LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY
Programme Specification
INFORMATION SCIENCE
Please note: This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme and the learning outcomes that a typical student might reasonably be expected to achieve and demonstrate if full advantage is taken of the learning opportunities that are provided. More detailed information on the learning outcomes, content and teaching, learning and assessment methods of each module can be found in Module Specifications and other programme documentation and online at http://www.lboro.ac.uk/
The accuracy of the information in this document is reviewed by the University and may be checked by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
Awarding body/institution:
|
Loughborough University
|
Teaching institution (if different):
|
|
Details of accreditation by a professional/statutory body:
|
|
Name of the final award:
|
BSc
|
Programme title:
|
Information Science
|
UCAS code:
|
N/a
|
Date at which the programme specification was written or revised:
|
May 2006
|
1. Aims of the programme:
to produce students with an understanding of the professional, managerial and technical dimensions of work in the information professions;
to provide a supportive environment in which international students can augment their existing information/library qualifications;
to introduce students to basic ideas of information science theory;
to deepen knowledge and understanding of the nature of information in all its forms, whether in printed, electronic, graphic or other form, including its generation, recording, communication, acquisition, storage, preservation, organisation, retrieval, management, dissemination, value and use;
to enhance awareness of working environments, whether public, academic, industrial and commercial;
to develop understanding of the information needs of individuals and organisations;
to provide a knowledge of systems and technologies by which information is handled to enable students to use technology with confidence;
to raise awareness of legal, ethical and professional issues as they relate to the information sector;
to enable students to apply the principles, ideas and concepts of the discipline to a defined area of study.
2. Relevant subject benchmark statements and other external and internal reference points used to inform programme outcomes:
QAA Subject Benchmark Statement for Librarianship and Information Management;
Loughborough University, A Strategy for Teaching and Learning in the New Millennium;
Loughborough University Department of Information Science, Aims and Objectives;
Loughborough University Department of Information Science, Learning and Teaching Strategy (revised draft February 2002);
Loughborough University Department of Information Science, Self Assessment Document, October 2000.
3. Intended Learning Outcomes
Knowledge and Understanding
This one-year programme offers international students a unique opportunity to extend their professional education by converting their existing diplomas into a British Bachelors degree. The programme covers a range of information-related topics and on successful completion of this programme, students should be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of:
the ethical and legal dilemmas facing information professionals;
the basics of information science theory;
the needs of users of information services;
the electronic information services industry;
the principles of information management;
how information services are organised to meet the needs of their users;
developments in IT applications and their use.
Teaching, learning and assessment strategies to enable outcomes to be achieved and demonstrated:
The programme content is delivered through lectures, seminars, tutorials, workshops, guided independent reading, practical computer laboratory classes and individual supervision. Students are required to work individually and also in independent small groups.
Students are assessed by a variety of: coursework assignments (essays and reports); examinations; a dissertation; oral presentations; and, depending on options chosen, computer-based practical assignments. The dissertation tests each student’s ability to bring the various skills and knowledge together into a comprehensive investigation of a specialised topic of the student’s own choosing.
Skills and other attributes:
a. Subject-specific cognitive skills:
On successful completion of this programme, students should be able to:
critically analyse developments in the information discipline and their implications;
interpret and use bibliometric data;
evaluate different information technology applications and their use;
discuss the principles of information management in a variety of environments and institutional contexts;
analyse data and synthesise information into value-added formats;
evaluate users’ needs in a variety of contexts and in relation to a range of printed and electronic information services and systems;
plan effective strategies for searching and handling information (in both printed and electronic formats).
Teaching, learning and assessment strategies to enable outcomes to be achieved and demonstrated:
Discussion and understanding of principles, developments and concepts is stimulated through lectures, small group teaching in tutorials and seminars and guided independent reading which is often further explored in a classroom setting. Workshops and laboratory-based sessions are also used to demonstrate key concepts and theories.
Cognitive skills such as analytical ability, argument and reasoning are assessed through coursework and examinations. Examinations enable students to demonstrate their mastery of subject knowledge and their ability to apply that to a particular problem or question under time constraints. Coursework assignments such as essays and reports allow students to explore a topic in depth and apply the full range of cognitive skills. Students are also required to demonstrate their ability by undertaking an extended piece of independent desk research.
b. Subject-specific practical skills:
On successful completion of this programme, students should be able to:
apply the resources of scholarship to specific problems in the information science field;
apply legal and ethical approaches to issues likely to be encountered as an information professional;
use citation indexes;
use effectively and compare a variety of information sources (print and electronic) in a range of professional contexts;
design information services and systems according to users’ needs;
demonstrate IT competence with a range of computer applications.
