Ecssd environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Working Paper N



Download 1.36 Mb.
Page16/16
Date02.02.2017
Size1.36 Mb.
#16502
1   ...   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16

Table 11: Poultry
Table 11a: Number of Poultry [billion head]


 

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2003

2004

Total ECA (CEE+CIS+Turkey)

1.64

1.40

1.12

1.07

1.11

1.11

1.16

1.18

Total CEE + CIS

1.50

1.22

0.98

0.89

0.87

0.89

0.91

0.92

Total CEE

0.38

0.30

0.31

0.29

0.27

0.30

0.30

0.31

Total CIS

1.12

0.92

0.67

0.60

0.60

0.59

0.61

0.62

New EU Members (8)

0.19

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.13

0.15

0.14

0.16

EU Accession (2)

0.14

0.10

0.11

0.09

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.10

Other CEE

0.05

0.04

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.05

Euro CIS

0.96

0.80

0.61

0.54

0.53

0.52

0.53

0.53

Caucasus

0.04

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

Central Asia

0.12

0.09

0.04

0.04

0.04

0.05

0.05

0.05

Turkey

0.15

0.18

0.14

0.18

0.25

0.22

0.25

0.26

World

12.62

13.77

14.97

14.51

16.06

17.56

17.69

17.75


Table 11b: Production of Poultry Meat [million tons]


 

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2003

2004

Total ECA (CEE+CIS+Turkey)

4.33

3.59

3.25

3.50

3.79

4.53

4.80

4.98

Total CEE + CIS

3.89

3.10

2.82

2.99

3.13

3.82

3.92

4.03

Total CEE

1.54

1.50

1.74

1.93

2.00

2.37

2.33

2.41

Total CIS

2.35

1.60

1.08

1.06

1.13

1.45

1.59

1.62

New EU Members (8)

0.99

1.00

1.18

1.40

1.50

1.76

1.73

1.80

EU Accession (2)

0.38

0.34

0.39

0.37

0.36

0.46

0.45

0.47

Other CEE

0.17

0.15

0.17

0.16

0.14

0.15

0.14

0.15

Euro CIS

2.09

1.45

0.99

0.98

1.04

1.34

1.48

1.51

Caucasus

0.05

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.04

0.04

0.05

Central Asia

0.21

0.12

0.06

0.05

0.06

0.06

0.07

0.06

Turkey

0.44

0.49

0.44

0.51

0.66

0.71

0.89

0.95

World

45.40

50.87

56.42

62.45

69.21

74.61

76.39

78.23


1 Csaki, C. and Nash, J. The Agrarian Economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Situations and Perspectives 1997, June 1998, The World Bank.

2 Csaki, C. and Fock, A. The Agrarian Economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: An Update on Status and Progress – 1998, April 1999, The World Bank.

3 Csaki, C. and Fock, A. The Agrarian Economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: An Update on Status and Progress – 1999, April 2000, The World Bank.

4 Csaki, C. and Kray, H. The Agrarian Economies of Central-Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: An Update on Status and Progress – 2000, May 2001, The World Bank.

5 Csaki, C. and Nucifora, A. The Agrarian Economies of Central-Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: An Update on Status and Progress – 2001, May 2002, The World Bank.

6 Csaki, C. and Zuschlag, A. The Agrarian Economies of Central-Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: An Update on Status and Progress – 2002, June 2003, The World Bank.

7 Csaki, C. and Zuschlag, A. The Agrarian Economies of Central-Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: An Update on Status and Progress – 2003, June 2004, The World Bank.

8 The description of the status of reforms for each country matrix was compiled by the World Bank staff most familiar with that country’s agricultural policies. Numerical ratings were then assigned to each of the five reform categories in accordance with the criteria listed in Table 2. These ratings were then revised in several review sessions to improve consistency of rankings. An earlier version of this analysis was presented by Csaki and Lerman, 1997. The current version of the numerical rankings was published first by Csaki and Nash, 1997.

9 This volume marks the first year that the eight ECA countries which became members of the EU in 2004 were not reviewed. Their agricultural and rural development policies are now fully governed by EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and therefore no longer fall under the transition category.

10 PRSC-I, II and -III do not specify the cotton sector explicitly in the Matrix.

11 To preclude the tax authorities from freezing accounts without obtaining a prior court order, the Tax Code was amended accordingly during 2001-02.



Download 1.36 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page