Oasis – Open architecture for Accessible Services Integration and Standardization

Annex 1: Benchmarking template

• 
  keyword:
  
• 
  name of product/service/project
  
• 
  area (as shown below)
  
• 
  manufacturer
  
• 
  end-user category (drop-down list):  Elderly Family members Informal care givers  Formal care givers
  
• 
  types of aging-related problems covered (e.g. visual, physical, cognitive)
  
• 
  view all
  
• 
  ontology existing:  Yes  No
  

• 
  User monitoring
  
  • 
    activity monitoring (WP2.3)
    
  • 
    health remote monitoring (WP2.6)
    
• 
  Assistive applications
  
  • 
    home automation (WP2.7)
    
  • 
    personal sustaining program (e.g. memory trainer, etc.) (WP2.2, WP2.4)
    
  • 
    support @ work (WP3.5)
    
  • 
    leisure and social events (WP2.5, WP3.4)
    
• 
  Mobility support
  
  • 
    travel information services (WP3.2, WP3.4)
    
  • 
    route guidance (WP3.3, WP3.4)
    
  • 
    driver support services (WP3.4)
    
• 
  Other (define categories and sub-categories if a database entry is not covered by the above areas): ……..
  

Which companies could benefit from the technology/product/service/R&D-Projects? (hint: have in mind a possible value web or business model and think about, companies from which branches could benefit from the technology/product/service?)

Who could be the possible end users from the technology/ product/ service/ R&D-Projects?

(hint: describe what end users the companies have in mind or what you guess could be possible end users)
What are the chances for the technology/product/service/R&D-Projects?

(hint: assess what chances the technology/product/service will have in the market, make a cross at the appropriate category and describe the chances below. Have in mind topics like possible prices (expensive premium products or cheap mass production), business models, cooperations, competition, regional relevance (could it be relevant for the whole EU or is it a typical Danish or Spanish product?), probability of occurrence (will the technology/product/service really get to the market?) etc.)

Select one:

very high

High

Low

Select one:

very high

High

very low

2010 or earlier

2011-2015

2016 or later

no estimation possible
When will the technology/product/ service play a relevant role in the market (e.g. has a well-known brand or a significant market share)?

2010 or earlier

2011-2015

2016 or later

no estimation possible
What are the possibilities for chances for OASIS?

(hint: have in mind topics like possible prices (expensive premium products or cheap mass production), business models, cooperations, competition, regional relevance (could it be relevant for the whole EU or is it a typical Danish or Spanish product?), probability of occurrence (will the technology/product/service really get to the market?) etc.)

Select one:

very high

High

very low

Select one:

very high

High

very low

Product Name:

Manufacturer:

Description:

Market availability:  Yes  No

Indicative Cost:

Technical specifications(e.g. communication, interfaces, interoperability, standards compliance):

End-user category (drop-down list):  Elderly Family members Informal care givers  Formal care givers

Types of aging-related problems covered (e.g. visual, physical, cognitive):

Accessibility characteristics and features (e.g. W3C AA):

Utility/Usability limitations:

Technical Limitations:

Contact info (e-mail, web page, tel, etc.):

Need of training for use: Yes  No

Product brochures, illustrations, etc.:

Customer support (guarantee, technical support, etc.):

Recorded customer feedback (advantages vs. disadvantages):

Version history (last update):

Keywords:

Specification of ontology communication interface:

Service Name:

Developer/provider:

Description:

Cost (permanent, subscription cost, …):

Technical specifications (e.g. communication, interfaces, interoperability, standards compliance):

End-user category (drop-down list):  Elderly Family members Informal care givers  Formal care givers

Types of elderly problems covered (e.g. visual, physical, cognitive):

Accessibility characteristics and features (e.g. W3C AA):

Utility/Usability limitations:

Technical Limitations:

Contact info (service url, tel, etc.):

Need of training for use: Yes  No

Service brochures, illustrations, etc.:

Recorded customer feedback (advantages vs disadvantages):

Version history (last update):

Accessibility level (e.g. W3C AA):

Keywords:

WSDL URL:

UDDI server publication:

Existing Ontologies:

Public availability:

Ontology Representation Languages:

Number of Concepts:

Number of Relationships:

Structure Consistency: Yes  No

Ontology Standardization Bodies:

Web Service Standards:

Ontology Documentation:
Research results (previous or ongoing projects)

Project full name:

Acronym:

Project web site:

Start date (duration):

Status:  Successfully completed (which year?)……..  On-going

Relation to the OASIS thematic areas:

Description if research result (system):

Technical specifications (e.g. communication, interfaces, interoperability, standards compliance):

End-user category (drop-down list):  Elderly Family members Informal care givers  Formal care givers

Types of aging-related problems covered (e.g. visual, physical, cognitive):

Accessibility characteristics and features (e.g. W3C AA):

Utility/Usability limitations:

Technical Limitations:

Reference (e.g. deliverable that the specific system is described):

Need of training for use: Yes  No

System brochure, illustrations, etc.:

Evaluation results (main user feedback):

Version history (last update):

Availability as a commercial product after the research:  Yes  No

Keywords:

Related Ontologies:

Public availability of ontologies:

Ontology Representation Languages:

Ontology Standardization Bodies:

Ontology Documentation: Yes  No

Ontology Authoring Tools:

Reasoning tools: