Using Multicultural Literature as a Tool for Multicultural Education in Teacher Education Juli-Anna Aerila



Download 1.19 Mb.
Page16/27
Date19.10.2016
Size1.19 Mb.
#4992
1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   ...   27

Diana Maak
Abstract: School subjects such as biology represent a specific form of L1-acquisition. Though Basic Interpersonal Skills (BICS, Cummins 1984) have been acquired, pupils are faced with specific forms of language use, including, but not limited to, technical terms, which provide them with first insights into languages used for specific purposes and their characteristics.

Research points to the fact that pupils, and especially those with German as a Second Language or/and from families of a lower economic status, struggle in these contexts (see for PISA for example Stanat 2003). Though overall descriptions of the “language of schooling” (Schleppegrell 2004) or “Bildungssprache” as it is generally referred to in Germany already exist, there are, to date, no extensive descriptions, and what descriptions do exist neither include the distinction between oral and written language use in specific subjects (Morek/Heller 2012), nor do they examine subject-specific characteristics.

Due to this perspective and as part of a larger research project (Fachunterricht und Deutsch als Zweitsprache), the study to be presented examines how content is conveyed in language. Seven hours of videotaped 8th grade biology lessons on the subject of the circulation of blood are analyzed based on a concept-oriented approach (Stutterheim/Klein 1987) focusing on the encoding of motion events and the overall input pupils receive, herein distinguishing between oral and written input. The results show subject- and topic-specific forms of language use and give first indications of how didactic and pedagogic reduction in language use might be counterproductive to content learning. Furthermore the results contain clues on how to conduct language-sensitive instruction in subjects such as biology in a way that supports content learning as well as how L1-teaching might support this process.
Literature
Cummins, Jim (1984): Wanted: A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual studentIn: Charlene Rivera (Hrsg.): Language proficiency and academic achievement. Clevedon, Avon, England: Multilingual Matters (Multilingual matters, 10), 2–19.

Morek, Miriam; Heller, Vivien (2012): Bildungssprache – Kommunikative, epistemische, soziale und interaktive Aspekte ihres GebrauchIn: Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik, 67–101.

Schleppegrell, Mary (2004): The language of schooling. A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Stanat, Petra (2003): Schulleistungen von Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund: Differenzierung deskriptiver Befunde aus PISA und PISA-E. In: Jürgen Baumert, Cordula Artelt, Eckhard Klieme, Michael Neubrand, Manfred Prenzel, Ulrich Schiefele et al. (Hrsg.): PISA 2000. Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland ; Zusammenfassung zentraler Befunde. Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 243–260.



Stutterheim, Christiane von; Klein, Wolfgang (1987): A Concept-Oriented Approach to Second Language Studies. In: Carol Wollman Pfaff (Hrsg.): First and second language acquisition processes (proceedings of the Second European-North American Workshop on Cross Linguistic Second Language Research, EUNAM II, held at Jagdschloss Göhrde, West Germany, August 22-28, 1982). Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle, 191–205.
College Students’ Use and Modification of Planning and Revision Strategies after a Semester of Instruction

Charles A. MacArthur
Abstract: Presenting author: Charles A. MacArthur
The purpose of this case study was to investigate how basic college writers used and adapted cognitive strategies that they had learned in semester course that was based on self-regulated strategy instruction. Theories of strategy instruction propose that learning is constructive process in which learners adapt strategies as they internalize them (MacArthur, 2011; Zimmerman, 2000). Strategies are not formulaic procedures but rather problem-solving heuristics that writers adjust to different tasks. Research has demonstrated the positive effects of strategy instruction on writing quality, but little research has investigated the modifications and adaptations that students make to strategies as they learn them.
This study was part of a larger project that developed and evaluated a writing curriculum based on self-regulated strategy instruction (Authors, 2013, in press). The participants were ten male community-college students who had completed a basic writing course using the project curriculum that taught strategies for planning and revising along with self-regulation strategies. Analysis of writing samples for these students from the larger study found large positive gains in quality, grammar, and inclusion of persuasive elements (e.g., thesis).
Two weeks after the end of the course, the ten students participated in a think-aloud session in which they planned and began to draft a persuasive essay and then revised an essay written by an unknown student. Video of the think-aloud sessions was analyzed to understand how students used and modified the strategies they had learned. Transcripts were systematically coded with a reliability check of 30% of the sessions by a second coder.
Students applied the planning strategies with some adjustments; for example, they simplified the graphic organizer. Two students had difficulty recalling the genre elements that were part of the strategy and one had difficulty generating ideas that would be convincing to the audience. Students used self-regulation strategies throughout the process. Preliminary analysis indicates that students made more significant adjustments to the revision strategies. A frequent problem was that students were not always able to identify breaks in meaning, suggesting interference from reading comprehension problems.
Keywords: think aloud, strategy instruction, writing, self-regulation

