AGREEMENT
01 April 2004, Riga No VL – 2004/ 7
Rīga Teacher Training and Education Management Academy with the payer reg. No 900000136987, on behalf of which in accordance with Constitution, as well as with valid legislation and regulations acts, acts RTTEMA acting rector Dace Markus, further in the text RTTEMA, for the one party and
Liepāja Pedagogical academy with the tax payer register No 90000036859, on behalf of which in accordance with Constitution, as well as with valid legislation and regulations acts Gunta Smiltnīece, further in the text LPA, from the other party, agreed on the following:
RTTEMA second level professional higher education study programme "Teacher
speech therapist" students, in case of the higher school liquidation, will have opportunity to proceed with their professional education at LPA second level professional higher education "Speech therapy" (471415) programme on basis of the tuition fee adopted by LPA Senate
RTTEMA warns the students studying in the Programme about the conditions of this Agreement.
LPA does not inherit RTTEMA’s commitments to the above mentioned programme students.
RTTEMA’s students who have signed the contract with the credit-establishment about study loan, this loan is pledged in accordance with Study foundation and the credit-establishment providing study loans.
RTTEMA students’ matriculation at LPA and the accomplished equalization of the study amount at the mentioned LPA
programme is regulated by its enrolment conditions, matriculation conditions, requirements of the mentioned study programme requirements, as well as in accordance with other study process regulation documents.
LPA possess the right to decide about the respective study year the student will be enrolled into for study commencement, in accordance with the content and requirements of LPA study programme.
From the data, when the students terminate their studies at RTTEMA and commence studies at LPA, they study, liable to all LPA’s regulation documents and pay tuition fee set by LPA
or cover the tuition fee by help of study loan.
The agreement is valid from the data of signing and is valid till non-determined time.
The agreement is liable to changes, amendments or terminated by the agreement of the both sides involved in written form, which is registered officially as Agreement protocol and
from the moment of signing it is indispensable part of the Agreement.
Rīga Teacher Training and Education Management Academy
LV 900000136987 __
Juridical address: Imantas 7. līnija 1 : ..
Rīga,
Rīga, LV-1083 Tel.:7808010
e-mail:
Liepāja Pedagogy Academy
LV 90000036859
Juridical address:
Lielā iela 14, Liepāja, LV-3401, Latvija
Telephone: 3423568, 3423510
e-mail: lpaiVclieppa.lv
Rector,
associated professor G.Smiltniece
CONTRACT
Rīga
|
COPY ļ
|
31 January 2006
No 01 – 21 / 1
2006/ 55
|
Rīga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy, represented by its rector Dace Markus in person, further in the text referred to as "RTTEMA", acting in accordance with RTTEMA Constitution, on the one party concerned behalf, and Rēzekne Higher School, represented by its rector Leonārs Svarinskis in person, further in the text referred to as "Rēzekne Higher School", acting according to Rēzekne Higher School’s Constitution, on the other party concerned behalf, each separately further named as "Party" or both together as "Parties", conclude this Contract ( further in the text referred to as ("Contract") on the following:
1. Contract subject
1.1. If in the period of validity of this contract RTTEMA second level study programme ”Teacher speech therapist” is not accredited or is liquidated (further in the text referred to as "Study programme"), Rēzekne Higher School promises to provide the Study programme students with the opportunity to continue their studies at the study programme "Teacher speech therapist" at Rēzekne Higher School.
2. Responsibilities of the parties
RTTEMA promises to inform the students studying in the Study programme about this agreement and its conditions.
Rēzekne Higher School does not inherit RTTEMA responsibilities to the students of the study programme.
Matriculation of RTTEMA students into Rēzekne Higher School and the adjusting of the study amount to the study programme “Teacher speech therapist” of Rēzekne Higher School proceeds in accordance with the Rēzekne Higher School enrolment regulations and matriculation conditions, as well as following other study process regulation conditions.
The number of the study places granted by the state is registered officially and passed to Rēzekne Higher School according to the real number of students studying who in the framework of this agreement are enrolled into
Rēzekne Higher School.
The students studying at RTTEMA Study programme who on the basis of this agreement are enrolled into Rēzekne Higher School, and who have signed credit contracts with the credit-establishment about their study loan, following the agreement between the Study foundation and the credit-establishment validated, are provided with the loan based on the previous conditions.
3. Contract duration
3.1. The contract is valid from the data of signing and is valid till non-determined time.
4. Parties’ warrant
4.1. The parties confirm their rights to execute the actions set by the Contract and pledge liabilities foreseen by this Contract.
5. Disagreements and discord
All discords and disagreements, which could arise in co0nnection with this Contract, the Parties settled by mutual negotiations.
The discords and disagreements, which are not settled by negotiations, are resolved by jurisdiction valid in the Republic of Latvia in accordance with the legislation and regulations.
Rīgas Pedagoģijas un izglītības vadības augstskola I. Miķelsone
Rīgā,.
6. Other conditions
This Contract can be changed and/or amended only by the written agreement of the Parties.
Each Party can terminate this Contract, announcing it to the other Party in written form at least 1 (one) month earlier.
This Contract is prepared and signed in duplicate in the Latvian language, which both possess equal juridical validity, each Party holds one sample.
7. Requisites of the Parties
Rīga Pedagoģijas un izglītības vadības augstskola
Imantas 7.līnija 1, Rīgā, LV 1083 VAT reg.No 90000013697 Latvijas Banka VKRNC Code: LACBLV2X Account: LV37TREL2150200030100
D. Markus
Rēzeknes Augstskola
Rēzekne, Atbrīvošanas aleja 90
LV-4600
VAT reg. No LV 90000076669
Latvijas Banka VKRNC
Code: LACBLV2X
Account: LV90TREL2150100030100
L.Svarinskis
Contents
-
Resolution on the study programme ”Teacher Speech Therapist” implementation commencement by RTTEMA Senate decision.
|
|
|
Licence on the right to implement the 2nd level professional higher education study programme ”Teacher Speech Therapist”
|
|
|
Contract with Liepāja Pedagogical Academy, contract with Rēzekne Higher Education School
The 2nd level professional higher education study programme ”Teacher Speech Therapist”
|
…………..….
|
8
|
1.1. Study programme justification
|
...………..…..
|
8
|
1.2. Aim and Objectives of the Study programme
|
...………..…..
|
9
|
1.3. Matriculation regulations
|
...………..…..
|
9
|
1.4. Requirements for the qualification
|
...………..…..
|
10
|
1.5. Content and organisation of the study programme
|
...………..…..
|
10
|
1.6. Assessment of study achievements
|
...………..…..
