(gallery5 at mindspring.com)
If it were me, I wouldn't touch it. If he wants a good usable
book, go buy a new one. Take that book and put it in a glass
box.
Rotax Steve
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3224. . . . . . . . . . . . Ester and the Texas Preamble
From: silkworthdotnet . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/27/2006 2:54:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Grapevine, February, 2001
Texas Preamble:
A few months after the Grapevine published the Preamble in June,
1947, Ollie L., Dick F., and Searcy W. decided to beef it up for the
drunks in Texas. "We worked on it, passed it around, and agreed on
this version, " says Searcy W. "It's now read by groups throughout
the state." It works for Searcy. He's been sober 54 years.
For all who would be interested in it:
-------------------------------------
Alcoholics Anonymous is a fellowship of men and women who share their
experience, strength and hope with each other that they may solve
their common problem and help others to recover from alcoholism.
We are gathered here because we are faced with the fact that we are
powerless over alcohol, and are unable to do anything about it
without the help of a Power greater than ourselves.
We feel each person's religious convictions, if any, are his own
affair, and the simple purpose of the program of AA is to show what
may be done to enlist the aid of a Power greater than ourselves,
regardless of what our individual conception of that Power may be.
In order to form a habit of depending upon and referring all we do to
that Power, we must first apply ourselves with some diligence, but
repetition confirms and strengthens this habit, then faith comes
naturally.
We have all come to know that as alcoholics we are suffering from a
serious disease for which medicine has no cure. Our condition may be
the result of an allergic reaction to alcohol which makes it
impossible for us to drink in moderation. This condition has never,
by any treatment with which we are familiar, been permanently cured.
The only relief we have to offer is absolute abstinence - a second
meaning of AA.
There are no dues or fees. The only requirement is an honest desire
to stop drinking. Each member is a person with an acknowledged
alcoholic problem who has found the key to abstinence from day to day
by adhering to the program of Alcoholics Anonymous. The moment he
resumes drinking he loses all status as a member of AA. His
reinstatement is automatic, however, when he again fulfills the sole
requirement for membership - an honest desire to quit drinking.
Not being reformers we offer our experience only to those who want
it. AA is not interested in sobering up drunks who are seeking only
temporary sobriety. We have a way out on which we can absolutely
agree and in which we join in harmonious action. Rarely have we seen
a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path. Those who do not
recover are those who will not or cannot lend themselves to this
simple program-- usually men and women who are incapable of being
honest with themselves. You may like this Program or you many not,
but the fact remains that is works.. and we believe it is our only
chance to recover.
There is a vast amount of fun included in the AA fellowship. Some
people may be shocked at our apparent worldliness and levity, but
just underneath there is a deadly earnestness and a full realization
that we must put first things firs. With each of us the first thing
is our alcoholic problem. Faith must work twenty-four hours a day in
and through us, or we perish.
with gratitude,
Jim M
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3225. . . . . . . . . . . . stepping stones
From: Rob White . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/1/2006 3:51:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I just got back from a visit to Stepping Stones in Bedford Falls NY (just
above
NYC) where Bill and Lois lived from 1941 on.
It is well worth a visit from anyone even slightly interested in AA history.
They have done a marvelous job of keeping it in exactly the same condition
it
was when Bill and lois lived there (Lois' glasses are where she left them in
the
kitchen).
What a treasure trove of history!
You can sit at the kitchen table that Ebby and Bill sat at in Clinton street
when Bill pushed a drink over to him and Ebby announced " I got
religion".
You can stand in the living room where Marty Mann and Bill formed Council
that
would become the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence .
You can sit at the desk where Bill wrote the Big Book and the 12 and 12.
You can see the map filled with stick pins where Bill measured the progress
of
new groups across the country.
You can sit and gaze out the window that he looked out when contemplating
how he
would respond to the hundreds of questions
coming in from all over the country about how to start a meeting etc.
The best part - its largely undiscovered by the masses. You can get a quiet
visit with a volunteer tour guide and take your time to savor each part.
It is the most important collection of AA artifacts and history anywhere.
I have been to East Dorset (birthplace, childhood home, gravesite)
I have been to Akron. (Dr Bob's house, Mayflower Hotel)
Bedford Falls is the Mother Lode.
www.steppingstones.org
they are having a big picnic on June 3 if you like a crowd,
but I recommend you go when its quiet and no one else is there.
Rob White
Baltimore
410 328 8549
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3226. . . . . . . . . . . . Significant March Dates in A.A.
History
From: chesbayman56 . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/2/2006 7:00:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
March 1936 - AA had 10 members staying sober. At end of 1936 A.A.
had 15 members.
March-May 1938 - Bill begins writing the book Alcoholics Anonymous.
Works Publishing Inc established to support writing and printing of
the book.
March 1940 - Mort J. came to LA from Denver; started custom of
reading Chapter 5 Big Book at Cecil group.