Meaning-making from different modes and media

Petra Magnusson
Abstract: Background: the presentation is part of a Ph. D project concluded in October 2014 with the overall aims to investigate and conceptualize meaning-making in school in the frame of multimodal theory. It describes and analyzes meaning-making and design in learning with meaning-offerings from different modes and media from the students’ perspective.

Research question: What similarities and differences can be made visible in meaning-making from different modes and media when using analytical tools inspired by a multimodal theoretical framework?

Theoretical framework: From a socio-cultural perspective, multimodal theory formation is used to find suitable tools and concepts for developing teaching and learning. Meaning-making is seen as multimodal, non-hierarchical and ecological drawing on Kress and van Leeuwen (2001), Kress (2010), Jewitt (ed. 2014), McLuhan (1999). Analytical tools: the Learning Design Sequence developed by Selander (2008), the wheel of multimodality inspired by the New London Group (2000), and the pedagogy of multiliteracies developed by Kalantzis and Cope (2012).

Methodology: The study is a design study combined with an ethnographic inspired approach. In cooperation with the teacher the groups, tasks, instructions and timings were set in order to get data that will show meaning-making through different modes and media. In order to widen the base for explanation data was collected and documented through observations and audio and video recordings. Recordings were transcribed both verbally and multimodally and analyzed using the analytical tools mentioned above.

Data: Audio and video recordings from lessons over three days in in an upper secondary school in a class taking social sciences and media courses.

Results: The study shows that it is possible to use multimodal theory formation in order to describe and analyze the students’ meaning-making. Both similarities and differences are made visible. When discussions are described as multiliteracies processes and are looked upon as a learning sequence it is obvious that lack of clarity and lack of guidance are obstacles for learning. The tools make it possible to explain and to systemize the data which can be interpreted in a multimodal frame. The multimodal data collection gives a wide understanding of what is going on during the discussions.


Keywords: multimodality, multiliteracies, meaning-making, meaning-offering
References:

Jewitt, C (ed.) (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. 2:nd ed. London: Routledge.

Kalantzis, M & Cope, B (2012). Literacies. Port Melbourne, Vic: Cambridge University Press.

Kress, G & Van Leeuwen, T (2001). Multimodal discourse, the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

Kress, G (2010). Multimodality, A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

New London Group (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. In Cope, B & Kalantzis, M (ed.), Multiliteracies. Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.

McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: the extensions of man. New ed. Cambridge Ma: MIT press.

Selander, S (2008). Tecken för lärande – tecken på lärande. Ett designteoretiskt perspektiv. In Rostvall, A-L & Selander, S (ed.), Design för lärande. Stockholm: Norstedts.



Assessment of the impact of the Common Core State Standards on Primary School Textbooks of Portuguese

Isabel A. Matos
Abstract: In Portugal, the last few years have been marked by continuous and rapid changes in the curriculum guidelines of Portuguese in Elementary Education. As a result of these changes, didactic resources have been produced in order to keep up with the fast developments that have been taking place.