|
10
|
1.7. Study programme’s comparison with the programmes of other Latvia’s higher education schools
|
...………..…..
|
14
|
1.8. Study programme’s comparison with the programmes of higher education schools abroad
|
...………..…..
|
14
|
2. Advertising, information issues on the study opportunities
|
...………..…..
|
15
|
3. Study programme’s prospective assessment based on the interests of the Republic of Latvia
|
………..….
|
15
|
3.1. Study programme conformity to the standard of the 2nd level professional education and the professional standard
|
………..…….
|
16
|
Employers’ opinion poll results
|
...………..…..
|
18
|
Study programme assessment
|
...………..…..
|
18
|
Aim and Objectives of the study programme
|
...………..…..
|
18
|
Study programme organisation
|
...………..…..
|
19
|
Study programme’s practical implementation
|
...………..…..
|
20
|
Assessment system
|
...………..…..
|
21
|
The amount of students in the programme
|
...………..…..
|
22
|
Students’ opinion polls and their analysis
|
...………..…..
|
22
|
Graduates’ opinion polls and their analysis
|
...………..…..
|
22
|
Academic staff employed in the study programme
|
...………..…..
|
22
|
The amount of academic staff
|
...………..…..
|
22
|
Academic staff qualification
|
...………..…..
|
23
|
Academic staff selection, development and renovation policy
|
………..…….
|
23
|
Finance assets and infrastructure maintenance
|
………..…….
|
25
|
External relations
|
……….…….
|
26
|
Cooperation with employers
|
…………..….
|
26
|
Cooperation with similar study programmes in Latvia and beyond
|
…………..….
|
27
|
Academic staff, who had worked in foreign educational establishments, or implemented scientific, research and artistic work abroad
|
………….….
|
27
|
Study programme prospective development
|
………..…….
|
27
|
Appendixes
1. References on the study programme
2. RTTEMA Resolution on the implementation of study programmes
3. Teacher’s professional standard
4. Teacher Speech Therapist’s standard-rules of the educational establishment
5. Reference on the student pedagogical action
6. Requirements for Diploma work elaboration
7. Curriculum Vitae of the Academic staff
8. Cooperation contract with Riga City Council Education, youth and sports department
9. Practice regulations for the study programme “Teacher Speech Therapist”
10. Contracts with the practice venues
11. Study course descriptions
12. Student opinion poll questionnaire
The 2nd level professional higher education study programme ”Teacher Speech Therapist”
1.1. Study programme “Teacher Speech Therapist” justification
Human exchange of thoughts, ideas is implemented both by verbal and non-verbal means of communication. Children try to use both forms to express their own identity. Not always they succeed, namely, due to existence of communicative barrier (speech and language development deviations); the child’s opportunity to perceive or transmit information is either reduced or lost.
Deviations of the child’s speech not always present evidence of great sensory or intellectual disorders. Preschool age is often characterised by scarce development of the phonemic perception, which is revealed by difficulties of language sound differentiations according to articulation and/or acoustic features. Articulation movement performance inferior ability, lexical grammatical inconsistencies, difficulties with narrative skills testify about language underdevelopment or even about non-adequate language system development.
In the framework of the child’s healthy development in 2002, the research carried out on the problems of the native language acquisition of 2 -3 years olds reveals that only 8 out of 37 children have acquired the native language according to the requirements of this age; 22 children have become retarded in their language development, but 7 children - have developed the 1st stage of the language system underdevelopment. Simultaneously these children are able to perform activities in the group of their peers, have developed self-service and hygiene skills adequate for their age. The abovementioned data prove the necessity to diagnose speech deviations, language acquisition problems in due time. If the deviations have been early diagnosed, then the sensitive language acquisition period, when it is possible to help the child – correct the deviation, is prolonged.
The growth of the speech deviations’ amount is caused by the increase in numbers of prenatal and perinatal development deviations, children’s psycho-somatic meagre-maturity, enfeeblement, malignant micro-social environment, parent pedagogical incompetence, and lack of desire to take care of their children, the parents’ light-minded attitude to the children’s peculiarities of speech. Also various endured trauma, illnesses can facilitate the child’s difficulties of speech.
The teachers- speech therapists from abroad claim that as a result of malignant factors’ influence, 60% of the middle preschool age children have developed ascertained speech deviations.
The child depending on the skills of listening, comprehension of the things told by other people, to use them in routine communication, more or less successfully gets integrated into a new micro-social environment (family↔ preschool educational institution↔ school), perceives or partially perceives the values created by previous generations. It means that the child’s speech and language development full value is closely correlated with the formation of the child personality, its development further prospects.
When the child starts going to school, the speech deviations are enlarged by the difficulties to perceive, understand and use the literary language, that develop into specific mistakes of reading and writing. The cognitions claimed by a practicing speech therapist prove how serious the problem is: the analysis of 17 years of practice force to come to conclusion that each pupil of forms 3 - 4 has developed either a speech or/and language deviation at the beginning of school attendance. Summarising the above said, teachers enter a vast venue of the child speech and language system to be put in proper order. The opportunity to acquire the needed professional skills for this work is offered by the study programme “Teacher - Speech Therapist”.
Aim and Objectives of the Study programme
The aim of the study programme “Teacher – Speech therapist” is –
To train the teacher – speech therapist who knows how to investigate, assess, comprehend, help the child with speech and/ or language development disorders in preschool and junior school age, ensuring a purposeful correction of disorders and providing profound opportunities learning.
Objectives:
To provide students with academic and professional knowledge for work with children who have special needs due to speech and/or language disorders;
To foster motivated and creative implementation of the theoretical knowledge into speech therapy correction work with preschool and junior school age children;
To promote motivated scientific research work of the students by developing practical, necessary for speech therapy work skills, by compiling diverse practical materials (speech therapy work portfolio creation), by working on the diploma paper.
1.3. Matriculation regulations
The study programme “Teacher – Speech Therapist” matriculates the applicants, which have acquired higher professional pedagogical education or academic Bachelor’s degree and professional pedagogical education, or professional Bachelor’s degree and professional pedagogical education. A characteristic on the applicant’s pedagogical work experience by the employer is preferable.
1.4. Requirements for the qualification
The following requirements have to be fulfilled for achievement of the qualification”Teacher – Speech therapist”:
The syllabus of the study programme must be attained in full extent;
Semester tests, examinations must be passed in due time and successfully, practices must be accomplished effectively;
The state examinations must be passed successfully, and the grades obtained in accordance with RTTEMA Senate decision cannot be lower than grade 5.
