Damien (All Teams) – Affirmative – El-Shifa
PLAN TEXTS
Ghill - The United States federal government should pass H.R. 5290 of the 106th Congress
Ghill 2 – The United States federal government should pass H.R. 5290 of the 106th Congress.
Ghill 3 – The United States federal government should appropriate monies for the rebuilding of the El-Shifa Pharmaceutical factory.
Meadows 1 – The United States federal government should substantially increase funding for the rebuilding of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical factory that was attacked by the United States on August 20, 1998.
Meadows 2 – The United States federal government should substantially increase funding for the rebuilding of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical factory.
Meadows 3 – The United States federal government should pass legislation substantially increasing funding for the rebuilding of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical factory that was attacked by the United States on August 20, 1998.
Meadows 4 - The United States federal government should pass legislation substantially increasing funding for the rebuilding of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical factory.
Meadows 5 – The United States federal government should pass legislation substantially increasing budgetary appropriations and funding for the rebuilding of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical factory.
I think that’s it….or at least I hope so…sorry about all the changes. Basically 4 teams that all changed plan texts in certain rounds based on certain opponents.
GHILL 1AC
Observation One: The Status Quo
First, In response to the bombings of our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the U.S. destroyed the Al Shifa pharmaceutical plant in Sudan because we thought it was producing CBWs – Instead of cooperating with Sudan, we took a go-in-alone approach
European Sudanese Public Affairs Council, 98 (September, “Confused, Inconclusive And Contradictory”: An Assessment And Analysis Of The American Government’s “Evidence” For The Cruise Missile Attack On Sudan” http://www.espac.org/al_shifa_pages/al-shifa_1.asp)
Second, The U.S. made a mistake – The plant wasn’t making CBWs – Our intelligence was bad
Ahmed, Director of the Institute for Policy Research & Development, Researcher at the Islamic Human Rights Commission, teaches undergraduate courses in International Relations at the University of Sussex, ’01 (Nafeez, October 22, “United States Terrorism in the Sudan: The Bombing of Al-Shifa and its Strategic Role in U.S.-Sudan Relations” http://www.mediamonitors.net/mosaddeq16.html)
Third, We destroyed Africa’s single most important facility in the provision of medicine
Becker, of the International Action Center in New York & Members of Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark’s delegation to the El Shifa Pharmaceutical Plant which gathered evidence refuting the claim that the plant made CBWs, 98 (Richard, “Sudan: Diversionary Bombing,” web site of the Institute for Media Analysis, www.covertaction.org/content/view/105/75/)
Specifically, Destroying the plant undermined Africa’s access to malaria medication
Clark, of the Newstatesmen, 3-20-2K (Malcom, “Bad air and rank hypocrisy” Newstatesmen, http://www.newstatesman.com/200003200023)
Last, We still haven’t taken responsibility for our mistake by providing compensation for the attack even though Sudan wants us to
BBC News, 8-20-’07 (“Sudan Commemorates Al-Shifa Bombing, Hopes For Better Relations With USA” lexis)
Observation Two: Terrorism Credibility
First, Refusal to take responsibility destroys our international credibility and cooperation needed to fight terrorism and guarantees future terrorist attacks
Mideast Mirror, 1998 (Aug 24th, “Why Washington's Arab allies won't support its missile strikes”)
Second, Taking responsibility and rebuilding the plant is critical to creating the international cooperation needed to solve terrorism
Lewis, twice winner of the Pulitzer Prize, taught at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism and James Madison chair in First Amendment issues, ’99 (Anthony, September 1, “Abroad at Home; Weighing the Price” New York Times, lexis)
And, Terrorism risks complete extinction
Alexander, Professor & Director Inter-University Center for Terrorism, 2K (Yonah, “Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century: Threats and Responses,” Depaul Business Law Journal, Fall 1999 / Spring 2000)
We’ll Isolate Several Scenarios:
Scenario One: Nuclear Terrorism
First, New terrorists are increasingly likely to both acquire and use nuclear weapons
Lippman, Professor of Criminal Justice at the University of Illinois-Chicago, 2K3 (Matthew, “The New Terrorism and International Law,” Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, Volume 10)
Second, That causes escalation and full-scale nuclear retaliation
Speice, JD Candidate Marshall-Wythe School of Law, College of William and Mary, ’06 (Patrick, February, “Negligence And Nuclear Nonproliferation: Eliminating The Current Liability Barrier To Bilateral U.S.-Russian Nonproliferation Assistance Programs” 47 Wm and Mary L. Rev. 1427, William and Mary Law Review, lexis)
Scenario Two: Bioterrorism
First, terrorists are on the verge of acquiring bioweapons – they won’t be deterred
Van Evera, Professor of Political Science and International Relations at MIT, ’06 (Stephen, September, “Confronting The Specter Of Nuclear Terrorism: Special Editor: Graham Allison: Assessing U.S. Strategy In The War On Terror” 607 Annals 10, American Academy of Political and Social Science, lexis)
Second, International cooperation is the only way to prevent catastrophic bioterrorism
Joseph, Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, ’06 (Robert, March 29, “U.S. Strategy to Combat the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction” Written Statement to the Senate Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, http://www.state.gov/t/us/rm/63877.htm)
Third, Even one bioterror attack would kill millions
Livingstone, chief executive of GlobalOptions, considered one of the nation’s preeminent authorities on terrorism, ’99 (Neil, February 3, “Clinton Anti-Terror Plan Is Correct” Newsday, lexis)
And, Even a small attack would cause nuclear retaliation triggering nuclear World War III
Hymers, Ret. Lt. Colonel in the US Army, published over a hundred articles, summa cum laude Masters Degree in Theology, 2K1 (Robert, “The Roots of Terrorism”, http://www.rlhymersjr.com/Online_Sermons/11-04-01PM_TheRootsOfTerrorism.html)
And, Our impact is bigger than any impact they will read. Use of a bioweapon causes extinction
Ochs, has published articles in the Baltimore Sun, Baltimore Chronicle, Science magazine and the website: www.freefromterror.net, past president of the Aberdeen Proving Ground Superfund Citizens Coalition, member of the Depleted Uranium Task force of the Military Toxics Project and a member of the Chemical Weapons Working Group, 6-9-2K2 (Richard, “Biological Weapons Must Be Abolished Immediately,” http://www.freefromterror.net/other_articles/abolish.html)
Scenario Three: South Asia
First, Terrorists will target South Asia and trigger an Indo-Pak nuclear exchange and uncontrolled nuclear proliferation
Alexander, Senior Fellow at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, Director of its International Center for Terrorism Studies, Director of the Inter-University Center for Terrorism Studies and Co-Director of the Inter-University Center for Legal Studies, 2K (Yonah, April 11, “South Asian storm clouds” Jerusalem Post)
Second, That nuclear war escalates and causes extinction
Caldicott, Former Prof @ Harvard, Founder of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute, Nobel Peace Prize Nominee, 2K2 (Helen, The New Nuclear Danger, p. xii)
And, Proliferation causes massive nuclear war
Utgoff, Deputy Director of the Strategy, Forces, and Resource Division of the Institute for Defense Analysis, ‘02 (Victor, Survival, “Proliferation, Missile Defence and American Ambitions”)
Scenario Four: Isolationism
New terrorist attacks will cause isolationism
Juster, Unde Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, ’02 (Kenneth, August 15, “Corporate Sector Workshop: Senior Corporate Leadership Perspective” http://www.bis.doc.gov/news/2002/kijspeecharlington8_15.htm)
Nuclear War
Khalilzad, Policy Analyst at the Rand Corporation, 95 (Zalmay, “Losing the Moment?: The United States and the World after the Cold War,” The Washington Quarterly, Spring)
The United States federal government should pass H.R. 5290 of the 106th Congress
Observation 3: We Solve
First, The plan is necessary to restore our global image, our credibility, and international cooperation needed to solve international crises
Lane, Chairman of the Center for Contemporary Diplomacy, 1998 (William, “U.S. Urged to Back U.N. Investigation into Sudan Attack”, US Newswire)
Second, Just apologizing isn’t enough – it’s a hollow gesture – offering compensation is critical
Mideast Mirror, 1998 (Sep 25th, “You can't fight terrorism without consistency and dialogue, U.S. told”)
Third, The consensus is on our side – the plant wasn’t producing weapons – not taking any responsibility because it could have crushes our credibility
Ahmed, Director of the Institute for Policy Research & Development, Researcher at the Islamic Human Rights Commission, teaches undergraduate courses in International Relations at the University of Sussex, ’01 (Nafeez, October 22, “United States Terrorism in the Sudan: The Bombing of Al-Shifa and its Strategic Role in U.S.-Sudan Relations” http://www.mediamonitors.net/mosaddeq16.html)
Fourth, The plan is critical to properly compensating the victims and getting the plant rebuilt. Waiting to act only furthers the injustice and does more damage to our global leadership
Bandow, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute, 8-10-2K1 (Doug, “Making it right in Sudan; U.S. owes damages for pharmaceutical bombing,” Washington Times)
Observation Four – Pre-Empts
First, Your corruption arguments don’t link
Rohrabacher, Republican Representative from the 46th District in California, 9-25-2K (Dana, “H.R. 5290 [106th]: To provide private relief for Salah Idris of Saudi Arabia and El Shifa Pharmaceuticals Industries Company relating to the bombing and destruction of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, and for other purposes,” http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h106-5290)
Second, Your aid trade-off disad doesn’t link
Rohrabacher, Republican Representative from the 46th District in California, 9-25-2K (Dana, “H.R. 5290 [106th]: To provide private relief for Salah Idris of Saudi Arabia and El Shifa Pharmaceuticals Industries Company relating to the bombing and destruction of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, and for other purposes,” http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h106-5290)
Third, Providing aid to increase pharmaceutical manufacturing is at the heart of the topic
Garrett, Senior Fellow in Global Health at the Council on Foreign Relations, 4-18-2K7 (Laurie, “Fiscal 2008 Appropriations: State, Foreign Operations,” Statement to Committee on Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs, CQ Congressional Testimony)
And, All of your perception disads aren’t unique – We already unfroze the owners bank accounts
The Independent, ‘99 (May 4th, “U.S. Admits Sudan Bombing Mistake”)
And, You can’t win a unique disad – We are the biggest donor to Sudan already
Bureau of African Affairs, 8-15-’07 (State Department Documents and Publications, “Fact Sheet: United States Policy on Sudan” lexis)
And, Bush has quadrupled aid to Africa and Sudan already
Agence France-Presse 2-5-2K7 (“US boosts foreign aid as part of international security drive, P. Lexis)
Share with your friends: |