Mesterházy, Zsolt – Dax Herbst – Nate Cassell – Brent Markus – Sam Pratt
Conifer Treasury of the USA & Canada 4.0
Handbook of North American Conifer Breeders
Chicago Peaks, Mount Evans CO - Nate Cassell photo
Published by ConiferTreasury.org 2015
Budapest 2015
Taxonomic Overwiev
Rendszertani áttekintés
XV. Gymnospermatophyta/Nyitvatermők
Gymnospermae
Lit.: Hortobágyi Tibor: Növényrendszertan 1979 Tankönyvkiadó Budapest
Literature of the bold printed genera: R. K. Brummit, Royal Horticultural Society 1992
A vastagon szedett fajok R. K. Brummit, Royal Horticultural Society 1992 után
Pteridospermophytina
Pteridospermopsida
Pteridospermales
Caytoniales
Cycadopsia
Cycadales
Chlamydospermophityna
Bennettitopsida
Gnetopsida
Gnetales
Welwitschiales
Ephedropsida
Ephedrales
Coniferophytina
Gingkopsida
Gingkoales
Gingkoaceae Engl. 1897
Gingko
Cordaitopsida
Cordaitales
Coniferopsida
Voltziales
Coniferales(Pinales)
Araucariaceae Henkel & W. Hochst. 1865
Agathis
Araucaria
Wollemia
Phyllocladaceae /Pilg./Keng 1973
Phyllocladus
Podocarpaceae Endl. 1847
Acmopyle
Afrocarpus
Dacrycarpus
Dacrydium
Decussocarpus
Falcatifolium
Halocarpus
Lagarostrobos
Lepidothamnus
Microcachrys
Microstrobos
Nageia
Parasitaxus
Podocarpus
Prumnopitys
Retrophyllum
Saxegothaea
Sundacarpus
Cephalotaxaceae Dumort. 1829
Cephalotaxus
Cupressaceae Rich. ex Bartl. 1830
Actinostrobus
Austrocedrus
Callitris
Calocedrus
Chamaecyparis
Cupressocyparis x
Cupressus
Diselma
Fitzroya
Fokienia
Heyderia
Juniperus
Libocedrus
Microbiota
Neocallitropsis
Papuacedrus
Pilgerodendron
Platycladus
Sabina
Tetraclinis
Thuja
Thujopsis
Widdringtonia
Xanthocyparis
Taxodiaceae Warm 1884
Athrotaxis
Cryptomeria
Cunninghamia
Glyptostrobus
Metasequoia
Sciadopytis
Sequoia
Sequoiadendron
Taiwania
Taxodium
Abiataceae(Pinaceae Endl. 1836)
Pinoideae
Pinus
Abietoideae
Abies
Cathaya
Hesperopeuce
Hesperotsuga x
Keteleeria
Picea
Pseudotsuga
Tsuga
Nothotsuga
Laricoideae
Cedrus
Chrysolarix
Larix
Pseudolarix
Taxopsida
Taxales
Taxaceae Gray 1821
Amentotaxus
Austrotaxus
Pseudotaxus
Taxus
Torreya
The Mentioned Genuses:
A tárgyalt fajok listája:
ABIES PINACEAE
ACMOPYLE PODOCARPACEAE
ACTINOSTROBUS CUPRESSACEAE
AFROCARPUS PODOCARPACEAE
AGATHIS ARAUCARIACEAE
AMENTOTAXUS TAXACEAE
ARAUCARIA ARAUCARIACEAE
ATHROTAXIS TAXODIACEAE
AUSTROCEDRUS CUPRESSACEAE
AUSTROTAXUS TAXACEAE
CALLITRIS CUPRESSACEAE
CALOCEDRUS CUPRESSACEAE
CATHAYA PINACEAE
CEDRUS PINACEAE
CEPHALOTAXUS CEPHALOTAXACEAE
CHAMAECYPARIS CUPRESSACEAE
CRYPTOMERIA TAXODIACEAE
CUNNINGHAMIA TAXODIACEAE
CUPRESSOCYPARIS X CUPRESSACEAE
CUPRESSUS CUPRESSACEAE
DACRYCARPUS PODOCARPACEAE
DACRYDIUM PODOCARPACEAE
DECUSSOCARPUS PODOCARPACEAE
DISELMA CUPRESSACEAE
DUCAMPOPINUS PINACEAE
FALCATIFOLIUM PODOCARPACEAE
FITZROYA CUPRESSACEAE
FOKIENIA CUPRESSACEAE
GINGKO GINGKOACEAE
GLYPTOSTROBUS TAXODIACEAE
HALOCARPUS PODOCARPACEAE
JUNIPERUS CUPRESSACEAE
KETELEERIA PINACEAE
LAGAROSTROBOS PODOCARPACEAE
LARIX PINACEAE
LEPIDOTHAMNUS PODOCARPACEAE
LIBOCEDRUS CUPRESSACEAE
METASEQUOIA TAXODIACEAE
MICROBIOTA CUPRESSACEAE
MICROCACHRYS PODOCARPACEAE
MICROSTROBOS PODOCARPACEAE
NAGEIA PODOCARPACEAE
NEOCALLITROPSIS CUPRESSACEAE
NOTHOTSUGA PINACEAE
PAPUACEDRUS CUPRESSACEAE
PARASITAXUS PODOCARPACEAE
PHYLLOCLADUS PODOCARPACEAE
PICEA PINACEAE
PILGERODENDRON CUPRESSACEAE
PINUS PINACEAE
PLATYCLADUS CUPRESSACEAE
PODOCARPUS PODOCARPACEAE
PSEUDOLARIX PINACEAE
PSEUDOTAXUS TAXACEAE
PSEUDOTSUGA PINACEAE
RETINOSPORA CUPRESSACEAE
RETROPHYLLUM PODOCARPACEAE
SABINA CUPRESSACEAE
SAXEGOTHAEA PODOCARPACEAE
SCIADOPYTIS TAXODIACEAE
SEQUIOA TAXODIACEAE
SEQUOIADENDRON TAXODIACEAE
SUNDACARPUS PODOCARPACEAE
