Selection Criteria
www.swaswa.com.au
Background
Historically regional Western Australia has produced an array of extremely talented athletes across a wide range of sports. As the demands of elite performance became more and more complex, both the Western Australian Institute of Sport (WAIS) and many state sporting associations (SSA) found it more and more difficult to cater for regional WA’s talent development. The concept of a sports academy in the South West Region began with a meeting of the South West Chambers of Commerce and Industry Chief Executive Rolf Stene and renowned sporting identity, the late Wally Foreman.
The idea of developing a pathway for talented athletes living in regional areas was born. With the purpose of assisting with the identification of talented young athletes and the provision of support to help them to reach state, national and international levels of competition, the South West Academy of Sport (SWAS) commenced operations in 2008.
Success in sport requires dedication and commitment from both the athlete and the athlete’s family. In the past this has meant an enormous amount of travel or even relocation to Perth for the families of many talented young athletes in regional WA. This caused considerable disruption to family life and education at a critical time in the young athlete’s lives. By providing local access to specialised coaches and service providers SWAS is designed to minimize the travel requirements and allow the athlete to continue their sporting development within the stability of their regional community during their formative years (14-18).
SWAS provides athletes with access to a team of service providers who help them to develop the skills necessary to build a long and rewarding career in sport. Athletes receive financial assistance to access top-tier coaches, specialist training and support services. Services such as sports psychology, physiotherapy, sports medicine, injury prevention, nutrition, life skills and athlete career education are all part of the program.
SWAS provides support to South West athletes via two programs:
Partner Sport Programs are run in conjunction with the state association’s development program and delivered at venue facilities across the entire South West. SWAS has seven Partner Sports: AFL, Hockey, Cricket, and Netball.
The Individual Athlete Support Program provides resources and support to individual athletes to assist in meeting the costs of their sporting development.
Athlete Eligibility
To be eligible for SWAS programs, athletes must meet the following eligibility criteria:
Athlete compete in sports and events that are able to contribute to SWAS goals or Australian International Success but are not eligible to join a SWAS Partner Sport Program (Reference AIS Sports Tally in Appendix 1 for approved sports and guidelines below*)
Meet the criteria in one of the four SWAS athlete categories;
Be an Australian citizen;
Permanently reside in the South West region within one of its 12 local government authorities: City of Bunbury, Shires of Harvey, Collie, Dardanup, Capel, Donnybrook-Balingup, Busselton, Boyup Brook, Bridgetown-Greenbushes, Augusta-Margaret River, Manjimup and Nannup (athletes who board in Perth are ineligible);
Be a current registered member of a club or association that is affiliated with the SSA and operates within the SW region;
Be 14 – 18 years of age** (as at the 1st July);
Demonstrate, through past performance within the last 12 months or potential capacity, the ability to improve performance to a high level; and
Be endorsed by the NSO (National State Organisation) or SSA (State Sporting Association).
(**Note: Athletes turning 14 by 31st December qualify for the SWAS IASP. In certain circumstances, SWAS may consider athletes outside this age group and these exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis).
*Greatest consideration will be given to athletes competing in sports and events within the following categories, in order of priority:
Events on the Olympic, Paralympic and Commonwealth Games programs; and
Sports of National Significance; and
World Championship Sports.
SWAS Athlete Categories
All SWAS athletes MUST be classified into one of the following four categories as part of the scholarship program selection process:
|
1
|
Potential International
|
Athlete has been selected to represent Australia in an international event as an individual athlete or as part of a national junior team.
Selection has been conducted by the National Sporting Organisation (NSO) and/or the event is sanctioned by the NSO.
Eligible national representation includes sporting organisations recognised by the Australian Sports Commission (ASC) and for open and age group categories.
Ineligible national representation teams not selected/ endorsed by the NSO, specific population competitions like University Games and / or national touring teams not selected by the NSO and events where the athlete has chosen to represent Australia in an event they have qualified or nominated for and has not been selected by the NSO.
|
2.
|
Emerging International
|
Athlete has been selected in a national junior talent squad program, national junior team training squad and / or as a reserve for a national team. Athlete has the potential to compete in an international event in the next 1 – 3 years.
Selection has been conducted by the NSO and/or the squad is sanctioned by the NSO. Potential must be justified by the NSO coach.
Eligible national talent squads, training squads and / or teams include sporting organisations recognised by the ASC and for open and age categories.
Ineligible national talent squads, training squads and / or teams include squads not selected/ endorsed by the NSO, specific population training squads like University Games and / or national touring squads not selected by the NSO where the athlete has chosen to represent Australia in an event they aim to qualify or nominate for and has not been selected by the NSO.
|
3.
|
National – Junior
|
Athlete has been selected/ qualified to represent Western Australia in a national junior event as an individual athlete or as part of a state team.
Selection has been conducted by the SSA and/or the event is sanctioned by the NSO.
Eligible state teams/ national events include sporting associations recognised by the Department of Sport and Recreation (DSR) and for open and age categories.
Ineligible state teams/ national events include those not selected/ endorsed by the SSA, specific population competitions like Country Week, University Games and/ or state touring teams not selected by the SSA and competitions where the athlete has chosen to represent Western Australia in an event they have qualified or nominated for and has not been selected by the SSA.
|
4.
|
Potential National – Junior
|
Athlete has been selected in a state talent squad program, state team training squad and / or as a reserve for a state team. The athlete has the potential to compete in a national event in the next 1 - 3 years.
Selection has been conducted by the SSA and/or the squad is sanctioned by the SSA. Potential must be justified by the SSA coach.
Eligible state talent squads, training squads and teams include sporting associations recognised by DSR and for open and age categories.
Ineligible state talent squads, training squads and teams include those not selected/ endorsed by the SSA, specific population training squads like Country Week, University Games and / or state touring squads not selected by the SSA and squads where the athlete can choose to represent Western Australian in an event they aim to qualify or nominate for and has not been selected by the SSA.
|
Appendix 1
AIS Sports Tally
The South West Academy of Sport will be utilising the AIS Sports Tally as a guideline for approved sports for the SWAS Selection Criteria. Any sport not appearing in the AIS Sports Tally will be subject to the same rating criteria.
The Sports Tally provides an annual health check on sports that receive Australia’s Winning Edge funding. This information has been derived from the Annual Sports Performance Review (ASPR) process. Each sport’s high performance progress has been given an overall rating and commentary has been inclined for high performance, governance and participation.
The overall high performance rating considers each sport against it’s annual benchmark event performance, future potential and health of sport’s high performance system. The sport-specific information and evidence is provided and reviewed in collaboration with national sporting organisations and the national institute network through the:
Winning Edge performance case submission and associated panel report (removed)
High performance planning and reporting template
2013 benchmark event reports (2014 benchmark event reports)
2013 ASPR (2014 ASPR)
2013 performance summary report (2014 performance summary report)
The Tally Key
Underperforming
|
Significantly below expectation; solutions to challenges not identified
|
1
|
Progressing
|
Evidence of improvement; solutions to challenges being implemented
|
2
|
On Track
|
Working well across key areas; on target
|
3
|
Performing
|
Performing well in all areas; above target
|
4
|
Excelling
|
Exceptional performance; setting a standard for others to aspire
|
5
|
Non-medal target – in all cases where no medal has been forecast or where the lower end of medal range is zero, a non-medal target is agreed. For example, fourth place or quarter final.
