Nonviolence has mostly been associated with oppressive governments, for example the apartheid regime in South Africa, Great Britain’s occupation of India or the oppression of Afro Americans in southern USA. Nonviolence has also been used a lot against regimes where people suffer great poverty. Oppression and injustice often go hand in hand.
The great global movement against injustice made itself manifest in the demonstrations in Seattle USA, in 1999. Thousands of people joined together in expressing their dissatisfaction with the way that world trade and world order creates a lot of poverty and few wealthy. After Seattle, it became usual with big demonstrations at the meetings of institutions which manage global economics: The World Bank, The World Trade Organisation and The International Monetary Fund
For a long time, people have protested non-violently and even violently against economic injustice. One of the largest organisations in the world using nonviolence to achieve economic justice is MST – Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra – The Landless Workers movement. MST is a Brazilian and has over a million members. Brazil is world champion in having the largest chasm between rich and poor. In this enormous nation there are millions of citizens living at the same standard as in Sweden, while many more millions are really poor, without work or land to grow food on. This grotesquely large chasm between rich and poor in Brazil originates in the time of colonisation and slavery. The Portuguese noblemen stole land from the indigenous population and shared among themselves. A few got nearly all of the land and remains so today.
The background to MST is that a sort of Christian basic group was formed in a number of Catholic Churches in Brazil. Here farm workers, priests, union representatives and oppositional people met. They discussed Christianity and how the situation for the poor could be improved. The idea of occupation of land, belonging to the rich, land not even used was born in theses groups. From there to MST which is still active today. They take over land which is not used pitch their tents or raise their huts and cultivate the earth. Often MST gets chased off the land by guards after a time they return and continue. It is not without its risks. Over 1,000 MST members have been murdered by the guards. It does not cost more than between Skr200 – 500 for the Brazilian elite to buy a murder Even so, MST has retained its policy of nonviolence. A few MST members have left the organisation as they believe it is better to defend themselves with violence.
Today MST is a movement that claims respect from both poor and rich alike. 56% of Brazilian voters sympathize with the movement. The movement has during 20 years taken over 20 million hectares of agricultural land which is an enormous area at the same time as Brazil is 350 million hectares. There are still 50 million people that do not get daily food, at the same time over a million people have been helped by MST46
Cowardice asks the question
“Is it safe?”
Comfort asks the question
“Is it polite?”
Pride asks the question
“Is it popular?”
But conscience asks
the question: “Is it right?”
And it comes to a point where one has to take a stand
which is neither safe, polite or popular,
one takes a stand because ones conscience says
that it is right.
-Martin Luther King Jr
During the dissolution of the Soviet Union there was both an “upside and down” and a ”downside and up” –perspective. From the top came “glasnost, perestroika and democratsatsiya” (openness, restructuring and democracy), initiated by Mikhail Gorbachev. Implacable pressures from below supported creating a climate ready for change. On the one side there was a small but stubborn group of human rights advocates that continuously craved that human rights be respected. The other side, religious, peace and environmental groups, artists and poets, refused in different ways to subject themselves to the totalitarian state.
The failure with the Czechoslovakian experiment in 1968 to create “socialism with a human face” strengthened the widely predisposed opinion that communism could not achieve peaceful change and democratic openness, that nonviolence may well function in India or USA but never in a communist regime. This provided fuel for The Cold War and the nuclear weapons race and the opinion that a Third World War was unavoidable. Few took note of the part of the Czechoslovakian experiment which contained indications of “peoples power” – the revolutions that would come during the 80´s.
