The ip coalition report I



Download 232.57 Kb.
Page10/11
Date07.08.2017
Size232.57 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11

CONCLUSION

Why protect the intellectual property rights? As seen from the software industry profile presented earlier, there seem to be an inverse relationship between the software piracy rates and the new investments in the industry. The same was observed in the analysis of the movie and recording industries. And from the literatures studying piracy and foreign direct investments, the same conclusion has been attained. Foreign direct investments increase as piracy rates decrease, or put in a different light, FDI also depends on the level of protection on IPR.

Findings in a study conducted by the International Data Corporation (IDC) in 2003 showed that a 10-point reduction in software piracy results in: 1) acceleration in the IT sector growths, 2) creation of new employment and higher tax revenues to the government, 3) countries with higher piracy rates obtain larger benefits from piracy reduction, and 4) a 10-point reduction in piracy is achievable as nearly two-thirds of countries studied have done it once.

The same impression may be derived from IPR infringement or piracy reductions in other industries. As in the movie and recording industries, curtailing piracy would create additional movies, productions, and recording albums in the industries. More economic activities would translate to more opportunities, jobs, and greater output. Further, additional tax revenues for the government would also be earned.

A lot of industries, like the manufacturing, biotechnology, chemical and pharmaceutical, are also IPR based. Depending on the importance of the industry to the over-all economy, an improvement in these business sectors would significantly help in the development of the macroeconomy. And one of the avenues by which the government can help these industries achieve development is by intensifying the protection of IPR.

The Philippine government has been a staunch supporter of intellectual property rights. IPR protection has been a state policy as provided by the Constitution; and more legislation have been put in place in order to adapt to the changing environment in the IPR system. The E-commerce Act has provisions to address copyright infringement in the internet, while the Optical Media Bill was ratified to tackle optical disc piracy. The country has also joined international treaties and agreements in support of IPR.

The government and the private sectors in the Philippines are actively participating in IPR related endeavors. In 2003 alone, the Intellectual Property Office and the Intellectual Property Coalition had conducted several activities regarding IPR advocacy and information dissemination. Meanwhile, the government enforcement agencies have continuously conducted monitoring and apprehension activities against IPR infringers. They have also been developing their human resources through the conduct of seminars and trainings on IPR issues and concerns.

However, a lot still needs to be done in order to curtail piracy and other IPR violations in the country. One of the downside in the Philippine case, with regards to IPR, is the prevailing social acceptance of IPR infringements. Hence, efforts must also be geared toward addressing this concern. Enforcement activities, placement of laws and other IPR endeavors will not be successful if the social aspect of IPR protection will be neglected. Therefore, the legal, economic and social aspects of IPR protection must all be given emphasis to completely safeguard the rights of intellectual property rights holders.

Though the focus of the study is on copyright industries and on piracy, it should be noted that the paper supports all IPR-related industries and advocates for the development of the Philippine intellectual capital/assets. Thus, both the government and society must give emphasis to protecting the rights of our artists, composers, performers, as well as our scientists, inventors, researchers, and other innovators.

REFERENCES

1995 Census-Based Municipal Population Projections. National Statistical Coordination Board


Association of Video Distributors of the Philippines (AVIDPHIL)
Bengzon, Anthony D. Bengzon & Negre Intellectual Property Attorneys. Personal Interview

Bromley, D.W. and M.M. Cernea. 1989. The Management of Common Property Natural Resources: Some Conceptual and Operational Fallacies. World Bank Discussion Papers, No. 57. The World Bank Washington D.C.