TAIWANIA TAXODIACEAE
TAXODIUM TAXODIACEAE
TAXUS TAXACEAE
TETRACLINIS CUPRESSACEAE
THUJA CUPRESSACEAE
THUJOPSIS CUPRESSACEAE
TORREYA TAXACEAE
TSUGA PINACEAE
WIDDRINGTONIA CUPRESSACEAE
WOLLEMIA ARAUCARIACEAE
XANTHOCYPARIS CUPRESSACEAE
'Semper vireo''
Introduction
It seems daring now to write a summarising study about the taxonomy of Conifers and the naming of commercial entries, however, several researchers in interested countries are working on this task to update the knowledge on this botanical trait to build up more handy, more useful, more careful and more clear descriptions by using also the most recent results.
The economically developed cultural areas breed a growing number of horticultural variants, ‘cultivars’. This generates the need to give them proper names founded taxonomically, to be differentiated from other existing taxonomical units.
This need faces us with two important questions of modern taxonomy. The first is the naming of the genus, species, varietas, subspecies and forms with a validity for the whole world. The second is the clear, unambiguous description of the horticultural cultivars.
I think that the answer for the first question is not my task as it would need an international co-operation of wide range between the experts of the coniferous taxonomists and would take a long time.
We have a better prospect to answer the second question. Not only the national registration authorities (NRA) need a more solid basis for registration, but an international need is also there to make internationally accepted the work of NRA. It is not an accident that a great work was made by the Royal Horticultural Society, London. Experts of the great exporting nations are also working on different kinds of plant registers. lists, indexes and data pools. Of course a well expressed economical need and interest are behind this activity: the well marketable and successful new selections bring serious royalties and income for the breeders and countries and functions as a trade mark. As the decision of the originality is often questionable. There are no collections where all cultivars and forms of a given genus would be represented and now the possibility is there that plants with different names can not be differentiated. Therefore an international testing organisation would be needed based on existing institutions specialised to different taxons. They would serve the whole world. So the testing and identifying commercial cultivars would be possible and the originality of new commercial cultivars could be secured.
When I have begun this taxonomy work, I had quite different ideas. I founded my own conifer collection in 1982, which was named later officially as Mesterházy Pinetum. At the beginning I consulted mostly the guide Krüssmann: Die Nadelhölze, but the answers were in many cases not found. I should stress, this is not the insufficiency of the work cited. Very often I found names that were not included here, because of later selections, and I felt so that I have to screen the literature to see what is the real situation. Of course, I had a strong interest to describe properly the many hundred entries (cultivars, forms) of my collection according to a solidly based taxonomic environment.
This work as every such contribution is not perfect, but I hope that this paper will be consulted by many breeders, taxonomists and arboretum specialists, researchers in many countries. Their ideas will be highly appreciated and used to make this work increasingly complete to serve scientific and practical needs.
