SS.7.C.2.5 - Distinguish how the Constitution safeguards and limits individual rights. |
Vocabulary
|
appellate process
|
the process of asking a higher court to decide whether a trial was conducted properly
|
ex post facto
|
a Latin term meaning “after the fact”
|
ex post facto law
|
a law that makes an act a crime after the crime has been committed
|
habeas corpus
|
the principle that the government has to provide a cause or reason for holding a person in jail
|
independent judiciary
|
the principle that decisions from the courts are fair and impartial and are not influenced by the other branches of government
|
precedent
|
a court decision in an earlier case with facts and legal issues similar to those in a case currently before a court
|
privacy
|
not in public
|
public interest
|
common benefit, the general benefit of the public
|
safeguard
|
To protect
|
summary judgment
|
a judgment decided by a trial court without the case going to trial; a summary judgment is an attempt to stop a case from going to trial
|
writ
|
law
|
|
10. Which type of law makes an act a crime after it has been committed?
Summary judgment
Double jeopardy
Habeas corpus
Ex post facto
|
Below is a statement from Chief Justice John Roberts.
Source: Morse v. Frederick (2007)
11. Why is this statement significant?
The Constitution limits individual rights.
The Constitution safeguards individual rights.
The Constitution does not limit individual rights.
The Constitution does not safeguard individual rights.
|
The timeline below shows events related to the death penalty.
12. What constitutional protections have resulted from these events?
Constitutional protections from cruel and unusual punishment are safeguarded while executions continue.
Constitutional protections from cruel and unusual punishment are limited while executions continue.
Constitutional protections of due process of law are safeguarded while executions continue.
Constitutional protections of due process of law are limited while executions continue.
|
Application Activity
|
|