Space Weaponization – 4 Week



Download 0.53 Mb.
Page1/27
Date28.01.2017
Size0.53 Mb.
#9677
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   27

Space Weaponization – 4 Week





Space Weaponization – 4 Week 1

***Uniqueness 4

No Weaponization Now – US 5

No Weaponization Now – China 6

A2: China’s 2007 ASAT test 7

Weaponization Now – China 9

Weaponization Now – US 11

2007 ASAT Test 13

***Inevitability 15

Yes Inevitable 16

Inevitable – State Rivalry 18

Inevitable – Human Nature 19

Not Inevitable 21

Not Inevitable – a2: Human Nature 22

Not Inevitable – a2: Rivalry 23

Not Inevitable – a2: Air and Sea 24

***Links 26

Satelittes/Space Programs = Space Weapon 27

Commercialization = Space Weapon 30

BMD = Space Weapon 31

SPS = Space Weapon 34

SSA = Space Weapon 35

Nuclear Powered Missions = Space Weapons 36

a2: Defensive ≠ Offensive 37

***Impact 39

Space Weaponization Bad – Arms Race 40

Space Weaponization Bad – Miscalculation 44

Space Weaponization Bad – Hegemony T/off 45

Space Weaponization Bad – Russia/US War 46

Space Weaponization Bad – Prolif 48

Space Weaponization Bad – Space Debris 50

Space Weaponization Bad – Commercialization 52

Space War – Turns Econ 53

Space War o/w – Probability 54

***Defense 56

Space Defense 57

a2: Miscalculation 58

a2: Need to protect commercial satellites 59

a2: Need to protect military satellites 60

***Aff Answers 62

BMD No Link 63

SPS not a weapon 64

SSA Solves Weaponization 65

US Space Weaponization Good – High Ground 66

US Space Weaponization Good – US/China War 69

US Space Weaponization Good – Space Pearl Harbor 72

US Space Weaponization Good – Hegemony 73

a2: Self fulfilling prophency 76

A2: Space Mil --> Arms Race 77

a2: Space Weapons Not Feasible 78

***Code of Conduct CP 80

COC – 1nc 81

COC – Solvency 86

COC – Solvency – Commercialization 88

COC – Solvency – Russia 89

COC – Solvency – China 91

COC – SOlvency – a2: Definitions 92

COC – Solvency – a2: Cheating 93

COC – a2: Perm 94

COC Fails – Definition 97

COC Fails – No cooperation 99

COC Fails – China 100

COC Fails – Enforcement 101

COC Fails – a2: Space Debris 102




***Uniqueness




No Weaponization Now – US



The US is not weaponizing space now

Porter 11 [Charles, “EU Consider Code of Conduct for Space”; Website; June 17; http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2011/06/20110617155237enelrahc3.353298e-03.html#ixzz1Qb7c0PBD]
Coming to a shared understanding of what “space security” means is a starting point, said Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Space and Defense Policy Frank A. Rose. He explained how the United States defines the term: “the pursuit of those activities that ensure the sustainability, stability and free access to, and use of, outer space in support of a nation’s vital interests.”Rose said the February 2009 collision between a commercial satellite and an inoperable Russian military satellite served as a stimulus in opening an international discussion about a code of conduct for space activities. Both Rose and Schulte say that it is in the interest of all nations to help prevent “mishaps, misperceptions and mistrust.”Rose told participants in the Prague meeting that the United States is taking a number of steps to show responsibility and transparency in its space activities: working on how to avoid space object collisions, improving the protection of space systems and infrastructures, and strengthening measures to reduce the hazard of orbital debris.The European Union issued its proposal for a code of conduct May 31. Rose said the EU proposal is consistent with U.S. support for “responsible actions in, and the peaceful use of, space,” and he added that the United States is weighing whether to initiate formal talks with the EU and other interested nations on a code of conduct for space. In the meantime, he said, the United States is involved in multilateral talks on space activity organized under the auspices of the United Nations, and is hopeful these discussions will lead to measures that solve existing problems.

No Weaponization Now – China



China is not weaponizing space now

Shixiu 7 [Bao, senior fellow of military theory studies and international relations at the Institute for Military Thought Studies, Academy of Military Sciences of the PLA of China, visiting scholar at the Virginia Military Institute, “Deterrence Revisited: Outer Space,” China Security, Winter, 2007, p2-11, http://www.wsichina.org/cs5_1.pdf]
Despite the need for an effective deterrent to meet security challenges that China may confront in space, it will not initiate a space weapons race with the United States or any other country. First, China does not have the ambition to enter a space weapons race. During the Cold War period, faced with a threat of nuclear war, China did not join in the nuclear weapons race between the United States and the Soviet Union. Today, China’s space program is pointed in the direction of peaceful development. The new political and diplomatic doctrines – a harmonious society and world – also curb China’s entrance to a space weapons race.14 Second, China does not have the ability to enter a space weapons race. Although China has ambitious plans in space, the technical gap, especially in the military area vis-à-vis the United States, is difficult if not impossible to fill. China will not and cannot expend significant budgetary resources pursuing space weapons, but will instead focus on civilian and commercial space assets.15 So, if China owns space weapons, their number and quality will be limited in their capacity to act as an effective defense mechanism and will not be a threat to other countries. China has every interest to avoid triggering a confrontation in outer space and it will never be a deliberate choice for China. Equally important, however, is that China will not shrink from defending its core national interests.



Download 0.53 Mb.

Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   27




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page