Bearing in mind that the lifecycle of textbooks is six years in Portugal, analysing the impact of the above-mentioned changes on these resources becomes of utmost importance. Thus, this paper aims at examining and discussing the changes that the Common Core State Standards for Portuguese (CCSSP), enacted in August 2012, produce in the adaptation of Primary School textbooks of Portuguese. Six Primary School textbooks of Portuguese, published by four different publishing houses, were analysed, according to the following criteria: (i) the overall structure of the textbook, its division into units and didactic sequences; (ii) operationalisation of the performance descriptors of the CCSSP in textbooks; (iii) texts within textbooks that are proposed as part of the domain of Literary Education (LE).

It is possible to observe that there are minor differences between textbooks that have been adapted to the CCSSP and those non-adapted in terms of the global structure, of the organisation of didactic units, of the structure of didactic sequences and of most aspects at a micro level. However, we can note that the CCSSP define the literary corpus to be explored and, given the central role played by the text in textbooks (in which the reading, writing, grammar and speaking tasks depend on the text), the lack of the prescribed texts is difficult to overcome. It is in this light that we will study the real impact of the changes in the curriculum guidelines on the production of didactic resources for mother tongue education and we will also reflect on what truly forms the basis of mother tongue textbooks.
Keywords: Common Core State Standards for Portuguese; Textbooks; Evaluation of educational resources; Teaching and learning of Portuguese.

Student-driven imitation in upper secondary school: Revealing traits of reflexive process and rhetorical agency in argumentative texts

Christina Matthiesen
Abstract: In classical as well as modern rhetorical education there is a strong tradition of imitation as a means to becoming a rhetor, a rhetorical active citizen. Especially Quintilian is praised for his notion of imitation. He highlights critical reading within a broad variety of genres, including poetry and historical accounts, along with attunement to the individual talent and temper of the rhetor in spe. The goal is not for the student to mirror the traits of the texts, but to learn from rhetorical strategies bound to context. Nevertheless, attunement to the individual tends to be downplayed in the practice of text-based imitation throughout history. Intrigued by this, I have developed the concept student-driven imitation, which impels Quintilian’s ideas into productive knowledge. Student-driven imitation is characterized by encouraging students to find texts themselves, that they are fascinated by as readers and willing to learn from as writers, as well as valuing process over mirroring, working across genres, and strengthening rhetorical agency. This does not only involve strengthening rhetorical skills, but also the ability to find or create rhetorical opportunities.

Until now, student-driven imitation has been examined in two settings; in higher education within the field of rhetoric and outside the educational system in a shelter for young homeless people. But what is the potential of student-driven imitation in the framework of the curriculum of Danish? This poster will reveal findings from comparative action-oriented case studies carried out in February 2015 in two classrooms in upper secondary school. The study will focus on argumentative texts, and the data will consist of class room observations, the students’ written assignments, including the students individual choice of text, and interviews with teachers. What kinds of argumentative texts will the students bring forth in terms of subject matter, rhetorical situation, media, genre, types of writers, and strategies of argumentation? With what reason? And in what ways can the reflexive process of working with student-driven imitation be traced in the students own production of a new argumentative text? The poster will show numeric data as well as examples and quotes.


(Re)reading the nation: investigating literacy policy in the context of the literary turn in English education.

