• the first step to world gov. made —> because many thinkers taught that anarchy was a problem
• according to thinkers if there was a world gov. there would be more justice in International law
•
but that was never material • why they're saying anarchical international society and not anarchical international system is to undermine that despite the lack of the world government there are still rules, norms and member states have to abide with that
• if they don't abide with them there could be different mechanisms to check.
• anarchy problematised at times
in recent theories of IR • since s we are criticising anarchy & the conceptualisation of anarchy
• but we have named the intl. system that we live in as anarchy
• still there ares different
norms values principles, trading mechanisms, different regimes
• ex there is a river passing from 10 states and the states
are managing that river • how through different regimes, treaties and we call it then
not an intl. anarchical system Share with your friends: 
