Supplementary Information (Online only): Identification of areas in Brazil that optimize conservation of forest carbon, jaguars, and biodiversity

Supplementary Information (Online only):
Identification of areas in Brazil that optimize conservation of forest carbon, jaguars, and biodiversity

De Barros, Alan E.; Macdonald, Ewan A.; Matsumoto, Marcelo H.; Paula, Rogério C.; Nijhawan, Sahil; Malhi,Y.; Macdonald, David W.

*Correspondence: E-mail: alanbiology@gmail.com
Appendix S1.Table S1: Datasets used in GIS analysis.
Appendix S2. Table S2: REDD related strategies in Brazil.
Appendix S3. Supplementary results and parameters and values adopted in the Promethee method

Fig. S3: Occurrence (within municipalities) of JCU and biodiversity categories in relation to forest carbon storage and annual deforestation rate.

Table S3a: Fundamental criteria used to compare all scenarios with distinct levels of carbon and deforestation

Table S3b: All criteria used to compare the top four scenarios

Appendix S4. Table S4: List of municipalities highlighted as “REDDspots”.

Appendix S5. Fig S5: “REDDspots” and (JCUs & corridors, Protected areas and Indigenous lands).
Appendix S6. Comparisons of carbon stored (in forest remnants 2008) within Brazilian municipalities for two different datasets: Ruesch & Gibbs (2008) and Saatchi et al (2011).

Table S6: Differences and correlation between Ruesch and Gibbs (2008) and Saatchi et al (2011) carbon datasets.

Fig. S6: Scatter plots comparing two datasets of carbon: Ruesch and Gibbs (2008) and Saatchi et al (2011) datasets

Fig. S7: Scatter plots for REDDspots and correlation plots for biomes comparing Ruesch and Gibbs (2008) and Saatchi et al (2011) carbon datasets.

Datasets_used:__Table_S1'>Appendix S7. Support references

Appendix S1. Datasets used:

Table S1: Datasets used in the GIS analysis. In some cases the datasets that we used in our analysis were themselves compiled from a number of pre-existing datasets; to make this clear we have listed the dataset that we used in regular font, but also added the original datasets below in italics.

Dataset	Data description	Source
Carbon dataset	Global biomass and soil carbon map a) global carbon biomass b) soil carbon map	Kapos et al (2008) a) Ruesch & Gibbs (2000) b) G.S.D.T (2000)
Biodiversity 1	Global map of priority areas for biodiversity with six prioritization schemes: a) Conservation International’s Hotspots b) WWF Global 200 ecoregions - terrestrial c) WWF Global 200 ecoregions - freshwater d) Birdlife International Endemic Bird Areas, EBA5 e) WWF/IUCN Centres of Plant Diversity, CPD5 f) Amphibian Diversity Areas	Kapos et al (2008) a) Mittermeier et al., (2004) b) Olson & Dinnerstein, (2002) c) Olson & Dinerstein, (2002) d) Birdlife International, (2008) e) WWF and IUCN (1994) f) Duellman, (1999)
Biodiversity 2	Biological Importance in Brazil, Ministry of Environment	MMA (2007)
Biomes	Brazilian main biomes	MMA & IBGE (2004)
Deforestation and remnant forest 1	Available deforestation and forest remnant landcover data for Amazon Biome from year 2002 to 2008. PRODES/ National Institute for Space Research (INPE).	INPE (2009)
Deforestation and remnant forest 2	Available deforestation and forest remnant landcover data for Biomes of Atlantic Forest, Cerrado, Pantanal, Caatinga and Pampas from year 2002 to 2008. Ministry of Environment/ Brazilian Environment and Natural Resources Institute (MMA - CSR/IBAMA)	MMA/IBAMA (2009)
Municipalities	Municipalities layer referent to 2007 from Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE)	IBGE (2008)
Jaguar Conservation Units	Priority areas for jaguar conservation. Updated data from CENAP/ ICMbio and Panthera Foundation. 20 JCUs inside the Brazilian territory (4 of urgent action priority, 9 of interest for research and conservation, 5 of interest for conservation and 2 of research interest).	Paula et al. (2010), Nijhawan et al. 2010, Nijhawan (2012), Sanderson et al. (2002), Desbiez &Paula 2012
Jaguar Corridors	Jaguar network corridors, CENAP/ ICMbio and Panthera Foundation. 18 corridors considering barriers, 13 corridors without consider barriers. * Corridor polygons merged and adapted from original.	Nijhawan et al. 2010, Rabinowitz & Zeller (2010)
REDD projects	We identified municipalities where REDD projects occur because many projects did not have available GIS layers.	Cifor (2010), SFB/MMA (2009), Idesam (2010) and others, see STable 2.
Protected areas, Indigeous Lands	Brazilian Federal, State and municipal PA of integral protection and sustainable use and Indigenous Territories	MMA & FUNAI (2010)

Directory: uploads
uploads -> 587 Return function, r i(X) r i(0) r i(1) r i(2) r i(3) 1 0 2 4 6 Thermal Station, I 2 0 1 5 6 3 0 3 5 6 10
uploads -> Department of science and humanities department of mathematics part-a questions and answers
uploads -> The Case Against the nypd’s Quota-Driven ‘Broken Windows’ Policing What Is It?
uploads -> For want of a nail
uploads -> Ownership Models There are two different types of ownership models
uploads -> Police Militarization
uploads -> City of rising star regular meting thursday, july 14, 2016
uploads -> Township of winfield
uploads -> Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act of 2014
uploads -> The Black Panther Party’s Ten-Point Program What We Want Now!