Y = yes
N = no
2016 Updates – AIS Sports Tally
Rating Five
Sport
|
Level
|
Rating
|
Basketball
|
High performance
|
5 (2 – Progressing)
|
Basketball
|
High Performance (Paralympic)
|
5 (2-Progressing)
|
Rating Four
Sport
|
Level
|
Rating
|
Bowls
|
High performance
|
4 (3 – On Track)
|
Cricket
|
High performance
|
4
|
Cycling
|
High performance (Paralympic)
|
4 (3 – On Track)
|
Golf
|
High performance
|
4
|
Netball
|
High performance
|
4
|
Rowing
|
High performance (Paralympic)
|
4
|
Rugby League
|
High performance
|
4
|
Sailing
|
High performance
|
4
|
Ski and snowboard
|
High performance
|
4 (2 – Progressing)
|
Surfing
|
High performance
|
4 (5 – excelling)
|
Rating Three
Sport
|
Level
|
Rating
|
Archery
|
High performance
|
3
|
Athletics
|
High performance
|
3 (1 - Underperforming)
|
Canoeing
|
High performance (Paralympic)
|
3
|
Canoeing
|
High performance
|
3 (2 – Progressing)
|
Cycling (including BMX)
|
High performance
|
3
|
Diving
|
High performance
|
3
|
Equestrian
|
High performance
|
3 (2 – Progressing)
|
Equestrian
|
High performance
|
3 (2 – Progressing)
|
Sailing
|
High performance (Paralympic)
|
3
|
Hockey
|
High performance
|
3
|
Rowing
|
High performance
|
3 (2 – Progressing)
|
Surf Life Saving
|
High performance
|
3 (2 – Progressing)
|
Swimming
|
High performance (Paralympic)
|
3
|
Table Tennis
|
High performance
|
3
|
Tennis
|
High performance (Paralympic)
|
3
|
Triathlon
|
High performance (Paralympic
|
3(2 – Progressing)
|
Triathlon
|
High performance
|
3(2 – Progressing)
|
Volleyball - Indoor
|
High performance
|
3 (2-Progressing)
|
Volleyball - Beach
|
High performance
|
3 (2-Progressing)
|
Water Polo
|
High performance
|
3
|
Rating Two
Sport
|
Level
|
Rating
|
Badminton
|
High performance
|
2
|
Boxing
|
High performance
|
2
|
Football
|
High performance
|
2
|
Gymnastics
|
High performance
|
2
|
Motor Sport
|
High performance
|
2
|
Rugby Union (rugby 7s) Men
|
High performance
|
2
|
Rugby Union (rugby 7s) Women
|
High performance
|
2 (3 – On Track)
|
Shooting
|
High performance
|
2 (3 – On Track)
|
Shooting
|
High performance (Paralympic)
|
2
|
Squash
|
High performance
|
2
|
Tennis
|
High performance
|
2
|
Non Medal Ratings
Sport
|
Level
|
Rating
|
Boccia
|
High Performance (Paralympic)
|
Y (Removed)
|
Goalball
|
High Performance (Paralympic)
|
Y (Removed)
|
Rugby (Wheelchair)
|
High Performance (Paralympic)
|
Y (Removed)
|
Powerlifting
|
High Performance (Paralympic)
|
Y (Removed)
|
Wintersports
|
High Performance (Paralympic)
|
N (Removed)
|
Weightlifting
|
High Performance
|
2 - Progressing
|
Wheelchair tennis
|
High Performance (Paralympic)
|
3 – On Track
|
Feedback
Basketball
Basketball Australia has been rated as progressing for both Olympic and Paralympic disciplines. Basketball Australia’s high performance programs are led by quality head coaches who have targeted the required changes in culture in the first two years of the Olympiad. This resulted in mixed outcomes in terms of 2014 benchmark event targets; the Opals and Rollers met their targets with bronze and gold medals respectively but the Boomers and Gliders missed their targets. Anthony Moore commenced as CEO of Basketball Australia in October 2014 and has board approval to implement an organisation-wide restructure (to be implemented in the first quarter of 2015).