This work aims not only assert the mean trends of the taxonomy, but also to make public the local results. During editing, based on available literature I have included also cultivars, of which taxonomic position has not bees secured (not legitime). I insisted to include them because I am convinced that also cultivars need listing that are existing now independently of the fact, whether they are formally described or not. By this way I would like to inform not only the taxonomy, but I intend to inform also practical breeders and users.
We have incredibly large undetected areas not being exploited taxonomically and commercially. Except the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Germany, The Netherlands, generally Western Europe, nearly the all the Mid and South Americas are not researched well, the tropics are mostly unknown and the rest of Europe and Asia has also unknown materials that could be included. Every one who feels that could help me will be participated in this work. Please contact me: zs.mesterhazy@chello.hu
During the last 15 years changed the World. The World Wide Web gives new opportunities, that earlier never existed. As I dreamed in 1995, that I could make a book with 200.000 illustrations, now the dream realised and became a real fact.
April 1995.
January 2005.
I think now in 2010, we have to divide the conifering history to different ages.
The first conifer age existed from the botanical beginnings to 1959, I call it as Classical or Latin Conifer Age. The second age I state till 1993, the Welch book, who made a resume of what he found and collected. This age is speaking of Krüssmann - Horstmann – Grootendorst – Jeddeloh – Barabits – Iseli – Jerry Morris, who were working with a new system, and they found even 200 cultivars in their life. This is the Conifer Hero Age, when great persons were able to work, their names are well known overall the world. This age looks to be unfinished, the documentations are rather poor, even lost. That’s why even Welch couldn’t collect everything, he wanted. Despite all, he is a big hero of this age. He tried, but the technology was simply not enough developed to help him. We have to learn, save and develop further his achievements in detecting conifer cultivars.
And now we are living in the 3rd Conifer Age, which is based on computer technology. This age happens today with new heroes, Holata, Slama, Fincham, Smits, Grubb, Sampson, Kohout, Hodi Toth etc. who are working in a wide great area with multimedia and modern technology. The breeding technology is also changed dramatically. Year to year hunderds of witches brooms are harvested in the forests, alpinists are working with the breeders. I brought in 1995 Barabits with his Life Monument to this age, we have the possibility to bring Harper-Morris-Stanley-Fincham-Waxman-Rezek-Dyskra etc. to this age with their Life Monuments, if we write them. We dont need forgotten breeders, we need living breeders, who get light at 40, 50 or 60 of their age. We need living heroes to learn their secrets. We need botanists, who bring down the forests from the mountains to the people as likely dwarfs or any forms, colours. And we need to be informed about conifering news throughout the world as soon as possible.
The first 3rd Conifer Age experimental book is published by me about the Hungarian Conifer Treasury. More than 650 hungarian breeded cultivars with full documentation and full service is in. The author stays now in the middle, fully description, photos from the www, and the story, of course. As anybody is reading the book on a computer, will have all possible available informations about the subject.
After that the Conifer Treasury 3.0 I hope and guess, this book could be the first general documentation of the 3rd Conifer Age. 17 years after Welch we have about 4000 new conifer cultivars. I hope, this will be a successful document: 14800 cultivar records, 800 species with photo gallery, photos of 4600 cultivars by google connections, 1600 more (of 6000) photos from different sites, which are not available for google (ACS, Stanley, Holata, Edwin Smits, Kohout, Burdan, Daglezja and me), english common names vocabulary, and more and more textal descriptions. After that with partners I would like to publish more national Conifer Treasuries, because these are the future grounds of conifering. Simply to find the creating people, the conifer breeders.
Yours sincerely
Mesterházy, Zsolt
June 2013.
Literature 1995-2005
Irodalom
American Conifer Society Bulletin 1990-2010
ACS P. O. Box 314 Perry Hall MD 21128 USA ACS
Andersen Horticultural Library's Source List of Plants
and Seeds, USA
W.J.Bean: Trees & Shrubs Hardy in the British Isles I.-V., 8th Edition
VIII. Edition, Butler & Tanner Ltd., Frome and London 1970-1989
Bonsai Catalogue of John Vermeulen & Son, Inc.
Neshanic Station, N. J. USA
Catalogue of Adolf Alzen Nurseries 1985 Herbst/Fall
5431 Hundsagen/Westerwald GER
Catalogue of Böhlje Pflanzenhandel Gmbh
2910 Westerstede GER 1991/92
Catalogue of Draijer Nursery
Zwaanshoek & Heemstede HOL 1981/82
Catalogue of Egzóta Nursery, Sopron HUN
Dr.Barabits Elemér & Sons, 9400 Sopron, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky utca 5 1992
Catalogue of Fenyőkert Nursery Budapest HUN
1023 Bogár utca 6/b , 1991/92
Catalogues of Firma C. Esveld Boomkwekerijen, Boskoop
HOL 1982/83 and 1991/93
Catalogue of the Foxborough Nurseries Inc. 1990 USA
Catalogue of the Iseli Nurseries Inc. 1990, 1991 USA
Catalogue of zu Jeddeloh 1978
2905 Jeddeloh in Oldenburg GER
Catalogue of the Karaca Arboretum, Turkey 1992
Catalogue of Hinrich Kordes Jungpflanzen Nurseries
2081 Bilsen Mühlenweg 8 GER 1985/86
Catalogue of Michael & Janet Kristick Nurseries
Wellsville PA USA 1991
Catalogue of Mitsch Nurseries USA 1981/82, 1990
Catalogue of Vannucci Piante 1993/94 Pistoia 51100 ITA
Catalogue of the Washington Evergreen Nurseries
Leicester NC USA 1991, 1993/94
Catalogue of Pieter Zwijnenburg Jr.
Boskoop HOL 1991/92, 1994/95
L. C. Chadwick & R. A. Keen: A Study of the Genus Taxus
Ohio Agriculture Research & Development Center
U. S. 250 Ohio 83 South, Wooster, Ohio, USA
Christophe Nugue: Cultivars of Metasequoia glyptostroboides in
The Geobiology and Ecology of Metasequoia, edited by Ben A. LePage, Christopher J.
Williams and Hong Yang, c Springer 2005. 361-366. p.
Collingridge Illustrated Encyclopedia of Gardening
by Arthur Hellyer 1976 1983
The Hamlyn Publishing Group Limited
84-88 The Centre Feltham Middlesex TW13 4BH
W.B.Critchfield, E.L.Little Jr.: Geographic Distribution of the Pines of the World
US. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service, February 1966 PW
S. K. Czerepanov: Plantae Vasculares URSS Leningrad, 'Nauka' 1981 Cz
Dictionary of Gardening of the New Royal Horticultural Society
The Macmillan Press Ltd. London. The Stockton Press, New York 1992 DG
Aljos Farjon: Pines
1984 E.J.Brill - Dr. W. Backhuys, Leiden HOL P
Flora Koreana
Editio Scientiarum R. P. D. C. Phyongyang Korea 1979 FK
Guide of the Budafa Arboretum HUN 1983
Guide List to Plants in Strybing, Golden State Park
San Francisco Ca. USA 1987
Handbook of Dwarf-Slow-growing & Rare Conifers
The Wansdyke Nursery & The Pygmy Pinetum established by
H. J. Welch in Devizes, Wiltshire England
Charles R. Harrison: Ornamental Conifers
Hafner Press, New-Zealand - New York
S. G. Harrison & E. A. Dallimore: Handbook of Coniferae
and Gingkoaceae
First Pubihshed 1923 London GBR
Hieke, Karel: Prakticka Dendrologie Praha 1978
The Hillier Catalogue 1991/1992
The Hillier Manual of Trees & Shrubs
6th Edition 1991 GBR
Horstmann's Zwergkoniferenkatalog 1991
3043 Schneverdingen GER
Horstmann Zwergkoniferen - Sammlung 1983
3043 Schneverdingen GER
Hortobágyi Tibor: Növényrendszertan 1979 Tankönyvkiadó Budapest
Index Kewensis 1863 -1989 Clarendon Press Oxford England KeI
Index Plantarum II. Vácrátót HUN
MTA Ökologiai és Botanikai Kutatóintézete
Index Seminum Alpengarten Belvedere Wien AUT 1991
The International Book of Trees by Hugh Johnson
Mitchell Beazley Publishers Limited GBR 1973
J. Lewis: The International Conifer Register
Part 1. & 2. 1987 London, The Royal Horticultural Society
Liu: A Monograph of the Genus Abies
Krüssmann, Gerd: Die Baume Europas
2.Auflage, Paul Parey Verlag Berlin-Hamburg 1979
Krüssmann, Gerd: Die Nadelgehölze
3.Auflage, Paul Parey Verlag Berlin-Hamburg 1979
Krüssmann, Gerd: Handbuch der Nadelgehölze
Paul Parey Verlag Berlin-Hamburg 1972, 1983 Kr
Krüssmann, Gerd: Handbuch der Laubgehölze, Registerband.
