I. A. Commander-in-Chief, U. S. Fleet, and Pacific Fleet



Download 1.58 Mb.
Page5/33
Date03.03.2018
Size1.58 Mb.
#42154
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   33

In accordance with the Basic War Plans, United States Pacific Fleet Operating Plan Rainbow 5 was approved by Admiral Kimmel and issued about July 1, 1941. It was offered in evidence as Exhibit 16. Admiral Smith said that these plans contemplated that the Pacific Fleet was to deny to the enemy the Marshalls and Carolines, and to capture a fleet base in Truk. With the available equipment and personnel, he said, the Marshalls could have been raided, but could not have possibly been captured.

Admiral Pye said that in his opinion, war plan Rainbow 5 was not yet up to date and that he considered that the whole basic war plans had really not been operations plans but development plans and had been used as a lever to get more men, ships and naval shore establishment development. (p. 160)

Admiral Pye said that under the provisions of the Joint Coastal Frontier Defense Plan, the responsibility for carrying out distance reconnaissance off Hawaii was apparently the Navy's under the direction of the Commandant of the Fourteenth Naval District. (p. 163)
The record submitted by the Naval Court refers to, but does not include, copies of Exhibits 4 to 7, inclusive. There was, however, considerable testimony concerning the local plans for the Hawaiian area.

Annex VII, Section VI to the Joint Coastal Frontier Defense Plan, Hawaiian Department and Fourteenth Naval District, dated March 28, 1941 (Exhibit 23) dealt with joint security measures and protection of the Fleet and Pearl Harbor base. It stated that in order to coordinate joint defensive measures for the security of the Fleet and for the Pearl Harbor Naval base for defense against hostile raids or air attacks delivered prior to a declaration of war and before a general mobilization for war, the following agreements were adopted.

Paragraph II provided for joint air operations. It stated that when the Commanding General and ComFOURTEEN agreed that the threat of a hostile raid or attack was sufficiently imminent to warrant such action, each commander would take such preliminary steps as were necessary to make available without delay to the other commander such proportion of the air forces at his disposal as circumstances warranted in order that joint operations might be conducted in accordance with the following plans: (a) joint air attacks upon hostile surface vessels to be conducted under the tactical command of the Navy; (b) defensive air operations over and in the immediate vicinity of Oahu to be executed under the tactical command of the Army; (c) when naval forces were insufficient for long distance patrol and search operations, and Army aircraft were made available these aircraft would be under the tactical control of the naval commander, directing the search operations.

Paragraph III provided for joint communications and, among other things, stated that all information of the presence or movements of hostile aircraft offshore from Oahu which was secured through Navy channels would be transmitted promptly to the Command Post of the Army Provisional Anti‑Aircraft. Brigade. It also stated that subsequently, when the Army aircraft warning service was established, provision would be made for transmission of information on the location or distance of hostile and friendly aircraft, and that special wire or radio circuits would be made available for the use of Navy liaison officers so that they might make their own evaluation of the available information and transmit it to their respective organizations. Information relating to the presence or movements of hostile aircraft offshore which would be secured through Navy channels was to be transmitted without delay to the Aircraft Warning Service Information Center.



Paragraph IV related to joint anti‑aircraft measures, dealt with arrival and departure procedure for aircraft, balloon barrages, and Marine Corps anti‑aircraft artillery, and the Army Aircraft Warning Service. This stated that that service was to be expedited in its installation and operation by the Army an "during the period prior to the completion of the AWS installation, the Nay, through use of Radar and other appropriate means, will endeavor to give such warning of hostile attacks as may be practicable."
Admiral Brown said that he would have expected the Army to depend on Navy planes to discover the approach of the enemy. (p 144)