Content and organisation of the study programme
The total amount of the study programme constitutes 68 credit points. It is envisaged for 2 years (4 semesters) in the part time studies. The elaboration of the study programme developed is based on Regulations on the second level professional higher education state standard (Regulations No 481, 20.11.2001.), Law on Professional education (Saeima of the Republic of Latvia, 10.06.1999.), Regulations No 347 “Regulations on the demands of the needed education and professional qualifications by the pedagogues” (03.10.2000.) by the Cabinet of Ministers.
During the implementation of the study programme, the students have to master (See Chart No 1):
Theoretical study courses of the branch – 15 CP;
Professional specialisation courses – 23 CP;
State examinations – 12 CP;
Pedagogical practice – 16 CP (+10 CP).
Assessment of study achievements
The achievements of the students’ studies are assessed by 10-point grading system. The following criteria are observed:
Ability to combine theory with practice skills;
Skills to compile, analyze and assess the obtained investigation data in the sphere of speech and language;
Skills to plan, correct and prognosticate the child speech/language development prospects;
Skills to work in team (teacher, speech therapist, parents, psychologist);
For the assessment of achievements the following grading forms are used: tests, examinations.
Chart No 1
Approved
By Senate sitting of 15/03/2004
Resolution 25 – 8
Rīga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy
Pedagogy faculty
Agreed
Study pro-rector __________________Z. Anspoka
________________________2005
2nd level professional higher education study programme
“Teacher – Speech therapist”
Enrolment year – 2005
Duration of studies – 2 years
Study plan for Part-time studies
Programme director – Mg. paed. doc. I. Miltiņa
No
|
Study course
Contact-hour amount,
Assessment type
|
Year 1
Ac.yr.2005/2006
|
Year 2
Ac.yr.2006/2007
|
Contact-
sessions
|
Autonomous works
|
Credit- points
|
Department responsible,
Lecturers
|
Sem.1
|
Sem. 2
|
Sem.3
|
Sem.4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
Branch academic theoretical study courses – 15 CP
|
1.
|
Urgent issues in pedagogy
|
24 E
|
|
|
|
24
|
96
|
3
|
General pedagogy department
Dr.paed.prof. I.Jurgena
Mg. paed., doc. I. Lāce
|
2.
|
Basic Rhetoric
|
16 E
|
|
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
General pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. S. Geikina
|
3.
|
Pedagogical research methodology
|
|
|
16 E
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
General pedagogy department
Dr. philol., doc. O. Pavlovs
|
4.
|
Special pedagogy
|
|
16 E
|
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
Preschool pedagogy department
Dr.psych.,assoc.prof.T.Zīriņa
General pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. S. Tūbele
|
5.
|
Contemporary Latvian literary language
|
|
|
16 E
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
Department of Languages
Dr. phil., prof. V. Kuzina
|
6.
|
Speech anatomic physiological basis, pathology
|
|
16 E
|
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
Dance, sports pedagogy and natural sciences department
Dr. biol., assoc. prof. J. Porozovs
|
7.
|
Introduction to neuropathology
|
|
16 E
|
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
Dance, sports pedagogy and natural sciences department
Dr. biol., assoc. prof. J. Porozovs
|
|
|
40
|
48
|
32
|
|
120
|
480
|
15
|
|
Professional specialisation courses – 23 CP
|
8.
|
Speech therapy in preschool
|
24 E
|
24 E
|
24 E
|
|
72
|
288
|
9
|
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., doc. I. Miltiņa,
Mg paed., lect. I. Habarova
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
9.
|
Speech therapy in primary school
|
24 E
|
24 E
|
24 E
|
|
72
|
288
|
9
|
General pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. S. Tūbele
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. J. Koļesnika
|
10.
|
Logo-rhythmic
|
|
|
16 E
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. G. Grigorjeva
|
11.
|
Speech therapy correction work with the children with psychic development deviations, intellectual development disorders; differential diagnostics
|
|
|
24 E
|
|
24
|
96
|
3
|
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., doc. I. Miltiņa,
Mg paed., lect. I. Habarova;
General pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. S. Tūbele
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. J. Koļesnika
|
|
|
48
|
48
|
88
|
|
184
|
736
|
23
|
|
Free optional study courses – 2 CP
|
|
Children literature / or
|
|
|
16 E
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., doc. V. Uršuļska
|
|
Basics of bilingual education
|
|
|
16 E
|
|
16
|
64
|
2
|
School pedagogy department
Dr.paed.prof.Z.Anspoka
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., doc. V. Uršuļska
|
Practice – 16 CP (+ 10 CP)
|
|
1st study practice (observational – active)
At PEI and primary school
|
3 weeks* and
3 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. J. Koļesņika,
Mg. paed., lect. I. Habarova,
Mg. paed., lect. G. Grigorjeva,
General pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. S. Tūbele,
praktizējošie logopēdi
|
|
2nd study practice (active) at PEI and primary school
|
|
3 weeks and
3 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
3rd study practice (autonomous, together with a the teacher – speech therapist),
Assistant- teacher – speech therapist at PEI or primary school
|
|
|
|
4 weeks
|
|
|
4
| State examinations – 12 CP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Speech therapy at preschool and primary school
(practical part)
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
2
|
Preschool pedagogy department
Mg. paed., doc. I. Miltiņa,
Mg. paed., lect. J. Koļesņika,
Mg. paed., lect. I. Habarova,
Mg. paed., lect. G. Grigorjeva,
General pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. S. Tūbele
|
|
Speech therapy theory (verbal)
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
2
|
|
Diploma paper
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
8
|
Preschool pedagogy department
Dr.psych.assoc.prof, T.Zīriņa
Mg. paed., doc. I. Miltiņa,
Mg. paed., lect. J. Koļesņika,
Mg. paed., lect. I. Habarova,
General pedagogy department
Mg. paed., lect. S. Tūbele
|
|
Total CP:
|
17
|
18
|
17
|
16
|
|
|
68
|
|
* 1week =1CP
1.7., 1.8. Study programme in comparison with the study programmes of other higher education schools in Latvia and abroad
The second level Professional higher education study programme “Teacher – Speech therapist” is being implemented by several Latvian higher education schools: Rēzekne Higher Education (RHE), Liepāja Pedagogical Academy (LPA), University of Latvia Adult Pedagogical Education centre (UL APEC), Rīga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy (RTTEMA), higher education schools abroad: Switzerland’s Rorschach Higher School (SRHS), Freiberg University (FU).