March 1941 - Second printing of Big Book.
March 1941 - 1st Prison AA Group formed at San Quentin.
March 1946 - The March of Time film is produced by NY AA office.
March 1949 - Dr. Bob considers idea of AA conference premature.
March 1951 - American Weekly publishes memorial article for Dr. Bob.
March 1, 1939 - Readers Digest fails to write article on AA.
March 1, 1941 - Jack Alexander's Saturday Evening Post article
published and membership jumped from 2,000 to 8,000 by years end.
March 3 1947 - Nell Wing started work at Alcoholic Foundation 415
Lexington Avenue.
March 4, 1891 - Lois W is born.
March 5, 1945 - Time Magazine reports Detroit radio broadcasts of AA
members. (Archie T?)
March 7, 1940 -- Bill and Lois visited the Philadelphia AA group.
March 7, 1941 -- Boston newspaper reported that any drunk who wanted
to get well was more than welcome at the AA meeting at 115 Newbury
St., at 8 PM Wednesdays.
March 9, 1941 - Wichita Beacon reports AA member from NY who wants
to form a group in Wichita.
March 10, 1944 - New York Intergroup was established.
March 11, 1949 - The Calix Society, an association of Roman Catholic
alcoholics who are maintaining their sobriety through participation
in Alcoholics Anonymous, was formed in Minneapolis by five Catholic
AA members.
March 14, - South Orange, NJ, AA group held an anniversary dinner
with Bill W as guest speaker
March 15, 1941 - 1st AA group formed in New Haven, Connecticut. Not
reported in paper until Oct 1, 1941.
March 16, 1940 - Alcoholic Foundation and Works Publishing move from
Newark to 30 Vesey St in lower Manhattan. First headquarters of our
own.
March 21, 1881 - Anne R, Dr Bobs wife, is born.
March 21 1966 - Ebby dies.
March 22, 1951 - Dr William Duncan Silkworth dies at Towns Hospital.
March 22, 1984 - Clarence S, "Home Brewmeister", dies.
March 23, 1936 - Bill and Lois visit Fitz M, "Our Southern
Friend", in
Maryland.
March 25, 1898 -- Jim B ("The Vicious Cycle") was born.
March 25, 2005 - Nancy Olson, Founder of AAHL- See Memorial at:
http://hindsfoot.org/nomem1.html
March 29, 1943 -- The Charleston Mail, WV, reported on Bill W's talk
at St. John's Parish House.
March 31, 1947 - 1st AA group formed in London, England.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3227. . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Paul O.
From: Executive Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/2/2006 1:13:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dr. Paul commented on the title of the story when interviewed in the
Grapevine. The story was originally published in the GV as "Bronze
Moccasins" and changed when reprinted in the Big Book. The interview is
in
the GV's Digital Archive and in The Best of Grapevine.
Cordially,
Robin Bromley
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3228. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dr. Paul O.
From: Diz Titcher . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/28/2006 4:26:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dr. Paul has written a few books, Contact Sabrina Publishing at 800-booklog
in Laguna Miguel, CA.
Diz T.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3229. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dr. Paul O.
From: Kimball . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/28/2006 6:47:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Charlene, I met Dr Paul in Ogden Utah in the early 90s. The story (much
shorter) was originally titled the Bronze Moccasins and ran in the
Grapevine.
It was later expanded for inclusion to the Big Book, and someone (possibly a
Grapevine editor) renamed the story Doctor, Alcoholic, Adict. Paul didn't
mind
at first, but as time passed, some of our fellowship would point to the
title of
his story and say things like "it talks about drugs in the Big
Book" or "you
have to let me talk about drugs, it's in the book." That botherd him.
Paul did
not want the title of his story to be a source of controversy. It was
renamed
in the fourth editon to "Acceptance was the Answer."
I was at a area workshop when the first box of fourth edition Big Books came
to
town and were uncrated. Everyone got a copy. It didn't take long for people
to
realize that their favorite passage in the story "Acceptance was the
Answer" was
moved from 449 to 417. I could almost hear a cry from coast to coast.
Imagine,
refusing to buy the 4th edition because you could not accept the page change
of
your favorite passage on Acceptance. A paradox of twisted thinking.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3230. . . . . . . . . . . . Price of things since 1935...
From: Charlie C . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/1/2006 3:05:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi, not much of an AA historian here, although I am learning a lot from this
site, but as a reference librarian I would suggest an excellent resource for
information re the question of a dollar in the basket and prices of things
would
be "The Value of a dollar: 1860-1999," a reference book most
academic and larger
public libraries would have.
For example, in the 1935-1939 section, a pound of coffee was 26 cents. In
the 1940-44 section it is noted that a fifth of Seagrams blended whiskey was
$2.70 (coffee was cheaper actually, 24 cents a lb.) 1945-49, coffee was up
to 31
cents a lb. In 1950-
54, coffee was 77 cents a lb., 93 cents in 1955-59...