Bureau of Investments, Department of Trade and Industry
Bureau of Trade and Promotions, Department of Trade and Industry
Calimag, Peter L. Angara Abello Concepcion Regala & Cruz Law Offices. Personal Interview.
Clark Development Corporation
Commission on Higher Education
Correa, C. “Bilateral Investment Agreements: Agents of New global Standards for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights?” August 2004 in http://www.grain.org/briefings/?id=186Commission on Higher Education
Cuevas, A.C. 1994. Institutional Arrangements in Common Pool Resources: The Case of Fishery. A Thesis Manuscript Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Economics, College of Economics, UPLB.
Cuevas, S.C. 1997. Influence of Technology in Determining the Exclusive and Non-exclusive Property Rights: The Case of Fishery. A Thesis Manuscript Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Economics, College of Economics, UPLB.
“Economy, Information Technology, and the Critical Role of the Software and Services Sector: Focus the Philippines. 2002-2003. “ Sallstrom Consulting and Nathan Associates Inc. 2002.
E-Philippines Strategic Plan. Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Council (ITECC). February 2003
Economic Indicators. National Statistical Coordination Board. December 1996.
Economic Indicators. National Statistical Coordination Board. December 1997.
Economic Indicators. National Statistical Coordination Board. December 1998.
Economic Indicators. National Statistical Coordination Board. December 1999.
Economic Indicators. National Statistical Coordination Board. December 2000.
Economic Indicators. National Statistical Coordination Board. December 2001.
Economic Indicators. National Statistical Coordination Board. December 2002.
Economic Indicators. National Statistical Coordination Board. October 2003.
Eighth Annual BSA Global Software Piracy Study. June 2003.
Electronic Commerce Act, Republic Act No. 8792.
“Expanding Global Economies: The Benefits of Reducing Software Piracy.” International Data Corporation (IDC). 2003
Feder, G. and D. Feeny. 1991. Land Tenure and Property Rights: Theory and Implications for Development Policy. The World Bank Economic Review 5: 135-53.
“Filipino IT Workers Rank High in Survey”. Philippine Daily Inquirer, June 1, 2002.
Fiscor, Mihaly. April 2003. “Intellectual Property and Economic Growth with Special Attention to Copyright and Related Rights.” Lecture prepared for the WIPO-ESCWA Arab Regional Conference on Recent Developments in the Field of Intellectual Property, Beirut, May 5 and 6, 2003.
Film Ratings Board. Local Film Industry.
Foreign Direct Investment Quarterly Report of the National Statistical Coordination Board. 2000
Foreign Direct Investment Quarterly Report of the National Statistical Coordination Board. 2001
Foreign Direct Investment Quarterly Report of the National Statistical Coordination Board. 2002
Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS). National Statistics Office. 1994
Garcia, Eduardo T., Jr. " An Economic Analysis of the Effects of Audio CD Piracy to the Local Record Industry". A Thesis Manuscript Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Economics, College of Economics, UPLB. March 2002.
Information Technology (I.T.) Services Industry Profile, Bureau of Export Trade Promotion, Department of Trade and Industry

International Data Corporation (IDC). Expanding Global Economies: The Benefits of Reducing Software Piracy. 2003


Intellectual Property Coalition (IPC) Brochure
Intellectual Property Office-Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Unit. Accomplishment Report. January-December 2002
“Intellectual Property Rights in the Philippines: Brief Background”. Chan Robles Virtual Law Library.
International Intellectual Property Alliance 2003 Special 301 Reports PHILIPPINES
International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) Comments on Special 301. Out-of-Cycle Review on the Philippines. October 30, 2002
International Intellectual Property Alliance 2001 Special report METHODOLOGY
Mendoza, Oz. "All About Money". www.philmusic.com
Mendoza-Vianzon, Marlene. Philippine IT Market Metrics. The IDC Advantage. 2001
National Accounts of the Philippines: 1998-2000.National Statistical Coordination Board
National Accounts of the Philippines: 2000-2002.National Statistical Coordination Board
National Accounts of the Philippines: 2001-2003.National Statistical Coordination Board
National Statistics Office
National Statistical Coordination Board
National Statistics Office
Office of the President Inter-Agency Committee on Intellectual Property Rights Executive Summary. January-December 1999.
Office of the President Inter-Agency Committee on Intellectual Property Rights Executive Summary. January-December 2000.
Office of the President Inter-Agency Committee on Intellectual Property Rights Executive Summary. January-December 2001.
Office of the President. "Response to the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) 2003 Special 301 Report for the Philippines. March 2003.
Parkin, M and R. Bade. Macroeconomics, 2nd Edition. 1992
PDCP Bank Industry Digest. "Computer Software and Services Industry: New Applications Drive Demand. Vol. 20, No.5 0115-4419. May 1996.
Philippine Association of the Record Industry, Inc.
Philippine Export Zone Authority
Philippine Software Industry Association, Inc.
Philippine Statistical Yearbook. National Statistical Coordination Board. 2002
Philippine Standard Industrial Classification (PSIC). 1994.
“Piracy talk With Philippines’ BSA president by Geoffrey P Ramos, October 28, 1999. www.cw.com.hk
Schlager, E. and E. Ostrom. 1992. Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics 68:249-62.
Seventh Annual BSA Global Software Piracy Study. June 2002.
Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority
Somera, Bienvenido, Jr. President, Philippine Intellectual Property Alliance. Personal Interview.
Southeast Asia Regional Initiatives for Community Empowerment (SEARICE) Primer, as cited by Basilio, Robert JA, Jr., June 24, 2002. www.cyberdyaryo.com
“The Annual Sourcebook of the Philippine Information Technology Community”. IT Resource Philippines. 2001-2002 Edition. Published by the WS Computer Publishing Corporation. 2001.
“The Annual Sourcebook of the Philippine Information Technology Community”. IT Resource Philippines. 2003-2004 Edition. Published by the Media G8way Corporation (formerly WS Computer Publishing Corporation). 2003.
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) “2003 Special 301” Report.
Video Regulatory Board Intelligence and Inspection Division. Summary of Operations. 2002
World Intellectual Property Organization. Guide on Surveying the Economic Contribution of the Copyright-based Industries. 2003.
www.cbbb.org/features/preventpiracy.asp
www.forecastcenter.com/public/guest/GNEI.htm
www.Tradelinephil.dti.gov.ph/betp/ITServices
www.tradeport.org/ts/countries/philippines/isa/isar0006.html
www.wipo.org




Download 232.57 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2020
send message

    Main page