Chart 2
Implementation of the Study programme “Teacher – Speech therapist” in higher education schools in Latvia and abroad
Criteria for comparison
| LPA |
RHE
|
RTTEMA
|
UL APEC
|
SRHS
|
FU
|
Duration of studies (in years)
|
3
|
2.5
|
2
|
2.5
|
3
|
3.5
|
Programme amount (CP)
|
111
|
80
|
68
|
80
|
120
|
140
|
Practice amount (CP)
|
26
|
26
|
26 (16 + 10 CP)
|
26
|
60
|
70
|
Enrolment Requirements
|
Professional higher pedagogical education or professional higher medical education
|
Professional higher pedagogical education
|
Professional higher pedagogical education or academic Bachelor’s degree and Professional pedagogical education, or professional Bachelor’s degree and professional pedagogical education
|
Professional higher pedagogical education or professional higher medical education, psychologist or social pedagogue education
|
Preschool teacher or basic school teacher, or vocational education teacher with a long practical work experience
|
Higher pedagogical education
|
General education study courses
|
Branch academic theoretical study courses
|
Professional specialisation courses
|
Included into the whole study period
|
State examinations, tests (SE), diploma-work (D)
|
State examinations, tests, diploma-work
|
Qualification obtained
|
Teacher – Speech therapist
|
Speech therapist
|
Speech therapist
|
In order to implement the comparative analysis according to the criteria given in the chart, you have to establish common and different features.
Common:
All programmes offer general education study courses and professional specialisation courses.
State examinations, tests and creation of diploma paper is envisaged by each programme.
Different:
Duration of studies in the higher education schools in Latvia and abroad – 2; 2.5; 3; 3.5 years.
Amount of credit points – 68, 80, 111, 120, 140.
Matriculation rules.
Amount of practice – in the programmes of the higher education schools in Latvia – 26 CP, in the programmes of the higher education schools abroad – SRHS – 60CP, FU – 70CP.
The qualification obtained in the higher education schools in Latvia – Teacher – Speech therapist, but in the higher education schools abroad –Speech therapist.
The dominant forwarded by RTTEMA study programme “Teacher – Speech therapist”– pedagogical perception of speech and language disorders; similar attitude exists also in - SRHS. LPA, RHE, UL APEC, the dominant in FU – clinical speech and language disorders’ classification
2. Advertising, information issues on the study opportunities
The information about the second level higher education study programme “Teacher- Speech therapist” can be obtained by the persons interested:
On Riga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy’s (RTTEMA) website - www.rpiva.lv;
From RTTEMA hand-outs on study opportunities in the programme “Teacher- Speech therapist” at the academy;
During the especially organized Information day and the annual exhibition “School 200_”;
By contacting RTTEMA Enrolment Commission (tel.: 7808130, free of charge tel.: 8002002 e-mail: uznemsana@rpiva.lv) .
3. Study programme’s prospective assessment based on the interests of the Republic of Latvia
The necessity of the study programme “Teacher – Speech Therapist” defined by several factors:
The increasing number of children in the state with deviations of speech and/or language. The majority of these children do not have organic damages of the cerebral system, but the articulation difficulties are connected with the minor ability or inadequate maturity of functioning of the speech apparatus’ central or peripheral part. Therefore, the above mentioned children can attend general education establishments (school or pre-school), but the corrective development assistance in the field of language is provided by the teacher – speech therapist.
Insufficient number of qualified specialists working in the educational institutions. The demand of the speech therapist help is much greater than the possibilities to offer it. So the situation hindering proper development of the child’s personality occurs and learning difficulties arise when the school age is reached.
The increased demand for the teacher – speech therapist’s assistance has created the necessity to train highly qualified professionals for work with the preschool and young learners’ age children.
The study programme “Teacher – Speech Therapist” has been positively assessed by the Ministry of Education and Science (G. Vasilevskis, 25/02/2004), by the director (A. Šteinberga, 30/04/2004) of the Adult Pedagogical Education centre (PPIC) at the University of Latvia, by the sub-line “Special education teacher” of the study programme “Teacher” at the University of Latvia and by the director of “Special education teacher” for the study programme “Special education teacher” at Adult pedagogical education centre at the University of Latvia (S.Tūbele, 01/12/2005) (See Appendix No 1).
3.1. Study programme conformity to the standard of the 2nd level professional education and the professional standard
The study programme is created according to RTTEMA Regulations on the study programme implementation in full and part time studies, Law on Education of Latvia, Professional education law, Law on Higher education institutions, and it is in compliance with the regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers on requirements to educationalist education and professional qualification.
The professional standard “Teacher – Speech Therapist” has not been worked out yet, therefore, the programme is based on the professional standard – Teacher (04.27.02. Decree No 116) adopted by the Ministry of Education and Sciences and on The teacher – speech therapist’s work standard rules in educational establishments (04.09.03.Decree No 146) adopted by the Ministry of Education and Sciences, (See appendixes 2; 3; 4).
In this connection pedagogical and special competencies, which the students acquire during the process of the programme implementation, become important.
General pedagogical competencies are achieved by the offered branch academic theoretical courses (Urgent issues in pedagogy – 3 CP, Basic Rhetoric – 2 CP, Methodology of researches in Pedagogy – 2 CP, Special pedagogy – 2CP, Contemporary Latvian literary language – 2 CP) and the special competencies are fostered by definite academic theoretical courses of the branch (Speech anatomical physiological basis – 2 CP, Introduction to neuropathology – 2 CP).
The acquiring of the needed special competencies is ensured by the courses in professional specialisation (Speech therapy in preschool- 9 CCP, Speech therapy in primary school – CP, Logo-rhythmic 2 CP, Speech therapeutic correction work with children having psychic development retardedness, mental development disorders, differential diagnostics – 3 CP and other study courses).
The standard of the teacher’s profession has particularly enhanced special skills, which are characteristic for and significant for the teacher- speech therapist. The teacher – speech therapist must know how:
strategically and analytically deal with the issues to be solved by special pedagogy and speech therapy;
to choose and implement appropriate means for more profound purposeful speech therapy investigation of children;
to diagnose the primary speech and/ or language disorders, differentiate them from the secondary (in cases of other development disorders);
to develop a plan of corrective developmental action for groups of children with different speech and /or language disorders and implement their decrease or disappearance in accordance with it;
participate in team work (therapist, psychologist, social pedagogue, teacher) to help the child whose special needs demand speech and/or language disorders;
to register the risk group children, which is liable to having verbal problems;
to involve and cooperate with the parents in the work on the prevention and extinction of the verbal disorders of children.
The link between theoretical knowledge and practical activity is ensured by pedagogical practices during which the students learn the skills of planning their own and their pupils’ activities, implement speech therapy correction activities, analyze the obtained results to ascertain what the child can do autonomously and which the nearest development zone is. The skills of team work and cooperation skills with parents are acquired.
The professional competency of the Teacher – speech therapist is proved by the level of the diploma work quality.
