Homogeneity and Heterogeneity in American English
--Relative homogeneity in the 17th and 18th cc.--3 distinguishable varieties:
1 New England 2 The South 3 General American (GA)
--Reason: relative to size, Britain displayed a more diverse range of dialects
The Study of American Regional Varieties
--Hans Kurath, A Word Geography of the Eastern United States (1949)
--focusing on the speech areas of the Atlantic Coast down to South Carolina
--18 smaller speech areas within the 3 more general Northern, Midland, and
Southern areas
--A.C. Baugh and T. Cable, A History of the English Language (1983)
--6 regional areas + GA (Network Standard) and Black English
[NB: these last two should be viewed as social dialects!)
--R.W. Bailey, “Dialect in America” In: T. McArthur (ed.).
The Oxford Companion to the English Language (1992)
--4 areas: North, Coastal South, Midland, and West
--R. McCrum, W. Cran, and R. MacNeil, The Story of English (1986)
--5 areas: Eastern NE, Inland Northern, North Midland, South Midland, S-ern
--no separate Western “region of AmE”
Some General Regional Markers
When the feature is used, one can be reasonably certain about the region where the
speaker came from (“carbonated soft drinks” as coke, soda pop, cold drink, etc., and
“automobile highways” as parkway, turnpike, thruway, freeway)
Reasons for Uniformity and Variation in Am. E.
a--the mingling of settlers; mobility; the influence of the media; Noah Webster`s role
b--the diversity of the origin of the settlers; the proximity/distance from the Atlantic
seaboard
The Evolution of the Dialects of American English
3 influences:
1 Founder effect—the durable imprint of lg structures taken to an area by the earliest groups of people forging a new society in the region: Am dialects still reflect some of these influences (see A Muse of Fire / The Guid-Scots Tongue)
2 Contact—with speakers of other languages (see Loan Word Examples)
3 Innovations—continue to set various dialects of AmE apart from one another
5 stages of development (Edgar Schneider, 2003)
1 Foundation stage—English is used on a regular basis in a region where it was not used previously (not necessarily in a linguistically homogeneous way): colonization
2 Exonormative stabilization—communities stabilize politically under foreign (Br) dominance, with expatriates providing the primary norms for usage
3 Nativization—a fundamental transition towards independence (politically, culturally, and linguistically): unique linguistic usages and structures (differentiation from the homeland)
4 Endonormative stabilization—the new nation adopts its own lg norms rather than adhering to external norms
5 Differentiation—internal diversification takes over: new dialects evolve on their own: differently from how lg change is proceeding in the former homeland
The first English(es) in America: centers of irradiation
1 Jamestown (1607) and 2 Massachusetts Bay Colony (1620) > Boston
Elizabethan English / Early Modern English from Southeastern England (London)
3 Philadelphia (1680s)
Scots English/Irish from Ulster in the north of Ireland
4 Charleston, SC (1670)
Heterogeneous: English, Irish, Welsh, Dutch, French, African
5 New Orleans (1717)
French and German + Cajun (1765)
Three periods:
1st colonial (1607-the end of the War of Independence)
initial extension from east to west
2nd national (-end of the 19th c.) » The westward movement
pushing westward toward the Pacific Coast
3rd international (-the present) » New immigrants
vertical & horizontal movements on the map
the growing importance of ethnic dialects (AAE and Spanish-based variants)
R.W. Bailey’s (1992) 4 areas: North, Coastal South, Midland, and West
The Northern Dialect (from New England and NY to Oregon and Wa)
Pronunciation: rhoticity (bird; car); cot=caught; matter=madder (the “flap”)
Grammar: dive » dove (Past T.);
Vocabulary: to bitch; comforter; sub(marine); babushka + Finnish (MI), Swedish
(MN), Polish (Buffalo, Detroit) & Russian (“Nice driveway!”) influence
New York City: nasal pronunciation; Yiddish influence (schlemiel, chutzpa, gonef)
Boston: also /r/-less and has the intrusive /r/ (JFK); twang
The Coastal South (Virginia, the Carolinas, the Gulf states, Texas)
Pronunciation: not rhotic=/r/-less; diphthongization of single vowel sounds (torn »
tone); monophthongization of diphthongs (hide » [had]); southern drawl
Grammar: 1—invariant be (I be pretty busy); 2—double modals (She might can do it)
3—frequency of ain`t (What it is, what it ain`t)
Vocabulary: thank you » (ap)preciate it; kinfolk; you-all
Subdialects: Texan (Dallas); Cajun (with French and Creole traces)
The Midland Dialect (Philly, Ohio, Indiana, Ill., Ky, Tennessee, Missouri, Arkansas)
Pronunciation: rhotic; merger of /o/ and /a/ (cot=caught)
Grammar: a-prefixation; anymore = “nowadays”; all = “run out” (The pot roast is all)
Vocabulary: blind (“w. shade”); fishing worm (“earthworm”); want + particle (I want
off)
Subdialects: Pennsylvania Dutch (Amish & Mennonites); Appalachian & Ozark
(country)
The West as a Dialect Region (west of the Mississippi to the Pacific Ocean)
Pronunciation: rhoticity, measure, edge » bait, age; really » rilly
Grammar: simplified syntax (I been); the use of like in Valley talk
Vocabulary: Mexican (hombre) and Hawaiian (aloha) influence
Subdialects: the “laidback” style of California
The Present and Future State of American English
(Walt Wolfram & Natalie Schilling-Estes, 2006)
Reasons for the alteration of the traditional dialect landscape in recent decades
(socio-historical & socio-cultural changes):
changing patterns of immigration and language contact
shifting patterns of population movement
changing cultural centers
increasing interregional accessibility
1 --Hispanic English (Florida, Texas, New Mexico)
--Vietnamese English (since the mid-1970s)
--desegregation and interethnic dialect contact on the increase
2 --along east-west & north-south lines as well
--two streams of northerly migration: N/SC > WDC, Philly, NYC
Deep S > St L, Chi, Detroit
--movement of AAs back to the S
--movement of EuA speakers from Midland and Northern dialect areas to the S
--from linguistic swamping towards linguistic focusing
3 --movement from rural to urban/metropolitan areas >
--markers of regional speech transformed into those of social class, ethnicity, etc.
--urbanization > loss of traditional (rural) vocabulary
4 --the ever-widening network of transportation and intercommunication
--consequence: the phenomenon of dialect endangerment
--yet: dialect difference is by no means a thing of the past
Share with your friends: |