Teaching, learning and assessment strategies to enable outcomes to be achieved and demonstrated:
Practical skills are promoted through practical work in laboratory-based classes, small group teaching and workshops. Students are advised on research skills through the individual supervision for their dissertations.
Assessment of practical skills is primarily through coursework assignments with some assessment of practical knowledge in examinations.
c. Key/transferable skills:
On successful completion of this programme, students should be able to:
plan and undertake independent research for a dissertation in a defined topic area;
manage a range of data and present them effectively in a suitable format;
communicate effectively the results of their studies and research in writing (reports and essays) and by means of oral presentation;
utilise time management skills in planning work;
work effectively in teams;
use a range of IT packages and applications confidently.
Teaching, learning and assessment strategies to enable outcomes to be achieved and demonstrated:
Many of the key transferable skills are developed through small group teaching and practical laboratory-based teaching. Individual dissertation supervision also helps build competence in key areas. Independent small group work develops students’ team working skills. Assignment feedback from tutors enables students to improve their written communication and data presentation skills.
Assessment of key skills is embedded in module assessment; communication skills and team work skills are often explicitly listed in the marking criteria of assignments.
4. Programme structures and requirements , levels, modules, credits and awards:
Credit weightings of modules are shown in brackets. Students are required to take modules amounting to 120 credits. This is a one-year programme.
SEMESTER ONE
|
SEMESTER TWO
|
Dissertation (30)
|
Information Science and Retrieval Systems (20)
|
Legal and Professional Issues (10)
|
User-Centred Services (10)
|
Options (10-40)
|
Options (20-40)
|
Option available running across both Semesters:
Strategic Planning and Marketing (20 credits)
Options available Semester 1:
Informatics and Systems; Information and Knowledge Management 1; Information and Knowledge Management in the NHS; Gender and Information Studies; The Book Trade; Culture and Change Management; Social Informatics (all 10 credits).
Options available Semester 2:
Systems Modelling; Database Design; Information Work in Developing Countries ;The Child and the Book; Consumer Health Information; The Magazine Business; Electronic Information Management; Information and Knowledge Management 2; Managing Projects: Managing Knowledge (all 10 credits).
5. Criteria for admission to the programme:
Students must hold an approved two-year diploma qualification. Those with the French qualification Diplôme Universitaire Technologique (DUT) must have been awarded a minimum score of 12/20, and in addition a minimum of 12/20 in the English Language component of the DUT.
6. Information about assessment regulations:
Students must register for modules with a total weight of 120 credits, and must pass modules totalling a minimum of 100 credits. Students must also achieve a minimum of 30% in all modules. Modules are assessed by coursework, examination, or (most commonly) a combination of both, as indicated in individual module specifications. Any student who fails to meet these requirements has the automatic right of reassessment on one occasion only in any module or modules which are causing them to fail. Students may choose to be reassessed in the University’s Special Assessment Period or during the following year.
7. Indicators of quality:
The department received an ESR (Teaching Quality Assessment) score of the maximum, 24/24, in October 2000.
The department was rated Grade 5 in the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise, one below the highest grade.
8. Particular support for learning:
Information on learning support is held at
http://www.lboro.ac.uk/admin/ar/templates/notes/lps
9. Methods for evaluating and improving the quality and standards of learning:
The University’s formal quality management and reporting procedures are laid out in its Academic Quality Procedures Handbook, available online at:
http://www.lboro.ac.uk/admin/ar/policy/aqp/index.htm
These are under the overall direction of the Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Teaching).
Each Faculty has an Associate Dean for Teaching responsible for learning and teaching matters. For each Faculty there is a Directorate (responsible for the allocation of resources) and a Board (responsible for monitoring learning and teaching quality issues within each department).
In addition to the National Student Survey, student feedback on modules and programmes is sought internally at regular intervals; in the Department of Information Science student feedback on every module is sought every year. All taught programmes are reviewed annually (Annual Programme Review), and Departments have their full portfolio of programmes reviewed every five years (Periodic Programme Review).
Any major changes to programmes are formally considered each year by the University Curriculum Sub-Committee, which makes recommendations to Learning and Teaching Committee and Senate. All programmes and modules are subject to an annual updating process before the start of the academic year, and minor changes may be made at this time with the approval of the Associate Dean (Teaching) on behalf of the Curriculum Sub-Committee.
All staff participate in the University's staff appraisal scheme, which helps to identify any needs for staff skills development. Both probationary staff and those seeking promotion to Senior Lecturer are subject to a formal teaching evaluation scheme, administered by Professional Development. The scheme for new lecturers is accredited by the Higher Education Academy.
May 2006
Share with your friends: |