Iepd analyze Requirements Use Cases for edxl situation reporting messages Draft Version 4
Page 1/3 Date 31.01.2017 Size 212.64 Kb. #13672
IEPD Analyze Requirements
Use Cases
for
EDXL Situation reporting messages
Draft Version 1.4
Prepared by the SWG EMS Call scenario team
(Scenario version 3.4)
EDXL “Situation Reporting” draft Messaging Standard
September 21, 2007
Revision / initial Meeting History
Name
Date
Reason For Changes
Version
Tim Grapes
April 2007
Highway Incident Scenario team kickoff meeting. Materials provided as input to develop scenario
Scenario 0.0
Tim Grapes
5/7/07
Presentation provided on DM program and EDXL messaging standards initiatives – call for scenario team volunteers
Scenario 0.0
Tim Grapes
6/01/07
EMS Call scenario team kickoff – Existing scenario identified as a starting point for tailoring
Scenario 3.0
Elizabeth Sullivan
6/11/07
Elizabeth tailored the scenario for realism and removing futuristic topics and technologies
Scenario 3.1
Tim Grapes
7/2/07
Tim incorporated Elizabeth’s revisions into the actual document using word “track changes” (version 3.1); put in standard scenario format, and then made additional revisions to transform some of the network and communications terms into “information exchange” terms (version 3.2).
Scenario 3.2
Larry Williams & Kevin McGinnis
7/4/07
Additional scenario tailoring and editing
Scenario 3.3
Tim Grapes
7/19/07
Following the 7/12 team review of the scenario, revised scenario to version 3.4 per walk-through comments and those provided by Kevin McGinnis. In the separate Use Case Document (“EDXL_use_case_EMS_Callv1.0.doc “) broke out the textual scenario into Tabular format with an independent row for each activity or event, columns for sequence , date/time, and Activity/event, and added Use Case Chronology columns for Senders, Recipients, and Information-Sharing requirement
Scenario 3.4 & U.C. (use case) 1.0
Tim Grapes
8/2/07
Scenario team meeting conducted – information and revisions from the call incorporated
U.C. 1.1 & UC 1.2
Jeff Sexton and Tim Grapes
8/15
Jeff Sexton incorporated revisions and additional steps, and Tim incorporated other revisions from previous call
U.C. 1.3
Tim Grapes
8/28 – 9/121 2007
A meeting was held on 8/28. Revisions from that meeting are incorporated into this version and distributed for review on 9/21/07
U.C. 1.4
Participants
Name
Organization / Profession
Email
Copeland, Tommy
Putnam County EMS
Cookeville, TN
Healthcare IT Stds Panel (HITSP)
tcopeland@putnamco.org
Irby, Robert
EMS, Oklahoma State Dept. of Health
RobertI@health.ok.gov
Mann, Clay
Utah.edu, EMS, HITSP
clay.mann@hsc.utah.edu
McGinnis, Kevin
PSG, Vice-Chair (NASEMSO) State EMS Officials, (JNEMSLC) Joint National Emergency Medical Services Leadership Conference
mcginnis@nasemsd.org; k.mcginnis@adelphia.net
Porter, Randy
Putnam County EMS
Cookeville, TN
Healthcare IT Stds Panel (HITSP)
rporter@putnamco.org
Rogers, Shawn
Director, Emergency Medical Services Division,
The Oklahoma State Department of Health
ShawnR@health.ok.gov
Schilling, Roger
EMS, Oklahoma State Dept. of Health
RogerS@health.ok.gov
Sexton, Jeff
Tennessee Department of Health, BHLR Information Technology Services, Healthcare IT Stds Panel (HITSP)
Jeff.Sexton@state.tn.us
Sullivan, Elizabeth
EMS, Oklahoma State Dept. of Health
ElizabethS@health.ok.gov
Vandame, Richie
Corrections Officer / former parametic supervisor
Richard.Vandame@dhs.gov
Williams, Larry
President / CEO, Roadside Telematics Corporation, HITSP
lwilliams@roadmedic.com
Share with your friends:
The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message