Admiral Bellinger said that the Commanding General of the Army's Air Force at Hawaii apparently expected the Navy would have early information and seemed surprised when Admiral Bellinger told him that they should not expect such information. (p. 131)
PROCEEDINGS OF HEWITT INQUIRY 391
ADMIRAL HEWITT'S EXAMINATION
Captain John B. Earle, USN, Chief of Staff of the 14th Naval District in December, 1941, was shown Annex VII, Section VI, Joint Agreements, of the Joint Coastal Frontier Defense Plan, dated 28 March 1941 (Exhibit 47), which deals with point Army and Navy measures for the protection of Pearl Harbor and the Fleet. Regarding joint anti‑aircraft exercises and drills in the months preceding December, 1941, Captain Earle stated that definite problems were developed for training purposes, which would serve to develop the control features of anti‑aircraft defense and also develop the necessary coordination between Army and Navy operations. In addition, about once in every ten days a drill was held in which planes flew over Pearl Harbor during ether day or night and ships in the harbor simulated anti‑aircraft fore. The Pearl Harbor area was divided into sectors, with a naval sector commander aboard ship responsible for controlling the fire from that sector and making required reports (p. 457‑458).

Captain Earle stated that about once a month a drill was held which entailed locating an aircraft target at a certain bearing from Pearl Harbor, with warnings being sent to both Army and Navy that an enemy aircraft carrier or unit was located at a certain distance and bearing. Fighters planes would then be sent up and bombers dispatched to attack the simulated target. Captain Earle believed that at least three of these drills were held prior to 7 December 1941, but could not recall the date of the last drill or whether any was held between 27 November and 7 December (p. 168).

Questioned regarding the command set‑up for the joint exercises, Captain Earle said (p. 458‑459):

"My recollection is colored from operations that took place after Pearl Harbor, but it is my belief that the entire problem of this aircraft coordination was handled through the fleet and the Army. In other words, after the word came through that an enemy had been signed on a certain bearing, this word was given to the fleet and to the Army and that then arrangements were made between the commander of the fleet air and the Army air to coordinate their operations, including order as to detailed directions as to direction, speed, and number of planes to be used, and so forth.

"To amplify the above statement, there was no joint command post or operations center actually set up for these drills before the war. The Operations Office in the Headquarters of the Fourteenth Naval District, which consisted of an operation switchboard with necessary communication personnel and a watch officer, was set up to handle these drills from the Fourteenth Naval District. I do not recall the exact time, but either somewhere just before Pearl Harbor or just after, a coast artillery liaison officer was placed in this Operations Office. Plans had been made for a joint command post, but no definite steps had been taken as to location or details prior to the start of the war. It is my recollection that plans had been made for a joint command post, but this had not gone beyond the planning stage."

Exhibit 47 provided in part that pending completion by the Army of an aircraft warning service, the Navy would by radar and other appropriate means attempt to give such warnings of hostile attacks as might be practicable. Captain Earle said that to implement this agreement, the Navy had established communications with the Army over radio nets and the teletype system, so that any information received could be promptly disseminated; had ordered the communications activities to make prompt report of enemy movements; had directed the few destroyers assigned to the Fourteenth Naval District to promptly report contacts; and since there were no planes attached to the District, had instructed fleet planes to forward immediately to the Army any pertinent information (p. 460).

Captain Earle said that prior to 7 December 1941 the Fourteenth Naval District assigned a liaison officer to General Short's headquarters for general liaison duties (p. 160). Captain Earle stated further that there had been a naval officer engaged in assisting the Army to get their aircraft warning system installed and that at one time this officer came to ham and asked for assistance. This officer also stated that several naval liaison officers would be required at the warning center. Captain Earle told him that the District Communications Officer would be glad to give him all possible assistance, but that there were no spare personnel an the District who could be used for naval liaison officers at the center (p. 461).
392 CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION PEARL HARBOR ATTACK
The above agreement was approved April 2, 1941, by Admiral Bloch and General Short.
Exhibit 22 is a letter forwarding the joint agreement between General Short and Admiral Bloch and the Joint Estimate, which was sent to the Chief of Naval Operations on May 1, 1941. (p. 86)

The Joint Coastal Frontier Defense Plan provided that the Chief of Staff, Fourteenth Naval District would be a member of the Joint Planning Com­mittee established by that plan. Captain Earle, however, did not act formally as a member of that Committee, but said that the Chiefs of Staff acted informally with sub‑committees appointed for the majority of the detailed work. (p. 368)

