International Journal of Management Reviews (2009)doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00238.x
International Journal of Management Reviews Volume 11 Issue 2 pp. 197–222
197© 2008
The AuthorsJournal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and British Academy of Management. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Garsington Road, Oxford OX 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA
Blackwell
Publishing LtdOxford, UK
IJMR
International Journal of Management Reviews 1468-2370
© Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2008
XXX
ORIGINAL ARTICLESQM, EM and firm performanceXXXXXX
Quality management, environmental management and firm performance: A review of empirical studies and issues of integrationJosé F. Molina-Azorín, Juan J. Tar, Enrique Claver-
Cortés and Mara D. López-Gamero
Quality management (QM) and environmental management (EM) are two business practices that may affect firm performance. These practices are being increasingly
introduced into firms, which often use them jointly owing to their similarities. As a result of these similarities,
their integration has become a popular topic of research and practice. In the field of integration, the highest level of integration maybe
achieved by means of a single, full QM–
EM system (QEM) in which QM and EM lose their independence. It is therefore desirable to identify dimensions from which to assess these management practices and their effects on performance. The aim of this paper is to carryout a literature review in order to propose and analyse dimensions for QM, EM, QEM and firm performance, as well as models of cause–
effect relationships between these variables. The topics reviewed are the following (1) the
QM and EM dimensions (2) the empirical studies about QM–performance and EM–
performance links and (3) issues of integration. The review suggests
that the large body ofQM research may inform EM and QEM. This is so because research on the QM side is more advanced and developed than that on the EM side.
IntroductionQuality management (QM) and environmental management (EM) are business practices that may affect firm performance. As several empirical studies have shown, implementing
QM effectively can influence firm performance positively (Flynn
et al. 1995; Kaynak