If we take the late '60s as a benchmark, since that is apparently how long
the buck in the basket has been the stock donation, coffee had actually
dropped,
to 85 cents a lb. A keypunch operator might make $85 a week, or a typist
$90. A
6 pack of Shlitz was 99 cents, and, well, I could go on but I won't ;-)
Obviously the pegging of the standard donation at a dollar for so long is
totally in defiance of economic common sense when you think of inflation. A
sponsee of mine has a nice solution to this - he gets $2 bills at the bank,
expressly to make his donation with in meetings!
"Keep on truckin"
Michael Corbett, BCHS class of '74
______________________________
From the moderator:
It seems to me that, on the basis of Michael Corbett's and Tom White's and
Bruce
Lallier's information, "a dollar in the basket" goes back to the
late 1960's or
early 1970's. This was in fact roughly the cost of a mixed drink at a good
bar
at that time. If we compare the cost of beer and shots of whiskey and
bottles
of decent liquor then, with prices now, it seems to me that 3 to 4 dollars
in
the basket would be the appropriate amount. Of course, if somebody wants to
fine tune it, and count out exactly $3.67 (or something like that) into the
basket, I suppose that person could do so.
Putting just small change into the basket, as they did in the 1930's, 40's,
and
50's would have made sense too, if we used the price of a drink as the
standard.
So it looks like the place where U.S. members started living in economic
fantasy
was during the 1980's (and all the way down to the present).
This is something which is much more important for AA's survival than
worrying
about chants at the end of meetings, or minor changes in the Big Book, or a
lot
of the other things like that.
Among other things, it has forced the New York GSO to start functioning as a
profit making publishing business (with all the distortions this has
produced)
because the membership has forgotten that "fully self supporting,
declining
outside contributions" means that we are supposed to come up with the
money to
support the New York office, not force it to sell books in order to survive.
And this also applies to intergroup offices and other necessary things.
Glenn Chesnut (South Bend, Indiana)
______________________________
From: Tom White
Glenn and Kimball:
I think I can dredge up a few memories of drinking in the 50s. I
sobered up in 59. "Nice" bars or "lounges" in NYC were
one thing, but
if you were drinking on the cheap, which I usually did, a glass (not
a bottle) of tap beer was still a dime at a White Rose in NYC in 59,
I'm pretty sure, and it had been right through my 13 years of state-
side drinking after I got home from the Navy in 46. I think a bottle
may have been 35 cents (again, cheap bars or grocery stores). You
could get a shot of bar whiskey, a rye like White Feathers, for a
quarter (or could it have been 50 cents?). Prices went up from there
as you went "uptown," but it seems to me that in my first AA
meetings
coins were still quite acceptable. I don't remember when the thing
became a standard one buck, but it sure has been hard to budge it
away from that. The price of a drink seems to have been the control,
after all, except that now it ought to be seen as more than a buck.
But then we have Bill's remark (was it not?) that sober alcoholics
are tighter than the bark on a tree. In our quite small group in
Odessa, Texas, we do seem to have the members trained to do $2.00.
Tom White
Kimball wrote:
I remember when I first started coming around (1976), the oldtimers
said "toss in the cost of a drink" You could get a good stiff
drink for a buck in 1976.
______________________________
From: "Bruce Lallier"
When I came in in 71 we put a quarter in, seems like it went
from a quarter to a dollar without stopping in between. I also
heard some of the oldtimes at that time saying it was a one
time said "if you have it put it in, if you need it take it
out." Wonder how that would go over today.
Bruce, a Connecticut transplant in Conneaut lake Pa
______________________________
From: John Lee
Followup to Glenn:
When talking about the Big Book at a meeting, I sometimes
indicate to the newcomers that they can get one "for the
price of a double margarita."
I agree with your reminders to supply historical evidence
on this board, not just conjecture or associations. Not
just "my sponsor told me or my therapist told me."
Isn't there something in Pass It On about how Bill
would pass the hat at Clinton Street, and never get
aper money [only change]?
john lee
member
pittsburgh
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3231. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dr. Paul O.
From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/6/2006 10:10:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
At 12:13 3/2/2006 , Robin Bromley wrote:
>Dr. Paul commented on the title of the story when interviewed in the
>Grapevine. The story was originally published in the GV as "Bronze
>Moccasins" and changed when reprinted in the Big Book. The
interview is in
>the GV's Digital Archive and in The Best of Grapevine.
>Cordially,
I got out my copy of the May 1975 Grapevine and compared the story
"Bronzed
Moccasins" to the story "Doctor, Addict, Alcoholic" in the
Third Edition
Big Book. [Note the correct title of the story.]
There are the same number of paragraphs and the first sentence of each
paragraph is the same in both volumes.