Paul Parey Verlag Berlin-Hamburg 1978
L. J. Metcalf: The Cultivation of New Zealand Trees & Shrubs
Reed Methuen Publishers Ltd. 1987
N.T.Mirov: The Genus Pinus
The Ronald Press Company, New York 1967
Christophe Nugue: Cultivars of Metasequoia glyptostroboides in
The Geobiology and Ecology of Metasequoia, edited by Ben A. LePage, Christopher J.
Williams and Hong Yang, c Springer 2005. 361-366. p.
Mitchell, Alan: Die Wald- und Parkbaume Europas
Paul Parey Verlag Berlin-Hamburg 2. Auflage 1979
Mitchell, Alan - Wilkinson, J.: Pareys Buch der Baume
Paul Parey Verlag Berlin-Hamburg 1979
Christophe Nugue: Cultivars of Metasequoia glyptostroboides in
The Geobiology and Ecology of Metasequoia, edited by Ben A. LePage, Christopher J.
Williams and Hong Yang, c Springer 2005. 361-366. p.
Plant Inventory of Arnold Arboretum of Harvard
University, Jamaica Plain, MA USA 1990
Plant Inventory of the Mesterházy Pinetum Budapest / Erdőtarcsa HUN 1994-2010
Plant List of the Kámoni Arborétum Szombathely HUN 1990
The Plantfinder 1991/1992 Edition
Moorland Publishing Co. Ltd. Ashbourne Derbyshire England
Rehder: Manual of Cultivated Trees &. Shrubs
G. R. Shaw: The Genus Pinus
1914 Cambridge PG
G. R. Shaw: The Pines of Mexico
Publications of the Arnold Arboretum N. 1. 1909. PM
Dr. Siro Kitamura & Gen. Murata: Coloured Illustrations
of Woody Plants of Japan vol. II. 1979 KM
Hoikusha Publishing Co. Ltd. Osaka JPN
G. B. Sudworth: Forest Trees of the Pazific Slope
U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service 1908
Sylva Sinica
Beijing CHN SS
Van Gelderen, Van Hoey Smith: Conifers
London 1986
H. J. Welch & G. Haddow: The World Checklist of Conifers WCC
The World Conifer Data Pool
1993, The Landsmans Bookshop Ltd. Buchenhill, Bromyard GBR
Literature 2005-2010
Irodalom 2005-2010
Farjon, Aljos: World Checklist & Bibliography of Conifers 2001. 2nd edition.
Hieke, Karel: České šlechtĕní okrasných dřevin, 2004. Czech Nursery Society
Mesterházy, Zsolt: Conifer Treasury of the World 1995, 1st Edition, Budapest HUN
Mesterházy, Zsolt: Conifer Treasury 2.0 2005, 2nd, Digital Edition, Budapest, HUN
Full Digital Sources
Mesterházy, Zsolt & al.: Conifer Treasury of New Zealand & Australia 1.0, 2010 Budapest
Mesterházy, Zsolt: Conifer Treasury of Poland 1.0, 2010 Budapest
Mesterházy, Zsolt & al.: Conifer Treasury of Hungary 1.0, 2010 Budapest
Mesterházy, Zsolt: Virtual World Pinetum 2010, Budapest, partly based on:
Debreczy, Zsolt – Rácz, István: Fenyők a Föld körül – Conifers Around the World, 2000. in common naming of genuses and species
Gymnosperm Database GD
Edited by Christopher J. Earle
International Dendrology Society IDS
Sources of the available photos from the web collected by Google: more ten thousands of sites, which’s photos are seen by Google, all together 3,5 million conifer photos. Thanks to all organizations, education, nurseries and privats throughout the World, who cares conifer photos on their sites. Special thanks to the Gardenweb conifering sites, where the visitors collected in the last years thousands of their own high quality conifer photos – and most of them are high educated professional nurserymen, or enthusiast conifer friends with high quality photoing knowledge- but sorryfully they work with nicknames.
