7 Current Water Environment Status, Impact Assessment and Mitigation Measures 7.1 Assessment of current water environment
In order to understand the water environment quality of the region where the project is located, assessment was made on data obtained from water quality monitoring activities carried out in 2003.
7.1.1 Monitoring sections, Items and Analysis Methods
Kuiqi Bridge crosses Beigang. Nanjiang Binlu is also located on the south bank of Beigang. We used the data obtained from normal monitoring of Kuiqi and Aofengzhou sections in 2002 to analyze the status of water environment.
Nanjiang Binlu crosses 7 inland rivers: Gangtou River, Longjin River, Puxia River, Yujin River, Pandun River, Lianban River and Linpu River. 10 water quality monitoring sections are set here. The Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road crosses such inland rivers as Mazhou River, Yixu River, Baihuting River, Luocheng River, etc. 7 water quality monitoring sections are set here. Please see Table7.1 1.
Table 7.1-1 Water Quality Monitoring Sections for Inland Rivers Crossed by Nanjiang Binlu and the Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road
Road Name
|
Section S/N
|
Section Name
|
Section Monitoring Position
|
Nanjiang Binlu
|
1
|
Gangtou River
|
Jufeng Paper Co., Ltd
|
2
|
Longjin River
|
Longgang Intersection (Meitanlai Market)
|
3
|
Communist Youth League School of Fujian Province (Shangshan Rd)
|
4
|
Puxia River
|
Oliver Factory
|
5
|
Yujin River
|
Fuzhou Liusu (Metallurgical Chemical Plant)
|
6
|
Gaohu District (Automobile Washing Plant)
|
7
|
Zhengyang Industrial District (Jiafu Color Printing)
|
8
|
Pandun River
|
Expressway Entrance (Hulu Town) (Printing&Dyeing Plant, Pig Farm)
|
9
|
Lianban River
|
Expressway Entrance (CCP Lianban Villagers Committee Building)
|
10
|
Linpu River
|
Linpu Village
|
the Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road
|
11
|
Mazhou River
|
Wushan Jimuqi Water Gate
|
12
|
Yixu River
|
Zhulan Village (Bamen Water Gate)
|
13
|
Baihuting River
|
Renmin Paper Plant (Baihu Village and Yingbin Rd)
|
14
|
Luocheng River
|
Aoshan (Ebb)
|
15
|
Wucuo Village, Dianqian Village
|
16
|
Zhouwei Village, Zhouwei River
|
17
|
Chengmen Village (beside Fuxia Road)
|
(3) Items monitored
According to the Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (HJ/T2.3-93) and the requirements for parameters for water quality monitoring under the similar project, the water environment quality monitoring and assessment of this project can choose the following water quality parameters: pH, SS, CODCr, DO, BOD5, Ammonia Nitrogen, petroleum, lead, etc
Sampling, preservation, transportation and analysis of these items shall be carried out in accordance with the methods (water and wastewater monitoring and analysis methods) as specified by State Environmental Protection Administration of China.
7.1.2 Assessment Standards
For assessment of ground water, the Environmental Quality Standard for Surface Water shall be used (GB3838-2002); for inland rivers, Class Ⅴ water quality standard shall be used; Class III for Minjiang River and Class II for source water areas. Please see Table 7.1 2 for these standards.
Table 7.1 2 Water Quality Assessment Standards
Assessment Factor
|
Unit
|
Class Ⅱ
|
Class Ⅲ
|
Class Ⅳ
|
ClassⅤ
|
pH
|
Zero dimension
|
6~9
|
CODCr≤
|
mg/l
|
15
|
20
|
30
|
40
|
BOD5≤
|
mg/l
|
3
|
4
|
6
|
10
|
DO ≥
|
mg/l
|
6
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
Ammonia Nitrogen ≤
|
mg/l
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
7.1.3 Water Quality Monitoring Results and Assessment
(1) Beigang Section, Minjiang River, Fuzhou
We used the data obtained from normal monitoring of Kuiqi and Aofengzhou sections in 2002 to analyze the status of water environment. The results and analysis are shown in Table 7.1-3.