What changes, except the title for the story in the Four Edition are you
referring to?
I found an interview of him in the July 2001 GV but it doesn't mention the
original title of the article. What article are you referring to?
I like the original title much better than the current one, but that is
just my two cents.
Tommy H in Baton Rouge
.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3232. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: stepping stones
From: Mitchell K. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/6/2006 8:44:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Just a couple of points....
When I visited with Lois about 3 months before she
passed on there were no glasses in the kitchen just as
there were no glasses in the kitchen when I visited
there soon after she passed on.
Maybe I'm losing my memory (I do know my short-term is
severely damaged) but can someone refresh it about
Bill and Marty starting what was to become the National
Council in the livingroom
As far as "THE" table.... it has been reported that
there are a few "THE" tables where Bill and Ebby met.
As far as the desk in the study on the hill being
"THE" desk where the Big Book was written... I've sat
at that desk many a time and it wouldn't fit in the
office in the Newark office and I someone will have to
fill me in if BandL stored the Clinton St. furniture or
took it with them on all their moves.
Another thing.... it cannot be classified as "It is
the most important collection of AA artifacts
> and history anywhere."
I'm tickled pink that you enjoyed yourself so much at
Stepping Stones. I wish more members of the Fellowship
would have your interest in our history. However... we
must temper historical fact with legend. Hey, I may be
totally off base...
> I just got back from a visit to Stepping Stones in
> Bedford Falls NY (just above NYC) where Bill and
> Lois lived from 1941 on.
> It is well worth a visit from anyone even slightly
> interested in AA history.
>
> They have done a marvelous job of keeping it in
> exactly the same condition it was when Bill and lois
> lived there (Lois' glasses are where she left them
> in the kitchen).
>
> What a treasure trove of history!
>
> You can sit at the kitchen table that Ebby and Bill
> sat at in Clinton street when Bill pushed a drink
> over to him and Ebby announced " I got religion".
> You can stand in the living room where Marty Mann
> and Bill formed Council that would become the
> National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence .
> You can sit at the desk where Bill wrote the Big
> Book and the 12 and 12.
> You can see the map filled with stick pins where
> Bill measured the progress of new groups across the
> country.
> You can sit and gaze out the window that he looked
> out when contemplating how he would respond to the
> hundreds of questions
> coming in from all over the country about how to
> start a meeting etc.
>
> The best part - its largely undiscovered by the
> masses. You can get a quiet visit with a volunteer
> tour guide and take your time to savor each part.
>
> It is the most important collection of AA artifacts
> and history anywhere.
>
> I have been to East Dorset (birthplace, childhood
> home, gravesite)
> I have been to Akron. (Dr Bob's house, Mayflower
> Hotel)
> Bedford Falls is the Mother Lode.
>
> www.steppingstones.org
>
> they are having a big picnic on June 3 if you like a
> crowd,
> but I recommend you go when its quiet and no one
> else is there.
>
> Rob White
> Baltimore
> 410 328 8549
>
>
>
>
>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3233. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: stepping stones
From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/6/2006 10:15:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
At 14:51 3/1/2006 , Rob White wrote:
>I just got back from a visit to Stepping Stones in Bedford Falls NY
(just
>above NYC) where Bill and Lois lived from 1941 on.
>It is well worth a visit from anyone even slightly interested in AA
history.
I believe the name of the town is Bedford Hills.
Tommy H in Baton Rouge
.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3234. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: stepping stones
From: Sally Brown . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/7/2006 1:42:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dave and I never heard that discussions about Marty's founding the National
Council on Alcoholism started at Stepping Stones. Wherever Marty and Bill
talked, whether at the AA office, over lunch, or out at Stepping Stones - or
all three - Marty certainly tossed around her plans with Bill and Lois since
Bill was her AA sponsor and she and the Wilsons were close personal friends.
However, we do know that he threw cold water on the whole idea, saying she
was unqualified for such a venture. She went ahead, anyway, since she was
being encouraged by other strong advisers, and besides was being driven by a
dream she had multiple gifts for fulfilling. Later, of course, Bill and Dr
Bob both joined her Advisory Board for a while. And as Marty's vision became
a successful reality over the decades, Bill changed his mind and
enthusiastically supported her efforts and achievements in dramatically
expanding AA's membership and influence as well as in educating our country
as a whole about alcoholism.
Marty's biography (see below) contains many hitherto unreported facts about
AA history. Dave and I tried hard to write only what could be verified and
attributed to sources. We are very grateful to other writers of AA and
recovery history before us who set high historical standards.
Shalom - Sally
Rev Sally Brown coauthor: A Biography of
Mrs. Marty Mann
Board Certified Clinical Chaplain The First Lady of Alcoholics
Anonymous
United Church of Christ
www.sallyanddavidbrown.com
1470 Sand Hill Road, 309
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Phone/Fax: 650 325 5258
Email: rev.sally@att.net
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3235. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: stepping stones
From: mertonmm3 . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/7/2006 7:22:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "Mitchell K."
wrote:
>
>> Just a couple of points....