Captain Earle said that when he first had his assignment as Chief of Staff it took some time to get the plans approved by the Army, but as time went on and various warnings were received, it became easier to accomplish joint action. (p. 369)

Captain Earle said that the Joint Coastal Frontier Defense Plan was not effective during the period preceding the attack, except as to the portion relating to planning. (p. 369)

Concerning annex No. VII to the Joint Coastal Frontier Defense Plan, which required the Army to expedite the warning service and the Navy to endeavor to give warning of hostile attack until such time as the Army system was in operation, Captain Earle had no recollection of discussion of this requirement. Neither did he have any definite recollection of the provision for liaison officers in connection with the dissemination of informa­tion, but vaguely recalled some talk with a fleet radar officer on the question of assignment of Navy personnel, and recalled that he told the fleet radar officer that as soon as they could get somebody who was qualified they would be glad to turn him over to the Army. (p. 369)

Captain Earle's recollection was vague as to other provisions of the Joint Plan such as procedure for recognition of aircraft and the use of barrage balloons, etc. (p. 370) Captain Earle could recall no plan for the coordination of Fleet anti‑aircraft fire with Army anti‑aircraft fire in the Pearl Harbor area. Captain Earle discussed generally his recollection of the Harbor Control Post. (p. 372‑3)
To the agreement was annexed Addendum One, dated March 31, 1941. Adden­dum One was a joint estimate covering joint Army and Navy action in the event of sudden hostile action against Oahu or fleet units in the Hawaiian area.
Concerning the estimate in Admiral Bellinger's air plan that the most likely and dangerous form of attack would be an air attack, Admiral Pye said that the estimate did not mean that the enemy was more apt to do that than to do something else. (p. 160)
In paragraph I of the addendum there was a "Summary of the Situation." The summary indicated that relations between the United States and Orange were strained, uncertain, and varying; that in the past Orange bad never preceded hostile action by a declaration of war; that a successful sudden raid against our ships and naval installations on Oahu might prevent effective offensive action by our forces in the western Pacific for a long period; that a strong part of our fleet was constantly at sea in the operating areas, organized to take prompt offensive action against any surface or submarine force which Initiated hostile action; and, that it appeared possible that Orange submarines and/or an Orange fast raiding force might arrive in Hawaiian waters with nor prior warning from our Intelligence service.

Paragraph II of the addendum was a "Survey of Opposing Strengths." This indicated, among other things, that Orange might send into the are one or more, submarines and one or more fast raiding forces composed of carriers supported by fast cruisers. Also that the most difficult situation for us to meet would be when several of the above elements were present and closely coordinated their actions. The aircraft available in Hawaii were inadequate to maintain for any extended period from bases on Oahu a patrol extensive enough to insure, that an air attack from an Orange carrier could not arrive over Oahu as a complete surprise.

Paragraph III of the addendum dealt with "Possible Enemy Action." This stated that a declaration of war might be preceded by a surprise submarine attack on ships in the operating area, a surprise attack on Oahu, including ships and installations in Pearl Harbor, or a combination of these two. Further, that it appeared that the most likely and dangerous form of attack on Oahu would be
PROCEEDINGS OF HEWITT INQUIRY 393
an air attack, which would most likely be launched from one or more carriers, which would probably approach inside of 300 miles. That a single attack might or might not indicate the presence of more submarines or more planes waiting to attack after defending aircraft have been drawn away by the original thrust. It was also stated that: "(d) any single submarine attack might indicate the presence of considerable undiscovered surface force, probably composed of fast ships ac­companied by a carrier." It was further stated that in a dawn air attack there was a high probability that it could be delivered as a complete surprise in spite of any patrol that we might be using.

Paragraph IV of the addendum dealt with "Action Open to Us." This stated that it would be desirable to run daily patrols as far as possible to seaward through 360°, but this could only be effectively maintained with present personnel and material for a very short period and as a practicable measure could not therefore be undertaken unless other intelligence indicated that a surface raid was probable within rather narrow limits of time. It contained other types of action open in the event of .a surprise attack on ships in the operating area or on the Island, and stated that none of the outlined courses of action could be initiated by our forces until an attack was known to be imminent or had occurred.