3.2. Employers’ opinion poll results
As the implementation of the study programme passes through its first study year, then the employers’ opinion poll will be carried out at the end of the second study year and the processed results will be presented to the experts of the accreditation commission. The preschool and school institutions will become potential employers.
4. Study programme comparative assessment
Aims and Objectives of the Study programme The aim and the objectives of the study programme “Teacher – Speech therapist” in their essence have stayed identical.
They are as follow:
Aim:
To train the teacher – speech therapist who knows how to investigate, assess, comprehend, help the child with speech and/ or language development disorders in preschool and junior school age, ensuring a purposeful correction of disorders and providing profound opportunities learning.
Objectives:
To provide students with academic and professional knowledge for work with children who have special needs due to speech and/or language disorders;
To foster motivated and creative implementation of the theoretical knowledge into speech therapy correction work with preschool and junior school age children;
To promote motivated scientific research work of the students by developing practical, necessary for speech therapy work skills, by compiling diverse practical materials (the teacher –speech therapist’s speech therapy work portfolio creation), while working on the diploma paper.
Study programme organisation
The second level professional higher education study programme “Teacher – Speech therapist” received the licence on 16 December 2004.
The study programme has not been altered (See Chart No 3)
Chart 3
Study programme’s parts and their amount
Study programme’s parts
|
CP
|
Branch academic theoretical courses
|
15
|
Professional specialisation courses
|
23
|
Practice
|
16*
|
Free optional study courses
|
2
|
State examinations and tests
|
12
|
Total:
|
68
|
* - Irrespective from the previously obtained academic or professional Bachelor’s degree, each candidate has to have the teacher’s qualification. The pedagogical practice proved by the education document is equal to 10CP of the pedagogical practice. The characteristics on the student’s pedagogical activities provided by the employer are welcome (See Appendix 5).
The theoretical courses of the branch comprise – Urgent issues of pedagogy (3CP), Basic Rhetoric (2CP), Methodology of pedagogical researches (2CP), Special pedagogy (2CP), Contemporary Latvian language (2CP), Speech anatomic physiological basis, and pathology (2CP), Introduction to neuropathology (2CP).
The professional specialisation courses include – Speech therapy in preschool (9CP), Speech therapy in primary school (9 CP), Logo-rhythmic (2CP), Speech therapy corrective work with children having psychic development retardedness, intellectual development disorders; Differential diagnostics (3 CP).
The optional part of the studies is formed by Children Literature (2CP) or Basics of bilingual education (2CP).
State examinations and tests (12CP) include the following total:
Speech therapy in preschool and primary school (practical part) – 2 CP;
Speech therapy theory (verbal test)- 2 CP;
Diploma paper work out rules can be seen in Appendix 6.
4.3. Study programme’s practical implementation
The study plan of the study programme “Teacher – Speech therapist” is seen in Chart 1.
The following structural units of RTTEMA participate in the programme implementation: department of School Pedagogy, General Education department, Language department, and departments of Dance, Sports pedagogy and Natural sciences and Preschool pedagogy department (See Appendix 7).
The studies involve various work methods and forms – work is carried out in lecture rooms (lectures, discussions, seminars, tests, consultations), in the library, IT classrooms, as well as in special and general education institutions.
The pedagogical practice occupies a crucial place in the implementation of the programme. A cooperation contract is signed with the Education, Youth and Sports Department of Riga City council (See Appendix 8). The total length of the practice – is 16 CP, and it proceeds according to the practice statute created for the study programme (See Appendix 9). The studies include 3 practices.
Study (observation, active) practice (in the first semester of studies) – 3CP Preschool education institution (PEI) and 3CP at the school speech therapy unit. The aim of the practice – is to provide the students with an opportunity to comprehend the micro-social environment, where the education and educational process including the child’s speech and /or language disturbance correction, the teacher – speech therapist’s work responsibilities, work organisation in preschool educational institution (PEI)/ primary school speech therapy unit.
Study practice (active) (in the 2nd semester of the studies) – 3CP at the Preschool educational institution and 3CP at the school speech therapy unit. The aim of the practice - to encourage the student’s skills to active work performance with the children having speech and/or language disorders, at implementing the child investigation in holistic perception, as well as at organising correction work at preschool educational institution or at school speech therapy unit.
Study practice (Autonomous, together with the teacher- speech therapist) (the 4th semester of the studies) – 4 CP at the preschool educational institution or 4 CP at the school speech therapy unit. The aim of the practice – to provide the students with an opportunity of autonomous work in any of the educational institutions, working as a teacher – speech therapist implementing the corrective developmental activities for extinction of the speech and /or language disorders in the framework of the given institution.
The positive assessment of the pedagogical practice is one of the criteria for obtaining of the professional qualification. The practice is considered as invalid if the student has not fulfilled the tasks of the practice. Each practice has its own requirements and criteria serving as the basis of the evaluation. At the post-practice conference, the student presents the developed materials, obtained cognitions to the colleagues and lecturers. The practice procedure, its results are analyzed at the sittings of the Preschool pedagogy department.
The venues of practice implementation (See Appendix 10):
Rīga Kurzeme district’s special Preschool educational institution “Riekstiņš”, its address: Riekstu ielā 14;
Rīga Kurzeme district’s 2nd special Preschool educational institution, its address: Vecumnieku ielā 7;
Rīga Kurzeme district’s Secondary School No 34, its address: Kandavas ielā 4/6;
Rīga Zemgale district’s Basic Education School named after Fr. Brīvzemnieks, its address: Zeļļu ielā 4 etc.
4.4. Assessment System
According to the study programme, lecturers on the basis of mutual requirements develop study course descriptions (See Appendix 11). Each individual study course has not only its predetermined aim, study contents, envisaged result, but also the student progress assessment. The study result assessment is implemented both on the quantitative and qualitative levels. The student theoretical knowledge, practical works, practices and other results are assessed by 10 point grading system (quality assessment). When accomplishing the quantitative assessment, the amount of the student’s performed work is considered in compliance with the study plan. For part-time studies 1CP corresponds to 40 academic hours, which are distributed in the following way: 8 contact-sessions and 32 student autonomous work hours.
In order to obtain the qualification Teacher – Speech therapist, the students studying
Must acquire the programme in full amount,
Have to pass the semester examinations in due time,
Obtain a positive practice assessment according to 10 point grading system,
Pass the State examinations in practical and academic theoretical fields (assessment not lower than 5 point-grade),
Work out and successfully defend diploma paper.
4.5. The amount of students in the programme
41 students are matriculated into professional higher education study programme “Teacher – Speech therapist” in the academic year of 2005 /06.