Table 7.1-3 Results of Monitoring and Statistics for Water Quality of Minjiang River Beigang Section (2002)
Section
|
Item
|
pH
|
CODMn
|
BOD5
|
DO
|
SS
|
Petroleum
|
NH3-N
|
Lead
|
Kuiqi
|
Average Value (mg/L)
|
6.92
|
2.58
|
1.34
|
7.08
|
41
|
0.04
|
0.475
|
0.0016
|
Class III Standard (mg/L)
|
6~9
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
--
|
0.05
|
1.0
|
0.05
|
Pollution Index
|
0.08
|
0.43
|
0.34
|
0.36
|
--
|
0.8
|
0.48
|
0.032
|
Aofengzhou
|
Average Value (mg/L)
|
6.97
|
2.53
|
1.43
|
7.74
|
--
|
--
|
0.340
|
0.0014
|
Class II Standard (mg/L)
|
6~9
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
-
|
0.05
|
0.5
|
0.01
|
Pollution Index
|
0.03
|
0.63
|
0.48
|
0.23
|
--
|
--
|
0.68
|
0.14
|
It can be seen from Table 7.1-3 that, by Class III, the pollution index for Kuiqi is 0.32-0.8 and the water quality conforms to Class III standard, and by Class II, the pollution index for Aofengzhou is 0.14-0.68 and the water quality conforms to Class II standard. This shows that the water quality of Minjiang River Beigang Aofeng – Kuiqi section is good.
(2) Inland Rivers Crossed by Nanjiang Binlu and the Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road
For water quality monitoring results, please see Table 7.1-4.
Table 7.1-4 Results of Water Quality Monitoring for Inland Rivers Crossed by Nanjiang Binlu and the Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road
Road
|
Name
|
S/N
|
pH
|
DO
|
BOD5
|
CODCr
|
Ammonia Nitrogen
|
Nanjiang Binlu
|
Gangtou River
|
1
|
0.440
|
0.903
|
2.760
|
1.580
|
4.115
|
Longjin River
|
2
|
0.040
|
8.740
|
9.870
|
9.800
|
11.450
|
3
|
0.015
|
8.380
|
8.950
|
2.625
|
11.300
|
Puxia River
|
4
|
0.170
|
9.160
|
12.017
|
5.167
|
16.733
|
Yuejin River
|
5
|
0.005
|
8.515
|
7.420
|
4.125
|
14.700
|
6
|
0.125
|
0.434
|
1.580
|
0.828
|
2.61
|
7
|
0.100
|
0.936
|
4.820
|
2.480
|
11.800
|
Pandun River
|
8
|
0.400
|
8.515
|
2.810
|
1.693
|
4.355
|
Lianban River
|
9
|
0.225
|
8.380
|
10.700
|
6.050
|
24.400
|
Linpu River
|
10
|
0.140
|
8.560
|
5.800
|
3.075
|
19.150
|
the 3rd Ring Road(Phase II)
|
Mazhou River
|
11
|
0.335
|
0.161
|
5.080
|
3.950
|
3.980
|
Yixu River
|
12
|
0.015
|
7.120
|
3.420
|
1.165
|
8.100
|
Baihuting River
|
13
|
0.055
|
8.740
|
10.300
|
5.450
|
14.550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
0.350
|
0.388
|
2.240
|
1.618
|
2.985
|
Luocheng River
|
15
|
0.080
|
0.684
|
2.660
|
1.465
|
4.355
|
16
|
0.030
|
0.386
|
0.893
|
0.715
|
10.700
|
17
|
0.630
|
8.065
|
5.710
|
2.750
|
8.950
|
It can be seen from the above results that:
-
There is an index for the ammonia nitrogen of the crossed inland rivers: for Nanjiang Binlu, the maximum value is 24 times of the index and the minimum value is 2.4 times of the index, and for the Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road , the maximum value is 9.7 times of the index and the minimum value is 2.0 times of the index. This is closely related to the fact that, for a long time, the island has discharged a lot of living wastewater and the loss of fertilizers from the agrihistoricalareas from the island.
-
Most of the CODCr and BOD5 values of the sections of inland rivers crossed by Nanjiang Binlu exceed the indexes set in Class V standard. Only the results of very few sections monitored are close to Class V water standard. For the 7 sections monitored of the 4 inland rivers crossed by the Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road , the CODCr values do not exceed the index. As to the values of BOD5 of the monitored sections, 4 sections exceed Class Ⅴ standard and 3 sections meet Class II-IV standards.
-
For DO, half of the monitored sections of the inland rivers crossed by Nanjiang Binlu and the Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road meet Class V standard, and for ph values, 50% of the monitored sections almost meet the index.
-
The above assessment results show that, in the whole, the water quality of the inland rivers crossed by Nanjiang Binlu is very bad. The rivers can be classified as Class V water bodies. The water quality of the inland rivers crossed by the Phase-II Project of the Third Ring Road falls within Classes IV-V, so some are bad Class Ⅴ water bodies. Except the pH index, all the rest the evaluated factors exceed Class IV standard. In the whole, the water environment of the inland rivers has been seriously polluted.
Share with your friends: |