Athletics
The Athletics Australia high performance program has been rated as progressing, while the para-athletics program has been rated as on track. The highly publicised departure of the Athletics Australia national head coach during the Glasgow Commonwealth Games was poorly timed and unhelpful for the sport’s image. Despite this distraction there were solid performances from a number of athletes — including Sally Pearson, Kimberley Mickle, Alana Boyd, Michael Shelley and Dani Samuels.
The Athletics Australia and ASC reviews following the Commonwealth Games reflect the wide-ranging challenges across the sport. It is expected the outcomes and recommendations of the reviews will provide athletics with a positive and productive way forward. The high performance unit at Athletics Australia continues to develop and implement strategies to improve the accountability, monitoring and coordination of support to its athletes. The sport is pursuing the appointment of a new head coach and performance services manager as a matter of urgency, with both roles being critical to achieving high performance outcomes in the future. There are a number of promising emerging athletes with podium potential, and this year’s world championships will provide insight into the performance potential in the pre-Olympic and Paralympic year.
Athletics is regarded to be on track to achieve its Rio 2016 targets.
Canoeing
Australian Canoeing has been rated as progressing (Olympic) and on track (Paralympic). Canoe slalom met its Australia’s Winning Edge target with a gold medal in the women’s K1 event at the world championships, which was complemented by a promising fifth place in the men’s event. However, beyond these performances — and an Olympic qualifying standard in the men’s C1 — few athletes met their targets/expectations at this event.
The sprint program fell short of its Australia’s Winning Edge targets for the 2014 world championships. There were nonetheless some valuable lessons learnt and positive results by younger athletes, including a silver medal for a new men’s K2 1000 combination and an impressive performance by a new women’s K2 combination, which is closing in on the podium. The sport believes it is on target for its Rio 2016 goals, but achieving this will require a great deal of work.
Australian Canoeing has made significant cultural shifts this year, particularly in the areas of planning, assessment and review. This includes close athlete monitoring after acknowledging that a tighter focus and rigor around operations is needed to win medals in Rio.
Rowing:
Rowing Australia has been rated as progressing (Olympic) and performing (Paralympic). Rowing Australia did not meet its 2014 world championships gold medal target in Olympic-class boats. While there is some caution around this result, there is evidence that with eight boats finishing in the top five — and four of them with medals — rowing is positioned to achieve its Rio 2016 targets.
The challenge for 2015 is to convert existing medals to gold, and the fourth and fifth placing to medals. There is a watching brief on this for 2015, with Rowing Australia needing to clearly set out the steps it is taking to improve the benchmark event performances of its Olympic-category boats. In para-rowing events, Australia finished at the top of the world championships medal table for a second successive year, with gold medals in the men’s single sculls and mixed double sculls Paralympic-class boats. The challenge for 2015 is to develop the mixed four as a third medal-potential boat.
Rugby Union (rugby 7s) – Women
Australian Rugby Union's (ARU) 7s program has been rated as progressing (men) and on track (women). The women’s and men’s teams improved significantly in the 2014 International Rugby Board (IRB) series. The women’s team finished second to world champions New Zealand, and the team’s 2–2 win/loss record in finals makes them a gold medal prospect for Rio 2016. The men’s team won a bronze medal at the Glasgow Commonwealth Games and are improving; however, they will need to continue this trajectory to meet their Rio medal expectations. AIS and ARU 7s have started an AIS Talent Transfer program, which is looking for new female talent to feed the program. The ARU has also expanded competitions and coach development areas since last year.
Surf Life Saving
Surf Life Saving Australia (SLSA) has been rated as progressing. After being defeated as overall point-score champions for the first time at the 2012 world championships, SLSA put in place a focused campaign for 2014. This was part of a restructure of the high performance program, including a new high performance team.
Although the target of winning the world championships was not achieved, post-event analysis has shown a significant reversal of downwards performance trends and a narrowing of the gap. The establishment of a more structured system — along with the success of the junior team in 2014 — augers well for Australia to achieve the target of being the number one nation in 2016.
