Terror Defense No Al Qaida Terror



Download 2.62 Mb.
Page10/81
Date18.10.2016
Size2.62 Mb.
#2908
1   ...   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   ...   81

US-Canada

Trilateral Business cooperation proves relations are strong


Esposito and Huh 6/24—Co-Chair, US Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group, and Associate at DLA Piper (Lesli C. and John D., “The rise of cross-border antitrust investigations: US, Canada and Mexico enforcers meet to discuss even closer collaboration,” DLA Piper, a global law firm, 24 JUN 2015, https://www.dlapiper.com/en/us/insights/publications/2015/06/the-rise-of-cross-border-antitrust/). WM

Antitrust investigations are no longer limited to a nation’s borders, or even to a region. Enforcers are more and more sharing information and coordinating their investigative efforts as they strive to uniformly enforce the antitrust laws.

This expansion was emphasized recently when the heads of the major North American antitrust enforcement agencies gathered for their annual trilateral meeting to discuss even stronger cross-border cooperation and coordination.

Key participants in the day-long Mexico City event: Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, Chairwoman Edith Ramirez of the Federal Trade Commission, John Pecman from the Canadian Commission of Competition and Alejandra Palacios Prieto, the president of the Mexican Federal Economic Competition Commission.

The officials stressed the need for cooperation and coordination among the four agencies. The consensus among the antitrust enforcement agencies is that cross-border cooperation and coordination is now a necessity for effective antitrust enforcement. As Chairwoman Ramirez noted, “The need to cooperate across borders increases every year, and we are working together to meet that challenge.” Assistant Attorney General Baer also stated the trilateral meetings provided the agencies with “a chance to review and improve our enforcement cooperation and to engage in policy dialogue on emerging topics of common interest.”

Notably, the heads of the antitrust agencies discussed the possibility of involving antitrust enforcement agencies in South America, further expanding their efforts to coordinate and uniformly enforce the antitrust laws.

Enforcement priorities

The participants also discussed their current enforcement priorities, as well as the implementation of Mexico’s new competition law, which substantially broadens the investigative powers of Mexico’s competition enforcement agency, the Federal Economic Competition Commission. The enforcement agencies, particularly in the US, have prioritized investigating anticompetitive conduct, as well as scrutinizing mergers and acquisitions, in the technology, pharmaceutical and automotive industries. It can be expected that Mexico’s involvement in such antitrust enforcement will grow with the implementation of its new competition law.

Annual trilateral meetings

The annual trilateral meetings are largely a result of the antitrust cooperation agreements entered into by US in 1995 and 1999 with Canada and Mexico, respectively, as well as an agreement entered into in 2001 by Canada and Mexico. The agreements generally provide that the various antitrust agencies will cooperate and coordinate with each other in order to increase consistency with respect to their antitrust policies and enforcement. In addition, Canada signed another agreement in 2014 with the FTC and the US Department of Justice on the Best Practices on Cooperation in Merger Investigations, which promotes effective coordination between the agencies.

The increase in international collaboration between the antitrust agencies in North America is further reflected in the recent statements of Russell Damtoft, Associate Director of the Office of International Affairs at the FTC, who noted that when it comes to work product, Canada’s Competition Bureau and the FTC “can and do share quite often.” The agencies, he added, also discuss confidential information that is not protected under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act or other laws and regulations. Mexico’s participation in these joint investigations is very likely to increase as well with the implementation of its new competition law.


US Canada relations resilient- interconnected militaries and common naval interests


U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs 14— (U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs, “Harris Highlights U.S-Canada Cooperation During Victoria Visit,” October 8, 2014, http://www.cpf.navy.mil/news.aspx/010319). WM

VICTORIA, Canada - Adm. Harry Harris Jr., commander of U.S. Pacific Fleet, spent time interacting with Royal Canadian Navy leadership and sailors during a visit to Victoria, British Columbia, Oct. 7, emphasizing the significance of the relationship between the two navies as the U.S. rebalances to the Pacific.

In town to deliver remarks on the U.S. Navy's role in America's rebalance to the Pacific at the biennial Maritime Security Challenges (MSC) symposium, Harris took part in a working luncheon aboard the frigate HMCS Regina and spoke with students at the Naval Officers' Training Center.