Larissa J McLean Davies
Abstract: In 2008, the Australian Curriculum and Assessment Authority released the draft version of the Australian Curriculum: English. Perhaps the most radical aspect of this Curriculum was (and still remains) the way in which it reconceived English, not as an amalgam of the language modes--reading, writing, speaking and listening—but rather as three ‘L’s’: language, literature and literacy. On one level, this decision can be understood as a parochial, retrospective and regressive act, a return to an understanding of English which privileges the aesthetic, canonical literary work (Mathieson 1975), and consequently a rejection of contemporary understandings of English as the study of texts in their contexts. Indeed, this decision to reorganise subject English, towards the end of the first decade of the 21s century, was undoubtedly influenced by conservative governmental and public concern about the study of literature, particularly Australian literature, in schools and Universities; these concerns had received considerable media attention in the months preceding the first draft of the curriculum (see Doecke et al., 2011; McLean Davies 2008 & 2014). On another level, this attention to literature—and the reconfiguring of literacy as one of the key strands of English rather than the ultimate goal of the curriculum in the Australian context— can also be understood in the context of a literary turn in English education internationally, which seeks to redefine national literacy. As this paper will argue, this return to literature seeks to position literature not just as a moral technology (Eagelton, 1985), but also as the vehicle through which national and international identity may be negotiated and asserted in a globalised world.
This paper will investigate this literary turn, evidenced in the Australian English curriculum (AC:E), and will consider this in the context of national language and literacy policies, such as Literacy for All: the Challenge for Australian Schools (1998) and Teaching Reading – Report of the National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy (2005). In particular, this paper will explore the ways in which literature in Australia is positioned outside or distinct from literacy, in both policy and curriculum. It will analyse work that literature is currently required to do in the ‘national interest’, and will consequently explore the way in which literacy is repositioned in this contemporary national discourse.
Investigating literary knowledge in the making of English teachers

Larissa J McLean Davies
Abstract: With the advent of the 21st century there has been renewed interest in the relationship between disciplinary fields and school subjects (Green 2010; Yates 2011; Yates & Collins, 2010; Yates, Collins & O’Connor, 2011). Recently, this concern has been brought to attention in Australia through debates about the development of the Australian Curriculum (Atwey & Sing, 2011; Brennan 2011); concerns about student performance in high stakes national testing and comparative international testing (Thomson 2013), and related concerns about teacher quality (Australian Government Department of Education 2014). Central to these debates are tensions about what constitutes discipline knowledge, about pedagogical content knowledge and about curriculum (Cambourne 2013; Shulman 1986). In light of these tensions, this paper analyses data gathered in the context of a broader project concerned with the relationship between disciplinary knowledge and teachers’ pedagogical practices in the teaching of secondary English in Australia. Specifically, this paper reports on a comparative analysis of Australian English curriculum and policy documentation concerning the teaching of literature within the suite of ‘English subjects’, and interviews conducted with pre-service teachers in two Australian States: Victoria and New South Wales, regarding the nature of the literary knowledge they value and bring to the profession. This document and interview data analyses are considered in the context of debates about the teaching of national and world literatures (Casanova, 2044). Analysis of these data will explore the connections and disjunctions between the utopian vision of disciplinary knowledge articulated in sanctioned curriculum documentation and associated official texts, and the understandings of literary knowledge pre-service teachers bring to the profession. In particular, this paper will explore the ways in which literary sociability (Kirkpatrick and Dixon, 2012; McLean Davies, Doecke and Mead, 2013) experienced through previous experiences as students of literature, mediates teachers’ understandings of the teaching of texts in English, and impacts on their articulations of a literary education.

A qualitative review on a model of the out-of-school literacy practices of Korean primary school students: effects of parents, teachers, and students’ characteristics

Byeonggon Min
Abstract: Context

The purpose of this study is to review a model of the out-of-school literacy practices of Korean primary school students focusing on the effects of parents, teachers, and students’ characteristics. It will be helpful to gain an understanding of children’s language development and practices as well as to determine the implications of the connections between in- and out-of-school literacy practices. This purpose has been pursued for two years throughout our three-year research project, funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea, which began two years ago and will end in 2015. The paper would cover an overview of the first-year results of the three years of research and the model which would be dealt with in our forthcoming paper including analysis of scripts of focus group and individual interviews with research participants.


Aims and research questions

The aim of the three-year research project is threefold. First, to survey cross-sectionally out-of-school literacy practices of Korean primary school students. Second, to gain an understanding of their language development and literacy practices. Finally, to investigate the implications of the connections between in- and out-of-school literacy practices.

