NIETZSCHE K – Links
The war on terror is the worst reactionary assertion, it resentfully identifies the US as good out of pure negation of the evil other – the terrorist.
Alt-f4 – Case Western Blog 2006
War on Terror through Nietzsche’s eyes, april 18
Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda poses a dire threat to American lives in the world… to either react or allow us to move humanity forward.
Hegemony is predicated on a violent will to order that seeks to elevate security to a transcendental idea. This moral framework for violence is not only a genocidal elimination of difference but also a ahatred of life, of the apparent world as it is.
James Der Derian is a Watson Institute research professor of international studies (Brown University), 1993 http://muse.jhu.edu.proxy.library.emory.edu/journals/boundary/v030/30.3derian.html
From president Bush’s opening lines of… balance of power is global suzerainty, and war is peace.
OTHER
There is nothing else. We read T/Theory. I’m not sure we’ve ever gone for a disad or CP.
Canada Counterplan
Text:
The Government of Canada should
Canada solves—NEPAD is tailored to address specific issues in a regional context.
CIDA October 2k7
“Canada Fund for Africa,” http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/CIDAWEB/acdicida.nsf/En/JUD-4465251-H54
Net Benefit
A. Uniqueness and Link—Canada’s soft power is low but can be restored by a renewed focus on aid to Africa.
Canada Newswire, 2007 (“Canada must reduce trade and ownership barriers, integrate economy with U.S., say Manning and Harris”, May 7, pg. lexis)
B. Global proliferation is increasing and only Canadian soft power can combat its spread.
Toronto Star, 2007 (07/07, “Canada can help rid world of nuclear arms”, Lexis)
C. Nuclear proliferation causes escalatory nuclear wars, seriously endangering the human race.
Quester and Utgoff The Washington Quarterly 1994
Trade Off
A. US assistance to Latin America is high but remains a low priority
Denver Post 07 (March 9, "EDITORIAL Timely trip to Latin America," lexis)
B. Aid to Africa trades off with funding for latin america
Menendez 2000 (Robert, US Senator, Testimony before HOUSE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE, Federal News Serice, 6/28, lexis)
USAID in Latin America is crucial to prevent deforestation
Franco 04 (Adolfo, Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Latin America and teh Caribbean, USAID"Foreign Assistance Priorities for the Western Hemisphere," 3/2, http://ciponline.org/colombia/040302fran.htm)
DEFORESTATION RESULTS IN GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY LOSS, and WATAR SCARCITY, KILLING 2 BILLION
ROPER AND ROBERTS 1999 - FOREST CONSERVATION CONSULTANT AND SENIOR ADVISOR, FORESTRY AND CONSERVATION, CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, http://rcfa-cfan.org/english/issues.12.htm
Foucault
A. Link
The affirmatives invocation of public health as the basis for action is a neocolonial intervention that seeks to regulate and manage different spaces of varying degrees of health - this form of governmentality diffesed by the 1ac can only be understood as an imperial hygiene that seeks to heal in order to rule. These lines of health become the basis for racial and eugenic orders of knowing
Bashford 2004 (Alion, Assoc Prof History of Sci @ U of Sydney, Imperial Hygiene: A Critical History of Colonialism, Nationalism and Public Health, p. 1-2)
B. Impact
Normalizing regimes of biopolitics ensure the management and hierarchization of life -- authorizing genocidal and imperial violence
Elden 2002 (Prof of Politics @ Warwick boundary 2 29.1, p. 148-9)
C. Vote Negative
Reject the affirmative for its complicity with _______
Rather than engage in the process of imagining another world that transcends oppression which only plays into systemic narratives, we should speak truth to power and take power by revealing its functions when it is most insidious. This form of specific intellectualism is the best approach to biopolitics.
Haber 94 (Honi Ferm, Asst Prof of Phil @ U of Colorado Denver, Beyond Postmodern Politics: Lyotard, Rorty, Foucault p. 92-95)
Heg Bad Modules in the 1NC
Prolif
A. US aggression causes nuclear counterbalancing, gauranteeing arms races and proliferation
Chomsky 2k6 Professor of Lunguistics and Philosophy @ MIT, Noam, Failed States, pg 69
Proliferation causes massively destructive nuclear wars
Utgoff, survival v. 44 no 1 summer 2002, pg. 90
Terror-Russia Module
A. US Power forces Rusia to protect itself by frequently relocating nuclear weapons, giving the Cheechen rebels the chance to seize nuclear materials - many of which come "ready to launch" speling instant doom for the world
Chomsky 2k6 Professor of Lunguistics and Philosophy @ MIT, Noam, Failed States, pg 15-16
B. The impact is extinction - nuclear terrorism is a catastrophe beyond all calculaion which outweighs any other policy concern
Chesney 97 (Robert, Law Clerk to the Hon. Lewis A Kaplan; JD Harvard Law School, Nov 97, 20
Iran
A. US power forces IRa to stock up on nukes as a deterrent
Chomsky 2k6 Professor of Lunguistics and Philosophy @ MIT, Noam, Failed States, pg 73-74
B. Iran prolif causes nuclear war
The Daily Texan, 2004 (Sept 8, http://dailytexanonline.com/news/2004/09/08/Opinion/iranuclear.program.should.not.be.ignored-712197.html)
Share with your friends: |