>
someone will have to
> fill me in if BandL stored the Clinton St. furniture or
> took it with them on all their moves.
Hi Mitch,
We are ever seeking the details. According to the diary they put the
furniture into storage when they left 182. Recall that they moved
directly into the Parkhurst 344 N. Fullerton, Montclair home from
there and for the next six or seven Sundays the regular meeting was
held there begining on May 14, 1939 if my memory is correct. At that
time there was only one meeting at most per night for the entire
Eastern United States. The meetings began at 4:00 and went most of the
night. They rotated speakers for the first portion according to Jim
Burwell who was probably living at Hank and Kathleen's home as well at
that time. They were mostly quite broke from the book which had just
arrived in final form the month before. However these were dinner
meetings with Herb T. paying for a "big spread". The wive's always
attended these along with their spouse's.
At that meeting they voted in the Bill and Lois Home replacement fund
and each pledged different amounts of which none of them paid more
than a few months. They wrote up a document with this information
which is in the GSO archives. Marty was still a Blythewood Sanatarium
patient and she took the train to the meeting from CT. to NJ. (Bill
and Lois were doing an errand when they voted this Home Replacement
Fund in - they arrived shortly thereafter and Lois wrote in her diary
that they were thrilled.
Very shortly thereafter Hank and Kathleen became estranged, probably
after Kathleen found out about his proposal to Ruth. Hank moved to
East Orange, 50 Beech St. I believe. His mail went to West Orange. By
June 21st Kathleen was moving out. And Lois helped her move her
furniture to a specifically named individuals house who I'd have to
look up. In her long diary entry that day she never said a word about
her own furniture.
Immediately they were offered the Green pond bungalow by the family of
Horace C. (note there was a Horace G. member too at that time.) His
family owned the mammouth international shipping firm of Moore
McCormick if I remember correctly. Green Pond was in the remote
wilderness and Lois loved it. The diary entries from that time, many
of which are in LR, are the longest and happiest of that first 5 year
period.
LR leaves you with the impression that when they left there shortly
thereafter it was for good. In fact, it was only rented for a very
short time and they lived there often during the next few years
gradually moving into the NYC clubhouse when that became an option.
Much time was spent with Bob and Mag V. at their farmhouse in Bog
Hollw near Monsey, NY. They both seemed more drawn to the country than
the city. SS is certainly that.
The Best to You and Your Wife Mitch,
-merton
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3236. . . . . . . . . . . . Stepping Stones, Bedford Hills
From: rriley9945@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/7/2006 12:59:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From: Tommy H. in Baton Rouge, in Message 3233:
Stepping Stones is in Bedford Hills, not Bedford Falls.
______________________________
From: rriley9945@aol.com
For you movie fans, Bedford Falls is the name of the
town in the holiday classic It's a Wonderful Life
starring James Stewart.
______________________________
From: "johnlawlee"
The town is Bedford Hills, not Bedford Falls. The latter is the
mythical setting for the Jimmy Stewart classic movie, "It's a
Wonderful Life." Incidently, Bill and Lois' house is in Katonah,
not Bedford Hills. Kotonah is the next town. The postal addresses
must have changed since Bill lived there. I searched the streets of
Bedford Hills for an hour, looking for the house. It's not there.
I received a nice private tour from a staff member.
john lee
pittsburgh
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3237. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dr. Paul O.
From: Cloydg . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/7/2006 9:01:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In the AA Archives that's accessable over the Internet, Dr. Paul did an
interview. He explained where he was at that time in his life and how he
felt
about his article, "Bronze Moccasins". Then he speaks about his
story being
included into the BB under the title, "Doctor, Alcoholic, Addict",
and the
ensuing problems he encountered. My question is: Does the AA interview
appear
to say that in his view, alcoholics can and do become dually addicted but
addicts seldom become alcoholic?" Also, did it appear to anyone else
that he
was attempting to make an apology to AA for writing his article?
In love and service, Clyde G.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3238. . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Paul O. on acceptance
From: Cheryl F . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/7/2006 11:06:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I have heard that Dr. Paul O. did not like the idea of people in the program
referring to the one paragraph about acceptance because it was take out of
context. Does anyone know what he has actually said about that?
Grateful so I serve,
Cheryl F
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3239. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Price of things since 1935...
From: ArtSheehan . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/7/2006 4:46:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Care should be exercised in defining the basis used for comparing
dollar amounts over time, particularly in considering the long-term
effects of inflation.