Sources of individual photos from famous nurseries, arboretums, organizations, which’s photos are not seen by Google
Sources of the conifertreasury.org World Conifer Gallery
Editor’s photos (blue links) Subtotal Total
Mesterházy Zsolt (conifertreasury.org photos) 3350
Google links by the editor 5942 9292
Stored on the conifertreasury.org server
Daglezja Nuresry POL 648
Jerry Morris Gallery 507
Malik1000 478
Sagalassos Expedition by Hódi Tóth 343
1976 11268
Nursery & photobucket orange links
Jiri Holata CZ 1021
ACS 959
Edwin Smits HOL 597
Dariusz Burdan POL 472
Sylwester Tomszak POL 600
Jörg Kohout GER 566
Henk van Kempen HOL 174
Clément Anthoine BEL 228
Dax Herbst USA 1542
David Stegmaier USA 18
Nate Cassell USA 15
Leu Gardens USA 144 6326 17594
Editor’s photos in 2011 May-June
CZ-AUT photos 2163 19757
Valenta, Malík, Etzelstorfer
CZ photos 970 20727
Malik, Krejci, Mesterházy
Links
Clément Anthoine 9
Editor’s photos 80
Šimánek Family CZ 22
Edwin Smits HOL 178
Szíjártó Péter HUN 4
293
21020
Mesterhazy 2011 September
Etzelstorfer, Malik, + 2070
Balatka 240
Topinka 40
Jan Veirauch, Pampeago Exp 25
Fanda Borovec, Turrach Exp 25 23420
Pavel Oralek 44 23464
Valenta RUS 27 Turrach4 10 37 23501
Simanek Turrach 5 12
Balatka 10
Musil 20
Komárek 17
Kostelmicek 17
Simánek 2
Balatka 15
Zdenek Novák 18 111 23612 2011 12 10
Balatka Index 100
Balatka Index Abies-Picea abies 86
Balatka Index Pic abies 179
Balatka Index 83
Malik Abies concolor Kersko 45
Balatka Index 151 644 24256 2012 01 03
Balatka Index 0104 41
Balatka Index 0105 68
Balatka Index 0106 44
Balatka Index 0118 232 381 24647 2012 01 18
Balatka international 444 25091
Mesterházy 2012 June-July
In Cesko 3011
Hodi Toth 187
Igor Uspenskiy 280
Komárek, Kubát, Orálek 16
Mesterházy 26
Jean Iseli 406
3826 28917 2012-08-15
Talon Buchholz 997
Mesterházy & Szewczyk 2012 Oct. 308 1305 30222 2012-10-12
2013
Hodi Toth, Dax Herbst, Nate Cassell
Borovec, Simanek, Trochonowicz
Topinka, Schneider
Dendroforum.pl 1-24
Mesterházy/Malík/Etzelstorfer in
Conifer Treasury 5.0 6999 37221 2013-05-31
2013-2014 photo sources
Russian photos 1131
Milan Šimánek CZ 206
Mesterházy Zsolt editor 2519
Dax Herbst USA 122
Zděnek Novák CZ 35
Nate Cassell USA 47
Josef Schneider AUT 478
Larry Nau USA 1
Wiktor Trochonowicz POL 100
Joey Malone USA 10
Keith Guess USA 13
Meredith Griffith USA 33
Scott Antrim USA 3
Miroslav Malík CZ 241
Sasha Weissbaeck 1
Tom Cox USA 1
William Roxburgh GBR 1
Zděnek Pos CZ 8
Larry Stanley USA 262
Jiří Trojan CZ 29
Hódi Tóth József HUN 369
Kevin Fechke USA 5
Jare Penttilä FIN 4
Johnny Withrow USA 2
Sam Pratt USA 698
Rich Eyre USA + E. Wiegand USA 276
Dariusz Burdan POL 763
Dendroforum.pl 25-39 pages 86
Jiří Balatka CZ 8
Václav Verbín CZ 98
Clement Anthoine BEL 3
C. K. Choo CAN 2
7514
Conifer Treasury 6.0 2014 44736 2014-01-20
Statistics of the Conifer Tresury 4.0 2012
Genus
|
Google shots of the genus
|
Pages
|
Number of
known cultivars
|
Cultivars with
photo documentation
|
%
|
Introduction
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
Abies
|
114 000
|
147
|
1552
|
665
|
42,84%
|
Acmopyle
|
369
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Actinostrobus
|
484
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Afrocarpus
|
1 050
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Agathis
|
41 300
|
5
|
|
0
|
|
Amentotaxus
|
1 420
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Araucaria
|
120 000
|
5
|
45
|
4
|
6,67%
|
Athrotaxis
|
1 960
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Austrocedrus
|
4 010
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
|
Austrotaxus
|
437
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Callitris
|
5 240
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
|
Calocedrus
|
8 610
|
3
|
31
|
10
|
30,00%
|
Cathaya
|
4 170
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Cedrus
|
76 700
|
30
|
358
|
144
|
40,22%
|
Cephalotaxus
|
8 480
|
4
|
36
|
12
|
32,26%
|
Chamaecyparis
|
54 000
|
87
|
1549
|
482
|
31,11%
|
Cryptomeria
|
33 800
|
16
|
279
|
96
|
34,40%
|
Cunninghamia
|
9 550
|
3
|
23
|
7
|
31,82%
|
Cupressocyparis
|
10 800
|
8
|
71
|
31
|
43,66%
|
Cupressus
|
55 900
|
56
|
411
|
174
|
42,33%
|
Dacrycarpus
|
1 730
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
Dacrydium
|
3 940
|
5
|
12
|
2
|
16,67%
|