Paragraph V contained the "Decisions." The primary decision was that this force would locate and attack forces initiating hostile actions against Oahu or fleet units in order to prevent or minimize damage to our forces from a surprise attack, and to obtain information upon which to base coordinated retaliatory measures. There were a number of subsidiary decisions, including decisions for the establishment of a search and attack group, an air combat group, assignment of missions to the groups, and definitions of conditions of readiness. The search and attack group was to be under the Commander Naval Base Defense Air Force‑Commander Patrol Wing Two, and was to include various units in accord­ance with current conditions of readiness. These units included patrol squadrons and Army bombardment and reconnaissance squadrons, among others.

Admiral Bloch, as Naval Base Defense Officer, issued his Operation Plan No. 1‑41, on February 27, 1941 (Exhibit ‑53): The Task Organization prescribed was (a) Destroyer Patrol (Commander Inshore Patrol), consisting of two destroy­ers, a boom patrol, a harbor patrol, an A/B boom and minesweepers, (b) Base Defense Air Force, (Commander Patrol Wing Two). In conjunction with the Army, (c) Antiaircraft Defense (District Marine Officer) in conjunction with the Army, (d) Harbor Control Post (District Operations Officer) in conjunction with the Army. This plan directed attention to, among other things, the Hawaiian Joint Coastal Frontier Defense Plan and stated:

"By cooperation in support of the Army, Naval security measures will be established as, necessary for the joint protection of PEARL HARBOR Base in order to safeguard the Fleet.

"In conjunction with the Commanding General Hawaiian Department, the Naval Base Defense Officer (Commandant Fourteenth Naval District) will arrange to coordinate joint effort; to set conditions of readiness; to hold required drills; to make "alarm" and "all clear", signals.


"ASSUMPTIONS
"(a) That no responsible foreign power will provoke war under existing condi­tions, by attack on the Fleet or base, but that irresponsible and misguided na­tions of such powers may attempt:

"(1) Sabotage from small craft on ships based in PEARL HARBOR.

"(2) Block the entrance channel to PEARL HARBOR by sinking an obstruc­tion in the channel.

"(3) Lay magnetic or other mines in the approaches to PEARL HARBOR.

"(b) That a declaration of war might be preceded by:

"(1) A surprise submarine attack on ships in base area—probable.

"(2) A surprise air attack on ships in PEARL HARBOR—possible.

"(3) A combination of these two—possible."

A detailed Inshore Patrol Plan was Annex "A" to Operation Plan 1‑41, a de­tailed Naval Base Defense Air Force Plan was Annex "Baker," a detailed Anti­-Aircraft Defense Plan was Annex "C", a detailed Harbor Control Post Plan was Annex "D", and a detailed Communications Plan was Annex "Easy."

Annex "Baker", the detailed Naval Base Defense Air Force Plan, was dated April 9, 1941, prepared by Admiral Bellinger and approved by Admiral Bloch.


According to Admiral Bloch, after Admiral Kimmel assumed command and before information was received about the correspondence between the
394 CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION PEARL HARBOR ATTACK
Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of War dealing with the Pearl Harbor defenses, Admiral Kimmel reviewed certain information that had been left by Admiral Richardson and decided that since the ships had anti­aircraft batteries, they should be used to the fullest extent to increase the volume of fire and protection that the Fleet would have in the harbor. He also decided that since the Navy also had a number of planes on shore many of which were carrier planes that had been sent ashore while the carriers were alongside, they also should be used. Admiral Kimmel loaned Admiral Halsey and Admiral Ballinger to Admiral Bloch to talk over with the Army the coordination of action of the airplanes. Conferences were held with the Army authorities and an agreement reached with the Army under which all fighter planes, including Navy fighter planes on shore at the time of an attack, would be placed under the Army's command and that all bombers would be turned over to the Navy. (p. 4)

Admiral Bloch said that generally speaking, he took no exception to the Air Defense Plan which had been worked out by Admiral Ballinger and General Martin. (p. 89)