Research questions in this study are as follows: First, what are the concrete aspects of parents, teachers, and students’ characteristics as influencing factors on primary school students’ out-of-school literacy practices? Second, how do the home factors be mediated by the students’ attitudes toward literacy practices? Third, how the teacher factor makes indirect effects on students' out-of-school literacy practices by way of students' attitudes? Last but not least, what are the implications of the research results in terms of supporting primary school students’ out-of-school literacy practices?
Main theoretical backgrounds

Literacy is a kind of socio-cultural practice in which people perform their identities and reflect their values and beliefs, not only the cognitive skills to read and write texts. We think that literacy is constantly changing, and is acquired through both formal and informal learning and through experiences of meaning-construction in various socio-cultural contexts. In this view, teachers need to ‘start where the child is’ and meet the child’s needs by fostering both in- and out-of-class literacy practices. Out-of-school literacy practices, the core concept of this research, can be defined as all kinds of practices in which students read, view, or write texts out of school, like at home, in the community, and among their peers. (Street, 1995; Lankshere, 1997; Barton & Hamilton, 1998; Moje, 2001, 2010; New London Group, 1996; O'Brien, 2006)

In the forthcoming paper (Sohn, et al., 2015), we are going to show that the home and students' factors have statistically significant positive effects on school happiness in either direct or indirect ways, while the teacher factor has only significant indirect effects on students' out-of-school literacy in terms of students' attitudes. Also, the mediating effects of students' attitudes toward literacy are relatively stronger than the direct effects between home or teacher factors and students' out-of-school literacy. Finally, the results reveal that the home, teacher and student factors can contribute to students' out-of-school literacy regardless of students' grade, or gender.
Methodology: participants, corpus, data gathering and analysis

In the first year of the study, we surveyed about 6,000 primary students, their parents, and their homeroom teachers in 13 schools which were selected considering the population. After that, we had some group focus or individual interviews with some students, their parents, and their homeroom teachers respectively. This paper would apply mainly qualitative methods to the scripts of the interviews while the full research methods used in the study include both quantitative and qualitative methods, that is, a mixed method. The qualitative approach would be implemented through content analysis by N-vivo program.


Expected main findings

The results of the study would be as follows: First, family members’ and teachers’ literacy practices and interactions with the students would really make effects on the primary students’ out-of-school literacy practices. Second, the effects of the factors on the students’ out-of-school literacy practices would be mediated differently by the students’ attitude toward literacy practices? Third, teacher factor that teachers think might be different from one their student evaluate it? Last but not least, this research results would imply some directions to support primary school students’ out-of-school literacy practices?


Multilingualism and multiculturalism in the education system and society of Botswana

Eureka, B. Mokibelo
Abstract: This paper examines how Botswana recognises and celebrates her linguistic and cultural diversity in society as well as in the education system. At various National Celebrations such as President’s Day, National Cultural Day and National Language Day, Botswana celebrates her linguistic and cultural diversity by inviting ethnic groups from almost all regions of the society to perform cultural dances, poetry and music while the same dispensation is denied primary school learners from ethnic minority groups (Republic of Botswana, 2013). Learners are introduced to Setswana medium of instruction only which comes along with its culture and leaves out the learners’ cultures, languages and identities (Republic of Botswana, 1994). The paper uses the multiculturalism theory to benchmark teachers’ classroom practices (Kymlicka, 1995). Teachers, school management were the key participants in the study while learners’ artefacts were examined. Data were collected through open ended questionnaires and interviews and analysing documents/programmes from the Ministry of Sports, Youth and Culture responsible for National Celebrations. The findings indicate that learners are denied this linguistic and cultural diversity of their languages and cultures in the classrooms while there is evidence of celebrating culture and linguistic diversity in society. This calls for a change in perspective and attitude to extend linguistic and cultural diversity to the classrooms so that learners can become capable of shouldering responsibility of their lives and participate in the development of their country.
Keywords: multilingualism, multiculturalism, ethnic minority groups, National Celebrations.
References:

Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship. A liberal theory of minority rights: Oxford. Clarendon Press.

Republic of Botswana, (1994). The Revised National Policy on Education. Gaborone. Government Printers.

Republic of Botswana, (2013). The National Day Speech. Botswana Sports Youth and Culture: Gaborone.



Download 1.19 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   ...   27




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page