Table of Contents 6
Section 1 - Relevance and contributions to the content and objectives of the Call 7
1.1 Relevance 7
Section 2 - R&D innovation and technical excellence 9
2.1 Concept and objectives 9
2.2 Progress beyond the state-of-the-art 10
Section 3 - S&T approach and work plan 14
3.1 Quality and effectiveness of the S&T methodology and associated work plan 14
WP summaries and interconnections 15
T7.3 Standardisation 47
Section 4 - Market innovation and market impact 49
4.1 Impact 49
4.2 Dissemination and exploitation 52
4.3 Contribution to standards and regulations 55
4.4 Management of intellectual property 55
Section 5 - Quality of consortium and management 56
5.1 Management structure and procedures 56
5.2 Individual participants 58
Philips Medical Systems Nederland BV 58
AVL List GmbH 59
CISC Semiconductor Design+Consulting GmbH 59
NXP Semiconductors Austria GmbH 59
Technical University of Denmark 60
PAJ Systemteknik 60
Contribyte Oy 62
Konecranes Heavy Lifting Corporation 62
Nokia Siemens Networks 62
Convergens Oy 62
University of Eastern Finland 62
University of Oulu 62
Technical Research Centre of Finland 63
Atego SAS 64
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives 64
European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS France SAS 64
Valeo 66
Bauhaus Luftfahrt e.V. 66
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel 67
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. 68
NXP Semiconductors Germany GmbH 68
Centro Ricerche Fiat S.C.p.A 69
Computers Guard 69
Latvian Railway 69
Riga Technical University 69
Almende 69
Océ Technologies BV 71
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 71
Ikerlan-IK4 73
Integrasys 75
Mondragon Unibertsitatea 75
ULMA Embedded Solutions 75
Mälardalen University 75
Volvo 75
EIS Semcon 75
Hoxville Oy 75
Technische Universiteit Delft 75
Prodrive 76
Daimler 76
ETAS GmbH 76
Fondazione Bruno Kessler 76
5.3 Consortium as a whole 78
5.4 Resources to be committed 78
Annex A – Funding calculation forms 81
There is a lot of knowledge gained from building a previous version of a product, and from the design flow used. Currently, this information is used informally, and is not systematically captured in the models. No solutions exist for back-annotation of information from previous product versions, gained over the whole previous development cycle: from simulations, analysis, runtime monitoring, testing, etc. We will propose (meta-) models dealing with model evolution and reuse.
Model reuse can be supported by improved model comprehension and model management. We will propose (semi-) automated model transformations to support evolutionary development. Models will have to be updated based on the knowledge learned in the previous product development. In evolutionary development, handovers between teams could be significantly improved by automated generation of standardized model-views and semi-automated editing that prevent errors from being entered into the model.
“Architectural design decisions are largely based on experience of past designs and this is difficult to apply to new situations” (ARTEMIS Strategic Research Agenda). The accuracy of decisions will be improved through the use of information gained from previous product versions. We will develop decision support methods and tools for the synthesis of system architectures that are extensible, increase quality of the product, reducing the time and development cost of evolutions.
ASP5: Computing platforms for embedded systems: There is a strong connection between contributions by the DECISIVE project to ASP1 and ASP5. To support evolutionary design, we have to record information during the runtime of previous product versions. The information recorded in this way will be fed back to the high-level models to be used in designing the new product versions. The SRA identifies the challenge of “evolvability”. We will propose architectural design patterns that improve evolvability. DECISIVE will provide methods and tools that will allow trade-offs between evolvability and other properties such as cost and performance.