Admiral Bloch said that Admiral Kimmel had a copy of the Joint Air Operat­ing Plan; that it was fair to assume that he must have known about the plan; and that General Short also must have known about the plan. (p. 89)

Admiral Smith said that the Commander‑in‑Chief was apprised of all of the plans made by the Army and by Admiral Bloch. However, Admiral Smith did not recall the Joint Defense Plan, Exhibit 5. (p. 37)
It divided the Task Organization into (a) Search and Attack Group, consisting of patrol squadrons and other planes, including Army reconnaissance squadrons, and (b) an air combat group. This plan was made in accordance with, among, other things, the Joint Estimate, dated March 31, 1941, which is digested above. The Naval Base Defense Air Force was, according to this plan, to locate and destroy hostile forces raiding against Oahu or Fleet units in the operating areas. The plan was effective upon receipt and would become operative without signal in the event of a surprise attack on Oahu. It might be made operative by des­patch. In the meantime, conditions of readiness prescribed in Addendum Two to this plan, would be taken as directed by the Commanding General Hawaiian Department for Army units, and by the Naval Base Defense Officer (Com­FOURTEEN) for Navy units. The condition of material readiness was to be signified by a letter, such as "E", signifying that all aircraft were conducting routine operations and none were ready for the purposes of this plan, and the condition of operational readiness by a number, such as "5", signifying that all types of available planes would be ready in four hours. It was also required that a dispatch readiness report, as of 1500 each day, be made by each unit assigned to a task group by this plan stating the number of planes and readiness.

General Short testified that the local joint defense plan was in effect prior to the attack, but was not in operation because, he said, it was predicated on the Rainbow Plan which had not been executed, and, therefore, the action taken under it prior to the attack was only drills (pages 259‑260).

Admiral Bellinger testified that about March 1, 1941, CincPac directed him to report to ComFOURTEEN to prepare an air defense plan in conjunction with the Commanding General, Hawaiian Force. He did so and worked with Major General Martin, Commanding General, Hawaiian Air Force. The operations plan for the Naval Base Defense Force included several subsidiary plans, the most im­portant of which was the plan for the Naval Base Defense Air Force, which out­lined the proposed employment of all units made available to that force (page 661):

Army and Navy orders he said, were based on the estimate of the situation dated March 31, 1941. He believed this estimate was sound, but that unity of command was missing (page 662). The plan was to function through mutual cooperation of the Army and Navy, and the Naval Base Defense Air Force could. function only in an emergency or when proper authority directed. The composition varied with the planes made available by the various Army and Navy commanders; the determining factor of availability was the daily employment schedule of planes belonging to various units. Available planes were subject to operational control only when the Naval Base Defense Air Force was in a function­ing status.

The normal procedure for vitalizing this organization for drill was an "air raid" dispatch from ComFourteen, as Base Defense Force Commander; then Bellinger, as Base Defense Air Commander, would send a dispatch to all units which made planes available to that organization, except Army pursuits, ordering them to
PROCEEDINGS OF HEWITT INQUIRY 395
place all available planes in highest readiness; searches would immediately be started then, and an attack on enemy surface forces when located (page 662).

The authority of "Commander Naval Base Defense Air Officer" was non­existent until an emergency was apparent or appropriate authority placed that force in a functioning status, and when called into existence covered not pursuit, but only the search and attack groups of that force (page 663). The planes ac­tually present on Oahu were not free until ordered to concentrate on naval base defense (page 663) .

Admiral Kimmel, he said, made final approval for naval aircraft operation. He or ComFourteen could vitalize the NBDA Force. ComFourteen worked under CincPac. NBDA Force was not composed of all aircraft but only of aircraft reported available (page 665).

Their estimate, he said, that "it appears possible that Orange submarines and/or an Orange fast raiding force might arrive in Hawaiian waters with no prior warning from our Intelligence service" was an estimate of hostile action and not of Japa­nese war plans (page 666).



In summary, the NBDA Force would come into being in the event of: (a) a drill, (b) an actual emergency, (c) orders from higher authority based on infor­mation as to the imminence of attack (page 678).

Download 1.58 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   33




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page