Decussocarpus
|
504
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Diselma
|
739
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Falcatifolium
|
360
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Fitzroya
|
4 030
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Fokienia
|
1 480
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Ginkgo
|
593 000
|
11
|
171
|
79
|
46,19%
|
Glyptostrobus
|
2 040
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Halocarpus
|
514
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
|
Juniperus
|
124 000
|
116
|
1425
|
485
|
34,03%
|
Keteleeria
|
1 820
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Lagarostrobos
|
944
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
100,00%
|
Larix
|
86 200
|
35
|
389
|
138
|
35,47%
|
Libocedrus
|
3 490
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Manoao
|
471
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Metasequoia
|
42 100
|
4
|
33
|
23
|
69,69%
|
Microbiota
|
20 800
|
1
|
10
|
6
|
60,00%
|
Microcachrys
|
791
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Microstrobos
|
423
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Nageia
|
1 380
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Neocallitropsis
|
431
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Nothotsuga
|
443
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Papuacedrus
|
323
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Parasitaxus
|
484
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Phyllocladus
|
2 380
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
75,00%
|
Picea
|
116 000
|
486
|
4508
|
2279
|
50,55%
|
Pilgerodendron
|
1 140
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Pinus
|
196 000
|
764
|
7039
|
3365
|
47,80%
|
Platycladus
|
4 570
|
15
|
216
|
74
|
34,25%
|
Podocarpus
|
38 900
|
29
|
69
|
35
|
50,72%
|
Prumnopitys
|
1 980
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Pseudolarix
|
4 770
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
25,00%
|
Pseudotaxus
|
536
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Pseudotsuga
|
27 200
|
60
|
548
|
242
|
44,16%
|
Rethrophyllum
|
405
|
2
|
|
0
|
|
Sabina
|
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Saxegothaea
|
1 120
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Sciadopitys
|
6 770
|
4
|
85
|
43
|
50,58%
|
Sequoia
|
1 340 000
|
2
|
37
|
14
|
37,83%
|
Sequoiadendron
|
19 800
|
4
|
62
|
36
|
58,06%
|
Sundacarpus
|
341
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Taiwania
|
3 580
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Taxodium
|
38 500
|
5
|
65
|
32
|
49,23%
|
Taxus
|
111 000
|
34
|
662
|
188
|
28,39%
|
Tetraclinis
|
3 440
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Thuja
|
96 600
|
43
|
693
|
334
|
48,19%
|
Thujopsis
|
8 080
|
2
|
24
|
9
|
37,50%
|
Torreya
|
15 200
|
2
|
8
|
1
|
12,50%
|
Tsuga
|
36 700
|
30
|
628
|
161
|
25,63%
|
Widdringtonia
|
1 130
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Wollemia
|
5 430
|
1
|
|
0
|
|
Xanthocyparis
|
1 000
|
5
|
68
|
33
|
48,52%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 527 289
|
2225
|
21127
|
9210
|
43,59%
|
Statistics of the Conifer Tresury 3.0 2010
Genus
|
Google shots of the genus
|
Pages
|
Species, ssp., var. with photos by Google
|
Number of known cultivars
|
Number of cultivars, which have Google shots
|
Number of
cultivars
with
single
shots
|
Total
cultivars
with
photo
shots
|
%
|
Abies
|
114 000
|
80
|
81
|
1186
|
383
|
186
|
569
|
47,98%
|
Acmopyle
|
369
|
1
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Actinostrobus
|
484
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
0
|
|
Afrocarpus
|
1 050
|
1
|
6
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Agathis
|
41 300
|
5
|
23
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Amentotaxus
|
1 420
|
1
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Araucaria
|
120 000
|
5
|
21
|
45
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
6,67%
|
Athrotaxis
|
1 960
|
1
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Austrocedrus
|
4 010
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|
|
0
|
|
Austrotaxus
|
437
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Callitris
|
5 240
|
3
|
16
|
1
|
|
|
0
|
|
Calocedrus
|
8 610
|
3
|
3
|
30
|
8
|
1
|
9
|
30,00%
|
Cathaya
|
4 170
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Cedrus
|
76 700
|
18
|
5
|
223
|
107
|
19
|
126
|
56,50%
|
Cephalotaxus
|
8 480
|
3
|
9
|
31
|
10
|
|
10
|
32,26%
|
Chamaecyparis
|
54 000
|
78
|
7
|
1503
|
403
|
71
|
474
|
31,54%
|
Cryptomeria
|
33 800
|
16
|
2
|
275
|
84
|
5
|
89
|
32,36%
|
Cunninghamia
|
9 550
|
1
|
2
|
22
|
5
|
2
|
7
|
31,82%
|
Cupressocyparis
|
10 800
|
6
|
3
|
66
|
23
|
4
|
27
|
40,91%
|
Cupressus
|
55 900
|
37
|
25
|
367
|
59
|
56
|
115
|
31,34%
|
Dacrycarpus
|
1 730
|
2
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
0
|
|
Dacrydium
|
3 940
|
5
|
33
|
12
|
2
|
|
2
|
16,67%
|
Decussocarpus
|
504
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
0
|
|
Diselma
|
739
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Falcatifolium
|
360
|
1
|
5
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Fitzroya
|
4 030
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Fokienia
|
1 480
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Ginkgo
|
593 000
|
10
|
1
|
160
|
65
|
6
|
71
|
44,38%
|
Glyptostrobus
|
2 040
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Halocarpus
|
514
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
|
|
0
|
|
Juniperus
|
124 000
|
96
|
81
|
1324
|
326
|
110
|
436
|
32,93%
|
Keteleeria
|
1 820
|
1
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Lagarostrobos
|
944
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
1
|
100,00%
|
Larix
|
86 200
|
25
|
16
|
278
|
58
|
43
|
101
|
36,33%
|
Libocedrus
|
3 490
|
1
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Manoao
|
471
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Metasequoia
|
42 100
|
4
|
2
|
32
|
20
|
3
|
23
|
71,88%
|
Microbiota
|
20 800
|
1
|
1
|
10
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
50,00%
|
Microcachrys
|
791
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Microstrobos
|
423
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Nageia
|
1 380
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Neocallitropsis
|
431
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Nothotsuga
|
443
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Papuacedrus
|
323
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Parasitaxus
|
484
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Phyllocladus
|
2 380
|
2
|
10
|
4
|
3
|
|
3
|
75,00%
|
Picea
|
116 000
|
161
|
48
|
2715
|
1012
|
482
|
1494
|
55,03%
|
Pilgerodendron
|
1 140
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Pinus
|
196 000
|
267
|
153
|
3719
|
1264
|
406
|
1670
|
44,90%
|
Platycladus
|
4 570
|
13
|
1
|
205
|
39
|
26
|
65
|
31,71%
|
Podocarpus
|
38 900
|
29
|
124
|
69
|
35
|
|
35
|
50,72%
|
Prumnopitys
|
1 980
|
1
|
9
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Pseudolarix
|
4 770
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
|
1
|
25,00%
|
Pseudotaxus
|
536
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Pseudotsuga
|
27 200
|
19
|
12
|
320
|
80
|
50
|
130
|
40,63%
|
Rethrophyllum
|
405
|
2
|
5
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Sabina
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Saxegothaea
|
1 120
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Sciadopitys
|
6 770
|
4
|
1
|
66
|
41
|
|
41
|
62,12%
|
Sequoia
|
1 340 000
|
2
|
1
|
37
|
13
|
|
13
|
35,14%
|
Sequoiadendron
|
19 800
|
4
|
1
|
54
|
34
|
1
|
35
|
64,81%
|
Sundacarpus
|
341
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Taiwania
|
3 580
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Taxodium
|
38 500
|
5
|
3
|
61
|
26
|
3
|
29
|
47,54%
|
Taxus
|
111 000
|
34
|
15
|
639
|
141
|
27
|
168
|
26,29%
|
Tetraclinis
|
3 440
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Thuja
|
96 600
|
43
|
5
|
674
|
235
|
59
|
294
|
43,62%
|
Thujopsis
|
8 080
|
1
|
2
|
22
|
5
|
1
|
6
|
27,27%
|
Torreya
|
15 200
|
2
|
5
|
8
|
1
|
|
1
|
12,50%
|
Tsuga
|
36 700
|
30
|
8
|
580
|
135
|
14
|
149
|
25,69%
|
Widdringtonia
|
1 130
|
1
|
3
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Wollemia
|
5 430
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Xanthocyparis
|
1 000
|
5
|
2
|
63
|
29
|
4
|
33
|
52,38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 527 289
|
1070
|
807
|
15100
|
4654
|
1581
|
6235
|
42,09%
|
Legend
Share with your friends: |