Knowledge organisation by means of concept process mapping Knowledge organisation by means of concept-process mapping



Download 395.15 Kb.
Page20/20
Date18.10.2016
Size395.15 Kb.
#1899
1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20
[Accessed 27 Apr. 2010].

Chein, M. and Mugnier, M.L., 2008. Graph-based Knowledge Representation: Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs. Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

Chen, P.P., 1976. The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 1(1), p.36.

Ciborra, C. and Jelassi, T., 1994. Strategic information systems: a European perspective.

Codd, E.F., 1971. Normalized data base structure: A brief tutorial. In: Proceedings of the 1971 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control. pp.1–17.

Conant, R.C. and Ashby, W.R., 1970. Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International journal of systems science, 1(2), pp.89–97.

Cook, W.R., Hill, W. and Canning, P.S., 1990. Inheritance is not subtyping. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, POPL ’90. [online] New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp.125–135. Available at: [Accessed 30 Jun. 2013].

Daconta, M.C., Obrst, L.J. and Smith, K.T., 2003. The Semantic Web a guide to the future of XML, Web services, and knowledge management. [online] Indianapolis: Wiley Pub. Available at: [Accessed 13 Jun. 2013].

Date, C.J., 2003. An Introduction to Database Systems. 8th ed. Addison Wesley.

Davies, J., Studer, R. and Warren, P., 2006. Semantic web technologies. John Wiley & Sons.

Davis, E., 2001. Knowledge Representation. In: N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes, eds., International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. [online] Elsevier Amsterdam/New York, NY, pp.8132–8139. Available at: [Accessed 15 Jun. 2013].

Davis, R., Shrobe, H. and Szolovits, P., 1993. What is a knowledge representation? AI magazine, [online] 14(1), p.17. Available at: [Accessed 15 Jun. 2013].

Delamont, S., 2007. Arguments against auto-ethnography. In: Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, 5-8 September 2007. British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Institute of Education, University of London, p.8.

Denzin, N.K., 1992. The many faces of emotionality: Reading persona. In: C. Ellis and M.C. Flaherty, eds., Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. [online] SAGE Publications, Incorporated, pp.17–30. Available at: [Accessed 12 Jun. 2013].

Dinu, V. and Nadkarni, P., 2007. Guidelines for the effective use of entity–attribute–value modeling for biomedical databases. International Journal of Medical Informatics, [online] 76(11–12), pp.769–779. Available at: [Accessed 30 Jun. 2014].

Eden, C., 2004. Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. European Journal of Operational Research, [online] 159(3), pp.673–686. Available at: [Accessed 12 May 2011].

Friedman, A. and Smiraglia, R.P., 2013. Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. Journal of Documentation, [online] 69(1), pp.27–48. Available at: [Accessed 1 Jun. 2013].

Friedman, A. and Thellefsen, M., 2011. Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization. Journal of Documentation, [online] 67(4), pp.644–674. Available at: [Accessed 30 Jun. 2013].

Green, P. and Rosemann, M., 2000. Integrated process modeling: an ontological evaluation. Information systems, [online] 25(2), pp.73–87. Available at: [Accessed 9 Nov. 2014].

Gregory, F.H., 1992. SSM to Information Systems: A Wittgensteinian Approach. Warwick Business School Research Paper No. 65, I.

Gregory, M., 2010. Collaboration and end-user information management tools. 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems: AMCIS 2010. Lima, Peru.

Gregory, M. and Macgilchrist, R.S.R., 2014. A Personal Working Model. In: UKAIS 2014: Proceedings of the 19th conference of the United Kingdom Academy for Information Systems, St. Catherines College, Oxford, April 2014. Shortly available in AISeL, the AIS electronic library. [online] Oxford, GB. Available at: .

Gregory, M. and Norbis, M., 2008. Towards a Systematic Evaluation of Personal and Small Group Information and Knowledge Management. 5th International Conference on Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Systems and Applications: CITSA 2008. Orlando, FA.

Gruber, T.R., 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5, pp.199–199.

Guarino, N., 1995. Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, [online] 43(5), pp.625–640. Available at: [Accessed 28 Jun. 2013].

Guarino, N., 1998. Formal ontology in Information Systems. In: N. Guarino, ed., Formal ontology in information systems: Proceedings of FOIS’ 98. IOS Pr.

Guarino, N., 2006. Ontology and Terminology: how can formal ontology help concept modeling and terminology? [online] EAFT-NordTerm ws on Terminology, Concept Modeling and Ontology. Vaasa. Available at: [Accessed 13 Jun. 2013].

Harŕe, R., 1975. Review of Method, Model and Matter by Mario Bunge. Isis, [online] 66(2), pp.264–266. Available at: [Accessed 25 May 2014].

Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. and Burks, A., 1931. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pierce (Volumes 1-8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hevner, A.R., 2010. Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. Springer.

Hevner, A.R. and Chatterjee, S., 2010. Design Science Research in Information Systems. Design Research in Information Systems, pp.9–22.

Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. and Ram, S., 2004. Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly, [online] 28(1), pp.75–105. Available at: [Accessed 17 May 2013].

Hjørland, B., 2009. Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, [online] 60(8), pp.1519–1536. Available at: [Accessed 30 Jun. 2013].

Hjørland, B. and Nicolaisen, J., 2005. The epistemological lifeboat. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science for Information Scientists, available at: www. db. dk/jni/lifeboat/home. htm. [online] Available at: [Accessed 12 Jun. 2013].

Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J., 1955. De la logique de l’enfant à la logique de l’adolescent: essai sur la construction des structures opératoires formelles. Presses universitaires de France.

Jackson, K.M. and Trochim, W.M.K., 2002. Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods, [online] 5(4), pp.307–336. Available at: [Accessed 12 Jun. 2013].

Jacob, E.K., 2004. Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference. Library Trends, 52(3), pp.515–540.

Jones, W.P., 2007. Keeping found things found: The study and practice of personal information management. Morgan Kaufmann Pub.

Kilov, H., 2004. Review of Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge by Mario Bunge, University of Toronto Press, 2004, ISBN 0-8020-8860-0. ACM SIGMOD Record, [online] 33(4), pp.88–90. Available at: [Accessed 23 May 2014].

Kowalski, R., 1974. Predicate logic as a programming language. Information processing, 74, pp.569–574.

Macgilchrist, R.S.R. and Gregory, M., 2015. Conjectures on the metamorphosis of meaning: Learning and the Semantic Web. (under development).

McKelvey, B., 1999. Toward a Campbellian Realist Organization Science. In: J.A.C. Baum and B. McKelvey, eds., Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T Campbell. SAGE Publications, pp.383–411.

Miller, G.A., 1995. WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM, [online] 38(11), pp.39–41. Available at: [Accessed 25 Aug. 2013].

Minsky, M., 1975. A Framework for Representing Knowledge: In: P.H. Winston, ed., The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill: New York, pp.211–277.

Novak, J.D. and Cañas, A.J., 2008. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Pensacola Fl, www. ihmc. us.[http://cmap. ihmc. us/Publications/ResearchPapers/T heoryCmaps/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps. htm].

Orton, J.D. and Weick, K.E., 1990. Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, [online] 15(2), pp.203–223. Available at: [Accessed 28 Nov. 2013].

Paquette, G., 2010. Visual Knowledge and Competency Modeling - From Informal Learning Models to Semantic Web Ontologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Peyton Jones, S., Blackwell, A. and Burnett, M., 2003. A user-centred approach to functions in Excel. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming. p.176.

Polya, G., 1988. How to solve it. Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ.

Recker, J. and Rosemann, M., 2009. Teaching business process modelling: experiences and recommendations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, [online] 25(1), p.32. Available at: [Accessed 5 Dec. 2014].

Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P. and Indulska, M., 2011. Do Ontological Deficiencies in Modeling Grammars Matter? MIS Quarterly, [online] 35(1), pp.57–A9. Available at: [Accessed 5 May 2014].

Rocha Souza, R., Tudhope, D. and Barcellos Almeida, M., 2010. Towards a taxonomy of KOS: Dimensions for classifying Knowledge Organization Systems. [online] 2010 ISKO Conference. Rome. Available at: [Accessed 12 Jun. 2013].

Rodriguez, N. and Ryave, A., 2002. Systematic self-observation. Sage Publications, Inc.

Rosemann, M. and Green, P., 2002. Developing a meta model for the Bunge–Wand–Weber ontological constructs. Information Systems, [online] 27(2), pp.75–91. Available at: [Accessed 1 Jun. 2013].

Rosemann, M. and Wyssusek, B., 2005. Enhancing the expressiveness of the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontology. AMCIS 2005 Proceedings, [online] p.438. Available at: [Accessed 9 Nov. 2014].

Sauermann, L., 2005. The semantic desktop-a basis for personal knowledge management. In: Proceedings of the I-KNOW. pp.294–301.

Sauermann, L., Bernardi, A. and Dengel, A., 2005. Overview and outlook on the semantic desktop. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on The Semantic Desktop at the ISWC 2005 Conference. pp.1–19.

Scheer, A.-W., 2000. ARIS--business process modeling. Springer.

Scheer, A.-W., Thomas, O. and Adam, O., 2005. Process modeling using event-driven process chains. In: M. Dumas, W.M.P. van der Aalst and A.H.M. ter Hofstede, eds., Process-Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology. [online] John Wiley & Sons. Available at: [Accessed 7 May 2013].

Smith, A.E. and Humphreys, M.S., 2006. Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, [online] 38(2), pp.262–279. Available at: [Accessed 25 Jul. 2012].

Smith, J.M. and Smith, D.C.P., 1977. Database abstractions: aggregation and generalization. ACM Trans. Database Syst., [online] 2(2), pp.105–133. Available at: [Accessed 24 Jun. 2013].

Sowa, J.F., 1984. Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Reading, MA.

Sowa, J.F., 1992. Conceptual graph summary. Conceptual Structures: Current Research and Practice. Ellis Horwood, New York London Toronto, [online] pp.3–66. Available at: [Accessed 1 Jul. 2013].

Sowa, J.F., 2000a. Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Brooks/Cole.

Sowa, J.F., 2000b. Ontology, metadata, and semiotics. Conceptual structures: Logical, linguistic, and computational issues, pp.55–81.

Sperry, R.W., 1975. Left-brain, right-brain. Saturday Review, [online] 2(9), pp.30–33. Available at: [Accessed 29 Sep. 2013].

Spry, T., 2001. Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, [online] 7(6), pp.706–732. Available at: [Accessed 12 Jun. 2013].

Stowell, F., 2013. Peter Checkland Interview. International Journal of Information Technology and Systems Approach, 6(2), pp.53–60.

Stowell, F. and Welch, C., 2012. The Manager’s Guide to Systems Practice: Making Sense of Complex Problems. John Wiley & Sons.

Thimor, J. and Fidelman, U., 1995. Concept-maps, logic and the cerebral hemispheres. Kybernetes, [online] 24(7), pp.35–51. Available at: [Accessed 11 Jun. 2013].

Trochim, W.M.K., 1989. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, [online] 12(1), pp.1–16. Available at: [Accessed 11 Jun. 2013].

Trochim, W.M.K., 1993. The reliability of concept mapping. In: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, Texas. [online] Available at: [Accessed 12 Jun. 2013].

Völkel, M. and Haller, H., 2009. Conceptual data structures for personal knowledge management. Online Information Review, 33(2), pp.298–315.

Wand, Y., 1996. Ontology as a foundation for meta-modelling and method engineering. Information and Software Technology, [online] 38(4), pp.281–287. Available at: [Accessed 1 Jun. 2013].

Wand, Y., Storey, V.C. and Weber, R., 1999. An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), [online] 24(4), pp.494–528. Available at: [Accessed 18 May 2014].

Wand, Y. and Weber, R., 1993. On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Information Systems Journal, 3(4), pp.217–237.

Wand, Y. and Weber, R., 1995. On the deep structure of information systems. Information Systems Journal, [online] 5(3), pp.203–223. Available at: [Accessed 17 May 2013].

Wand, Y. and Weber, R., 2002. Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling--A Research Agenda. Information Systems Research, 13(4), pp.363–376.

Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. and Obstfeld, D., 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization science, 16(4), pp.409–421.

Wilson, B., 1984. Systems: concepts, methodologies, and applications. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Wirth, N., 1985. Algorithms + Data Structures=programs. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Zeng, M.L., 2008. Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). Knowledge organization, [online] 35(2-3), pp.160–182. Available at: [Accessed 13 Jun. 2013].



1 See http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/168227.htm and http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/qualiti/QualitativeResearcher/QR_Issue4_Feb07.pdf

2 Kuhn also wrote extensively about the nature of concepts, largely from a cognitive psychology point of view.

3 I note here that the stance of Hjørland is socio-constructivist and that my own is (realist and) pragmatist – a stance which Hjørland also recognises as very important.

4 Checkland might perhaps resist ontological commitment. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_commitment.

5 To inform Leximancer of the centrality of such compound terms, it is necessary to Edit Compound Concepts: to manually compound selected concepts via Boolean operators to obtain deeper and more meaningful analysis. Clicking ‘Edit’ at the ‘Compound Concepts’ stage enables this. Subsequently, Compound concepts will automatically appear on the map if they are regular word concepts.

Page


Download 395.15 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page