4.5.1. Student opinion poll and its analysis
To establish the achievements of the study programme during the 1st semester of the studies, the student opinion poll questionnaire was created (See Appendix 12).
In total 86 % of the students consider that the acquired academic theoretical knowledge and practical skills are perfectly satisfying their needs, 14 % - are partly satisfied, no one is unsatisfied.
4.5.2. Graduates’ opinion poll and its analysis
The study programme is being implemented for the first academic year, therefore, no graduates’ opinion poll exists, and there are no employers’ references yet.
4.6. Academic staff employed by the study programme
4.6.1. Academic staff list and amount (See Chart 4).
Chart 4
Lecturers involved into the implementation of the study programme
Department
|
Employment type
|
Name, surname,
scientific, academic degree
|
Courses lectured
|
Department of Languages
|
Main elected position
|
Viktorija Kuzina
Dr. phil. prof.
|
Contemporary Latvian literary language
|
General pedagogy department
|
Main elected position
|
Oļegs Pavlovs
Dr. phil., doc.
|
Methodology of pedagogical research
|
Main elected position
|
Inese Jurgena
Dr.paed.prof.
Inguna Lāce
Mg. paed., doc.
|
Urgent issues in pedagogy
|
Main elected position
|
Silvija Geikina
Mg. paed.., lect.
|
Basic Rhetoric
|
Guest-lecturer
|
Sarmīte Tūbele
Mg. paed., lect.
|
Special pedagogy
Speech therapy in primary school
Speech therapy correction work with children having mental development disorders
Practice manager in primary school
|
Dance, sports pedagogy and natural sciences department
|
Main elected position
|
Juris Porozovs
Dr. biol., assoc. prof.
|
Speech anatomic physiological bases, pathology
Introduction to neuro-pathology
|
Preschool pedagogy department
|
Main elected position
|
Irēna Miltiņa
Mg. paed., doc.
|
Speech therapy in preschool
Speech therapy correction work with children having speech development deviations
|
Guest-lecturer
|
Irina Habarova
Mg. paed., lect.
|
Speech therapy in preschool
Speech therapy correction work with children having speech development deviations
|
Guest-lecturer
|
Jeļena Koļesnika
Mg. paed., lect.
|
Speech therapy in primary school
Speech therapy correction work with children having mental development disorders
Practice manager in primary school
|
School pedagogy department
|
Main elected position
|
Zenta Anspoka
Dr.paed.prof.
|
Basics of bilingual education
|
Preschool pedagogy department
|
Main elected position
|
Vladislava Uršuļska
Mg. paed., doc.
|
Children literature
Basics of bilingual education
|
Guest-lecturer
|
Ginta Grigorjeva
Mg. paed., lect.
|
Logo-rhythmic
|
Main elected position
|
Tija Zīriņa
Dr.psych.assoc.prof.
|
Special pedagogy
|
4.6.2. Academic staff qualification
The study programme is implemented by 14 lecturers:
10 – employed in the main elected position (71.5 %);
4 - Guest-lecturers employed (28.5 %).
6 - Doctors (42.8 %) – in the programme work lecturers having Doctor’s degree, which is in full accordance with the programme specifics;
8 – with Master’s degree (57.2 %).
4.6.3. Academic staff selection, development and recruitment renovation policy
Lecturers possessing appropriate education and qualification, as well as practising teachers – speech therapists, who have been working for long years in general education and special education institutions – preschool / school take part in the study programme implementation.
The lecturers actively get involved into scientific research activities, perfect their experience, knowledge in various courses, seminars, conferences, produce training aids, text-books - including, as well as conduct the in-service courses for teachers and teachers – speech therapists.
As speech therapy is considered to be an intra-disciplinary branch of science, then research and methodological activities can be joined into several groups: pedagogy, speech therapy, medicine, linguistics. In the self-assessment period the following lecturer activity directions exist:
Scientific research work,
Participation in scientific conferences,
Participation in the exhibition of scientific projects,
Participation in the development of programmes and publications (books).
Pedagogy
Projects: Leader of the State Language Agency’ project (4 – 9/6) “Development of the Latvian language methodological aid for the primary school teachers working with minority pupils, who attend schools with the Latvian language of instruction” (2005). International research project: Participant of the research led by Aegean’s Humanitarian faculty” Work experience with mixed classes in Europe” from Greece (2005). Since 2005 – Z.Anspoka acts as an expert for the European Union Social foundation projects on teaching practices of the higher education school students, professional standards, educationalists’ further education programmes.
I.Jurgena is the leading researcher of the project”Pedagogy in the post-soviet period in Latvia: comparative analysis” financed by the Latvian Scientific Council(2005). Participation in conferences: LVAVA Scientific conference “Contents and language integration - a way to high quality education” – report”Texts for acquisition of various subjects at basic education school” (2005); Erasmus coordinators’ conference ”Eracom 2005” – report ”Students and Teachers Mobility in RTTEMA”. Discussion ”Basic education Forms 1 – 6” organized by the Ministry of Education and sciences of the Republic of Latvia and publishers RaKa (discussion materials are published by the magazine ”Skolotājs” 2005., N0 50) (Z.Anspoka).
Directions of scientific research work: Pupils’ learning activities development in primary school (I. Lāce).
Education contents integrated implementation for the children with special needs in PEI (I. Habarova, I. Miltiņa).
Publications (books): Play – children’s lifestyle (D. Dzintere, I.Stangaine), Introduction to special pedagogy (S. Tūbele).
Medicine
Directions of scientific research work: preschool age children’s health problems and early diagnostics of cerebral regulatory functions (J. Porozovs).
Participation in scientific project development (2005- 2008): Peculiarities of cerebral neuro-physiological development of preschool age children and computerised Express-diagnostics (J. Porozovs).
Speech therapy
Participation by reports in scientific conferences in Rīga, Tartus: Diagnostics of reading disorders, opportunities for correction by S. Tūbele.
Publications (books): “If the pupil writes wrong” by S. Tūbele, J. Lūse
“Pupils’ speech development assessment” by S. Tūbele
”Phoneme pronunciation disorders” by I. Miltiņa
Linguistics
Participation by reports in scientific conferences in Liepāja, Rīga: Solving of refined language issues in legislation and resolutions; the place of the Latvian language in education of values by V. Kuzina.
Publications (books): Basics of Rhetoric by S. Geikina.
The Latvian language teaching aid envisaged for preschool education teachers by V. Uršuļska and others
The following lecturers conduct in-service courses for working teachers and teachers – speech therapists: S. Tūbele, I. Habarova, I. Miltiņa, V. Uršuļska, G. Grigorjeva and others.