It is useful to convert past dollar amounts to show the equivalent
buying power in current dollars. This is easily accomplished by using
Consumer Price Index (CPI) conversion factors. CPI conversion data can
be obtained on-line from Professor Robert C Sahr, Political Science
Dept, Oregon State U, Corvalis
http://oregonstate.edu/Dept/pol_sci/fac/sahr/cv2005.pdf
The "quantity" of past dollars amounts can erroneously be viewed
as
the "value" of past dollar amounts. An amount expressed in 1940
dollars can erroneously be viewed as less expensive than 2005 dollars
when in fact the 1940 value is substantially more expensive.
Consider the $3.50 selling price of the Big Book when it was first
published in April 1939. $3.50 in 1939 dollars would be the equivalent
value of $49.30 in 2005 dollars. The Big Book was a rather expensive
book for its time. That's the reason it was printed on such large and
thick paper and got the name "Big Book" (the idea was to convince
the
alcoholics that they were getting their money's worth).
The Summer/Fall 2005 catalog of Conference-approved literature shows
that a hard cover Big Book can be purchased for $6. You can also
erroneously conclude that this is almost twice the cost of what the
Big Book sold for in 1939. In fact the 2005 Big Book price actually
represents only 12% of what a Big Book sold for in 1939 (i.e. a nearly
90% price reduction).
As best as I can determine, groups and members were first asked to
make direct contributions to what is today GSO in March 1941 when Jack
Alexander's Saturday Evening Post article was published. The publicity
caused 1941 membership to jump from around 2,000 to 8,000. The article
led to over 6,000 appeals for help to be mailed to the NY Office to
handle. The NY office asked groups to donate $1 ($13.33 in 2005
dollars) per member, per year, for support of the office. This began
the practice of financing the NY office operations from group
donations (re the Service Manual, page S7).
Several years ago some posters and flyers were distributed asking
members to consider donating $2, instead of $1, in the 7th Tradition
collections at meetings. I think this is a touchy issue since there
are a number of members who just can't afford to do so. It should be
left up to each member to decide for themselves. My appeal would be
for each member to just try to donate something no matter how small.
The same goes for each group trying to donate to their Central Office,
District, Area and GSO - just try to donate something no matter how
small (it does have a tendency to add up over time).
Cheers
Arthur
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3240. . . . . . . . . . . . Bill W.''s 1966 Letter
From: Carter Elliott . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/8/2006 6:27:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
As Bill Sees It contains thirty-one entries sourced to "Letter,
1966". Do we
know if this letter was a single, philosophical essay or letters collected
from
his general correspondence?
Carter E.; Blacksburg BA
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3241. . . . . . . . . . . . Moderator gone March 11-17
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/10/2006 12:15:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The moderator will not be available from Saturday March 11 to Friday March
17.
If you could hang onto your messages until the 17th, it would be greatly
appreciated.
Glenn Chesnut, Moderator
South Bend, Indiana
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3242. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dr. Paul O. on acceptance
From: JNP in Maine . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/10/2006 12:09:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi,
Someone once told me that in a conversation with Dr Paul he stated that
acceptance was not the answefr and he had made that statement before he had
taken the steps as they were laid out in the Big Book
Joe Pet
Orono, Maine
Cheryl F wrote:
I have heard that Dr. Paul O. did not like the idea of people in the program
referring to the one paragraph about acceptance because it was take out of
context. Does anyone know what he has actually said about that?
Grateful so I serve,
Cheryl F
SPONSORED LINKS
Addiction recovery program Recovery from addiction Addiction
recovery center Christian addiction recovery Alcoholics anonymous
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "AAHistoryLovers" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAHistoryLovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3243. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dr. Paul O. on acceptance
From: Azor521@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/10/2006 10:10:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In a message dated 3/10/06 8:49:25 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
learning3legacies@cox.net writes:
paragraph about acceptance
I met Dr. Paul O. at a speaker meeting in Modesto, CA @ 1993 and while we
were at dinner he made it clear he didn't get acceptance out of the blue. He
had to work for it and suggested we read his entire story to get the full
perspective of his life in recovery to that point.
He and his wife Max seemed like loving and caring people grateful for their
recovery.
Love and Huggs to all............ Floyd J
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3244. . . . . . . . . . . . Doctor Bob''s nightmare
From: Rob . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/10/2006 3:32:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
hi everyone. I was reading Dr. Bob's nightmare in my 3rd edition and
it said As I write nearly six years have passed. This is in my 2nd
printing. I also have a 17th printing and it staes nearly four years
have passed as also does my fouth editions. Does anyone know where
this changed? It would be most appreciated.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3245. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dr. Paul O. on acceptance
From: wilfried antheunis . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/10/2006 2:19:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I will only quote part of the article in the July 1995 Grapevine:
GV: Is there anything you regret having written in your story?