The 1968 invasion of the Warsaw pacts armies was expected to crush all resistance within the period of a couple of days. It took eight months. Czechoslovakians large and well trained army was ordered to remain in barracks while the population answered in creative and nonviolent ways. The Czech news agency refused to report disinformation such as the leader of Czechoslovakia had asked for the invasion. Road signs were turned the wrong way to confuse the invaders. Students sat in the way for oncoming tanks, others climbed up on the tanks to discuss with the tank crews. People did not fight physically with the invaders but refused to cooperate. Secret messages via the radio helped to maintain a good moral in the population at the same time as radio programmes spread vital information about calling a general strikes. The Czech leaders succeeded in retaining their positions and continuing some reforms until resistance started to give way.
Twelve years later, in 1980 neighbouring country Poland took up the flag of nonviolence when the shipyard workers went on strike. With prayers and meetings the union movement Solidarity was born. Through strikes, sit ins and demonstrations, Solidarity gave the workers an independent voice and started a “grass roots movement” which quickly spread over the whole of Poland. The government immediately proclaimed a State of Emergency in December 1981. Instead of this destroying Solidarity, people started creating an alternative society from below; they chose to live “as though they were free”. A new society was born in the shell of the old one. When eventually general elections were held in 1989, Solidarity won a landslide victory.
The Polish elections were helped by the revolutionary changes in the Soviet Union. Gorbachevs´s reforms which started in1985 opened the dams of longing for change – which ultimately would wash away even Mikhail Gorbachev and the Soviet Block. One after another the totalitarian regimes of Eastern Europe are overthrown by people armed with truth and bravery. A critical mass had been reached by a growing body of people. The symbol of change was 9th November 1989 when the Berlin Wall fell the old order collapsed and with exception for Rumania47 very little violence and loss of life occurred.
In the wake of the fall of the Eastern Block a number of nonviolent revolutions have taken place, Serbia,48 Georgia, the Ukraine…. In Serbia the Otpor organisation used many often creative methods. When the news was shown on TV people vacuum cleaned their balconies to show that they had better things to do than watch propaganda. When the police forced Otpor to move they used empty moving crates which they carried as though they were heavy as a way of delaying the move. When police in an effort to speed up the move lifted a crate which he thought to be heavy the impetus of the lift caused him to land on his backside. It is important to remember that Otpor worked for several years, with resources in the form of money and non-violence training from different quarters and that finally became a mass movement which could not be stopped.
Belarus on the other hand, Sweden’s nearest dictator and Europe’s last is among the least reformed countries of the former Soviet Union. When independence came to Belarus the country did not have a national identity and the economy was in a state of crisis, which contributed to creating prerequisites for political populism. Simple solutions and security were demanded, Aleksander Lukasjenko was elected president in 1994. As a result of a number of referendums since then the role of the president has become increasingly powerful. There is no sharing of power in the country and relations between Belarus and the western world are strained.49
Intensive efforts are in progress in different quarters to democratize Belarus. One of democracy’s nonviolence leaders is Olga Karach. Olga is one of the leaders for the resistance movement in Belarus, Zubr; partly inspired by Otpor in Serbia. The work is not without its dangers. Olga tells of friends whose parents have betrayed them to the KGB. Their own parents! It becomes possible for the whole system in Belarus to be built on fear and completely break people. Olga herself has lost her place as a teacher and has on several occasions been interrogated by security police. She is now also active as a politician in opposition. After the election 2004, the parliament of Belarus does not have any politicians in opposition!
Belarus has no free media. Olga says that it is difficult to get a newspaper officially registered, and without registration the maximum circulation number is 299. It is also the official number for the newspaper “Our House” in which Olga participates once a fortnight. In reality the circulation is about 35,000, says Olga. Their resources are small. Olga and her friend spend a lot of time producing information material and knocking on doors to spread the information, talking to people about Belarus and how the country can be democratized and what can be done.
There are several organisations in Sweden working for democracy in Belarus, for example PeaceQuest., Landsrådet för Ungdomsorganisationer (LSU) Svenska Freds och Skiljedomsföreningen. Although a lot has happened in the former Soviet States there is still a lot to achieve in Belarus, until Belarus also becomes an example of the success of non-violence.50
Share with your friends: |