4.7. Finance assets and infrastructure maintenance
The study programme ”Teacher- Speech therapist” is being implemented by part-time studies. The finance asset is formed by student fees (Ls 400 – per year of studies) (See Appendix 13).
The programme implementation venue is: Rīga, Imantas 7. līnijā 1. RTTEMA total room space covers 2682 m2 with 29 study rooms – 1628 m2, 48 studies – 1054 m2.
An important role is played by RTTEMA library in the study process maintenance. Students have access to the reading room with 70 reader seats and 15 free-access computers.
The library is regularly supplied by literature on special pedagogy, speech therapy, linguistics issues, which play an important role in the implementation of the programme (See Chart 5).
Chart 5
Book funds for implementation of the study programme „Teacher – Speech therapist”
Branches of sciences
|
Number of book copies
|
1. Pedagogy - special pedagogy, defectology, up-bringing of peculiar social groups etc.
|
1035
|
2. Children literature, folklore
|
2720
|
3. Rhetoric
|
360
|
4. The Latvian language
|
765
|
5. Medicine - anatomy, physiology, neuro-pathology etc.
|
355
|
TOTAL:
|
5235
|
To foster the student equipment with special literature for teacher-speech therapy courses’ studying, literature folder producing has been started, whish compile information and periodical materials on speech therapy and special pedagogy, which cannot be found in the library stock. You can get acquainted with them in the scientific methodological study of Pedagogy faculty and students use them for their autonomous research implementation and diploma paper writing.
For the study process implementation is envisaged certain technical maintenance. In the study process both the students and the lecturers can use:
Computer classrooms, equipped with Intel Pentium and Celeron processor computers, licensed soft-wares, Internet services,
In the study work three mobile presentation units can be used (portable computer and data video-projector), digital video-camera and digital photo-camera,
Students and employees can use RTTEMA e-mail,
RTTEMA website page is maintained topical, where the students can find needed information.
4.8. External relations
4.8.1. Cooperation with employers
Cooperation, as it was already mentioned before, is most successfully with general and special preschool educational institutions / schools, which are interested both in the practice organisation and the training of new specialists as potential employees.
4.8.2., 4.8.3. Cooperation with similar study programmes in Latvia and abroad
Communication on the level of information, thought exchange level on the study programmes in speech therapy involves directors of similar programmes in Latvia: S. Tūbele (UL APEC), B. Trinīte (LPA), P. Vucenlazdāns (RHS). Contracts are signed with Liepāja Pedagogical Academy, Rēzekne Higher School. A reference is made about the study programme ”Teacher –Speech therapist”, which is provided by the second level higher Professional education study programme ”Special education teacher” with the director S. Tūbele (UL APEC).
It has to be pointed out that up to-now, no cooperation is started with the directors of similar programmes abroad, as well as no guest lecturers are involved into the implementation of the programme, nevertheless, lecturers and students actively take part in the training courses organized by Latvia’s Speech therapist association, which are conducted by guest-lecturers – highly qualified specialists: G. Čirkina, leader of the speech therapy laboratory, professor lectured on Dyslexia and dysgraphy (Moscow, Corrective pedagogy institute 2005); T. Vizela, scientific researcher in Psychiatric Scientific Research Institute, grant “Appeal” winner, Doctor of sciences lectured on Speech pathology of children and adults (Neuro-psychological and neurological aspects) (Moscow, 2005); T. Fridmann, lecturer of neurology at Research Institute in Moscow, doctor with the highest category, lectured on Neurology (2005).
5. Study programme’s prospective development
SWOT analysis of the programme ”Teacher – Speech therapist”
Strengths
Great attention is paid to implementation of the principle – synthesis of theory and practice.
The succession principle is implemented into the corrective-developmental work with preschool and junior school age children possessing speech and/or language disorders.
Qualified academic staff members are involved into implementation of the study programme.
Weaknesses
Inadequate cooperation with similar programmes beyond Latvia.
Not- adequate student scientific research activity.
Inappropriate number of practice venues.
Opportunities
By cooperation with the institutions providing practice venues, opportunities for qualitative implementation of State examination practice part are created.
To increase the number of students, as the existing practice prove interest, motivation of the students to acquire the programme.
Threats
Tuition fee increase for the programme implementation.
Maintenance of the number of pedagogical practice venues.
Development plan of the study the programme “Teacher - Speech therapist”
To increase efficiency of cooperation with the higher education institutions in Latvia (UL APEC, LPA, RHS), in order to involve highly qualified specialists into study course reading.
To widespread cooperation with general education institutions for speech therapy activity implementation by involving new educational institutions (Rīga Kurzeme district’s PEI “Kadiķītis”, Zemgale district’s PEI “Kristapiņš”, Zemgale district’s Secondary School No 47 etc.).
To continue work on developing a qualitative study programme, by using opportunities provided by information technologies; to foster the increase of lecturers’ qualification.
To start developing international links between academic staff members (with Germany - S. Tūbele).
To continue annual self-assessment of the study programme more actively by involving the students into this process.
Work team:
Irēna Miltiņa,
Mg.paed., docent at Preschool pedagogy department , programme director
Tija Zīriņa,
Dr.psych, assoc. prof., Head of Preschool pedagogy department
Sarmīte Tūbele,
Mg.paed., lecturer of General pedagogy
Baiba Medne,
First year student at the study programme “Teacher - Speech therapist”
CURRICULUM VITAE
NAME
SURNAME
| VIKTORIJA
KUZINA
|
Address: Kalnciema 101 – 68
Rīga, LV – 1046
Mob.tel.: 6770085
Tel.: 7808126
|
| DATE OF BIRTH |
28 May 1947
|
|
|
PLACE OF BIRTH
|
Krāslavas reg.
|
|
|
CITIZENSHIP,NATIONALITY
|
Latvian
|
|
|
FAMILY STATUS
|
Widow, sons – Māris Kuzins, Jānis Kuzins
|
|
|
EDUCATION
|
1988 – 1991
1965 – 1971
|
Post –graduate student at Latvian Academy of Sciences
LSU; student at Faculty of Philology
|
ACADEMIC TITLES AND SCIENTIFIC DEGREES
|
1992
1991
|
Doctor of Science in Philology (nostrificated)
Candidate of Science in Philology
|
EMPLOYMENT
|
2004 – 2005
1994 – 2003
1993 – 2000
1992 – 1994
1990 – 1993
1971 – 1990
|
Assoc. professor at the Language department for the Department of Management and Economics at RTTEMA
Head of the Humanities Department at RTTEMA, assoc. professor, director of the professional study programme ”Teacher of the Latvian Language AT Minority Basic education School”, leader of a professor group
Researcher of Latvian Language Institute at the University of Latvia
Teacher of the Latvian language in Imanta’s Teacher Training Institute
Researcher, senior researcher of Institute of Language at Latvian Academy of Science
Junior Researcher at Institute of Language and Literature at Academy of Sciences
|
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
|
Monographs
Articles in scientific journals and collections Dictionaries
Conference theses
|
90
4
54
5
27
|
|
TEXT-BOOKS
|
Study literature
Methodical articles
|
5
3
2
|
|
DISSERTATIONS
|
|
1
|
|
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
|
|
8
|
|
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACTIVITY DIRECTIONS
|
Lexicology, lexicography, phraseology
Sociolinguistics, culture of language
Terminology, functional stylistics
Mathematical linguistics
|
|
|
ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES
|
2000 – 2005 Docent of the courses “Contemporary Latvian literary language”, “ Culture of language”
|
|
|
ACTIVITIES IN SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL ORGANISATIONS
|
Member of professor association
Member of International Phraseologist association
Member of RTTEMA Science council
|
|
|
RECOGNITION IN AND BEYOND LATVIA
|
Gratitude diploma for the project contest “European Sign of recognition for language learning” by the Ministry of Education and science
In 2004 – gratitude for significant input into RTTEMA creation and development by RTTEMA rector;
In 2002 – Gratitude for Enthusiasm and participation in the project contest “ “European Sign of recognition for language learning” by the Ministry of Education and science;
Gratitude for significant input into scientific development promotion and study methodological work by RTTEMA rector;
In 1996 - Gratitude for work in research in linguistics by Latvian language institute;
In 1994 - Gratitude for active promotion of the Latvian language rebirth as a state language by the State language centre.
Danish scientists (experts) have appreciated the contribution into science.
|
|
PARTICIPATION IN INTERNETIONAL CONFERENCES AND CONGRESSES ABROAD
|
Ukraine (Kiev), Russia (Moscow, Sankt Petersburg), Belarus (Grodn), Lithuania (Siauliai, Kaunas), Poland (Warsaw, Gdansk, Rzeszow)
|
|
GRANTS
|
In 2000 by Latvian language institute. Theme “Functional and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Language”
In 2000 for Euro-intellect project “A Latvian language video-course”
|
|
ORGANISATIONAL ACTIVITIES
|
In 2001- organizer of the international scientific conference “Language and higher pedagogical education” (RTTEMA)
Chair person of the international scientific conference plenary-sessions and sections (Gdansk, Kaunas, Rīga, Liepāja)
Member of RTTEMA Scientific articles’ collection editorial board
|
|
KNOWLEDGE OF LANGUAGES
|
Latvian
Russian
German
English
|
native
speak, write
speak, write
by help of dictionary
|
|
SCIENTIFIC
PUBLICATIONS
|
Kuzina V. Latviešu valoda: Videokurss. Videokasetes. – R.: Eirointelekts, 2000. – pp. 242
Kuzina V. Valodas prasmei. R.: Pētergailis, 2004. – pp. 126 (Submitted).
Kuzina V. Latviešu valodas videokurss latviešu sarunvalodas apguvei. Žmogus kalbos erdveje. Kaunas 2001 pp. 76. – 79
Kuzina V. Eiropas Valodu gads un valodu apguve// Svešvalodu skolotājs. Eiropa. Globalizācija: starptautiskas zinātniskas konferences materiāli. - Rīga, RaKa, 2002 , pp. 5. – 12
Kuzina V. Latviešu valodas normas un valodas prakse// Valodu apguve: problēmas un perspektīva. Zin.rakstu krājums. - Liepāja, 2002., pp. 30. - 37
Kuzina V. Vārdnīcas un valodu apguve// Baltu valodu leksikoloģija un leksikogrāfija: XXXI zinātniskās konferences materiāli. – Sanktpēterburga: Filoloģijas fakultāte, 2002, 24. – 26.lpp.
Kuzina V. Latviešu valoda kā nacionālās izglītības satura pamats// Teorija un prakse skolotāju izglītībā: starptautiskas zinātniskas konferences matedriāli (ISBN 9984-689-98-0). Rīga, Petrovskis un Ko, 2002, 301. – 306.
Kuzina V. Latviešu valodas vieta vērtībizglītībā. // Teorija un prakse skolotāja izglītībā II. – Rīga, 2004, pp.570. – 575
Кузина В. Русско – латышские языковые контакты в сфере фразеологии. В сб. «Language, Kulture, Teaching and Upbringing», Rzeszow, 2004, 257. – 262.
|
|
20/09/2005 /V.Kuzina/
CURRICULUM VITAE
Name, Surname Juris Porozovs
Place of birth Rīga
Date of Birth 21 February 1958
Nationality Latvian
Citizenship the Republic of Latvia
Family status Married, 3 children
Address Valdeķu iela 68/2 – 1, Rīga, LV-1058
Telephone 7675161, mob. 6806992
Education and Qualification
1965 -1976 Rīga Secondary School No 4
1976 -1981 University of Latvia, Faculty of Biology
Biologist, Lecturer in biology and chemistry
Academic titles and scientific degrees
1993 - Doctor in Biology; in the Republic of Latvia
1997 – Docent
2005 – Assoc. professor
Work Experience
2005/ 06/ Rīga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy – assoc. professor
1997/08/- 2005/ 06/ Rīga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy – docent
1999/10/ - 2005/ 06/ International practical psychology higher school – docent
1998/08/ - 2003/ 08/ State Fire and Rescue Service Department– senior specialist
1997/08/ - 1998/08/ Republic of Latvia; Civil Defence service centre – head specialist
1996/04/ – 1997/08/ Republic of Latvia; Civil Defence service centre - expert
1992/08/ - 1996/02/ Scientific research and production enterprise "Amats" - senior scientific co-researcher
1995/03/ - 1995/11/ Children clinic hospital "Gaiļezers" – physician- laboratory assistant
1981/11/ - 1992/08/ Medical biological and ecological research centre - senior l laboratory assistant, junior researcher
Scientific publications (Recent 6 years):
Articles in scientific journals and article collections 19
Conference theses 17
Text-books – 1 (book in 3 parts) 1
Participation and presentation of reports at international scientific conferences during 6 previous years: 22
Scientific research directions during 6 previous years:
Characteristics of adolescent sports activities, health conditions and lifestyle; Assessment of students’ physical condition changes during the study process and attitude to sports assessment; Preschool age children health problems and early diagnostics of cerebral regulation functions; Future pedagogues’ professional choice motives analysis; Environment and vocational health theme integration into the secondary school curriculum; Riga secondary school pupils and biology teachers’ views on biology teaching at school
Share with your friends: |