Dr. Paul: Well, I must say I'm really surprised at the number of people who
come up to me and ask me confidentially if what they've heard on the very
best
authority - usually from their sponsor - is true: that there are things in
my
story I want to change, or that I regret having written it, or that I want
to
take it out because it says so much about drugs, or that I've completely
changed
my mind that AA is the answer or even that acceptance is the answer. I've
also
heard - on the best authority. -that I've died or gotten drunk or on pills.
The
latest one was that my wife Max died and that I got so depressed I got
drunk.
So, is there anything I'd like to change? No. I believe what I said more now
than when I wrote it.
This was taken out of context- the whole article should be available in the
Grapevine digital archives.
wil
----- Original Message -----
From: Cheryl F
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:06 AM
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Dr. Paul O. on acceptance
I have heard that Dr. Paul O. did not like the idea of people in the program
referring to the one paragraph about acceptance because it was take out of
context. Does anyone know what he has actually said about that?
Grateful so I serve,
Cheryl F
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3246. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Dr. Paul O. on acceptance
From: Charles Knapp . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/10/2006 8:42:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hello Group
Living in Southern California I was able to listen to Dr Paul often. He
always spoke in my area at least 3 or 4 times a year. On several occasions
I Heard him say he thought there other things in his story that was just as
important as that one paragraph. For instance he thought the part about him
and his wife Max getting well together in AA was better than that paragraph.
Personally I like the next to the last paragraph which reads:
"Acceptance
is the key to my relationship with God today. I never just sit and do
nothing while waiting for Him to tell me what to do. Rather, I do whatever
is in front of me to be done, and I leave the results up to Him; however it
turns out, that's Gods will for me." I believe of all the speakers I
have
been able to listen to from So Cal over the past 15 years I miss hearing Dr
Paul the most.
Thanks
Charles from California
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Cheryl F
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 8:07 AM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Dr. Paul O. on acceptance
I have heard that Dr. Paul O. did not like the idea of people in the program
referring to the one paragraph about acceptance because it was take out of
context. Does anyone know what he has actually said about that?
Grateful so I serve,
Cheryl F
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3247. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Price of things since 1935...
From: Arkie Koehl . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/10/2006 1:40:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
My personal experience has been that while in treatment I was encouraged to
participate in AA meetings, including putting money in the basket.
The centre I went through provides rooms and encourages meetings and has
forgone
collecting rent so a meeting can get off the ground and become established.
Fiona D
On Mar 7, 2006, at 11:46, ArtSheehan wrote:
> Several years ago some posters and flyers were distributed asking
> members to consider donating $2, instead of $1, in the 7th Tradition
> collections at meetings. I think this is a touchy issue since there
> are a number of members who just can't afford to do so. It should be
> left up to each member to decide for themselves. My appeal would be
> for each member to just try to donate something no matter how small.
Is there, to anyone's knowledge, a protocol on donations from
treatment center in-patients sent to AA meetings? I'm guessing there
is no right way to handle the awkward fact that so many patients are
sent to our meetings by profit-making treatment centers yet put
nothing in the basket. Of course the patient should not be expected
to contribute, but the "provider" is charging the patient or the
state money for the treatment and using AA as a free resource.
Arkie
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3248. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Price of things since 1935...
From: Jon Markle . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/13/2006 7:16:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In meetings around here, I've noticed the chairperson stating that
newcomers, visitors and those currently in a hospital or treatment center
(in patient), need not contribute.
Jon (Raleigh)
9/9/82
> From: Arkie Koehl
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:40:48 -1000
> To:
> Subject: Re: [AAHistoryLovers] Price of things since 1935...
>
> My personal experience has been that while in treatment I was
encouraged to
> participate in AA meetings, including putting money in the basket.
> The centre I went through provides rooms and encourages meetings and
has
> forgone collecting rent so a meeting can get off the ground and become
> established.
>
> Fiona D
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2006, at 11:46, ArtSheehan wrote:
>
>> Several years ago some posters and flyers were distributed asking
>> members to consider donating $2, instead of $1, in the 7th
Tradition
>> collections at meetings. I think this is a touchy issue since there
>> are a number of members who just can't afford to do so. It should
be
>> left up to each member to decide for themselves. My appeal would be
>> for each member to just try to donate something no matter how
small.
>
> Is there, to anyone's knowledge, a protocol on donations from
> treatment center in-patients sent to AA meetings? I'm guessing there
> is no right way to handle the awkward fact that so many patients are
> sent to our meetings by profit-making treatment centers yet put
> nothing in the basket. Of course the patient should not be expected
> to contribute, but the "provider" is charging the patient or
the
> state money for the treatment and using AA as a free resource.
>
> Arkie
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3249. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Doctor Bob''s nightmare
From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/13/2006 9:04:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
At 14:32 3/10/2006 , Rob wrote:
>hi everyone. I was reading Dr. Bob's nightmare in my 3rd edition and
>it said As I write nearly six years have passed. This is in my 2nd
>printing. I also have a 17th printing and it staes nearly four years
>have passed as also does my fouth editions. Does anyone know where
>this changed? It would be most appreciated.
I checked my Third Editions and printings number 1 thru 8 state "six
years"
and 9 on state "four years." This is on p. 180.
I checked several Second Editions and they all said "six years" as
did the
two First Editions I have, but the statement was on p. 192 of the Firsts.
The question of why this change was effected was discussed at some point in
the recent past on our list. I remember reading it but am not confident
enough in my memory to quote and I can't find the post.
Tommy H in Baton Rouge
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3250. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Doctor Bob''s nightmare
From: Carolyn W . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/13/2006 10:34:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Mark,
I looked in my copy of the 3rd edition of the BB. and it says ' four years
'.
Carol
----- Original Message -----
From:
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:32 PM
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Doctor Bob's nightmare
hi everyone. I was reading Dr. Bob's nightmare in my 3rd edition and
it said As I write nearly six years have passed. This is in my 2nd
printing. I also have a 17th printing and it staes nearly four years
have passed as also does my fouth editions. Does anyone know where
this changed? It would be most appreciated.
SPONSORED LINKS Addiction recovery program Recovery from addiction Addiction
recovery center
Christian addiction recovery Alcoholics anonymous
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "AAHistoryLovers" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAHistoryLovers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3251. . . . . . . . . . . . Universal Mind
From: wbmscm . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/14/2006 8:30:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I hope this question is not beyond the purpose of this list, but
Got any info. on Bill using the term "Universal Mind" in his
story.
The term caught my eye because it's capitalized. I searched the
archives and didn't come up with anything ( I may have missed it),
googled the term, with some success (seems origin may be from Hindu),
but any info. re: Bill using it would fulfill my curiousity.
Peace,
Wendy
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3252. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Sauerkraut remedy
From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/14/2006 4:51:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I recently revisited this as a result of picking up a pamphlet from Dr.
Bob's Home which had his last talk to the Cleveland A.A. Conference on July
30, 1950. It quotes him as saying "sauerkraut and cold meadow."
This talk
is in the June '73 Grapevine. The September '73 GV addresses "cold
meadow"
and concludes "And then one dear reader sent us a length of tape, much
better than ours, on which it all came out quite clearly, "sauerkraut
and
cold tomatoes." This was confirmed by a second reader in a letter from
England."
Tommy in Baton Rouge
At 16:26 1/31/2006 , Peggy Anna wrote:
>I have a book written in 1993 by Don Julio DeMedici Santaleone, entitled
>"The James Connection or Sauerkraut, Tomatoes, and Karo Syrup"
The author
>has been a member of AA for over 20 years now and lives in Rochester,
New
>York. In his introduction he states "as related in Dr. Bob and the
Good
>Oldtimers (p 74) a detoxification treatment of a combination of
tomatoes,
>sauerkraut and Karo corn syrup was administered by Bill W. to Dr. Bob in
>order to supply Bob with vitamins and energy so that Bob could perform
>surgery".
>
>Peggy Anna
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rich Foss"
>To:
>Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 12:13 PM
>Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Sauerkraut remedy
>
>
> >
> > An "old timer" in our fellowship is fond of using the
Sauerkraut Juice
> > treatment when he finds a wet one. It may have something to do
with
> > replacing electrolytes or something. He says it is mentioned in
our
> > literature. But we cannot find it. Perhaps AA Comes of Age or Dr.
Bob
> > and
> > the Old Timers? The force of his personality and his approach to
AA's
> > simple program of recovery have helped a great number of people
find a way
> > out. Just curious about the Sauerkraut.
> > Thanks.
> > Rich
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3253. . . . . . . . . . . . "Stump the Archivist"
From: J. Carey Thomas . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/15/2006 5:43:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Our Area has started a idea called "Stump the Archivist." The
four questions below have come from attendees at our Area business
weekends.
I have tried the search capability of our site, but have not
mastered its capabilities. Probably the answers to these *questions* are
there, but I could use some help...!
Here is the first batch of four questions we have been asked:
JANUARY 2006 STUMP THE ARCHIVIST
Did Bill Wilson have a mistress who lived in Miami?
When and where did the poker chip tradition start for the groups?
Where did AA come to use the circle and triangle?
When was the grapevine first published? In its present form?
I would apppreciate any direction you might suggest,. . . or even
some answers!
_\|/_
(o o)
-----------o00-(_)-00o-----------carey----------
Carey Thomas
Archivist, Area 15
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 3254. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Crooked thinking
From: Charlene C. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/15/2006 1:57:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
it would be my guess that employers are more inclined to think in
intellectual
terms than medical or spiritual. especially in that time, when alcoholism
was
considered more of a moral dilema than a spiritual mallody or terminal
illness.
just a thought.
C. Cook
trixiebellaa
Share with your friends: