 275). Thus righteousness "is simply the Holiness of God as it is expressed when confronted with the created world" (ibid., 278). To Barth the righ­teousness of God means that in founding and maintaining fellowship with His creation God "wills and expresses and establishes what corre­sponds to His own worth" (Church Dogmatics, 2:377).

The Psalmist sang of the righteousness of God (Ps. 19:9). Isaiah longed for a time when God's righteousness would be supreme (Isa. 11:5). Paul wrote that righteousness was the glory of the gospel (Rom. 1:17). At the end of the Bible angels testify to God's righteousness: "Thou art righ­teous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be" (Rev. 16:5).

See god, infinite, immutability omnipotence, spirit, holiness, love, righteousness, justice, grace, good (the good, goodness), faithful (faithfulness), contingent.

Directory: sites -> default -> files -> publications
publications -> Table of Content forward introduction
publications -> Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Wireless Technologies Georgia Institute of Technology
publications -> Housing Counseling Research in Chicago
publications -> Communicating with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Audiences
publications -> New Brunswick Info Sheet on First Nations Child Welfare
publications -> Paap’s Electronic Newsletter 14 November 2008 Volume 11 Number 22 towards ‘smart’ subsidies in agriculture: lessons from recent experience in malawi
publications -> Information support of pedagogical process for the children experiencing difficulties with acquisition of preschool educational programs
publications -> Asus’ ZenFone ar has Google’s augmentted and virtual reality baked in — but not combined
publications -> School Readiness and Early Grade Success Consultation Memo Atlanta, ga

Download 6.66 Mb.

Share with your friends: