Environment Impact Assessment For Jiangxi Shangrao Sanqingshan Airport Beijing Guohuantiandi Environmental Technology Development Center. Ltd. Oct. 2012 Content

Download 3.9 Mb.

Page	3/45
Date	18.10.2016
Size	3.9 Mb.
	#2970

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 45

1.4 Assessment Grade

1.4.1 Acoustic environment

At present, the airport link road-Airport Avenue line has not been determined, but the basic direction is fixed, only requiring some partial adjustment. The environmental impact assessment on airport avenue is included into environmental management framework. After preliminary site investigation, there are no special environmental sensitive points such as hospitals and sanatoriums on both sides along the road within 200m, and the main environmental sensitive points are mainly urban residential areas. According to the principle related to classification of evaluation grade of Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (Sound Environment) (HJ2.4-2008), the traffic noise is evaluated as Grade II. Once the line is determined finally, EIA staff will conduct detailed site survey, once the special environment sensitive points are found on the two sides along the road 200m range. It will classify the EIA grade in accordance with the requirements of environmental management framework.

1.4.2Ambient Air

The pollution sources of ambient air mainly come from the boiler flue gas, aircraft exhaust, and car exhaust. Aircraft exhaust and car exhaust are fugitive emissions. The boiler adopts clean energy-natural gas as raw material. Estimating the pollutant emissions by the emission factors, SO₂emissions is 0.012kg/h and NO_x emissions is 0.118 kg/h, after estimation and calculation, P_max=6.47%, less than 10%. Class 1 Ambient Air Quality Functional Zone is not included in the assessment scope, the environmental quality of the major assessment factors does not approach or exceed the environmental quality standards, this project does not emit special pollutants that will do harm to human health or seriously affect ecological environment. According to “Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment-Atmospheric Environment” (HJ2.2-2008), the Ambient Air of this project is rated as Grade Three.

1.4.3 Surface water environment

The sewage generated by the project is treated in the site by the sewage treatment state and recycled completely without discharge. For impact on surface water environment, carry out the demonstration analysis on sewage without discharge and the impact of airport construction on the basin water quality as well as the impact on water for agricultural irrigation.

1.4.4 Ground Water Environment

According to the classification and rating standard of construction projects classification and assessment grade in “Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment Ground Water Environment” (HJ610-2011), and by taking the airport engineering characteristics into account, project Ground Water environment impact is rated as Grade Three. Specific assessment basis is show in table 1-4-1.
Table 1-4-1 Table of the Classification Standards for the Work Grade Evaluation of Class I Project

	Classification Standards	Category/Classification	Work Grade
Class I	Anti-pollution Performance of Aeration Zone	Medium	Grade Three
	Vulnerable to Pollution Characteristics of Aquifer	Vulnerable
	Degree of Sensitivity of Ground Water Environment	Not sensitive
	The Sewage Emission Intensity (m³/d)	Low
	The Complexity Degree of the Sewage Quality	Vulnerable

1.4.5 Terrestrial Ecological Environment

The airport project newly acquired 148.8hm²of land, the Airport Avenue acquired 27.8 hm² of land, supporting pipelines and drainage works do not cover permanent area of land, the land acquisition aread of the project is less than 2km² , and the project does not involve the ecologically sensitive areas like the Natural Reserve, the World Cultural and Natural Heritage Sites and etc.. The World’s natural heritage Sanqing Mountain is about 60km away from the airport in stright-line distance. According to the relevant assessment grade evaluation principles and methods of “Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment-Ecological Impact” (HJ19-2011), the ecological assessment grade is identified as Grade Three.

1.4.6 Environmental Risk Assessment

According to “Identificaiton of Major Hazard Sources of Hazard Chemicals” （GB18218-2009）, the major hazard unit of the airport is the Airport Depot, Ground Gas Station and Sewage Treatment Station. Comparing the critial mass of the various risk aspects of hazard substances with the actual storage capacity, the hazard units of the airport do not constitue a major hazard source, therefore, it is rated as Grade Two.

1.4.7 Determination of evaluation grade of off-site supporting projects

Table 1-4-2 List of evaluation grade of off-site and supporting projects

Off-site project	Evaluation grade
Off-site project	Ecological environment	Sound environment	Water environment	Ambient air
Airport avenue project	The area along the project road belongs to insensitive area of ecological environment without key environmental protection objects including natural reserves or cultural relics preservation, which is thus evaluated as Grade III.	There are no special sensitive points such as hospitals and sanatoriums within the scope at 200m from both sides along the road, and main environmental sensitive point is town residence area, which is thus evaluated as Grade II.	The project road does not cross surface water region, and the discharge quantity of sewage during construction period for road construction is small. Thus, the evaluation for surface is determined as Grade III.	The evaluation scope does not include Category I ambient air quality function area and the ambient quality of the main evaluation factor is not close to or beyond the standard for ambient quality. The project does not emit the special pollutants that are greatly harmful to human body health or ecological environment; the evaluation of ambient air of the project is Grade III.
Pipeline project	The impact during construction period mainly includes vegetation damage, occupancy; the evaluation grade is Grade III.	After construction of project, the functional area belongs to Category II Standard area regulated by GB3096-2008. Its impact on acoustic environment is mainly reflected during construction period and the impact of noise during the construction period will disappear with the ending of construction period. Considering the degree of the affected people comprehensively, the evaluation for sound environment is determined as Grade III.	The project is newly constructing sewage, water supply, air supply net of 4521.212m and aviation fuel transportation, which does not cause negative impact on the water environment during the operation. Judging from HJ/T2.3-93, the evaluation grade of surface water is determined as Grade III.	The impact of the project on the atmosphere is mainly reflected in construction period. Pollutants are mainly the construction dusts, the type of generated atmosphere pollutant is simple and the affected area is limited. According to judgment requirement of guidelines, the impact evaluation of atmosphere environment of the project is determined as Grade III.
Natural water replacement project of off-site drainage and around airport	The impact during construction period mainly includes vegetation damage, occupancy; the evaluation grade is Grade III.	After construction of project, the functional area belongs to Category II Standard area regulated by GB3096-2008. Its impact on acoustic environment is mainly reflected during construction period and the impact of noise during the construction period will disappear with the ending of construction period. Considering the degree of the affected people comprehensively, the evaluation for sound environment is determined as Grade III.	Rain discharge around the airport can be perfected through implementation of the project, thus to make positive benefits of the surrounding discharge and agricultural irrigation. Judging from HJ/T2.3-93, the evaluation grade of surface water environment is determined as Grade III.	The impact of the project on the atmosphere is mainly reflected in construction period. Pollutants are mainly the construction dusts, the type of generated atmosphere pollutant is simple and the affected area is limited. According to judgment requirement of guidelines, the impact evaluation of atmosphere environment of the project is determined as Grade III.
Reconstruction project of village road around airport	The area along the project road belongs to insensitive area of ecological environment without key environmental protection objects including natural reserves or cultural relics preservation, which is thus evaluated as Grade III.	There are no special sensitive points such as hospitals and sanatoriums within the scope at 200m from both sides along the road, and main environmental sensitive point is town residence area, which is thus evaluated as Grade III.	The project road does not cross surface water region, and the discharge quantity of sewage during construction period for road construction is small. Thus, the evaluation for surface is determined as Grade III.	The evaluation scope does not include Category I ambient air quality function area and the ambient quality of the main evaluation factor is not close to or beyond the standard for ambient quality. The project does not emit the special pollutants that are greatly harmful to human body health or ecological environment; the evaluation of ambient air of the project is Grade III.
110kV Maozao Line relocation and modification project of Sanqingshan Airport	The area long the line belongs to common area without key environmental protection objects including natural reserves or cultural relics preservation, which is thus evaluated as Grade III.	After operation of project, the generated main noise includes audible noise generated by brush discharge of conductor, armor clamp and insulator, which has small impact on the ambient environment; thus, the evaluation grade is Grade III.	The project only generates sewage in small quantity during construction period and the pollutant composition is simple; thus, make simple analysis.	The impact of the project on the atmosphere is mainly reflected in construction period. Pollutants are mainly the construction dusts, the type of generated atmosphere pollutant is simple and the affected area is limited. According to judgment requirement of guidelines, the impact evaluation of atmosphere environment of the project is determined as Grade III.
110kV Wangzao Line relocation and modification project of Sanqingshan Airport	The area long the line belongs to common area without key environmental protection objects including natural reserves or cultural relics preservation, which is thus evaluated as Grade III.	After operation of project, the generated main noise includes audible noise generated by brush discharge of conductor, armor clamp and insulator, which has small impact on the ambient environment; thus, the evaluation grade is Grade III.	The project only generates sewage in small quantity during construction period and the pollutant composition is simple; thus, make simple analysis.	The impact of the project on the atmosphere is mainly reflected in construction period. Pollutants are mainly the construction dusts, the type of generated atmosphere pollutant is simple and the affected area is limited. According to judgment requirement of guidelines, the impact evaluation of atmosphere environment of the project is determined as Grade III.
10kV line newly constructed project from Maojialing to Airport	The area long the line belongs to common area without key environmental protection objects including natural reserves or cultural relics preservation, which is thus evaluated as Grade III.	After operation of project, the generated main noise includes audible noise generated by brush discharge of conductor, armor clamp and insulator, which has small impact on the ambient environment; thus, the evaluation grade is Grade III.	The project only generates sewage in small quantity during construction period and the pollutant composition is simple; thus, make simple analysis.	The impact of the project on the atmosphere is mainly reflected in construction period. Pollutants are mainly the construction dusts, the type of generated atmosphere pollutant is simple and the affected area is limited. According to judgment requirement of guidelines, the impact evaluation of atmosphere environment of the project is determined as Grade III.
10kV line newly constructed project from Zaotou to Airport	The area long the line belongs to common area without key environmental protection objects including natural reserves or cultural relics preservation, which is thus evaluated as Grade III.	After operation of project, the generated main noise includes audible noise generated by brush discharge of conductor, armor clamp and insulator, which has small impact on the ambient environment; thus, the evaluation grade is Grade III.	The project only generates sewage in small quantity during construction period and the pollutant composition is simple; thus, make simple analysis.	The impact of the project on the atmosphere is mainly reflected in construction period. Pollutants are mainly the construction dusts, the type of generated atmosphere pollutant is simple and the affected area is limited. According to judgment requirement of guidelines, the impact evaluation of atmosphere environment of the project is determined as Grade III.

Directory: curated
curated -> Concept stage
curated -> Concept stage
curated -> Republic of Côte d'Ivoire Urbanization Review
curated -> Report No: aus11011 Central America
curated -> Report No. 94474-pk fiscal Disaster Risk Assessment Options for Consideration
curated -> Environmental and Social Management Framework for the Costa Rica Telecommunications Sector Modernization Project
curated -> Growth through Innovation An Industrial Strategy for Shanghai By Shahid Yusuf Kaoru Nabeshima April 22nd, 2009
curated -> Report No: 70178. People's Republic of China
curated -> Making Nutrition Policy Central to Development Understanding the Political and Institutional Conditions for Policy Change Case Study of the Political Economy of Nutrition Policies in Ethiopia Prepared By

Download 3.9 Mb.

Share with your friends:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 45