"The U.S. - Canada friendship is a celebrated one where we are each other's number one trading partner, where we share a deep and abiding commitment to peace, and prosperity and where we share the largest undefended border between nations in the world," Harris reminded the more than 150 MSC attendees during a conference banquet address. "Our two nations have worked, fought, bled and died together during World War I and II, through the Korean conflict and the Cold War. Even now in Northern Iraq we are working together as part of a broad coalition to stamp out ISIL."

During his remarks, Harris went on to explain why the U.S.'s rebalance to the Pacific is important to both countries.

"The freedom of the seas is the minimum condition necessary for global prosperity and trade to flourish," he said. "This applies to the United States, a maritime nation and Pacific power, this applies to Canada, also a maritime nation and a Pacific power. We all rely on freedom of the seas so that our economies can thrive.

"That's why the United States Pacific Fleet maintains a strong presence throughout the Indo-Asia-Pacific," Harris said.

During the MSC symposium, Vice Adm. Mark Norman, commander of the Royal Canadian Navy, spoke of his navy's evolution.

"We're going to need new ship's and new capabilities because the world's ocean's have never been more important to our collective security and prosperity than they are today," Norman said, "as ocean politics continue to intensify in this 21st century, and perhaps no where more dramatically than here in the Asia-Pacific."

Capt. C. J. Cassidy, naval attaché to Canada, noted that there's more to the rebalance than just a friendship.

"It's clearly in the United States' national security interests for Canada to have a capable and relevant Navy," Cassidy said. "When Canada deploys with the U.S. Navy in a battle group, that means we can leave a ship at home. We share training interoperability, communications and weapons; we are truly connected to each other."


US-Canada relations resilient- relations prove


Sevastopulo 15— Pentagon & intelligence correspondent for FT (Demetri, “Relations tepid between US and Canada,” April 1, 2015, Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2b663538-d6fd-11e4-97c3-00144feab7de.html#axzz3fhf0oG4l). WM

When President Barack Obama recently vetoed a bill supporting the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, it reinforced the view that US-Canada ties are cool and that his personal relationship with Prime Minister Stephen Harper is even icier.

Derek Burney, a former Canadian ambassador to the US, says relations between the nations are likeOttawa winter in the deep freezeand that while Canada is “not unaccustomed to being taken for granted”, problems have spread beyond Keystone in a way that is “beyond the pale”.

Mr Obama has visited Canada less than any full-term US president since Richard Nixon, underscoring a sense in Ottawa that the White House is being complacent despite Canadian co-operation against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isis) and on Ukraine. Critics say this is hurting ties between the neighbours who remain each other’s top trading partners with $759bn of annual trade in goods and services

But while some paint a picture of doom, others such as John Manley, a former Liberal government deputy prime minister, point out that while the nations “have had better head of government relations”, there have been sour periods in the past.



When Lyndon Johnson hosted Lester Pearson in 1965, he hauled the Canadian prime minister up by his lapels and shouted, “you pissed on my rug” after his guest criticised the Vietnam war in a speech during his visit to the US. And when Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau learned that Richard Nixon had called him “an asshole”, he responded: “I’ve been called worse things by better people.”

Lawrence Martin, the author of books on both Mr Harper and the history of relations between US and Canadian leaders, says one big difference now is that “Harper is the first truly rightwing prime minister that Canada has had”, putting him right at the other end of the spectrum from Mr Obama.

Instead of hurling insults at each other or back slapping, experts say the problem now is that Mr Obama and Mr Harper rarely talk. One former Canadian official describes them as “cat people” who are more comfortable with policy than building personal ties that would help bilateral relations.

While Mr Obama has not matched the four visits to Canada that both Bush presidents made or the five by Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan, Mr Harper did not help by postponing the 2015 “Three Amigos” North American Leaders Summit over tensions with Mexico about Canadian visa policy.

“It is hard to think of another country that would refuse a visit by the US president,” says Michael Kergin, a former Canadian ambassador to the US.

Amid tensions over Keystone, observers in Ottawa say Mr Harper’s team has sometimes made it difficult for Bruce Heyman, the former Goldman Sachs executive who became US ambassador last year, to get meetings with cabinet ministers.

While Canadians blame Mr Obama for sacrificing relations with Canada by stalling on Keystone for the sake of his environmental legacy, Mr Kergin says the Harper government also erred by making Keystone “emblematic of the entire relationship”.

Critics contend that Mr Harper hurt his case with remarks during US visits that Keystone was a “no brainer” and “you don’t take no for an answer”. Others accuse him of pushing the narrow topics that Condoleezza Rice as secretary of state famously called Canada’s “condominium issues”.

“Canada is dealing with the USA as neighbours that are equal but it is not,” says Nik Nanos, a pollster in Ottawa. “Canada has become the whining neighbour, not realising that there are other powers at play.”

Mr Obama has not issued a final ruling on the pipeline but he has been increasingly vocal in his scepticism about its merits. While Keystone has gained the most attention, there are other disputes. Mr Harper recently said Canada was “prepared to retaliate” unless Washington responded to a World Trade Organisation ruling that US laws requiring meat products to show the country of origin broke global trade rules.

Relations with the US will also take the stage in Canada as the country prepares for a general election in October. Chrystia Freeland, a Liberal politician, says that under Justin Trudeau the party will campaign partly on the need to mend ties with the US. “The US-Canada relationship today is at a real nadir . . . The US ambassador has been having a hard time getting meetings with Canadian ministers.”

Rob Nicol, Mr Harper’s spokesman, dismisses claims that the relationship is in trouble, saying the US and Canada co-operate on many issues, such as border security, terrorism, Isis and Ukraine. He points to a recent border deal that has been hailed as an important effort to speed up cross-border trade and travel, which have suffered since the US closed the border after the 9/11 attacks in 2001.

The US also downplays the tensions with its neighbour. “We continue to engage productively with the Canadian government at the highest levels,” says a US embassy official in Ottawa, adding that seven US cabinet members have visited Canada since July 2014.

Edward Alden, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and author of The Closing of the American Border, says that although the Obama-Harper relationship is chilly, the border deal is a “good example that it doesn’t mess up the co-operation on bread and butter issues”.

The deal would allow US customs to operate on the Canadian side of the border, which Mr Alden says was “significant” given issues of sovereignty. “It is a pretty god example of the depth of trust.”

Alt cause- TPP negotiations


Mauldin and Vieira 7/10—Reporters at the WSJ (William and Paul, “U.S.-Canada Dairy Spat Sours Trade Talks,” the Wall Street Journal, July 10, 2015, http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-canada-dairy-spat-sours-trade-talks-1436544890). WM

Milk may do a body good, but it’s giving trade negotiators fits.



Because of a decades-old dispute between the U.S. and Canada, dairy is emerging as the thorniest issue souring final talks to conclude a sweeping trade agreement, known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, linking 12 countries around the Pacific.

The U.S. wants Canada to loosen a decades-old system for protecting dairy farmers from imports, seeing the severe restrictions on milk products as a piece of unfinished business from earlier negotiations on the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement and an earlier free-trade deal with Canada. Several U.S. senators on Thursday asked U.S. trade representative Michael Froman to conclude a Pacific trade deal without Canada if Ottawa doesn’t move to open its dairy and chicken markets, according to a person familiar with the meeting.

“The Canadians need to step it up and get serious about agriculture and dairy,” said Rep. Paul Ryan, the Wisconsin Republican who leads the House committee that oversees trade. Mr. Ryan’s state produces three times as much cheese as Canada, and in January he brandished a Gouda-style wedge in part to protest Canada’s stance.

Like many countries, Canada instituted measures to protect dairy farmers that remain politically popular because of the large number of small farms. Prime Minister Stephen Harper is walking a delicate balance ahead of an election in October and doesn’t want to lose support in Ontario and Quebec, which benefit from the high prices for milk products the Canadian system all but guarantees.

At the heart of the dispute is what Canada calls its supply-management system, in which prices for dairy products are set based on the average costs of production. Production is controlled through a regulated quota system, and competition is thwarted through tariffs.

Other countries in the TPP talks are looking at the U.S.-Canada milk fight closely, especially New Zealand, where dairy is the biggest export of all. New Zealand wants tariffs lifted in the U.S. Meanwhile, Washington officials this week flew to Tokyo to seek a deal that would include greater dairy access to Japan.

“We have made it very clear that we draw the line if we don’t get access to those countries,” said Jaime Castaneda, senior vice president for the National Milk Producers Federation and the U.S. Dairy Export Council.

President Barack Obama and top officials are seeking to conclude the TPP talks as soon as this month, after narrowly winning special trade powers from Congress in June.

The trade bloc would cover countries comprising two-fifths of the world’s gross domestic product, and the U.S. and Japan—the two biggest economies in the group—have narrowed their differences on agriculture and automobiles to within striking distance and could shake hands in coming days, according to officials on both sides.




Download 2.62 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   ...   81




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page