SLSA remains a key player in the talent transfer of athletes into the Olympic pathway for canoeing and open water swimming, with policy agreements and programs in place that will achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.
Surfing
Surfing Australia has been rated as excelling. The 2014 women’s surfing world tour saw three Australians — Stephanie Gilmore, Tyler Wright and Sally Fitzgibbons — in the running for the title. Gilmore did enough in the last event to win her sixth world title, holding off Wright who repeated her second-place performance from 2013. Fitzgibbons slipped off the podium into fourth place.
The men’s event came down to the last event of the year. Australian Mick Fanning was in contention but unfortunately was unable to chase down the young Brazilian Gabriel Medina, who won his first world title and the first for his country. Joel Parkinson was also in podium contention until the last event but eventually placed sixth. Overall, Australia had four of the top 10 surfers in the world. Like in the women’s event, Australia finished with four of the top 10 surfers in the world.
Surfing Australia’s high performance program continues to play a significant role in the success of Australian surfers on the world stage. The support offered at seven of the events and the ever-expanding services provided by the high performance centre has been critical in maintaining Australia’s status as the number one surfing nation worldwide.
Triathlon
Triathlon Australia has been rated as progressing for both Olympic and Paralympic disciplines. Triathlon Australia did not have a successful 2014 season; it did not reach its benchmark event targets at the ITU World Triathlon in Edmonton or at the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow. The sport recognises that while the male athletes improved, more is expected from them and that the female cohort slipped from the high levels expected of them. There were, however, some encouraging under-23 and under-20 medal performances at the world championships.
Triathlon Australia will consider its high performance coaching area and explore how to guarantee future athlete performances at the benchmark events. There is awareness of the coaches’ delicate balance between achieving strong performances across the entire ITU World Triathlon Series and the one-off benchmark event competition.
In 2014 Triathlon Australia implemented a coaching system below the elite level, which aims to provide a greater influence capability at that level and in coaching in the future.
Australia has a rich history of elite performance since the inclusion of triathlon at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games, but the competitive environment has become much stronger. Other nations are now concentrating on the sport and this requires intelligence gathering from these countries to glean world’s best practice examples in athlete preparation and coaching.
Volleyball
Indoor volleyball (men)
Volleyball Australia has been rated as progressing for both Olympic and Paralympic disciplines. The Australian team benefited from competition exposure in the FIVB Volleyball Word League in 2014. They played in the finals and qualified for the first division in 2015 — a first for Australia — and achieved their best ever finish at the world championships by finishing equal 15th (though missing their Volleyball Australia benchmark event target of 4–8th). While this performance is to be applauded relative to the team’s past record, Volleyball Australia’s target of a medal in Rio appears ambitious.
There has been significant leadership change in the sport, with a new CEO (April 2014) and high performance director (November 2014) providing a positive direction for the high performance program. The high performance director will oversee both the men’s indoor and beach volleyball sections.
Volleyball Australia will streamline the men’s indoor program. This is necessary given the large number of overseas contracted players and allow for concentration on the senior squad returning for team preparation from May to September, when they will play in the world league’s top division and in the Olympic qualifying competitions (Asian Championships and world cup).
In early 2015 Volleyball Australia commenced a recruitment process for a men’s indoor volleyball coach.
Beach volleyball
Beach volleyball achieved its benchmark event targets for 2014 through the efforts of a men’s and women’s pair. This combined set of performances suggests Olympic qualification is a possibility for both male and female pairs, but a medal will require much work to achieve consistently high performances. Volleyball Australia also won the 2014 world under-23 women’s championships and Asian men’s and women’s senior titles.
Through new leadership, Volleyball Australia aims to provide greater direction and targeted resourcing going into the 2015 Olympic qualifying period — a labour-intensive period that will involve a lot of international travel.
P/C IASP ADMIN 03/13 SWAS Individual Athlete Support Program Application Form Page of 10
SWAS Selection Criteria Feb 2015
Share with your friends: |