4c. Are TMs avoided unless used as a primary reference for a specific performance step or performance sub-step?
|
|
|
|
|
5a. Does the condition statement include a trigger or cue? (What has occurred that requires this drill to be performed)
|
|
|
|
|
5b. Is the condition statement use terms applicable to the target population in order to avoid unnecessarily restricting the applicability of the drill to other units? (Example: unit, unit leader, machine gun.)
|
|
|
|
|
5c. Does the condition statement address relevant aiding and limiting factors required to establish the appropriate situation required in order to conduct the drill?
|
|
|
|
|
5d. Does the condition statement allow the Commander to apply variables of METT-TC to the extent applicable to the drill?
|
|
|
|
|
5e. Is the condition statement not unnecessarily restrictive (allows units and/or other proponents to use the drill if appropriate)?
|
|
|
|
|
6a. Does the drill standard describe clearly what the collection of Soldiers must do to succeed at the drill?
|
|
|
|
|
6b. Is the drill standard measurable and/or observable?
|
|
|
|
|
6c. Is the drill standard written in present tense and paragraph format?
|
|
|
|
|
7a. Are performance steps written using a present tense and subject, verb, and object format, with each step identifying who performs it?
|
|
|
|
|
7b. Are the performance sub-steps written using a subject, present tense verb and object format? (The subject may be omitted, if implied.)
|
|
|
|
|
7c. Are performance sub-steps both measurable and observable?
|
|
|
|
|
8a. Are performance step and/or sub-step notes "by exception"?
|
|
|
|
|
8b. Do notes provide only amplifying information that is not otherwise appropriate for inclusion in an existing or additional performance step or sub-step?
|
|
|
|
|
9. Do the setup instructions include enough information about resources, training site requirements, and unit instructions to conduct the drill?
|
|
|
|
|
10. Do the talk-through instructions include enough information about orientation, safety, CRM process, demonstration, and explanation to conduct the drill?
|
|
|
|
|
11. Do the walk-through instructions include enough information to perform the drill at a reduced speed?
|
|
|
|
|
12. Do the run-through instructions include enough information to perform the drill at operational speed?
|
|
|
|
|
13. Do the coaching points clarify and expand on the actions and/or techniques needed by the drill leader to guide Soldiers through the drill?
|
|
|
|
|
14a. Is each supporting individual task the most current proponent task?
|
|
|
|
|
14b. Is each supporting individual task performed during the supported drill or is a direct prerequisite (first order effect) of the supported drill?
|
|
|
|
|
14c. Is proficiency in each supporting individual task essential to ensure successful accomplishment of the supported drill?
|
|
|
|
|
15a. If multimedia is used, does it clarify the drill?
|
|
|
|
|
15b. Has an effort been made to limit the multimedia file size to less than 5 megabytes?
|
|
|
|
|
15c. Are the multimedia files limited to the basic types such as .mpg, .jpg, .gif, .ppt, .doc, .png, and .wav?
|
|
|
|
|
